Community > Posts By > BillingsDreamer
Topic:
Just a question
|
|
I don't think any one would contest that the heavens and the earth were created by God. That is not an issue. The point is that they were not created "without form and void."
Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. There you have a plain statement. If God created the heavens, then there were suns, moons, galaxies, stars and all of that already. But the next verse says something different. Gen 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. The earth was in darkness. No light could strike its surface. King James translators wrote: The earth was without form and void. the words without form and void are tohu and bohu and mean chaos and confusion. God did not create the world in confusion. He is not the author of confusion (ICor 14:33). And,as Isaiah writes: Isa 45:18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in VAIN he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else. The word vain here is the same one in Genesis. So God did not create the earth in vain, but Genesis says it was vain. The word "was," is also important here. It could and should be translated "became." Thus God created the heavens and the earth. There was a sun and there was light, but something happened. It was the war in heaven with Satan the devil. This war led to the destruction of the earth, and the world that was with its dinosaurs perished with them having food in their mouth. It just took seconds to wipe out the habitable earth. By this war, the earth "became" chaotic and confused. After the war, God put things back in place, and made the earth inhabitable again. Gen 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
It saddens me...
|
|
Judge not lest ye be judged...is that not what the Bible says? Well ive gotten used to the fact that people judge when i have not judged them. Beliefe shouldnt be a Sin.... Jesus said not to judge others, but by that statement He meant not to condemn them. It must be understood that Jesus also said that we are to judge righteous judgment. Not to judge by appearances. The prophets did judge the wicked deeds of the leaders of the nations. They told them where their false teachings and practices would lead. In like manner, Jesus did too. He did judge the false practices of the religious leaders of His day. He did not condemn them. He executed no sentence on them--yet. But He will. Notice His words: Mat 23:1 Then spake Jesus to the multitude, and to his disciples, Mat 23:2 Saying, The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: Mat 23:3 All therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do not. Mat 23:4 For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. Mat 23:5 But all their works they do for to be seen of men: Mat 23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in. Mat 23:14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation. Mat 23:15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves. Mat 23:16 Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor! Mat 23:17 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold? Mat 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone. Mat 23:24 Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. Mat 23:25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. Mat 23:26 Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also. Mat 23:27 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Mat 23:28 Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. So, Jesus set the example, and if people claim to be Christian, and yet worship other gods, keep other days than He did, and teach lies, don't you think they should be challenged? Or, do you think it is best to just let everyone believe their own thing, and do their own thing so that Christianity continues to be mocked and ridiculed for its hypocrisy? I think if we post our beliefs, we are in a sense advertising our view, in the interest of truth, we should be challenged on things. Art |
|
|
|
Spirituality? What does a spiritual person mean to you? I am spiritual but do not have a religion to govern it. I do not believe in a god as religions define it. So to each of us is spirituality a different definition? By this definition, you can "feel" some sort of spiritual, but with no religion, you cannot define what that feeling of being spiritual is. It is an ethereal "feeling." It may make you feel good about yourself to say it. It may legitimatize your feelings about yourself and other ideas you have, but is is just your feelings. It really is meaningless beyond that. So, by being spiritual and not religious, there really are no rules. There are no definitions. And, in fact there really is no spirituality. If there is such a thing as spiritual, there must be a spirit. If there is a spirit then it must be able to be defined. Further, just think. We all would like to find someone who has similar views to our own. We need that. However, once you find someone with similar views, you have defined something you both agree upon, and then you have a rule. You created your self a religion. What a funny game we humans play with ourself. Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
What is the purpose........
|
|
What is the purpose of religion? Throughout history man has felt the need to have a spiritual belief or religion. Why? I am not talking about any one religion being right or specific beliefs, in general what was man's purpose in having religions? I believe that mankind was created with an inner need to believe in something greater than himself. Thus, the phrase there are no atheists in a fox hole. Of course there really are some, but the point is that when we are faced with death, we want to call out on a greater power. Further, there are mysteries to life and man searches for meaning and purpose, so it is natural for us to create religions. That said, I think that there are two kinds of religion. There is man-made religion. The pagan religions are man made. They look to the creation and worship it. They think that God is in things like trees, air, rocks, seasons, and so on. There is the modern day man made religion of being being "spiritual but not religious." This religious belief gives people the option of feeling spiritual without having any rules. Atheism is a man made religion. They have faith in themselves and in what they decide to believe, but their religion is just a faith. It too is unprovable. You understand they face a creation with no creator. It is absurd, but they want to believe it so that they feel superior and have no rules telling them what is moral. Some make science their religion, but ironically, science tells us there are laws that are unbreakable. These laws exist in the physical realm, the emotional realm and the psychological realm, but the worshipers of science refuse to admit that there are laws in the spiritual realm. Spiritually they dead end. They have no sense of purpose for the existence of the creation. They simply strive to understand how it works. So, some of these are examples of man made religions. They all serve the purpose the people who create them and who believe in them want. However, I believe that there is also a God made religion. I believe that God's religion is designed by Him for the benefit of His creation. He gave a list of the laws for worship of Him, and for our success in life. Those laws are just like the laws of physics. If you break them they will eventually break you. They never change. When we are in harmony with the laws of creation we can do anything. When we break them, we crash and burn. So, in like manner, if you have other god's you fool yourself and never find the truth. If you worship various images, yourself, money or things like that, then you are in bondage to those things. They control you. If you take God's name in vain, you cheapen truth, what is right, and good. We lose the respect for that which is holy, and eventually what is noble in man. If we steal, lie, and commit adultery the society degenerates and as history shows incredible empires came to nothing because they failed to keep these laws. So, God's religion was to help man know what He could only know by revelation. His religion reveals to man what he was created for. It was to give man guidelines for worship and living life successfully. Of course, man took God's religion and used it for himself to enslave, persecute and control others. But--again--that is man's religion, not God's. So, I believe that man creates religions to satisfy his needs and desire. And, I believe that God creates religion for unselfish reasons--to direct mankind to the way of life that works and leads to success physically as well as spiritually. Most who condemn God's religion do so because because of what man has done to it. Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
Some new questions...
|
|
In the way I was raised, I was taught that Christ experienced everything a man could experience before he was crusified, so that he understood every aspect of what man goes through on earth. Jesus did not experience everything we humans do. He did not experience what the crack addict does, and what the prostitute does. The Scripture states: Heb 4:15 For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin. He was tested, or tempted in all points like we are. He did not experience everything we do. He did not experience a car crash, but experienced His body being torn apart. But, He was tempted in the same points we are tempted in. What are those points? There are three areas we are all tempted in. They are these three: 1Jo 2:16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. Christ was tempted in the categories of the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes and the pride of life. We are all tempted in different ways through different experiences, but those temptations all fall into one of these three categories. His experiences also fell into these three areas of life. Since Christ was in his early 30's when he was crucified, he could not have experienced such things as a loss of a parent, since both his mother and father were living. Tradition has it that Joseph had died. This is the reason why Christ told the apostle John that Mary was now his mother at Christ's death. She had no husband. Christ understood being the sole provider as the first born. He understood being raised in a fatherless home. He experienced brothers that were jealous and antagonistic. You get the point. He was tested like we are, probably in more ways than we think, but not every exact single way we are. how could he relate to something so powerful in human nature as sex. And so many other things. Since Jesus was flesh, He did experience the powerful pulls on us like sex. So this leads me more towards that Christ was here not to experience everything that man goes through on earth, but really a focus more of why he was here and that was to take the sins of the world upon himself and was here really just for that purpose. I believe that Christ was here for more than one reason. 1. He was here to learn what it like to be a human, and thus He said to the Father, The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak. Thus He is our advocate and High Priest now. 2. He was here to show us how God would live if He were a man. As Isaiah states, He would magnify the law and make it honorable. He personally said, thus they have "no cloak for this sin." That is men can no longer twist the law to suit their own advantage because of Christ's example. By His example, we know how to obey God. Thus, He showed that the law was not for the sake of bondage like the Pharisees made it. The law was to free us from the painful backlash of sin. He healed on the Sabbath, and kept the law in it's true intent and purpose. 3, Christ said that He came to reveal the Father. No one knew of the Father. They had not seen Him or heard of Him. Christ as the Word was the God of the Old Testament. I Cor 10:1-6. Now we know of the Father. The veil in the heavenly temple is torn, and can pray to Him. 4. Christ was here to Die for us and take our sins on Himself. 5. He was also beaten beyond recognition. He did not have to do that for us to be saved. He was beaten for our healing. By His stripes we are healed. 6. Christ was here on earth as a human to show us how far God would go to show His love for mankind. By His example, we see that no person has ever loved us as much as He has. 7. He came to earth to fulfill the prophecies. Thus we can be assured that all the prophecies in the Bible will also be fulfilled exactly as stated. So to say the Christs "understands" what we are all going through in any and every situation, well i would have a little problem in that if he did not experience it on a first hand basis. The understanding is there to a point, but would not see how it could be from a "first hand" perspective. He did not experience every single exact thing we do, but He experienced what we all experience in the three points of lust of the flesh, the eyes, and our pride. By this, He can understand our weakness, and can help us instead of condemning us. Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
Jesus Christ Never Existed?
|
|
I get a kick (albeit) a tragic one out of the atheist's continual posts that Jesus did not exist and that He was simply a myth. I apologize for not having time to continue to post, but this caught my eye on Fox news today. I just could not resist posting it.
Fox News: One in four Britons don't believe wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill existed, according to a recent survey. Churchill is compared to Florence Nightingale and Sir Walter Raleigh, seen by many survey respondents as a mythical person, the London Daily Mail reported Monday. The survey, conducted with 3,000 respondents to test their general knowledge, reported other historical figures such as Indian leader Mahatma Gandhi, Cleopatra and the Duke of Wellington were made up for books and films, the Mail reported. The survey, by UKTV Gold, also found that Sherlock Holmes was a real person. Young Britons under 20 lack a basic historical education according to the survey results, historian Correlli Barnett told the Daily Mail. "This suggests a complete lack of common sense and respect for our greatest heroes of the past," Barnett said. Art |
|
|
|
Here is a different point of view.
I suggest that all the god's and goddesses are the same with one exception. All of the gods and goddesses of this world come from one source. That source is the god of this world. He is noted in this verse. 2Co 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. Of course this is speaking of the devil. In another place, the apostle John records: Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: So, the Scriptures state that God's enemy, Satan actually is the god of this world. Further, He has deceived the world into worshiping him. Of course all the religions can be traced right back to him. All roads do lead right to him. However, all roads do not lead back to the God of the Bible. He is unique and says that only He is God and that there is none else. In fact, He does not want people associating any other gods with Him. He does not want worship using ways of worship that other gods have been worshiped with. He does not want any other names applied to Him than His. Isa 45:6 That they may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside me. I am the LORD, and there is none else. Deu 12:30 Take heed to thyself that thou be not snared by following them, after that they be destroyed from before thee; and that thou enquire not after their gods, saying, How did these nations serve their gods? even so will I do likewise. Exo 20:3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Exo 20:4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Exo 20:5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; Exo 20:6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments. Exo 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. Art |
|
|
|
Ive found the more I watch the history channel the weaker my faith becomes. Here is a man who believes the History channel. I once watched an episode on fire breathing dragons on this program. The History channel must come up with challenging topics. They must have something interesting, controversial. They are driven by ratings, not always honesty. Art |
|
|
|
Matthew 14:22 Jesus walks on the water... Immediately Jesus made the disciples get in the boat... Should the author, if the author were actually an eyewitness, be using this approach? Why would the author do this if it were not a story which had been told to him about the events? One could surmise, if the author were an eyewitness to the event, he would have just written 'us' instead of 'the disciples'... would he not? The King James has: Mat 14:22 And straightway Jesus constrained his disciples to get into a ship, and to go before him unto the other side, while he sent the multitudes away. In Christ's day, it was considered inappropriate to talk about oneself personally when writing. Thus, when the apostle John speaks of himself, he says the disciple Jesus loved. In that context, as a narrative it it absolutely normal for Matthew to say that that He constrained his disciples to get into a ship. If you want to try to disprove Christianity, there are better arguments than this. Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
Sabbath Confessions
|
|
Protestant Denominations and the Sabbath
ANGLICAN / EPISCOPAL "And where are we told in the Scriptures that we are to keep the first day at all? We are commanded to keep the seventh; but we are nowhere commanded to keep the first day... The reason why we keep the first day of the week holy instead of the seventh is for the same reason that we observe many other things, not because the Bible, but because the church has enjoined it." Plain Sermons on the Catechism, Isaac Williams, Vol. 1, pp. 334, 336 ~ ~ ~ "We have made the change from the seventh day to the first day, from Saturday to Sunday, on the authority of the one holy Catholic Church." Why We Keep Sunday, Bishop Seymour ~ ~ ~ The Lord’s day was merely of ecclesiastical institution. It was not introduced by virtue of the fourth commandment." Jeremy Taylor ~ ~ ~ The Primitive Christians had a great veneration for the Sabbath, and spent the Day in Devotion and Sermons. And ‘tis not to be doubted but they derived this Practice from the Apostles themselves." A Discourse in Six Dialogues on the Name, Notion, and Observation of the Lord’s Day, p. 189 ~ ~ ~ BAPTIST "To me it seems unaccountable that Jesus, during three years’ intercourse with His disciples, often conversing with them upon the Sabbath question... never alluded to any transference of the day; also, that during forty days of His resurrection life, no such thing was intimated..." Dr. Edward T. Hiscox, New York ministers’ conference, Nov. 13, 1893 ~ ~ ~ "...But what a pity [Sunday worship] comes branded with the mark of paganism, and christened with the name of the sun god, adopted and sanctioned by the papal apostasy, and bequeathed as a sacred legacy to Protestantism!" Dr. Edward T. Hiscox, New York ministers’ conference, Nov. 13, 1893 ~ ~ ~ "The Lord’s Day is not sanctified by any specific command or by any inevitable inference. In all the New Testament there is no hint or suggestion of a legal obligation binding any man, whether saint or sinner, to observe the Day. Its sanctity arises only out of what it means to the true believer." The Sabbatic Question, p. 72, J. J. Taylor ~ ~ ~ CONGREGATIONALIST "...it is quite clear that however rigidly or devotedly we may spend Sunday, we are not keeping the Sabbath... the Sabbath was founded on a specific Divine command. We can plead no such command for the obligation to observe Sunday... There is not a single sentence in the New Testament to suggest that we incur any penalty by violating the supposed sanctity of Sunday." The Ten Commandments, p. 127-129, Dr. R. W. Dale ~ ~ ~ "...the Christian sabbath [Sunday] is not in the Scriptures, and was not by the primitive Church called the Sabbath." Theology: Explained and Defended, 1823, Ser. 107, Vol. 3, p. 258, Timothy Dwight ~ ~ ~ DISCIPLES OF CHRIST "‘But,’ say some, ‘it was changed from the seventh to the first day.’ Where? When? And by whom? No man can tell. No; it never was changed, nor could it be, unless creation was to be gone through again: for the reason assigned must be changed before the observance, or respect to the reason, can be changed! It is all old wives’ fables to talk of the change of the Sabbath from the seventh to the first day. If it be changed, it was that August personage changed it who changes times and laws ex officio - I think his name is Doctor Antichrist." The Christian Baptist, Feb. 2, 1824, Vol. 1, No. 7, p. 164, Alexander Campbell, Founder, Disciples of Christ ~ ~ ~ "The first day of the week is commonly called the sabbath. This is a mistake. The Sabbath of the Bible was the day just preceding the first day of the week. The first day of the week is never called the Sabbath anywhere in the entire Scriptures. It is also an error to talk about the change of the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. There is not in any place in the Bible any intimation of such a change." First Day Observance, pp. 17, 19 ~ ~ ~ LUTHERAN "We have seen how gradually the impression of the Jewish Sabbath faded from the mind of the Christian Church, and how completely the newer thought underlying the observance of the first day took possession of the church. We have seen that the Christians of the first three centuries never confused one with the other..." The Sunday Problem, 1923, p. 36 ~ ~ ~ "But they err in teaching that Sunday has taken the place of the Old Testament Sabbath and therefore must be kept as the seventh day had to be kept by the children of Israel... These churches err in their teaching, for Scripture has in no way ordained the first day of the week in place of the Sabbath. There is simply no law in the New Testament to that effect." Sabbath or Sunday, pp. 15-16, John Theodore Mueller ~ ~ ~ “There was and is a commandment to keep holy the Sabbath day, but that Sabbath day was not Sunday. It will be said, however, and with some show of triumph, that the Sabbath was transferred from the seventh to the first day of the week... Where can the record of such a transaction be found? Not in the New Testament – absolutely not...” Dr. Edward T. Hiscox, New York ministers’ conference, Nov. 13, 1893 METHODIST "The reason we observe the first day instead of the seventh is based on no positive command. One will search the Scriptures in vain for authority for changing from the seventh day to the first." Ten Rules For Living, Methodist, Clovis G. Chappell ~ ~ ~ "It is true there is no positive command for infant baptism... Nor is there any for keeping holy the first day of the week." Methodist Episcopal Theological Compend, Amos Binney, pp. 180, 181 ~ ~ ~ PRESBYTERIAN "The Sabbath is a part of the decalogue - the Ten Commandments. This alone forever settles the question as to the perpetuity of the institution... Until, therefore, it can be shown that the whole moral law has been repealed, the Sabbath will stand... The teaching of Christ confirms the perpetuity of the Sabbath." Theology Condensed, pp. 474, 475, T. C. Blake, D.D. |
|
|
|
Topic:
it's time for bed now
|
|
Hey yall. Been home for a few. Gotta get some rest. I'm sooo sleepy. Lynns Dr said everything came out okay and that she did very good. Sending off for more tests. She is in pain and looks pale and kinda yellow. But, other than that. I am one relieved woman I tell ya. I will go and see her for awhile later after I rest. Maybe then I will hear more. I will probably be busy for awhile helping her out at home. Thanks for all the positivity and prayers. Kat Thanks for the update, God be with you, Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
Re-Creation?
|
|
Many people think that the Bible is in opposition to Science. True believers would object to such thinking, realizing that the God of the Bible created all that science finds over time.
One example is the story in Genesis. Some professing Christians attempt to argue that the earth is only 6,000 years old to resolve the seeming conflict. Others state that the days of creation were millions of years long. Is it possible that there is another explanation? What follows are some notes from a study I did on this many years ago. I believe what is not understood is that the earth existed long before man was created. The angels were given rule over the earth and, led by Lucifer, they waged war on God. The destruction that ensued erased all life on the planet and devestated the earth. Then when God created man, He made man in His image, and the animal kingdom after the image of the faithful angelic community--warm blooded and not reptilian. Notes follow for anyone interested. I apologize for the caps. I am not yelling. It is just easier to read as notes for speaking, and I once gave a message from these notes. Re-Creation TODAY A CONFLICT RAGES ON BETWEEN THE PROFESSING CHRISTIAN WORLD & SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALIST CHRISTIANS TEACH THE WORLD IS 6,000 YRS SCIENTISTS TEACH THAT OUR EARTH IS BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD THIS MODERN DAY CONFLICT BEGAN DURING THE MIDDLE AGES IN THOSE DAYS THE ROMAN CHURCH TAUGHT THAT THE UNIVERSE CONSISTED OF A VAST --- ENORMOUS SKY IN THAT SKY WERE SET THE SUN, MOON, & STARS THEY BELIEVED THAT SOME GREAT INVISIBLE MECHANISM CAUSED THESE HEAVENLY BODIES TO ROTATE AROUND A FLAT EARTH THEN A SCIENTIST NAMED COPERNICUS DISCOVERED THE TRUTH HE FOUND THAT THE SUN DID NOT REVOLVE AROUND THE EARTH THIS TEACHING OPPOSED THE DOCTRINE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH THE CHURCH HAD GREAT INFLUENCE OVER SCIENCE THEN THEY ONLY ALLOWED HIS THEORY TO BE CONSIDERED A GUESS SPEAKING OF COPERNICUS EVEN MARTIN LUTHER SAID: "This fool wants to change the whole science of astronomy." ABOUT 75 YEARS LATER GALILEO USED HIS NEW TELESCOPE TURNING IT TO THE SKY HE PROVED BEYOND ANY DOUBT COPERNICUS WAS RIGHT---THE CHURCH'S TEACHING WAS WRONG! THE TRUTH WAS THAT THE EARTH REVOLVED AROUND THE SUN GALILEO'S TRIUMPH WAS SOON CHALLENGED BY THE CHURCH IN TIME IT BECAME HERESY TO EVEN CONSIDER THIS AS TRUE LATE IN 1615 GALILEO RETURNED TO ROME IN A LAST ATTEMPT HE MADE A GRAND EFFORT TO CONVINCE THE CHURCH TRAGICALLY HIS ARGUMENTS & FACTS FELL UPON DEAF EARS IRONICALLY GOD HAD SAID TO SEARCH OUT SUCH MATTERS: Pro 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honor of kings is to search out a matter. GOD HAS CONCEALED SOME OF HIS GLORIOUS THINGS ABOUT CREATION HE EXPECTS US TO SEARCH THEM OUT THERE ARE MANY THINGS WE STILL DO NOT UNDERSTAND WE ARE TOLD TO SEARCH SUCH THINGS OUT BUT POPE PAUL THE 5TH HAD DECIDED --- IT WAS FINAL A STATIONARY SUN WAS UN-SCRIPTURAL NOT ONLY DID HE BELIEVE IT UN-SCRIPTURAL HE SAID THIS TEACHING WAS A GRAVE THREAT TO THE CHURCH ROME BEGAN TO PERSECUTE ANYONE WHO BELIEVED THIS IT IS INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT THE SCRIPTURES NOWHERE STATE THAT THE SUN TRAVELS AROUND THE EARTH NOTHING STATES THAT THE EARTH IS FLAT INSTEAD THE SCRIPTURES STATE THAT THE EARTH IS ROUND THE CHURCH CONTINUED TO TEACH THEIR ERROR HOWEVER IN ORDER TO RETAIN THEIR POWER & INFLUENCE THEY REJECTED PAUL’S SIMPLE INJUNCTION TO THE SAINTS 1Th 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. THUS, THE CHURCH CONTINUED TO MISREPRESENT THE SCRIPTURE NEXT THEY VIOLENTLY SUPPRESSED THE TRUTH SOME WENT TO PRISON & OTHERS ENDURED THE SWORD THIS OPEN PERSECUTION CAUSED A GROWING MOVEMENT AGAINST RELIGION BY THOSE IN THE SCIENCES THE NEXT AREA OF CONFLICT WAS CREATION THE CHURCH BELIEVED EARTH’S CREATION WAS SUPERNATURAL WHILE THIS WAS CORRECT, THEY TAUGHT ANOTHER ERROR THEY BELIEVE GENESIS ONE ALL OCCURRED AT ONCE THEY COMPRESSED ALL EARTH'S HISTORY INTO A FEW THOUSAND YEARS AS SCIENCE ADVANCED THEY FOUND EARTH’S AGE GREATER THAN A FEW THOUSAND YEARS THE EARTH WAS BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD AND --- IT HAD GONE THROUGH MASSIVE CHANGES OVER TIME AGAIN THE CHURCH DEFENDED A MISINTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE THE BIBLE NOWHERE SAYS THE EARTH IS ONLY 6,000 YEARS OLD BUT THE CHURCH BECAME ALL THE MORE INSISTENT ULTIMATELY THIS LED TO SCIENTISTS REJECTING GOD & THE BIBLE THE CATHOLIC & PROTESTANT CHURCHES CLAIMED THAT THEY GOT THEIR TEACHING FROM THE BIBLE THEREFORE THEY BELIEVED IN CREATION THEY THOUGHT THESE DISCOVERIES UNDERMINED FAITH IN TURN, SCIENTISTS CAME TO BELIEVE RELIGION BLINDED MEN THEY REJECTED RELIGION & REPLACED CREATION WITH EVOLUTION & SPONTANEOUS GENERATION MANY BELIEVED THEY MUST OPPOSE THE BIBLE TO FIND TRUTH REJECTING THE FABLES OF ROME THEY ALSO REJECTED A CREATOR GOD THEY TAUGHT ALL THINGS CONTINUE AS FROM THE BEGINNING CREATION WAS JUST THE RESULT OF NATURAL FORCES AT WORK THIS HAS LED MANY TO MISS THE MAJESTY OF GOD’S CREATION Rom 1:20 For the unseen things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being realized by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, for them to be without excuse. Rom 1:21 Because, knowing God, they did not glorify Him as God, neither were thankful. But they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. MANY SCIENTISTS BECAME VAIN IN THEIR IMAGINATIONS THEIR REACTION TO MIDEVAL SUPERSTITIONS BLINDED THEM THEY ELEVATED THEIR OWN KNOWLEDGE & REJECTED GOD IN TIME ---MANY RELIGIOUS JOINED IN WITH THE SCIENTIFIC ERROR THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS NOW ACCEPTED EVOLUTION MANY PROTESTANT CHURCHES HAVE ALSO ACCEPTED EVOLUTION THEY JUSTIFY THEIR BELIEF SAYING THE BIBLE WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE A BOOK ON SCIENCE. THIS ALL FLIES IN THE FACE OF THE ENORMOUS TRUTH THE SCRIPTURES ARE INSPIRED BY GOD THEY ARE FOR DOCTRINE REPROOF & INSTRUCTION THE BIBLE CAN BE TRUSTED WHEN IT SPEAKS OF HISTORY IT SPEAKS THE TRUTH WHEN IT SPEAKS OF THE LAWS OF PSYCHOLOGY IT SPEAKS TRUTH WHEN THE BIBLE SPEAKS OF SCIENCE IT SPEAKS TRUTH TRUE SCIENCE DOES NOT CONTRADICT THE BIBLE --- IT CONFIRMS IT 1Ti 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: 1Ti 6:21 Which some professing have erred concerning the faith. Grace be with thee. Amen. SCIENCE ONCE TAUGHT A FLAT EARTH THE BIBLE STATED THE EARTH IS ROUND SCIENCE ONCE THOUGHT THE EARTH SAT ATOP SOME STRUCTURE THE BIBLE STATED THAT THE EARTH WAS HUNG ON NOTHING SCIENCE TAUGHT THERE WAS NO WRITING IN ANCIENT EGYPT LATER THEY FOUND THE WAY TO UNDERSTAND HYROGLYPHICS SCIENCE TAUGHT THAT NINEVEH WAS A MYTH THEN THE GEOLOGISTS UNEARTHED NINEVEH THEY FOUND TABLETS IN UR WITH ABRAHAM’S NAME ON THEM THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE ISSUES THAT SCIENCE HAD WITH THE BIBLE & WHERE THEY WERE LATER PROVEN WRONG WHAT ABOUT CREATION? WHAT DOES THE BIBLE REALLY SAY ABOUT IT? WAS IT A MERE 6,000 YEARS AGO --- OR DOES THE BIBLE SHOW CREATION FAR EARLIER THAN THAT? WHAT DOES GOD SAY? HE SAYS HE CREATED ALL THINGS --- HE SHOULD KNOW HE TELLS US THAT HE REVEALS THE TRUTH TO HIS PROPHETS Deuteronomy 29:29 The secret [things belong] unto the LORD our God: but those [things which are] revealed [belong] unto us and to our children for ever, that [we] may do all the words of this law. THE THINGS THAT HE HAS REVEALED BELONG TO US GOD HAS REVEALED A GREAT DEAL ABOUT THE AGE OF THE EARTH HE HAS REVEALED A GREAT DEAL ABOUT CREATION LET’S CONSIDER THE BEGINNING Genesis 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. THE 1ST VERSE IN THE BIBLE STATES GOD CREATED HEAVEN & EARTH BUT WAS THAT A MERE 6,000 YEARS AGO? THE ANSWER IS NO! GOD ORIGINALLY CREATED THE HEAVEN & EARTH THEN VERSE 2 SHOWS THAT SOMETHING HAPPENED TO CREATION IT BECAME AFFECTED BY SIN Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. GOD DID NOT CREATE THE EARTH "WITHOUT FORM" & "VOID" THESE TWO WORDS ARE "TOHU" & "BOHU" IN THE HEBREW TOHU MEANS "CHAOS" & BOHU MEANS "CONFUSION" GOD DOES NOT CREATE THINGS IN CONFUSION HE IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF CONFUSION I Corinthians 14:33 For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE & IT WAS PERFECT IT REFLECTED WHAT GOD IS & WHAT HE IS LIKE IT WAS A BEAUTIFUL --- UNIFIED ---- HARMONIOUS IT WAS NOT CREATED IN TOHU & BOHU --- NOT A CONFUSED MESS Isaiah 45:18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I [am] the LORD; and [there is] none else. THE WORD "VAIN" IS THE SAME WORD "TOHU" IN GENESIS 1:2 GOD DID NOT CREATE THE WORLD IN CONFUSION IT HAD TO BECOME THAT WAY BY AN OUTSIDE FORCE THIS SAME WORD TOHU IS ALSO USED BY JEREMIAH SHOWING GOD'S VIEW HE USES THIS IDENTICAL WORD TO SHOW SIN WAS THE FORCE Jeremiah 4:23 I beheld the earth, and, lo, [it was] without form, and void; and the heavens, and they [had] no light. THE UNIVERSE WAS ORIGINALLY CREATED BY GOD TO BE BEAUTIFUL IT WAS HARMONIOUS - IN UNITY & PEACE THEN SOMETHING HAPPENED TO MAKE IT CHAOTIC & CONFUSED THUS IN GENESIS 1 IT SAYS THAT GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS & EARTH VERSE 2 SAYS THAT THE EARTH “WAS” WITHOUT FORM & VOID THE WORD “WAS” IS "HAYAH" IN THE HEBREW THIS WORD IS # 1961 IN STRONGS DICTIONARY IT MEANS "BECAME" OR "CAME TO PASS" THUS IT IS CLEAR THAT GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS & EARTH CREATION EXISTED FOR AN UNSPECIFIED AMOUNT OF TIME IT COULD BE MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS OF YEARS AFTER IT BECAME CHAOTIC & CONFUSED - GOD RESTORED IT AGAIN WHEN DID THIS OCCUR? --- HOW DID IT HAPPEN? THE DETAILS ARE REVEALED IN OTHER PARTS OF THE BIBLE CHAOS & CONFUSION IS THE RESULT OF SIN WHAT MANY FORGET IS THAT MAN WAS NOT THE FIRST TO SIN ANGELS SINNED BEFORE MAN THE ANGELS WERE CREATED BEFORE MAN ANGELS WERE WITNESS TO THE CREATION OF THE WORLD WHEN GOD WAS WORKING WITH JOB HE REVEALED THISTO HIM Job 38:1-7 Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said, Who [is] this that darkeneth counsel by words without knowledge? Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee, and answer thou me. Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy? THE ANGELS WERE PROBABLY JOYFUL BECAUSE THE EARTH WAS CREATED FOR THEM THEY WERE THE FIRST INHABITANTS OF THIS EARTH THEY DID NOT KEEP THIS EARTH AS GOD INTENDED HOWEVER THE ANGELS GIVEN CHARGE OVER THE EARTH LEFT THE EARTH THEY TRIED TO TAKE OVER HEAVEN & GOD'S THRONE Jude 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. GOD DID NOT ALLOW THE ANGELS TO GO UNPUNISHED WHO DID THIS HE DID NOT LET THEM OFF THE HOOK FOR WHAT THEY DID THEY ARE STILL WAITING THEIR FINAL FATE II Peter 2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast [them] down to hell, and delivered [them] into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; THIS WORD "HELL" IS NOT SOME PLACE OF EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT IT IS "TARAROO" IN THE GREEK THIS IS THE ONLY TIME THIS WORD IS USED IN THE BIBLE TARAROO SIMPLY MEANS "PLACE OF RESTRAINT" THE ANGELS ASCENDED TO HEAVEN THEY WERE CAST BACK DOWN TO THE EARTH NOW THEY ARE RESTRAINED TO THIS EARTH THEY'RE AWAITING THE LAST GREAT DAY AT THAT TIME ALL WILL BE JUDGED NOT ALL THE ANGELS ARE RESTRAINED RIGHT NOW SATAN IS LOOSE AND ---HE HAS MANY OTHER ANGELS AS THE BOOK OF JOB REVEALS HE TRAVELS TO & FROM HEAVEN SOME OF HIS ANGELS HAVE ACCESS TO HEAVEN ALSO APPARENTLY HE LED OVER 1/3 OF THE ANGELS ON THE EARTH THE SCRIPTURES SPEAK OF HIM PRIOR TO CHRIST’S BIRTH Rev 12:4 And his tail drew the third part of the stars of heaven, and did cast them to the earth: and the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born SATAN ACTUALLY FUNCTIONS AS THE GOD OF THIS PRESENT WORLD HE OFFERED JESUS ALL THE KINGDOMS OF THIS WORLD HE COULD DO THIS BECAUSE HE OWNS THOSE KINGDOMS IN THE DISTANT PAST HE WAS ONCE GOD’S LEADER OVER THESE ANGELS HE IS STILL IN CONTROL OF THEM BUT IN TIME HE WILL NO LONGER BE ABLE TO BE IN HEAVEN HE WILL BE KICKED OUT FOREVER Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. WHEN THIS FIRST REBELLION TOOK PLACE JESUS CHRIST WAS THERE HE WITNESSED THE EVENT AS GOD BEFORE HE WAS A MAN Luke 10:18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven. SATAN LED AN ATTACK ON GOD'S THRONE THE DEVIL WAS THRUST BACK HE WAS THE ONE WHO "FELL" NOT MANKIND THIS EVENT WAS ALSO DOCUMENTED IN THE OLD TESTAMENT Isaiah 14:4 That thou shalt take up this proverb against the king of Babylon, and say, How hath the oppressor ceased! the golden city ceased! THE KING OF BABYLON IS DISCUSSED BECAUSE SATAN WAS THE REAL POWER BEHIND HIS THRONE, THE VERSES LIFT TO SPEAK OF THE DEVIL HIMSELF AND HIS ATTACK Isaiah 14:14 How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! [how] art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. THE DEVIL ASCENDED FROM THIS EARTH TO THE THRONE OF GOD HIS DESIRE WAS TO BE LIKE THE MOST HIGH WE HAVE OFTEN SPECULATED THAT THIS TOOK PLACE WHEN GOD REVEALED HIS PLAN FOR MAN TO THE ANGELS YOU CAN IMAGINE THIS GREAT POWERFUL SPIRIT BEING RULING EARTH HE MANAGES VAST ARMIES OF ANGELS & PHYSICAL CREATURES HE FINDS GOD IS GOING TO MAKE MAN & MAN WILL BECOME RULER OVER HIM IT IS SIMPLY TOO MUCH TO TAKE---A PHYSICAL MAN – LIKE GOD? THESE WORMS I PLAY NURSE MAID TO WILL BE OVER ME? NO WAY! THIS SAME EVENT WAS DESCRIBED IN ANOTHER SECTION OF SCRIPTURE IN EZEKIEL IT IS TALKING ABOUT THE KING OF TYRE THE HUMAN KING ALSO LIFTS TO BECOME A TYPE OF SATAN AGAIN THIS IS PROBABLY BECAUSE DURING THIS TIME, SATAN WAS INFLUENCING THESE KINGS Ezekiel 28:12-17 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Thou sealest up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone [was] thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created. Thou [art] the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee [so]: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. Thou [wast] perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee. By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned: therefore I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain (GOVERNMENT) of God: and I will destroy thee, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire. Thine heart was lifted up because of thy beauty, thou hast corrupted thy wisdom by reason of thy brightness: I will cast thee to the ground, I will lay thee before kings, that they may behold thee. IT BECOMES CLEAR THAT THIS REBELLION OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE DEVIL’S LEADERSHIP HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR AN UPRISING ---AGAINST GOD HE BELIEVED HE WAS BETTER THAN GOD IT IS CLEAR THAT HE ASCENDED FROM EARTH TO HEAVEN HE WAS ACCOMPANIED BY MANY POWERFUL ANGELS HIS INTENT WAS TO TAKE THE THRONE FROM GOD HE WANTED TO BECOME GOD HE COVETED GOD'S PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE THE ANGELS HAD MISJUDGED THE ETERNAL ONE THEY MUST HAVE BEEN SHOCKED AT THE RESULT THEY FOUND THEMSELVES BLASTED BACK TO EARTH REELING BACKWARD AT THE POWER OF GOD THEY LEARNED NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE TO THE ALMIGHTY GOD HIS POWER & GREATNESS IS OVERWHELMING HE CANNOT BE CONTESTED SATAN FOUGHT AGAINST GOD AND WAS THRUST BACK TO THE EARTH THERE HE IS RESTRAINED BY GOD HE & HIS ANGELS ARE NOW LIMITED IN POWER THIS WAR IN HEAVEN CAUSED VAST DESTRUCTION THE WHOLE UNIVERSE WAS EFFECTED WHEN WE LOOK AT THE CREATION WE SEE THE EVIDENCE SCIENTISTS ADMIT THE EARTH WAS HIT BY TREMENDOUS DESTRUCTION THEY REALIZE THERE WAS A CATASTROPHE THAT HIT HUGE AREAS OF VEGETATION WERE BURIED UNDER THE EARTH ANIMALS WERE SUDDENLY BURIED WITH FOOD IN THE MOUTHS THEY WERE CAUGHT OFF GUARD BY SOMETHING THAT HIT HARD IN MANY CASES, THEIR FOOD WAS TROPICAL THEY WERE FOUND IN POLAR AREAS THIS MEANS THAT THE POLAR ICE CAPS MUST HAVE SHIFTED SOMETHING HIT THE EARTH SO HARD IT CHANGED IT'S AXIS THE SCRIPTURES APPEAR TO VERIFY THAT Psalms 82:5 They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course. SCIENTISTS SPECULATE NOW THAT A GIANT ASTEROID HIT THE EARTH THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT IT WAS THEY KNOW SOMETHING OF ENORMOUS MAGNITUDE HIT EARTH THEY SEE POCK MARKED PLANETS AND SPACE DEBRIS EVERYWHERE THERE ARE GIANT PIECES OF PLANETS FLYING THROUGH SPACE THERE ARE MASSIVE ASTEROIDS THERE ARE HUGE PIECES OF ICE THAT ARE MILES ACROSS THEY ARE SIMPLY SPEEDING THROUGH SPACE THEY ARE MOVING AT THOUSANDS OF MILES PER HOUR THE RINGS OF SATURN WERE ONCE MOONS THEY HAVE BEEN PULVERIZED IN TO ROCKS THERE ARE OTHER AREAS OF SPACE THAT ARE ONLY DUST WHOLE GALAXIES MAY HAVE BEEN DESTROYED IN AN INSTANT EVERYTHING OUT THERE IS DESOLATE THE PICTURES FROM MARS SHOW A DESOLATE PLANET THE BIBLE INDICATES THAT THIS UNIVERSAL CATASTROPHE WAS THE RESULT OF WAR IN HEAVEN THE AWESOME & POWERFUL ANGEL SATAN FOUGHT WITH GOD HIS ANGELS FOUGHT WITH HIM THE FORCES UNLEASHED IN THIS WAR WERE BEYOND HUMAN COMPREHENSION THE POWER EXPENDED WAS DEVASTATING EVERY LIVING THING ON EARTH PERISHED THE BEAUTIFUL BLUE & WHITE & GREEN ORB CALLED EARTH BECAME LIKE MARS OR THE MOON THE DEBRIS COVERED THE SUN THE EARTH BECAME CHAOTIC & CONFUSED NO LIGHT COULD PENETRATE THE DARKNESS Genesis 1:2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness [was] upon the face of the deep.... THE EARTH GREW MORE & MORE COLD EVENTUALLY MASSIVE GLACIERS DEVELOPED THEY COVERED ENTIRE CONTINENTS & SOME STILL EXIST TODAY THEN GODS SPIRIT MOVED OVER THE EARTH HE RENEWED THE FACE OF THE EARTH "...And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." THE WORD “MOVED” IS “RA—KAFF” IN THE HEBREW IT MEANS TO BROOD GOD PONDERED GRIEVED OVER & AGONIZED ABOUT THE EARTH THEN GOD RE-CREATED A NEW PHYSICAL HEAVENS & EARTH HE USED THE SAME POWER TO DEFEAT SATAN TO CREATE BY THE POWER OF HIS SPIRIT HE RENEWED THE EARTH’S SURFACE Psalms 104:30 Thou sendest forth thy spirit, they are created: and thou renewest the face of the earth. AT THIS POINT GOD RENEWED THE EARTH HE DID NOT CREATE IT THE FIRST TIME HE RE-CREATED LIFE UPON IT GOD CLEARED AWAY THE DEBRIS THE LIGHT COULD SHINE THROUGH Genesis 1:3 And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. THE EARTH WARMED UP & THE GLACIERS MELTED THE WATER WAS EVERYWHERE GOD VAPORIZED MUCH OF THE WATER TO CREATE AN ATMOSPHERE Gen 1:7 And God made the firmament, and divided the waters which were under the firmament from the waters which were above the firmament: and it was so. Gen 1:8 And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day. NEXT GOD CAUSED DRY LAND TO APPEAR HE CREATED THE VAST & DIFFERENT VEGETATION ON THE EARTH THIS TOOK PLACE THE THIRD DAY THE FOURTH DAY, GOD POSITIONED THE SUN & MOON TO BE A SIGN FOR HOLY DAY OBSERVANCE Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. Gen 1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, Gen 1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. Gen 1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. NOTICE THAT THE SCRIPTURES STATE THAT GOD MADE THE SUN & MOON THIS DAY HE SET THEM IN THEIR RESPECTIVE POSITIONS THE 4TH DAY THIS MEANS THAT THE SUN & MOON COULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN THEIR EXACT POSITIONS THE FIRST DAY THEY TOO WERE KNOCKED OUT OF THEIR ORBITS THE FIFTH DAY GOD CREATED THE ANIMALS THE SIXTH DAY HE CREATED MANKIND NOW GOD REVEALS ANOTHER EVIDENCE THIS IS RE-CREATION WHEN GOD CREATED ADAM HE DID NOT TELL HIM TO POPULATE EARTH HE TOLD HIM TO RE-POPULATE IT Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,.. ADAM WAS TOLD TO RE-POPULATE THE EARTH THAT IS BECAUSE IT WAS POPULATED ONCE IT TEEMED WITH LIFE MILLIONS OF YEARS BEFORE NOW GOD WAS STARTING ALL OVER AGAIN ADAM WAS TO REPLENISH THE EARTH THIS TIME IT WOULD BE MANKIND HOWEVER NOT ANGELS THIS WORD REPLENISH IS THE SAME WORD GOD USED TO INSTRUCT NOAH GOD HIMSELF DESTROYED THE EARTH AFTER HE ERASED THE POPULATION OF THE EARTH HE TOLD NOAH THE SAME THING HE TOLD ADAM Genesis 9:1 And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. SO GOD CREATED THE UNIVERSE AND THE EARTH IT WAS BEAUTIFUL IT WAS CREATED TO BE INHABITED THE GALAXY WE LIVE IN IS BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD THE EARTH IS ALSO BILLIONS OF YEARS OLD MANKIND, & THE CREATION AS WE KNOW IT TODAY IS ABOUT 6,000 YEARS OLD THE ANGELS INHABITED THE EARTH FIRST IT WAS THEIR FIRST ESTATE SATAN CORRUPTED THE THEM AND THE EARTH THEN THE ANGELS ON THE EARTH LEFT THEIR HABITATION THEY ASCENDED TO THE THRONE OF GOD TO TAKE IT THERE WAS WAR IN HEAVEN IN THE PROCESS OF THE WAR THE EARTH WAS DESTROYED THE UNIVERSE WAS DESTROYED THE ANGELS WERE CAST BACK DOWN TO EARTH GOD THEN RE-CREATED THE EARTH HE MADE MAN IN HIS IMAGE HE MADE THE OTHER ANIMALS WARM BLOODED & IN THE IMAGE OF THE ANGELIC COMMUNITY THUS, THE ANIMALS HAVE WINGS, BEAKS, FACES OF OXEN, THEY ARE HORSE LIKE, AND HAVE FACES LIKE LIONS SO THAT THE CREATION WOULD REFLECT THE THINGS OF GOD HE ALSO MADE COLD BLOODED CREATURES THERE IS THE WHOLE COLD BLOODED REPTILIAN COMMUNITY REFLECTING THE DEVIL & HIS ANGELS THE NEW CREATION COULD NOT HAVE EVOLVED THERE IS NO REAL EVIDENCE THAT EVOLUTION IS TRUE JUST THE OPPOSITE IN ORDER FOR EVOLUTION TO BE TRUE THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE LINKS BETWEEN LIZARDS & BIRDS THERE WOULD BE LINKS BETWEEN DINOSAURS & OTHER CREATURES THERE ARE NO FOSSILS ANYWHERE THAT INDICATE THIS INSTEAD THERE IS A WORLD THAT WAS REPTILIAN IN NATURE EARTH WAS ONCE DOMINATED BY LIZARD LIKE CREATURES THEN THAT WORLD SUDDENLY DISAPPEARS SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT EMERGED GOD WOULD COMPLETE HIS PLAN THE NEW WORLD WAS PREPARED FOR A NEW CREATURE -MANKIND THE NEW WORLD WAS NO LONGER PRIMARILY COLD BLOODED IT WAS PRIMARILY FILLED WITH WARM BLOODED CREATURES IT WAS A WORLD DESIGNED FOR MANKIND TO LIVE & LEARN IN IT WAS CREATED TO BE A TRAINING GROUND FOR MAN TO LEARN TO LIVE LIKE GOD ONLY GOD CAN BE TRUSTED TO USE HIS POWER IN LOVE FOR THIS REASON HE WILL NOT PUT THE EARTH UNDER THE CONTROL OF ANGELS AGAIN Hebrews 2:5 For unto the angels hath he not put in subjection the world to come, whereof we speak. HE WILL PUT THE WORLD UNDER THE SUBJECTION OF MAN CHANGED TO BECOME LIKE CHRIST MAN WILL HAVE LIVED UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF THESE BEINGS WE WILL HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO HATE LUST AND COVETING WE WILL HAVE COME TO HATE THAT WAY HAVING DEVELOPED THE MIND OF GOD --- TO THINK LIKE HE DOES TO LIVE AS HE DOES EVENTUALLY WE WILL INHERIT THIS EARTH WE WILL FINISH BEAUTIFYING IT THUS WE CAN SEE THAT REAL SCIENCE & GOD’S WORD ARE COMPATIBLE WE CAN’T ALWAYS TRUST OUR INTERPRETATION BUT --- WE CAN ALWAYS TRUST GOD’S WORD MORE THAN MEN THUS --- PREHISTORY TEACHES US AN INCREDIBLE LESSON WE NEED TO WORK AT BECOMING LIKE GOD AND CHRIST WE NEED TO REMAIN HUMBLE MEEK & TEACHABLE SATAN IS GOING TO ONCE AGAIN ATTEMPT TO RUIN THIS WORLD IT WILL BECOME SO BAD THAT IF CHRIST DID NOT COME, ALL FLESH WOULD BE DESTROYED Mat 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. THE CREATOR WILL NOT LET THAT HAPPEN AGAIN IF WE SUBMIT TO HIS GOVERNMENT IN OUR LIVES NOW IF WE WILL LIVE BY HIS LAWS HE WILL USE US HE WILL USE US TO PRESERVE GODS KINGDOM ON EARTH WHEN HE RETURNS WE WILL LIVE & WORK WITH THE FATHER, CHRIST AT THAT TIME WE WILL WORK WITH THE AND GREAT MEN & WOMEN OF GOD THROUGH HISTORY AND --- ONE DAY WE WILL BE PRIVILEGED TO BE PART OF ANOTHER RECREATION GOD WILL CREATE A NEW HEAVENS HE WILL CREATE A NEW EARTH HE WILL BRING NEW JERUSALEM WITH HIM TO LIVE WITH US IT IS THE GREATEST HOPE EVER IMAGINED AND LIKE THE REST OF THE BIBLE WE CAN TRUST IT ---IT IS ABSOLUTELY TRUE THEREFORE, LETS LEARN THE LESSON SATAN FAILED TO LEARN LET’S SEEK THE KINGDOM WITH ALL OUR MIGHT LET’S SEEK THAT KINGDOM --- NOT BY POWER STRUGGLES LETS SEEK IT BY PURSUING CHRIST’S RIGHTEOUSNESS IN OUR LIVES |
|
|
|
Topic:
A moral ethical God?
|
|
Well Art,
I love ya. But, you know you have various chores and other work you must do. So say good by to your wonderful friends here for a while. Thanks for the reminder, Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
A moral ethical God?
|
|
Ok - time for a little athiesm 'logic' here. Well, I’ve learned something today. This post and a couple other recent posts have led me to validate the word god through many different souces. What I have found is that Art,. . says that “God can not be defined”. Art says God cannot be defined by us and our thinking. The God of the Bible defines Himself. We just don't believe Him. If you don't want to believe His definition, then fine. He does not need us to believe Him. He will do what He will do, and we cannot stop it any more than we can make a day longer or shorter. He set that up, not us. On another level, you spoke earlier of the hypocrisy of professing Christians. I suggest that the Atheists are also hypocritical. For example, they keep Christmas. They keep Halloween. They keep Valentines day. They are all official church holidays. Funny! Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
A moral ethical God?
|
|
God did not copy those mythologies. They copied God's. That’s impossible because the mythologies were written first. Because you do not believe in God, you do not believe in a devil. However, the devil was alive long before the creation of the earth, Job 37. The angels, and Lucifer shouted for joy at the world's creation. However, we were a part of the plan before the earth was created. Eph 1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: Knowing the path man would take, Christ was as good as slain before that. 1Pe 1:19 But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot: Who verily was foreordained before the foundation of the world, but was manifest in these last times for you, So, do you think that the angels did not know God's plan? Of course they did, and God's enemy knew it, and it was he who would cause these various counterfeit messiahs to occur. I mean, just think. It is weird that there would be so many especially considering the unusual nature of the sacrifice of Christ. Few people would dream up such a scenario on their own. It had to come from the one who knew the plan from the beginning. The devil made em do it. Actually, the mistake is in reading the sequence of events. The days were 24 hour days. Thus the plants created on one day had insects and birds to pollinate them the next day. They did not have to wait a thousand years or billions of years for that.
Not according to the Genesis,… Yes, according to Genesis and many other places in the Bible. [1] In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Realize that God separated light from darkness and that was the first day, not the creation of the earth which took place at the same time as creation of the universe. Consider --when was this beginning? It was long before man existed. There were billions of years before that. There were dinosaurs and Neanderthals. It was a hostile kill or be killed world, reptilian world. Now consider the next verse: [2] And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. This is not the way that the world was created. It was not without form and void in the beginning. The term "was" could and should be translated "became" The terms without form and void are actually chaotic and confused in the Hebrew. For example, the term "vain" is tohu and it is the same word used in the verse below: Isa 45:18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it NOT in VAIN he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else. Void is actually the Hebrew word meaning word “confused and God is not the author of Confusion I cor 14:33. Satan is. So, God created the heavens and the earth for the purpose of being inhabited, but they both BECAME chaotic and confused. This was the result of sin. This took place during the war in heaven when everything was destroyed on the earth. This is why the great beasts are found with food still in their mouth. It is why the moons of Saturn are crushed to dust. It is why asteroids and meteors are still flying around space. Thus, the earth had existed for millions of years before man as we know man. The angels inhabited the earth and they left their first estate, which was the earth, Jud 1:6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. There was war in heaven. As Jesus said, He saw Satan fall like lightening. Where did Satan fall to? He fell to the earth where he was originally. That is why Satan was there in the garden. He fell back to the earth. The earth was his before Man was on it. He was always the ruler of this world. That is why he could offer the kingdoms of this world to Jesus at the temptation. That is why when Christ died on the Cross, He said, now is the prince of this world cast out. Christ had qualified to replace the ruler of this earth, but would not cast Satan out of this world until His return. Back to Genesis, now God comes to the earth that already exists, and He begins to clear away the rubble, so that light can shine through. This making of day and night was the first day, not all that occurred before it. [3] And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. [4] And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. [5] And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day. According to this the evening and the morning were the first day and the earth was still without form. Definitely not earthy days. It doesn’t even make sense to try to take this literally. Any attempt to try to make the Bible into a literal account will necessarily fail, because it’s clearly not a literal account of anything. Yes, it is still without form, but it was not made without form and void. It became that way as a result of sin. The bible uses symbolism from time to time, but the symbolism is always the same. The symbols always have the same meaning—stars are angels, leaven is sin and pride, mountains are large governments, hills smaller ones and so on. So where is there symbolism in this account? There is no symbolism indicated here at all. There is the simple definition of evening and morning. We are told they are a day. There are descriptions of specific kinds of animals, and so on. It is all specific and not symbol at all. Gen 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so. Gen 1:12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Gen 1:13 And the evening and the morning were the third day. Gen 1:14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: Gen 1:15 And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. Gen 1:16 And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. Gen 1:17 And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, Gen 1:18 And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. Gen 1:19 And the evening and the morning were the fourth day. Gen 1:20 And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven. Gen 1:21 And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good. Gen 1:22 And God blessed them, saying, Be fruitful, and multiply, and fill the waters in the seas, and let fowl multiply in the earth. Gen 1:23 And the evening and the morning were the fifth day. Gen 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. So, you see that these had to be single 24 hour days for the plants that were created to exist until the creatures needed to pollinate them were created. Certainly the Sabbath was a 24 hour creation. It was the seventh day, and it was only evening and morning. God did not rest for millions of years. You claim that the Bible says these things. Where are they written? See a post on recreation for the full story What you fail to realize Art is that the Bible was made up in the minds of men. You think that just because you adhere to ancient stories that this gives your belief more validity than another other belief but that’s not true. The same thing could be argued about Greek Mythology! Why not believe in Greek Mythology??? This is so ironic. Your beliefs are made up on the mind of men. It is what ever you think! The beliefs found in the Bible are from a true God. For example, Greek Mythology has no prophecies that have come true. They have no moral basis like the Scriptures. Those are gods made in the image of man. They act like men. The God of the Bible does not act like men. His thoughts are higher than ours. The Bible has a history that can and has been validated. At first the critics thought there was no writing in Egypt, then they found the writing on the Rosetta stone. Then they said that there was no Nineveh. It was mythological. Then Opps! They found Nineveh. Then, Abraham was a myth. Again, they found tablets in Ebla with his name and others on it. One man took at robotic camera into the sea of Aqaba and caught photos of encrusted chariot wheels. Where is there evidence that you have that there is no God? The God of the Bible challenges us to prove Him, not take Him on faith. The God of the Bible makes contact with us and we can have a personal relationship with Him. In the pages of the Bible, there are over 300 prophesies of Christ alone. There are many others about different nations. God foretold the future of ancient Tyre and Sidon. He foretold how the Persians would take Babylon by going through the flood gates. God even foretold the name of King Cyrus who would let the people go after their 70 years of captivity. God revealed to Daniel when the Messiah would come, and Israel knew He was due and were looking for Him in either John the Baptist or Christ. The God of the Bible foretold of Israel going into captivity and being taken out of Egypt exactly at the time He said. Further, the entire exodus scenario was written for the church at the end, to encourage them to understand that they would be taken out of this evil world by a resurrection after the trumpet plagues of Rev 8.... Yes, you can mock and think your gods are as good as any. Those gods did not say any thing like the Bible, and certainly not this: Isa 46:8 Remember this, and shew yourselves men: bring it again to mind, O ye transgressors. Isa 46:9 Remember the former things of old: for I am God, and there is none else; I am God, and there is none like me, Isa 46:10 Declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure: As this verse shows, God is not omniscient. He does not know what will happen in the future. Instead, He tells you what will happen, and then He MAKES IT HAPPEN. That is different than any of the gods you speak of. He has made what He said would happen come to pass. We men can’t do that. We are hit and miss. You don’t believe in it because you believe it was just made up by men. Well, duh! This is precisely what I’m saying about the Bible!!! But you think your beliefs are better, and they are the beliefs of men. They are your beliefs. It is just your theory, with little real evidence. . Sincere Bible readers prove what they read.
Where’s your proof of any divinity of the Bible? Showing that some places and people actually existed is not proof of divinity. Well what proves divinity? I can’t prove anything to you. You are too invested in your beliefs. If God came to you and showed that He was real, you would argue it was a dream or something. There is no proof you will accept. Consider that when God says to prove Him, He means to live His way and see if it does not produce blessings. Are you willing to do that? No. You don't really want any proof. When it comes to Paul's admonition, He says to prove all things. You are not willing to do that. You have no proof that there is no God. We offer you that creation is proof of a creator. That laws that you cannot break are proof of a supreme law giver. You can object to this all you want, but think my friend, if you do, you object to the plain obvious truth. You make yourself look foolish in reality. You did not create these things. Something greater than you did. But you refuse to think there is anything greater than you. So, there is no real personal God—but it is only in your mind. So, there is evidence. It is actually proof enough that there is a Creator and He is smarter and more powerful than you. I recommend that you accept it and get over it. That can be shown with Greek Mythology too! That doesn’t prove its divinity. Show me any proof of the divine claims of the Bible? There isn’t any Art. If there were proof of the Bible it would be world renowned. We know that there is no proof for the Bible! All such claims for proof of the Bible are bogus and have been shown to be nothing more than wishful thinking. There is no proof of the Bible’s divinity. On the contrary, there is overwhelming observational evidence that its claims are not based on truth. Actually the proofs of the Bible are world renowned. They are there for anyone who is open to see them. You won’t see them even if I show them to you. But, I will give evidence. How about a few off the top of my head? 1. No one believes in the Greek Gods. Billions believe in Jesus and the Bible. 2. God told man things long before science could ever have known them the earth is round It is hung on nothing Eating swine and shell fish is dangerous Wash after touching anything dead bury your excrement Don't overcrowd yourself in cities 3. Those who claimed to be eyewitness died for their beliefs in Jesus Christ. They would not if it were made up by them. 4. The Biblical history tells the truth to the point that it openly shows the weaknesses of its own heroes, and that testimony supports the reality of Christ, the acts of the church & its miracles 5. Secular history supports that Jesus existed, did miracles, lived a good life and died by crucifixion. 6. Over 300 fulfilled prophecy supports the fact that the Bible is true 7. My own personal relationship with Christ, and miracles I have witnessed show it. 8. Answers to prayer show it. 9. How about the popularity and continued existence of a book that has had repeated attempts to stamp it out? 10. Almost all ancient civilizations have some sort of flood account. All of the above confirms the Bible. But—don't panic though, you can still refuse to believe. You can continue to believe you are smarter and better than the God of the Bible. By the way, where is your proof of you being smarter and better than that God? I don’t see it. (i.e. we can clearly see that the world was not perfect before man even came onto the scene much less before he fell to sin) Yet the Bible holds man responsible for these imperfections in the world. It's clearly wrong. Man can't be responsible for imperfections that existed before he did! That's enough right there for me to toss the book on the self marked fiction. How did you ever get to this conclusion? Clearly? Where is the clarity you who wants all this proof. How do you know that the world was imperfect before man? Were you there or something? I am either missing this one big time, or you are just making this up out of thin air because you want it to be true so bad. After God recreated the world some time after the great war, He created man. It was a perfect world until man made the choice that you are making today. That is to choose for himself what is right and wrong. This is the tragedy of your kind of thinking. You believe that without the influence of God in the Patriarchs, the history and teaching of the Bible, we can make our own moral choices. But, the truth is that we don't have that moral compass in us to know right from wrong. Certainly even your posts prove that. We all want to be our own god. You may think that because you believe the world was imperfect before man, that the Bible should be put in the shelf marked fiction, but your view is the fiction. Your post is enough for me to put it in the delete section. I can't keep spending this much time going over this stuff. You are going to believe what you want to believe. And, you and others like you will press it, and press it, until you win. You can tell a lie enough times and people will begin to believe it. We as a people will push God out of our nation. And, just like the history of the Bible, when we finally do push God out of our nation, He will push us out of His nation. Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
A moral ethical God?
|
|
feral votes yes to the notion of an omniGod... ok... I want to get a concensus of all those who agree... feral, I appreciate your particpation... I do not feel anything being is being shoved... so... I just want to find a 'plane' to where the conversation can indeed begin on an agreement, if this is ok with everybody... I claim that the description of 'God', as claimed within the bible is inaccurate. To establish a starting point I have posed a question. Is God omniscient(all-knowing), omnibenevolent(all-good), and omnipotent(all-powerful)? We must find a reference to discuss the topic. We must define either 'God' or some character of 'God'... some attribute... any attribute... While some claim to not define 'God' they describe what 'God' is and what 'God' is not. We could go on and on about this... I want to establish a reference point... something tangible to discuss... again... Is God omniscient(all-knowing), omnibenevolent(all-good), and omnipotent(all-powerful)? Ok ---first show us where in the Bible God says He is omiscient? Where does it say that God is Omibenevolent and all powerful? This shows again that people talk about the bible without knowing what it really says. God is not omiscient. He is not all knowing. Thus, he said to Abraham when he was willing to offer up his son, "Now I know." God always does what is in the best interests of all concerned, but that does not mean that He always does things are are benevolent. He punishes the wicked. Isa 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: (calamity) I the LORD do all these things. God is not all powerful. He has given us free will. Therefore, by choice, He does not have the power to force us to do His will. It is our choice to follow Him, not His. The point I make is that the opponents of the Bible do not know the Bible. Why even listen to them? Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
A moral ethical God?
|
|
Man! Look around at the world that we have created by not following God. I’m sorry Art, but this is total bull crap! Most of the problems facing our world today were indeed created by people who supposedly have Christian values!!! The Christians came to the Americas and murdered the pantheists who lived here calling them ‘savages’! The Christians went to Africa and brought back “black men” that they enslaved and treated as sub-human! Even today many commercial enterprises that pollute and rape mother earth are run by people who supposedly have “Christian values”. Sure you can argue that all of these people and their actions are not supported by the religion, but if so then all you are doing is denouncing 99.9% of the Christians in the world!!! If we had all lived our lives according the pantheistic views of Sitting Bull the world would be a beautiful place. This CRAP that the world is screwed up because mankind didn’t live according to the laws of the Bible is just that, total CRAP! There are many philosophies, and even atheists who have lived lives that would have produced a beautiful world had everyone lived like them. Of Course this is all true. However, you really did miss my point. I was talking about the values and standards of the Bible, not the values and standard of men who only profess belief in the Bible. That was the point of my list of changes to show that people are not following the Bible. The middle ages, and all of its religious superstition did not come from the bible. It came from pagans who worshiped the mystery religion and who put Christ's name on it. You understand that the Saturnaila was named Christmas. Easter that still retains the name of the goddess of fertility over laid the passover. The bible teaching of Christ coming and setting up a kingdom for a thousand years was reinterpreted by the Roman Church and its Emperors so that the church was the kingdom, then they put out the people who held to the truth, and they killed others thinking they did God a service, exactly like the scriptures said they would . Joh 16:2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. What I am saying is that the God of the Bible and the values and standards that are His have not been lived. That is the point of this thread. Not that we should look to what people who call themselves Christian have done, but what Christ said we are to do. There is a vast difference. To put it another way, if Lexus has made quality luxury cars for years, but suddenly there is a hostile take over by their competitors and they make a car that is of terrible quality, it does not mean that the original Lexus was inferior. But this is what you are doing. You are judging the God of the Bible by the acts of those who cooperated in a hostile take over of Christianity. Any sincere pantheist has morals that far exceed those of the Bible. How can I say that? Simply, take all of the moral values of the Bible and add to them a respect for mother earth, nature, and the animal kingdom. That increases their value and places them are a much higher plateau than the Bible holds them. The Bible dose not preach respect for the natural world the way pantheism does! And well it should not. Pantheism puts man on the same level as beasts. In case you did not notice, we are superior. We are made in God's image and the animals in a lower image of angels. That is why angels are shown to have faces of an eagle, ox, lion, and have wings, and so on. For example Christ comes back on a white horse, and that horse is not a physical one. It is a spirit being. Thus the Bible does not want us worshiping animals, like so many of the false religions do. Further, you are again absolutely wrong on your point about God's teaching regarding animals. God said that even the animals are to have rest on the Sabbath. He said we are to break even God's rule to save their lives. He says that you cannot restrict the animal from eating when it is treading out the grain. God says you don't even eat a calf boild in it mother's milk. Regarding the environment, God told the people to bury their excrement, not to leave it laying around. He knew about bacteria before we did. He also warned people not to build crowded cities. He said they were not to build house to house. We should not live in apartments. Now science finds that this overcrowding causes us to be more violent. God says when He comes back, He will punish those who destroy the earth. God told us to dress and keep the environment. He did not tell us to rape it. God required that everyone who lost property due to bad financial decisions must have the property returned to them every fifty years. His economic system was designed so that no one single entity could take over everyone else like the huge corporations have done today. His system was so fair, so just, and so perfect. Ours is the problem. and ours did not come from true Christians or from people following the Bible. It came from people who professed Christianity and did not live it. So, I don't know how to take you. You put down the Bible, but you don't even know what it says. It is just all empty talk. So don’t even think about trying to claim to me that the reason the world is so screwed up is because people aren’t following the biblical laws. Those laws do no prevent people from raping planet earth. Those laws are inadequate. Again, you know better. You act as if we followed your laws everything would be fine. But, the truth is you don't know God's laws or why they exist. Just look at what Christianity has done to the USA!!! It’s clearly a devastating religion! You blame it on a lack of Christianity, I blame it on Christianity! Christianity is the religion that taught people to be so egotistical and to have no respect for the physical world or nature!!! Here you are again blasting what you don't know. Christianity taught people to be egotistical? Mat 23:12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted. 1Pe 5:6 Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time: Jam 4:10 Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up. Jesus taught us to be humble. But human nature has made us egotistical. In fact it is not the teachings of Jesus that is egotistical. In an era when women were not allowed to talk to men or especially a Rabbi, Jesus talked with Gentile women. He listened to them, and in some cases, their argument caused Him to change His judgement. It’s a devastating religion. As a religion it clearly doesn’t work to instill good morals in people. It had its chance and fell flat on its face. But again, and again, and again, it is not Christianity that you see. It is a counterfeit you see. They worship the god of this world, and call him Christ. I have said this so many times, and you just by pass it. You are not seeing God's religion. You are seeing the devil at work. art |
|
|
|
Topic:
A moral ethical God?
Edited by
BillingsDreamer
on
Tue 01/08/08 05:53 PM
|
|
Art This is amazing to me, the lengths we will go to reject God. Hello I don't see this as a rejection of God but rather a rejection of a biblical definition that does not seem to fit. I don't think many can claim a better smile than yours--wow! But, in answer to your comment, where exactly does the Bible not fit? It really is the other religious systems that don't fit. For the Atheist it is a creation without a creator. For the Buddhist, it might be chanting to change the world. But words don't change the world, actions change the world. For the Hindu it is a belief that we are reincarnated, and must keep coming back until we get it right. But, then the world never gets better. No one is learning the lesson, and the population keeps growing it is not static like it would have to be in their scenario. The pagans and witches worship gods that don't really exist, and they think that god is in every rock and tree. Wow! the rock wears away in the stream, and god becomes minerals in the water. The tree dies, and God becomes fertilizer. It is nuts. You get my point. These religions are goofy. They don't make sense. They are the ones that don't fit. The Bible tells us the way that works. Like for example, work hard, don't be lazy. Discipline your children, so later they can discipline themselves. It tells us to keep the ten commandments, don't commit adultery, lie, steal or murder. It tells us to respect our parents. It tells us not to worship these other gods. To me, it really is good advice. Why all the hatred for the common sense approach to life? There are many traditions outside of Christianity which speak of God. If our relationship with God is indeed a personal one should our understanding not also be personal? Sure, but then keep it personal. Don't try to push it on others. Don't try to minimize the God of the Bible and expect no one to protest. You see, it is not personal when we put it on the forum. So, if you tell us that something is true, we have the right to challenge it. There seems to be this notion that if, for example, my definition of God does not fit the prescribed one allowed by the bible that my view is wrong. I would suggest rather than my perspective has broadened to encompass a more wholistic view based upon study and experience. It is what resonates and sits well within me ... just me. We all have our own path back to our source. I don't agree with you. No one said your views are wrong because they are not the bible views. I don't really know your views. However, you state that they are superior to the Bible. In that, you are actually denigrating the Bible and its values and morals. In your mind, and now in your print, you are superior to it. I challenge such a view. Any why not? This is forum for that. Further, you are telling everyone on this forum that you have a better, bigger view than the Bible. It is a little arrogant to me, but you can believe what you want. However, if you tell others these things, I will challenge if I have the time. There is often an assumption made, and I see it here in relation to creativesoul and abra (I use them as examples as I know both men), that there is a desire to denounce God or that they fail to or are incapable of understanding Christianity and its basis. Nothing could be farther from the truth. So, you speak for them? I don't get this. I mean I have been wrong lots of times, but do you really think that they do not put down the God of the Bible? Of course they do. They, like you are superior to it. They have risen above it. They know better than the God of the Bible. Where have you been. Or, ok, that is right, one of them said they like the bible and read it sometimes. That has no real meaning. Lots of people read the Bible. They don't understand it. Do you really think that they understand the Bible by what they say? Why am I defending the Bible in the light of their attacks. It flies in the face of the obvious reality. I know I have not read every post of theirs, but I have never heard them speak of a positive thing about the Bible or its God. I don't see why it has to be science or God. Religion and science both are trying to describe and understand the same thing...the nature of the universe. I suspect when you get beneath all the dogma that both views are not so far apart. Yes, and when the astronomers found the lingering noise of the big bang, and when they calculated to see if it could be an expanding or contracting universe, they found it is only expanding. Thus they crawled over the mountain of ignorance and as they get closer to the top, science found that there was a beginning--a creator. Creative I believe that 'God' is everything... everything and nothing... I absolutely agree. We live in a world that seems pretty real. I trust that the table at which I eat dinner is solid enough to hold the plate. Yet, at a quantum level what is really there? Tiny particles and a whole lot of empty space - anything but solid. And at a deeper level there are even smaller particles with even more space... bits of which flit in and out of 'our' reality. Everything and no-thing at the same time...depending upon my perspective at the time. But in this view, you are treating nothing as if it is something when it really is not. There is matter, light, electrons, and quarks that are material and measurable. These things are real and they exist. Take them away, and there is nothing. The matter was created and now fills the space where there once was nothing. The nothing that exists between all these things has no reality. It is nothing. It is the absence of something. It is like space. There are planets, and suns and asteroids, and moons, and all that stuff that exists, but they are something. The emptiness, the space that is between them is absence of anything. The God of my belief is in a state of constant creation. This cannot be true. The truth is that everything is subject to entropy. Everything is winding down. All energy moves from a point of high intensity to low intensity. Thus, if you put a pot of steaming water on the counter, it will become the same temperature as the room. This is also true of the universe. It is winding down. The suns in all the galaxies will eventually burn out. Nothing is winding things up again. It is not an ego in the sky....a separate 'thing' ... [/quite] See, you say you are not against God. But you call the God I worship an ego in the sky. This is so denigrating to God and self aggrandizing. Here is God's response: Isa 40:13 Who hath directed the Spirit of the LORD, or being his counsellor hath taught him? Isa 40:14 With whom took he counsel, and who instructed him, and taught him in the path of judgment, and taught him knowledge, and shewed to him the way of understanding? Isa 40:15 Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing. Isa 40:16 And Lebanon is not sufficient to burn, nor the beasts thereof sufficient for a burnt offering. Isa 40:17 All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity. Isa 40:18 To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him? My first point is that God is not an ego. He is not bragging here. This is simply the understated truth. He is just telling you who He is. God is far greater and more powerful than this. The people then did not know about the far flung galaxies so far away that our modern Hubble can't see them. He could not talk to them about the power it takes to send galaxies spinning millions of miles per hour out into space. So, He used analogies they could understand. Second, This God is not some sort of force like star wars. He is not in every rock, tree, and piece of the material world. He is spirit, not anything to do with matter. He is a separate powerful awesome being. He is NOT in the nations or the trees. He burns them. He destroys them if they become too self destructive or harmful to others. By the belief you have created in your mind, you put yourself above this magnificent God. You make Him a part of the the nothing that is in the plate you eat from. You make Him a part of the world that you use. This is a belief that does not fit. By it, you create a painting, a home, or other project of your choosing. You can destroy it, but you think God has no such power. Perhaps you don't see it yet, but God is not an ego in the sky. We are the egos run a muck! {quote] it is the source of everything which comes into physical reality. The source of all holds the potential of all things ... but it is undefined ... a no-thing ... until it is manifested into the physical world. This is your god. Certainly it is a controllable god. It is not a being. Does not think, does not love or hate. Your god is a nothing until somehow it is able to manifest itself into our physical world. And you think that this is the better view of God? Well sure it is to you. Your god has no power. It is just a nice thought in your head. But, I ask you to think real thoughts. What about when the world no longer exists. There is coming a time when our sun burns out, and when it does, it will take the rest of the planets with it. Your god will not be able to manifest itself anymore. It will cease to exist. But, then, I guess it doesn't matter to you because your god is only one of your personal choice, designed to fit your needs for now. I say it is no god. It is just your thoughts. Art |
|
|
|
Topic:
A moral ethical God?
|
|
I don't see how quoting a book, written by men(!) wanting to control other men(!), can ever become a sane way of discussing the appearance of matter (of which we know very little by the way). Regarding the book, it was not written to control men, but to enlighten them in the way that they should live successful lives. The purpose of the book is to prevent pollution, wars, disease, and famine, divorce, teenage gangs, violence in our cities, and all the rest of the terrible stuff you see on Fox News and don't like about our life today. Then, discussing the appearance of matter, you agree that science has no clue. But, ironically, the Bible that you put down, actually does have a clue. It clearly says that matter was not created out of nothing. Matter was created out of invisible spirit: Heb 11:3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. God changed spirit to matter in an explosion so great that it sent entire galaxies spinning into space at millions of miles per hour. To me, any distribution of one's faith automatically ensures a dumbing down and oversimplification of wholly indescribable personal truths. This is nonsense. Do you think that the distribution of Christian values is the dumbing down of the personal values of the Hindus who drink urine and put cow dung on their heads? Do you think that the distribution of Christian values dumbs down the personal values of those who want to practice voodoo? However, many to think that the distribution of Christian values is the dumbing down of the personal values of those who want to be licentious, to use women for our personal pleasure, and not give them the security of marriage in return. We don't want to dumb down those those personal high moral standards that cause us to pass diseases around the young people--do we? We don't want anything to impinge on the exercise of our personal values no matter who we hurt. The values and standards of the Bible are there to free us. There are immutable laws that govern our universe. When we break laws, physical, emotional, or spiritual, there is a consequence. The Bible is written to show the history of those who did not keep its values. It is to show us the way that works without causing suffering to others and ourselves. But, if you really want to keep lying, stealing, dishonoring your parents, hating others, hurting them, and committing any sex acts you want, of course the Bible is a problem. That nasty old Bible is dumbing you down. It is bringing you back to reality, and making real common sense that puts our nonsense into an embarrassing perspective. We want to think that we can do what we want and there are no consequences. Man! Look around at the world that we have created by not following God. Maybe someday, we will give Him a chance, and actually try His way and see what happens. And the more people you want to convince, the more dogmatic you get. Do you think that I am arrogant in what I say? Does it bother you? I say what I say after decades of research and proof. I can say dogmatically what the scriptures say. I can also tell you dogmatically answers about air conditioning. I was in that field for 27 years. I know my trade, and I know the Bible. Is there a problem with knowing what you believe today? Is there a problem with passion for our beliefs? What is interesting to me, is that you actually speak dogmatically, and in so doing, you accuse others of trying to convince people of things. But the truth is the opposite of what you say. It is you who are trying to convince. And, to do so, you ridicule, make up stories about why the Bible was written, and by who, and then you offer no evidence, just your feelings about the subject. For example I'll keep my faith to myself ;o) But you don't. You share it here to ridicule the Bible and those who believe in it. Art |
|
|
|
These (and many other examples) are the reason that there is so much ambivalence extended toward those Christians who support specific 'doctrine'. Art, your posts specifically explain how very important the Sabboth really is to the 'basics' of Christianity. This was exactly what I was hoping to have come out in this thread. But to be honest I was rather hoping others would see, their own hypocracy, by explaining the importance of the Sabbath and relating it to their own lives. But, people are not interested in the Sabbath generally. And, no one can see their own error. Correct me if I am wrong, but my impression is that you would like to see professing Christianity exposed for their hypocrisy in order to justify not accepting the Bible, its God, and teachings. Their mess does not invalidate the bible. It invalidates their belief about the Bible. But, for me to not cry out? That won't happen. I can't stay on this forum forever. I have other work to do, but for me to not teach that we should respect and honor that book, and its God, it is unthinkable. This is the entire message of the constitution of the United States of America. They wrote free speech into our law to insure that if someone had the truth, it could be spoken, and not repressed. Further, I have never seen anyone condemn others here. It is the cry of those who oppose the Bible and the professing Christian world. For example, I have condemned the logic and arguments that some have had against the Bible and its God. But, no one is judging, meaning condemning others. But, please realize, I mean take a look around. The atheists mock and ridicule the professing Christians. Do you think they have no hypocrisy? Do you think their desire to have no moral authority over them, so that in effect, they can do what ever they want is not its own hypocrisy? We are all hypocrites. None of us live up to the standards we set for ourselves. Further, I believe that there is incredible hypocrisy among atheists. They contradict themselves, they make up scenarios to fit their beliefs. They manipulate history, and write entire books to discredit the Bible. But, they are driven, just like the professing Christian community to find reasons to justify what they believe, not necessarily to find out the truth. Speaking of finding the truth, regarding people seeing their own hypocrisy. Our human nature blocks it. It is the defense mechanism. You do it, I do it, and we all do it. Thus, "professing Christians" will NOT accept the Sabbath. They actually worship according to the ancient mystery religions. They don't know this, but if you tell them, they will become defensive and fight against it without really knowing. But, you can ask any knowledgeable witch. They will tell you that the professing Christian community worships their gods. Sometimes it's necessary to hold a mirror in front of a speaker, and hope they will learn from the experience. In this case, to judge themselves according to their own beliefs and stop judging others who are not bound by those beliefs. We all need that mirror, but we don't always want to look at it. I hope you understand that I do judge myself by my beliefs. I don't judge (condemn) others. However, they do judge us. You judge us. For example, you call us names like Hypocrites. You think you are superior because of their hypocrisy and don't see your own. You wanted this post to teach them the lesson you want them to learn. Isn't this fun irony? To be totally sincere, however, if the (Christian) community continues to believe they are entitled to pass judgment on others to the point of creating bias accepting prejudical actions, and dictating sociatal laws in accordance with their doctrine, than their is a tradition in need of breaking. Does this mean that those who profess to believe in the Bible have no right to say that they believe homosexuality is wrong? Does it mean that they have no right to say that they believe abortion is wrong? Do they have no right to say and teach what they believe is true and right and good? What would you do to a prophet of God for teaching the truth and condemning our society for its injustice, and lack of morality? Does the prophet have no rights in our country any longer? I say this, because I believe that it is thinking like yours that will lead us to this exact spot. It is already a hate crime to quote certain parts of the Bible in Canada. Eventually, they will jail us for speaking what we believe to be true. It will be thinking like yours that causes this. So, I think you have every right to profess that there is no God. But, I have a right to profess that there is. Further, while I think there is no evidence that God does not exist. You cannot prove that. I do have the evidence that He exists. The fact of entropy and that everything is winding down requires something or someone to have wound it up. The creation requires a creator The perfect design of our universe requires a designer Laws require a law giver Life only comes from other life, there must be a life giver There is fulfilled prophecy There is answered prayer So, it is not like we offer a belief in the God without some reason for such belief. That is no hypocrisy. With the information you have provided, Art, it seems that Christians, themselves, can be credited with the unraveling of that which they seek to extoll to others. Yes, I agree, they are unraveling what they believe they must preach to the world. And, ironically, they are doing that by the fact that they don't live what they preach. Sad, for me, but true. It is reaching critical mass too. The Christian community is becoming a laughing stock on TV and movies. They are always pictured as kooks, and weirdos. Bill Mayer (sp?) is an example of where all this is leading. There is nothing sacred in a tradition of change and nothing of value to extend into the future. Yes, it would be so wonderful if we actually lived by what the book says, and had a tradition of sincerely living it. I believe that it would be so attractive that the vast majority of people would willingly seek to be a part of it. After giving the commandments, God said: Deu 5:29 O that there were such an heart in them, that they would fear me, and keep all my commandments always, that it might be well with them, and with their children for ever! It would be better than any of us could ever imagine. However, in the scriptures, God says He will return at the end of a certain time, and then He will set up His kingdom on earth, headquartered at Jerusalem. As word of that Kingdom spreads, people will desire to be a part of it. As Zechariah writes about that future time: Zec 8:21 And the inhabitants of one city shall go to another, saying, Let us go speedily to pray before the LORD, and to seek the LORD of hosts: I will go also. Zec 8:22 Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek the LORD of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before the LORD. Zec 8:23 Thus saith the LORD of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you. This future time is my hope for mankind. As an aside, everyone is posting here, and no one on my Sabbath thread. It is disappointing to me. But, trust me, people, especially professing Christians, don't want to hear about what God actually says. I would recommend it though. Try it someday, to read the Scriptures for what they say, and not what others teach that they say. It is eye opening. Art |
|
|