Did I say that? No.

But, everyone in the intelligence agency believed he had WMD and was hiding banned items (which he was with illegal missiles and such). And, he was financing terror by sending $25,000 to families of martyred suicide bombers in the Palestinian territories (that money I doubt got into the hands of families, more likely got in Hamas' hands).

If you need a reason why we didn't attack Saudi Arabia you are not adept at international affairs. Think in reality, not in the fantasy world.

Ukraine is strong! lol, great scene from Seinfeld

Isn't the Ukrainian government really corrupt? I remember reading a piece where it said like George Soros practically 'owns' the government. He bought a seat in it.

So, you can only attack people who have attacked you first? Are those the new rules? You must wait for death and destruction on the population you swore to defend before defending yourself against it?

The "I'm With Stupid" Bible, a very odd version I must admit...lol

Yeah, I read that somewhere as well. I studied German-American history extensively because I have a German-American heritage. My family came here from Germany in 1748. And, I live in Pennsylvania, a state where many people in my area can speak Pennsylvanian German as well. Everything in this area was done in German until English became the official language of the governments and markets. Everyone converted to English to adapt and flourish, schools were the first to do so.

Everyone should learn English in the US and that be that. Yes, learning another language will broaden your vocabulary and allow you to travel to a country WHERE IT IS THE NATIONAL LANGUAGE AND THE MAJORITY SPOKEN and use it there.

However, to suggest that parents SHOULD make sure their children learn a second language is ridiculous. Why not make the monopoly public education system do it better? They are doing a marvelous job with all other forms of education they should be able to do such a great job teaching languages as well.

Obama said something like:

"Immigrants will learn English, but parents SUOULD make sure their children speaks a second language."

Immigrants will? Yeah, the smart ones.

English is the national language, even if it doesn't have the formal title of being so.

There is only truth in my last post. Unless you have something to dismiss it, to simply suggest you do without proof, is propaganda on your own part. You are no different than the evil Bush and NeoCons that you claim to do the same exact thing you just did. Just like when you claimed you knew the truth about Afghanistan and knew more than Steve Coll and blasted the Pulitzer Prize, which is given to top professionals in fields for their work by Columbia University.

His assets were not contained though and we were not sure that he was disarmed with WMD. You know darn well that the UN officials were getting kickbacks from Saddam. They were getting rich off the Oil for Food program, as was Saddam, while the people of Iraq were being kept void of the food and supplies. In the meantime Saddam's sons, instead of dispensing food and goods to the people were raping, pillaging, and torturing citizens for the pure pleasure of it. The one video I saw, his son's men having a blast throwing people off rooftops.

UN members, just like UN peacekeepers in Africa raping women and children leaving bastard children behind, were doing the same thing in Iraq but this was for monetary profit. They were essentially raping the people of Iraq. They would also ship in BANNED supplies to Iraq. And Russia, was in Iraq immediately prior to our invasion doing who knows what, but there is strong reason to believe they were doing shady trade dealing and other such things.

We went in because of WMD, all evidence said it was there, but it suddenly wasn't. When the bet is 100 to 1 would you not take the odds? The odds all pointed to it being a sure thing he had WMD. Now, he did have banned items, but it was not linked to WMD, but it was on the banned list. He, as well, did have missiles that were from the '90s, and obviously compiled after the first Gulf War, but they were missiles that had nothing to put on them. Had he the WMD it would be a different story for those banned missiles he had.

He was still sending 20k to families of suicide bombers in the Palestinian territories. And, he was sending money all over the place, I wonder where all his funding went. I'm sure Hamas got a good penny ontop of the families of suicide bombers.

So, in other words yes, you have no problem with a foreign government firing on US pilots. Good one.

I hope that is true, for some reason my Mutual Fund is on the heavy slide for over a year now thanks in great part due to the decline in the stock of Exxon. You'd think with all that stolen oil the Exxon stock would be going through the roof.

So, a foreign country firing on another, breaking yet another UN Resolution that allowed a tyrannical dictator to remain in power, is not an act of war anymore?

Should we have waited until a pilot had gotten shot down, or only if that pilot had gotten shot down and killed?

Weed smokers are supposedly more docile. They themselves use this to show that it is a safe, calming drug. But, isn't that exactly what the government would want you to be, a much more docile populace?

So, in other words, you don't have any. I want just one piece of evidence where John Kerry has made Bush's terrorist list.

That logic is flawed. Religion is an internal belief that one discovers, just like their views of the world and what is right and wrong. Everything is intertwined. Religion is no different from morality that one gains by experience than one learns by studying a religions beliefs. Not all Christians are strict followers of Christianity as not all atheists are strict followers of everything 'non-Christian'. You are painting Christians like mindless zombies stricken to a set rule of laws that they cannot interpret what they can support and not support based on their core values.

You know what, I'm getting INCREDIBLY tired of those anti-smoking commericals on TV. They are getting incredibly annoying, so much so I can't wait until they make a commercial where a guy is smoking and they have all the actors or maybe the cute animated babies and bunnies falling around dead around him and then horns pop out of the guys head. It is getting quite ridiculous.

As proven by what evidence?

What? Because a Christian does not believe in same-sex unions and abortions they are evil? Like pure evil? What? Wow, and what do you suppose we do to these evil Christians, huh?

That is an incredibly ignorant statement.

Communism by ideology is not necessarily evil as well. Those that live and die by the doctrine of communism are though for it is a highly flawed ideology that does not work with humanity for evil turns it into a brutal regime.

Same with Islamists, tyrants, nationalists, and billionaire socialists (which is the oddest thing, "Socialism is totalitarianism with a human face" - Thomas Sowell)

NeoCons are not necessarily evil by definition, nor are Zionists. Just because you disagree with them does not mean they are immediately evil.

The political ideology of Neoconservativism has no 'evil' intent in it. It is the people of Neoconservatism that can be evil, but not the ideology.

And, a Zionist, by definition, is anyone who supports a State of Israel. So, that would mean all Israelis are evil and all those that support a Jewish state are evil?