Nope.

I'll say no more.

..God laughed and said:

"Who cares what Funches thinks. He's a tool, a troll, and a robot zombie. Just chuckle and walk away. The argument is pointless, and you are wasting time that could be spent chasing females."

..and know what?

I agree so..

Hahahahaha..

*walks away*

Cowboy...are you saying that you heard God's voice and it told you that he knows that he exist?

How can someone/something not know they exist?

right...that why you don't have to "believe" that you exist...because that would imply "doubt"

but anyway enough of that...I just needed you and Sin_and_Sorrow to argue my point to "MorningSong" how Faith pertaining to God only fits into the psychology section of science

Finally.

I can finally see where you stand and what side of the fence you are on, Funches.

Just a flat-out atheist.

Bout time you took a side.
Now we can put aside these ridiculous arguments..

Man.

nope...just sticking to the topic of the thread...you always argue my points for well for me...thanks

I'm pretty sure the Pharisees thought Jesus to be a Troll...perhaps If i keep being a troll like Jesus I can get to sit on the left hand side of God

Let's see.

1. Always referring to God through 'playful' analogies; robot zombies, three-heads, etc. Proves you are not of religious values.

No religious person who ridicule God in any form.

2. IMO; always countering everything with 'science' yet never 'stating' your own belief, that pushes more towards atheist than Agnostic.

Of course, I could be wrong on the second, but definitely not the first.

3. Numerous times you have nudged towards the idea, we 'exist out of coincidence'. As far as I know, this is a straight atheist frame of mind, because agnostics believe in something, they just don't always call it 'God'.

So, through this 'logic' and 'reasoning' I've assessed you'd be more towards atheist than anything due to your own arguments and reasoning.

Not true though.

If someone didn't believe they existed, they wouldn't know they existed. If someone believed they exist, they know they exist. And so forth.

Knowing and believing are the exact same thing.

the fact that Peter nor any of the apostles ever walked on water only proves they none of them ever had complete Faith in God

And point being?

that "the walking on water incident" of Peter was not about having Faith in God

That is the reason he started to sink. He started to doubt God and or doubt him staying on top of the water as Jesus did.

and again it goes back to Peter having to be a robot zombie with a mind that never have doubts or wavers in order to walk on water

Peter was not a zombie.

When you put a rock in water it sinks.

Peter needed a lesson so Allah gave him a 'gibbs' slap.

Peter beleived that Jesus was God.

When he found himself in the Water he looked again to Jesus and realised that only His Faith would keep him dry.

When he did as Jesus did and placed his faith in the Father.

Allah simply reminded him that Jesus was his guide.

By baptising him for his lack of focus.

Reality exists because you have faith that it does.
So much faith, in fact, that you stated it as a fact.

It is not God who puts rocks in the path.

..seriously.

Just reading the last like four posts..
..my brain exploded.

All this prophetic mumbo jumbo..

GAH!

x.x

and this is why religious Faith has nothing to do with science and why there are no such things as Miracles or "Free Will"......because everything is done by intervention from a God

Peter could only walk on the water if he didn't have doubts about God so in turn God would not allow him to walk on water...

which is why for Peter to be able to walk on water would require Peter to have the mind of a Stepford wife or a robot zombie..or what is known as "Blind Faith"