Community > Posts By > yzrabbit1

 
yzrabbit1's photo
Sat 05/03/08 03:01 PM

personally I dont think god gives a sh!t about us, god created and moved on...to me, there is something extremely comforting in that.
:smile:



This is where I am at too. I don't know how I got there exactly but if god did create us he does not care what goes on here on earth because he is god.

yzrabbit1's photo
Sat 05/03/08 11:39 AM


I was referring to the God that is known by Christians and Jews.


since christians refer to Jesus as being God and Jews maybe disagreeing with that means that the God in the New Testament is not the same one that is in The Old Testament ..didn't god tell Moses his name was "I AM" ..I may be wrong but I don't remember anything about god telling Moses to call him god or spell god with a capital "G"


Thats a good point. I wonder if the original language even dealt with using capital letters at all?

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 04:28 PM

Morningsong covered her head with her quote.

Christ is her head and her words are sharing that which a man of God spoke.

I find no fault. Nor do I find fault with her speaking her heart and mind.

Acquila and Priscilla did as well and they are honored by Paul in his writings, as well as Luke's in the Book of Acts. And they were present back in the day with the apostles.

Those that would silence her would do better to remind others of what the Bible says more pointedly, which is, come unto Jesus for the rest of your souls.

If anything is to be quoted, let it be at least that.

The Bible also says one must be saved. Why is it that dissenters choose their quotes to be argumentative and not take to heart the greater message upon their own person as it says?

Because, the dissenters would silence anything that suggest personal responsibility for the care and feeding of their own guilty conscience before God.

Torment enough within, that torment from without is offensive.

The offence is a guilty conscience, not the truth.

The truth that sets one free also demands that one choose to accept that freedom.

Appeasement is not peace, nor is silencing any.


show the respect for diversity that you who dissent demand!!!!

hypocrites.

flowerforyou :heart: bigsmile








I think it makes perfect sense when someone claims that the Bible is word for word from God. It is at those times that the ridiculous and contradictory verses need to be pointed out.

The real question is why do "Fundamentalist Christians" that supposedly love this word of God, never bring up these verses on their own. Are there some verses that are not Gods best work. I would like to hear why they don't want to discuss the importance of stoning in the modern day.

I have a feeling they actually pick and choose which verses they will take seriously and live by. While at the same time saying it is wrong for anyone else to do the same.

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 10:05 AM



How to interpret anything you read.

Read the words.
Know the defintions.
Know the context.

You have failed to do any of those Rabbit.



Actually I agree with you. The key word is "interpret". The book is open to interpretation. Not just the cold dead words. The article is trying to say that the King James in English is the word of God.

I think that is open for interpretation.


All communication is up for interpretation. That doesn't mean every interpretation is valid, does it? Let's try to be honest and reasonable and not make specious arguments, okay?

If the KJV is an accurate translation of the Word of God, then there is no problem. Most scholars agree that the KJV is a very good translation. I see no merit in an obviously hostile layman's disagreements with the translation.


The fact that even you are not going so far as to defend the original article makes me think that you also do not buy into its arguments.
If you are reading the Bible you need to know something about it. The words in english are not enough.

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 09:46 AM

frankly, I find it extremely morbid and in serious bad taste to be wearing a dead guy around your neck and calling him god...but then again, christianity is a very morbid religion that ritualistically worships a dead god, drinks his blood and eats his flesh as a way to wipe away one's sins




Yuck that sounds gross. What religion does this again?

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 09:41 AM

and you walk on your feet.

you shall not walk on your hands with shoes on them.

get a grip Rabbit.

flowerforyou :heart: bigsmile


I still stand by my point that if you say the answer is yes and the answer is no. You have a pretty good chance of being correct.

Anyone that takes those comments as proof of divinity is the one that needs a grip.

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 09:38 AM

How to interpret anything you read.

Read the words.
Know the defintions.
Know the context.

You have failed to do any of those Rabbit.



Actually I agree with you. The key word is "interpret". The book is open to interpretation. Not just the cold dead words. The article is trying to say that the King James in English is the word of God.

I think that is open for interpretation.

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 08:00 AM
There are many dead beat Dads out there that I think are the lowest of the low. However God sees it differently and we know the "Bible says it is so". God says that men can just up and leave your wife and kids and as long as you have the God of Abraham and Jesus in your heart you are heaven bound (some of his followers did this very thing by the way) I wonder why woman don't get to do that? OH YEAH. The kids would die of starvation. Well good luck ladies. God say your men are to be greatly rewarded.

I say they are scum sucking bums. Any man that leaves his kid behind is a punk. I will take on the wrath of God to stand by my point.

18:29 And he said unto them, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or parents, or brethren, or wife, or children, for the kingdom of God's sake,

18:30 Who shall not receive manifold more in this in present time, and in the world to come life everlasting.

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 07:49 AM

11:5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
11:6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
11:7 For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.


Since the "Bible says it is so" I imagine you pray with your head covered or you have a bald head. Which one is it may I ask?

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 07:29 AM
Edited by yzrabbit1 on Fri 05/02/08 07:30 AM
And here. Is it 6 days or 8 days. For something that is supposed to be ultimate truth, it sure has a hard time with simple facts.



Matthew 16:28 - 17:2
Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom. And after six days Jesus taketh Peter, James, and John his brother, and bringeth them up into an high mountain apart, And was transfigured before them.





Luke 9:27-28
But I tell you of a truth, there be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the kingdom of God. And it came to pass about an eight days after these sayings, he took Peter and John and James, and went up into a mountain to pray. And as he prayed, the fashion of his countenance was altered, and his raiment was white and glistering. And, behold, there talked with him two men, which were Moses and Elias.


maybe we should just round it off to 7 days and call it good.

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 07:24 AM
Even God covers his bets. Too bad the people make mistakes and sometimes leave both contradicting statements in.

Genesis 1:29
Behold, I have given your every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree ... to you it shall be for meat.



Genesis .2:17
of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it

yzrabbit1's photo
Fri 05/02/08 07:19 AM
Edited by yzrabbit1 on Fri 05/02/08 07:20 AM
He's hard to read really . for instance...



Matthew 12:30
He that is not with me is against me.



Mark 9:40
For he that is not against us is on our part.



Easy to get it right when you say everything from both sides. Then you can just let the people in the future pick out your words that are correct.

yzrabbit1's photo
Thu 05/01/08 08:05 PM



Prehaps, share with him your experience as a teenager. Let him know that you did it and most all teens do it, but also tell him how you eventually grew out of it. This should hopefully, let him know, that in fact, there is nothing wrong with it (or him) and also boost his confidence that he too will eventually grow out of it as well.


Rightnoway noway noway

How you two grew out of it and don't do it anymore.


And then tell him about the commandment about not lyingdrinker

Hey clown, I never said I grew out of it, however TLW said he practices self restraint. It was merely a suggestion nothing else. Also note, there was no Biblical reference in my suggestion.

While your drinker maybe you could reseach the commandment that talks about not being a Jackass!laugh


God left that commandment out. Too bad really


Lets face facts guys, masturbation is as normal as drinking water. The sooner he realizes it the better. Please do not load that poor kid down with Guilt.

yzrabbit1's photo
Thu 05/01/08 07:27 PM


I Hope you get all A's







A_OKflowerforyou

yzrabbit1's photo
Thu 05/01/08 07:24 PM

Prehaps, share with him your experience as a teenager. Let him know that you did it and most all teens do it, but also tell him how you eventually grew out of it. This should hopefully, let him know, that in fact, there is nothing wrong with it (or him) and also boost his confidence that he too will eventually grow out of it as well.


Rightnoway noway noway

How you two grew out of it and don't do it anymore.


And then tell him about the commandment about not lyingdrinker

yzrabbit1's photo
Thu 05/01/08 07:22 PM

interesting as it might be, there are many flaws in it. Some people need to pick back up their bibles and put down the "other sources" of "information". "Casting down imaginations and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God". ( believe that is an exact quote, too lazy this morning to go look it up) As Christians we need to remember this. Many people have had "thoughts" or "ideas" about what we think God would do based on what WE would do. This idea of universal salvation is just one fine example of such an idea. Yes it is true, "God is not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." However, this is not going to be the case. God Himself will not put anyone in hell, their sins will drag them there. Yes, God is merciful, but He is also perfect justice. His justice DEMANDS that sin is paid for, and unless a person is willing to accept the sacrifice of Christ for their own their sin remains. Even in the "end" when He returns for us, Christ will still meet out justice on His church. Read in Matthew the parable of the Sheep and the Goats, in this parable Christ returns and gathers HIS OWN and divides them. He clearly sends the goats to "eternal punishment prepared for the devil". After the 1000 year reign of Christ on the earth, the devil will be released from "sheol" and once again wreak havoc on the earth and form the armies of Gog and Magog and wage war against Christ and His servants. After this war Christ will reign supreme and EVERYTHING will be consumed by fire. The devil and his followers will be cast into the lake of fire and God will create a new heaven and a new earth. There the faithful will once again live in the paradise that God originally intended. In 1 Corinthians (I believe) it says "know you not that you shall judge men and angels" if we are to judge men, then what is to become of that judgment if not that some are condemned?

Well I think I have made my point and will not over state my opinion.

James


Ive read this same interpretation by others. The thing that confuses me is if God did this once and man "sinned" then he thought about destroying it but let Noah and his family start it over and again they messed it up . So he had to send his son to clean out all sin and now we all mess it up again.

It sounds like he is just going to give everyone a chance and they are going to mess it up again when the new earth comes.

Is he not bright enough to learn by what has happened in the past?

yzrabbit1's photo
Thu 05/01/08 07:09 PM


I know how he feels I have this addiction to water. No matter what I do I always go back to it. Its a thirst I just can't quench.noway

yzrabbit1's photo
Thu 05/01/08 05:55 PM

The Name Bush is the mark of the beast.

yzrabbit1's photo
Tue 04/29/08 06:53 AM

Is it true that LDS'ers believe in "magic rocks"?
noway


I am not in the LDS but are you maybe talking about the story that Joseph Smith looked at stones in a bag to get the book of Mormon. (This is my simplified version of it please feel free to correct me) However I wouldn't call this believing in "magic rocks" I don't think it would be the first time someone claimed God had spoken to his people by putting his words on tablets of stone.


yzrabbit1's photo
Sun 04/27/08 09:09 PM

I have personally had good interactions with people from the LDS. I think the history of it is also very interesting. All of these things made me feel inclined to look favorably at the Church.

However just recently my friends son got married in the LDS church and they would not let him in. That is his only son, and my buddy is like the nicest guy in the world, anyone that meets him likes him. His wife decided to join the LDS after they were married for about 10 years. He tried to go along with it but just couldn't buy into it. So now he has missed the wedding for his only son.

1 2 7 8 9 11 13 14 15 24 25