Community > Posts By > splendidlife
humanity would be hurting, art wouldn't exist. I think it would be strange not to recognize anyone or anything for every magical breath, and every thought, it's only logical to seek these things on our own, then die without it, we'll see in the hour of our death. Yeah, but humanity is already hurting... Do we have to have religion in order to create art, recognize anyone or anything for every magical breath, and every thought? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Gnostic Christians?
|
|
Are their any fellow Gnostic Christians here? Here is the piece of the Goggle-gathered info so far that had my immediate interest: being freed from these illusions of darkness so that they can perceive Reality These illusions of darkness are perpetuated by many Man-made religions. Putting fear into the minds of our people. Gnostic Christianity is certainly something of interest to me. Thank you for bringing it up, Red. |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Thu 11/06/08 07:57 AM
|
|
Funny Piece...
Here's an interesting response from that same website made by a reporter named Eileen Fleming: The Escapist theology of the 'Left Behinder's' in NOT Biblically based. It's on the same par as the FEW Muslims who believe they are going to get all those virgins by blowing themselves and others up. The term 'Christian' was not even coined until the days of Paul, about 3 decades after Jesus walked the earth a man. Jesus was NEVER a Christian! Jesus was a social, justice, radical revolutionary Palestinian devout Jewish road warrior who rose up and challenged the job security of the Temple authorities by teaching the people they did NOT need to pay the priests for ritual baths or sacrificing livestock to be OK with God; for God already LOVED them just as they were: Sinners, poor, diseased, outcasts, widows, orphans, refugees and prisoners all living under Roman Military Occupation. What got Jesus crucified was disturbing the status quo of the Roman Occupying Forces of his time, by teaching the subversive concept that Caesar only had power because God allowed it and that God preferred the humble sinner, the poor, diseased, outcasts, widows, orphans, refugees and prisoners all living under Roman Occupation above the elite and arrogant. The early followers and lovers of Jesus were called members of THE WAY-being THE WAY he taught one should be; Nonviolent, a Peacemaker and one who did the will of the Father . "What does God require? He has told you o'man! Be just, be merciful, and walk humbly with your Lord." -Micah 6:8 Jesus remained NONVIOLENT and forgiving even while being mocked, whipped and nailed to a cross and he promised that it is the Peacemakers who are the children of God, not the peace-talkers and NOT those who bomb, torture or occupy others. 2,000 years ago The Cross had NO symbolic religious meaning. When Jesus said: "Pick up your cross and follow me." He was issuing a POLITICAL statement, for the main roads in Jerusalem were lined with crucified agitators, rebels, dissidents and any others who disturbed the status quo of the Roman Occupying Forces. A lot of what passes for Christianity in the USA is an abomination. Eileen Fleming, Reporter and Editor WAWA: http://www.wearewideawake.org/ |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Wed 11/05/08 08:34 AM
|
|
If you can actually prove such a thing as an absolute law of god... "The soul who sins is the one who will die." Eze 18:4 Don't know how you're getting around that one either. That is an absolute. Many Edits Later... Wow, Eljay... Can you believe it? I sort of agree... With the exception that the soul isn't the one dying, but rather the mortal. If every soul "sins" simply by virtue of becoming mortal, wouldn't their human form (of course) die? Hence the word: mortality. My "belief" is that there is a choice made by the soul (ahead of time) to become mortal. Why would a soul choose mortality? Perhaps to learn in this realm as only one could in the physical. Perhaps being human is like going to school. One lifetime = One Semester (or) One Grade Year With this as a possibility, couldn't it be that many people have an unnecessarily negative perception of "sin"? Maybe "God's Laws" have been viewed/interpreted in a sort of reverse manner. Perhaps religion has the "Absolute" in "God's Absolute Laws" completely convoluted. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Ever Wonder!
|
|
Ever wonder brothers and sisters how you would act in front of the All Mighty God?
I think it would depend on what he looked like. If he looked like an angry giant on a throne, I'd probably try to stay out of sight. If he looked like my bartender, I'd probably order a drink. If he looked like a homeless person, I might give him a quarter. If he looked like a 25 Pitch climb on the face of Half Dome, I'd make sure I had all my gear, supplies and assure there'd be no trace of me after I left. If he looked like my mom, I'd run up, hug him and thank him for coming back to visit. If he looked like a vast globe of golden light, I'd invite him to surround me. If he looked like every face I'd ever looked into, I'd continue to savor all the beautiful differences in all the faces I see. If he looked like that ass hole who just cut me off on the freeway, I'd tip my hat and be on my way. What ever... Don't we see "God" in each other every day? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Stupidity and Religion
|
|
True Christianity is not about brainwashing.... but about accepting and beleiving on the Lord Jesus Christ....by Faith. And that decision must be made WILLINGLY.........and MUST come from the HEART....ONLY... in order to be truly born again... NOT from the Head. If someone makes a decision to follow Christ .... but makes the decision because someone else is telling him/her to.....then that decison only comes from the head...and NOT from the HEART.. ..and all that person will have found is DEAD RELIGION...disguised as Chrsitianity... and nothing else!!! And that person will either probably eventually get bored and leave ...cause there was no heart change....made willingly from the heart.... or .... that person will stay stuck in dead religiousity...thinking that is what christianity is all about. But there will be no fruits evident in that person't life..casue nothing has changed. Just dead religiosity flowing from his/her life. And satan loves to see this happen to people.....and laughs.... but let him laugh... cause God is still on the throne... and the VICTORY has already been WON... by what JESUS did on that cross... and the devil has already lost.... he just doesn't know it yet. One of my sisters went though a Born-Again-Christian phase when I was 18. She had a Pastor come to our house to do the deal. He asked me if I was ready to accept... yada, yada, yada. I wanted to be... really. I actually sat down to join my sister in support. As the Pastor spoke, I realized that it didn't feel real to me. As hard as it was to stop him in the middle of his passion-filled speaking, I had to. It MUST be in my heart in order for me to embrace it. The Pastor was very appreciative when I explained that it didn't feel real to me and that I needed to respectfully decline. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Stupidity and Religion
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Tue 11/04/08 01:04 PM
|
|
Im not feeling really inspired today so I stole this from another thread. "The men of Israel wandered around the desert for 40 years... even in biblical times, they wouldn't ask for directions." Tee Hee! I know what you're sayin'... Where's the Passion? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Stupidity and Religion
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Tue 11/04/08 12:49 PM
|
|
Discussion of the topic of religion, more than any other topic, enlightens me about how willfully and stubbornly stupid some people can and are quite proud to be... At great lengths, the effort is made to put the fear of hell into children when they have not yet developed critical thinking skills and will believe anything mummy, daddy and grown-ups say. By the time they grow up to develop and employ critical thinking skills to every other facet of life (hopefully) they fear a hell and are brainwashed from a young age so skillfully to crave a heaven that they put up that mental block between they're normal intelligent thought process and religion. Even questioning it is frowned upon as not "having faith" as is the self-preservationist clause inherent in it. Such people are past the ability to look at religion reasonably and will always fear questioning something they grew up being taught and what they're parents grew up being taught etc etc. To think "just because some thing has always been thought to be true, does it make it true?" is a hell sentence to some. I am not interested in debating such people who can not and who will not think for themselves and are willfully and stubbornly ignorant. My mom was raised Christian, my dad, Jewish. I was not raised with religion, but with Spirituality (yeah... that could mean anything, right?). Thank you, Jasmine, for reminding me from where many religious people are coming. Many have been raised (conditioned) to believe based partly on belonging. It makes complete sense that it could seem that a non-religious person questioning another's religious beliefs might seem like a threat to all that has seemed sacred. As if questioning tries to take something away from another. Critical thinking doesn't always seem to enter the picture when a Christian feels their beliefs are somehow being threatened. Perhaps forced introduction of beliefs prior to the proper development of critical thinking could result in a somewhat stunted ability to think critically. |
|
|
|
Saying that the bible teaches us to fix ourselves does not imply that all humans are flawed. Nor does the quote imply that the bible says we are flawed. The quote only states that the original speakers mother interpereted the use of the bible in that manner. I think the point of the quote is to say that we should only use the bible to better ourselves, and to learn to accept others for who they are. If we are setting any other agenda, besides personal enlightenment, then we are misusing the bible and twisting it's intent. As that applies to the OP, it doesn't matter if the text is taken in a literal translation or not, only how the reader uses the information that is absorbed. There is a good message in the bible, whether you want to believe the story of it's gods or not. There are hundreds of tales, parables, and analogies that tell of charity, kindness and goodwill and how we should take those qualities and teach them to the word. But the idea was lost and replaced with dogmas and creeds. The church was built of stone and it is unyeilding, and it teaches it's subjects to be the same. That's why it's so easy to get christians riled up in the chat rooms. Thank you, RO... I especially agree with your last paragraph. The Church and the Bible are two entirely different arenas. |
|
|
|
I am kinda wondering why we are called by some scientists... Decendants. I allways thought that it was our responsibility to put the next generation up on our shoulders so they could see farther... Go farther... Climb higher... and do more. That would make us ascendents... Would it not? Or is the human race falling not climbing? I think not. Else why leave us here. We come into the physical realm and experience gravity right off the bat. We come from purfectness to experience imperfection. That would seem initially to be like descent. However, as we move through a lifetime, I believe we ascend. The process of passing through the human experience, remembering our wholeness and reaching the pinnacle of a lifetime of learning/remembering about love would certainly seem like ascent. |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Tue 11/04/08 09:52 AM
|
|
Well, there is only one part of the bible that needs to be taken literaly, at least if you're a christian. That's the two commandments Christ set out for his followers (and the two which almost never get followed): 1. Keep NO gods before THEE 2. Love thy neighbor as thyself Other than that, most things in there are parables and alagories anyway, maybe a little bit of a history lesson for those that want it. However, the history lesson most be interepted. Joshua's horns didn't cause the walls of Jericho to fall. They did signal the troops inside the walls to open the gates so the city could fall. So, you have to be careful with that book. Read it wisely, more than once, and with an open mind, you should be able to find the real message buried inside. Which suprisingly enough, is the two rules I listed above. Hey there...how have you been??? It's good to cya again~~~~ I think it's all literal as well as moral. As Christ came to fulfill the laws so we can more than just follow them we can actually get joy & life for living with them... I take the entire Bible as Literal. From God our Creator to God our Jehovah Jirah..to the parting of the Red Sea to Christ's resurrection & His second coming for His church. From the creation all the way to the book of Revelations. It's all true & it's all righteous. ...and that's the short of it. I've been good. I've been transitioning the majority of my time from one my jobs to another, you know how change can disrupt a life. Other than that I'm good. Of course God never has seen to throw anything at me I couldn't eventually deal with. I've also noticed that if I look at a longer view, He's always making things turn out for the better. Did I miss any good arguements? Surely someone said something to really get some good stuff flowing in here. I heard a good quote the other day, I guess it fits well in this room. "My mother taught us that the Bible is used to teach us how to fix ourselves and be good to others. Short of that, we should use it sparingly or we will destort it's meaning." I don't even remember where I heard it, I just remember thinking "Wow, that's probably right." Saying that the Bible teaches us how to fix ourselves suggests that we are flawed. Does the Bible actually state that we are flawed? I'm asking this because I'm really not sure. Are we flawed as humans? Or, did we come to this realm specifically to be seperated from purfectness for a greater purpose? Further learning, perhaps... It would be hard for me to trust a doctrine that flat out deems mankind as somehow broken. Of course, I can choose to interpret text to fit for me. That would be taking it literally after filtering it through what I already believe (rather than through the religious filter). See, I don't have a religion telling me how to interpret the words. When the question comes up about taking it literally, I always want to add... Literally, according to ALL? As far as Christians are concerned, are non Christians even at all welcome to answer a question like this? Could seem like a platform to further push the Christian agenda (not that this was the OP's intent). I trust my guide... my heart... my connection to the Universe... to provide confirmation. |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Tue 11/04/08 09:48 AM
|
|
A world without would be a lost world indeed My lady, if religion or gods never existed, how would one be able to concider themselves lost? Think of all the STUPID, BAD choices people make on a daily basis... Most/some of those people don't care or believe in God. Most good standing citizens are God fearing individuals. They try their best to be the best person they can be... If we lived in a world that was run by people that had no regard for themselves or others, it would be Chaos! I rest my case....no God heart leads to "HELL." That's what a world without God would be...HELL. The question was: What would life be like without religion? Your answer makes it seem as though you actually think that God would cease to exist if there was no religion. |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Mon 11/03/08 10:19 AM
|
|
Right but that would be off topic wouldn't it . . . . . The post he was responding to was not about people, but about god Well, double duh, then... I'll consider my hand slapped and just go back to sleep now. |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Mon 11/03/08 09:41 AM
|
|
Is it really important? Or will it (has it) taken away from the truth of the message? Is what was (possibly) worn by a person as important (in this time) as the words spoken by that person. Much ado about nothing (imho). People want to focus on a piece of cloth and on proving this correct or that invalid. "Heaven" forbid anyone threaten someone's ideas and upset the modus operandi. If it could have been possible to unearth a piece of JC's excrement, harebrained individuals would be jumping at the chance to glorify and argue over it ad nauseam. D'oh! |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Mon 11/03/08 06:56 AM
|
|
Weak minded human beings need something to lean on dont they? Sounds like LIBS & their love for Nanny govt. to me...I think you are confusing the two. OOPS! Would this be considered off topic??? Nah! Secular humanism IS a religion. So tell me again who the REAL weaklings are...those who cry for their nanny govt. or those who walk not by sight but by faith in God? The real weaklings are ones who cant stand on there own. Those who cant form there own beliefs. Those who have to look to an outside source for strenth and self worth. The real weaklings are those who force there beliefs on others by mass. Those who belive in a hyerarchy system where 1 man is supperior and the other are inferrior In my opinion of course Uh? Christianity is not for the weak... it takes strength to stand back & wait on God. OTOH, it's a weakling who puts their faith in govt. Just MHO... Weakness comes by way of being non self suffecient. When you look 2 something else for "strength" or self worth. One could also look at it like this: Weakness can come by way of NOT asking for help and suffering as a result, because one refuses to admit that they're fallible. Sure I break my leg im going to ask for help from another person, perhaps someone that has a track record for helping. Duh. Am I going to ask an invisible sky daddy how I should think about killing to survive? I assume you eat meat? Does god say its ok to kill to survive? My Values do not . . . . Duh? Never did this poster suggest asking an invisible "sky daddy" for help. What was said was more about humans in relation with other humans. Duh... I just went back and read my post that you responded to, Jeremy, and realized that (if you didn't know me) it certainly would seem as though I was comming from a religious angle. Aint no Sky Daddy... |
|
|
|
Topic:
SPLENDED AND SKYHOOK SUCK
|
|
IF IT GETS ANY MORE BORING ON HERE IM GONNA HAVE TO TAKE A VACATION. I hear ya. I was having fun till Redy smashed me flat and then eloped with Abra to shamanland!
What IS UP with the lag in passion here? Well, at least we're still sucking... |
|
|
|
Weak minded human beings need something to lean on dont they? Sounds like LIBS & their love for Nanny govt. to me...I think you are confusing the two. OOPS! Would this be considered off topic??? Nah! Secular humanism IS a religion. So tell me again who the REAL weaklings are...those who cry for their nanny govt. or those who walk not by sight but by faith in God? The real weaklings are ones who cant stand on there own. Those who cant form there own beliefs. Those who have to look to an outside source for strenth and self worth. The real weaklings are those who force there beliefs on others by mass. Those who belive in a hyerarchy system where 1 man is supperior and the other are inferrior In my opinion of course Uh? Christianity is not for the weak... it takes strength to stand back & wait on God. OTOH, it's a weakling who puts their faith in govt. Just MHO... Weakness comes by way of being non self suffecient. When you look 2 something else for "strength" or self worth. One could also look at it like this: Weakness can come by way of NOT asking for help and suffering as a result, because one refuses to admit that they're fallible. Sure I break my leg im going to ask for help from another person, perhaps someone that has a track record for helping. Duh. Am I going to ask an invisible sky daddy how I should think about killing to survive? I assume you eat meat? Does god say its ok to kill to survive? My Values do not . . . . Duh? Never did this poster suggest asking an invisible "sky daddy" for help. What was said was more about humans in relations with other humans. |
|
|
|
Weak minded human beings need something to lean on dont they? Sounds like LIBS & their love for Nanny govt. to me...I think you are confusing the two. OOPS! Would this be considered off topic??? Nah! Secular humanism IS a religion. So tell me again who the REAL weaklings are...those who cry for their nanny govt. or those who walk not by sight but by faith in God? The real weaklings are ones who cant stand on there own. Those who cant form there own beliefs. Those who have to look to an outside source for strenth and self worth. The real weaklings are those who force there beliefs on others by mass. Those who belive in a hyerarchy system where 1 man is supperior and the other are inferrior In my opinion of course Uh? Christianity is not for the weak... it takes strength to stand back & wait on God. OTOH, it's a weakling who puts their faith in govt. Just MHO... Weakness comes by way of being non self suffecient. When you look 2 something else for "strength" or self worth. One could also look at it like this: Weakness can come by way of NOT asking for help and suffering as a result, because one refuses to admit that they're fallible. right doe eyes, i know i try to be as self sufficient as i can - but also know that sufficiency is still dependent on others to what ever degree i might need at any given time. I know there are cases or circumstances [especially in the past] where man had no choice but to be as self sufficient as possible, of course thats why life spans were much shorter also. you can't be all things you need at all times unto yourself. To me, sufficency or dependency for now is somewhat dependant on others. though i do feel for those who don't know how to grow and raise food and their own animals or sew or or maintain their equipment or other things not that long ago everyone just knew. how many could can their own food if necessary, or perserve their meats, or even cook decently, etc.. with this recession it got me to wonder how young people would cope if things got really bad like in the 20's and 30's?? Sometimes I hope that soon a time will come that we'll all be put in a position to rely on nature and the cooperation of the people around us for survival. I've heard stories from friends that lived in the San Fernando Valley during the Northridge Quake in '94. Everyone I spoke with said that, having been disconnected from "the grid", people were united and more connected to one another than they'd ever experienced. i've seen that to during the hurricanes in fla. people do come together, unfortunately when things get back to "normal" it soon goes away - does that mean we can only come together in a meaningful way if we stay in a state of emergency? let's hope not, but it seems to be true. Perhaps the loss of all modern amenities, due to some sort of global cataclysm, will force humans to rely on a more permanent cohesive coexistence. It's not that I wish to see great suffering. But, don't we see agonizing suffering in our isolation from one another? |
|
|
|
Edited by
splendidlife
on
Sun 11/02/08 10:47 AM
|
|
Weak minded human beings need something to lean on dont they? Sounds like LIBS & their love for Nanny govt. to me...I think you are confusing the two. OOPS! Would this be considered off topic??? Nah! Secular humanism IS a religion. So tell me again who the REAL weaklings are...those who cry for their nanny govt. or those who walk not by sight but by faith in God? The real weaklings are ones who cant stand on there own. Those who cant form there own beliefs. Those who have to look to an outside source for strenth and self worth. The real weaklings are those who force there beliefs on others by mass. Those who belive in a hyerarchy system where 1 man is supperior and the other are inferrior In my opinion of course Uh? Christianity is not for the weak... it takes strength to stand back & wait on God. OTOH, it's a weakling who puts their faith in govt. Just MHO... Weakness comes by way of being non self suffecient. When you look 2 something else for "strength" or self worth. One could also look at it like this: Weakness can come by way of NOT asking for help and suffering as a result, because one refuses to admit that they're fallible. right doe eyes, i know i try to be as self sufficient as i can - but also know that sufficiency is still dependent on others to what ever degree i might need at any given time. I know there are cases or circumstances [especially in the past] where man had no choice but to be as self sufficient as possible, of course thats why life spans were much shorter also. you can't be all things you need at all times unto yourself. To me, sufficency or dependency for now is somewhat dependant on others. though i do feel for those who don't know how to grow and raise food and their own animals or sew or or maintain their equipment or other things not that long ago everyone just knew. how many could can their own food if necessary, or perserve their meats, or even cook decently, etc.. with this recession it got me to wonder how young people would cope if things got really bad like in the 20's and 30's?? Sometimes I hope that soon a time will come that we'll all be put in a position to rely on nature and the cooperation of the people around us for survival. I've heard stories from friends that lived in the San Fernando Valley during the Northridge Quake in '94. Everyone I spoke with said that, having been disconnected from "the grid", people were united and more connected to one another than they'd ever experienced. |
|
|
|
Weak minded human beings need something to lean on dont they? Sounds like LIBS & their love for Nanny govt. to me...I think you are confusing the two. OOPS! Would this be considered off topic??? Nah! Secular humanism IS a religion. So tell me again who the REAL weaklings are...those who cry for their nanny govt. or those who walk not by sight but by faith in God? The real weaklings are ones who cant stand on there own. Those who cant form there own beliefs. Those who have to look to an outside source for strenth and self worth. The real weaklings are those who force there beliefs on others by mass. Those who belive in a hyerarchy system where 1 man is supperior and the other are inferrior In my opinion of course Uh? Christianity is not for the weak... it takes strength to stand back & wait on God. OTOH, it's a weakling who puts their faith in govt. Just MHO... Weakness comes by way of being non self suffecient. When you look 2 something else for "strength" or self worth. One could also look at it like this: Weakness can come by way of NOT asking for help and suffering as a result, because one refuses to admit that they're fallible. |
|
|