http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbOVtcSUVjI&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpprOGsLWUo

Unprovoked war is Anti-American!

Peace Brother!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiNHe7BUqhc&feature=related

Thats true and irag is that war.

A friend, Gypsy turned me on to this video. It has to be one of the most thought provoking Videos Ive ever watched!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oegoI80t6WE&feature=related

I thought you did a special thread (which is not allowed according to forum rules) saying goodby?

Firing on US and British jets = what? I suppose they accidentally leaned on the wrong button.

Good training for the pilots and suicide for the person doing the shooting.
In the end, one less air-defense system, 4100 less American dead, and lord knows how many less Iraqi dead (men, women, and children)!!

So, a foreign country firing on another, breaking yet another UN Resolution that allowed a tyrannical dictator to remain in power, is not an act of war anymore?

Should we have waited until a pilot had gotten shot down, or only if that pilot had gotten shot down and killed?

1991-2003-0 dead pilots
How many dead American since then!

So, in other words yes, you have no problem with a foreign government firing on US pilots. Good one.

Not the way they did it.
No success!
And if you want to get it to it deep, it was illegal and a violation of the seize fire we signed at the end of the Gulf War!
The success the Iraqi's enjoyed shooting at our aircraft, Zero, only proves that Saddam was incapable of being a threat to his neighbors.
If I'm remember right this was what all the military advisers said to Bush when they told him Saddam was contained and there was no reason to invade!

It was good training for our pilots, and there are more deaths among US troops in one year resulting from peace-time training than the iraqis were able to cause in the ten years they tried!

Kind of a ridiculous argument when you consider the 4000 plus killed by Bush's illegal war!

Of course it doesnt matter in a game played by an armchair General sitting on his ass safe and sound in the good ole US of A!

His assets were not contained though and we were not sure that he was disarmed with WMD. You know darn well that the UN officials were getting kickbacks from Saddam. They were getting rich off the Oil for Food program, as was Saddam, while the people of Iraq were being kept void of the food and supplies. In the meantime Saddam's sons, instead of dispensing food and goods to the people were raping, pillaging, and torturing citizens for the pure pleasure of it. The one video I saw, his son's men having a blast throwing people off rooftops.

UN members, just like UN peacekeepers in Africa raping women and children leaving bastard children behind, were doing the same thing in Iraq but this was for monetary profit. They were essentially raping the people of Iraq. They would also ship in BANNED supplies to Iraq. And Russia, was in Iraq immediately prior to our invasion doing who knows what, but there is strong reason to believe they were doing shady trade dealing and other such things.

We went in because of WMD, all evidence said it was there, but it suddenly wasn't. When the bet is 100 to 1 would you not take the odds? The odds all pointed to it being a sure thing he had WMD. Now, he did have banned items, but it was not linked to WMD, but it was on the banned list. He, as well, did have missiles that were from the '90s, and obviously compiled after the first Gulf War, but they were missiles that had nothing to put on them. Had he the WMD it would be a different story for those banned missiles he had.

He was still sending 20k to families of suicide bombers in the Palestinian territories. And, he was sending money all over the place, I wonder where all his funding went. I'm sure Hamas got a good penny ontop of the families of suicide bombers.

Im through!
You ignore the facts and Im tired of showing them over and over to someone intent on only believing Bush Propaganda!
When you are ready to acknowledge any truth or facts Let me know!

There is only truth in my last post. Unless you have something to dismiss it, to simply suggest you do without proof, is propaganda on your own part. You are no different than the evil Bush and NeoCons that you claim to do the same exact thing you just did. Just like when you claimed you knew the truth about Afghanistan and knew more than Steve Coll and blasted the Pulitzer Prize, which is given to top professionals in fields for their work by Columbia University.