..so, basically..

Most-to-all the Christians we know are complete and total ******** morons, because none of them read/pursue the Hebrew heritage of the Bible; therefore, making them totally delusional, moronic, and gullible.

Least, that's what I'm getting from the fact you keep putting this statement out there..

..as if it held any value considering we speak of the general census.

Interesting.

*continues on his journey through the threads*

Pre-Jesus days; and it seemed God's main focus revolved around 'his people'. It seemed that God paid little mind to the other civilizations who feared more in boogeymen than actual Gods and thus, he didn't deem there worship 'blasphemous' but more 'misguided'.

However, at the same time, those 'western cultures' were very dense and superstitious so who are we, 30 some thousand years later, to say that the 'God' they worshiped wasn't the same and like most religions, just referred to him by a different name? Different principles, same overall concept?

One reason that this could, possibly, be viable lies in language. God spoke the language of the East, not the West; therefore, even if he did speak to them, they'd be next to oblivious as to what he said outside of his 'magic acts'.

As far as I know, also, those westerners, although not affected by plagues, floods, and other ideals of voodoo, did suffer their own sorts of 'unknown' tragedies.

One other interesting idea you could take in to consideration is.

Indians didn't seem to suffer much from 'diseases' until the white man showed up; aka, the 'sinners' as proclaimed by 'Jesus' because they were 'tainted' etc.

..maybe, to justify the 'inactivity' or lack of influence on these people was simply put.. they had it right?

Or, putting it more simply:

Easterners - descendants of Cain
Westerners - descendants of Abel

See what I'm saying?

..then again, I just invented a whole clause of possibilities and I've no clue if any are truly valid; but ultimately they are still 'possibilities' IF the bible holds any true validity.

riiiiiight?So he creates people just some are considered his people....i'm trying to keep from laughing it ain't working.

While I would never have been so blunt or callous, I won't refute your statements...

I think that these few passages may shed some light on why I think this way: (NIV for your viewing pleasure...)


Matthew 24:10-11
New International Version (NIV)

10 At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other,
11 and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people.



Titus 1:10-11
New International Version (NIV)

10 For there are many rebellious people, full of meaningless talk and deception, especially those of the circumcision group.
11 They must be silenced, because they are disrupting whole households by teaching things they ought not to teach—and that for the sake of dishonest gain.

..hey, I'm not criticizing.

I'm just pointing out..
..that it totally explains why I have, at times, trouble figuring out where you are actually coming from.

..and I figured instead of using theatrics, I'd just be blunt, lol.

Either way, now it makes sense.

Where I am coming from is quite simple.

I don't want you to believe me, I want you to do the research yourself. It's much more convincing when someone "discovers" these things on their own... Need a hint? Ask...


I must commend you too. You are the ONLY Bible detractor who has ever shown any evidence of understanding and a willingness to "debate" with me. I am sooo used to the standard evilbible.com rants and the "no need to show proof" response.

LOL, a little nonsense now and then is cherished by the wisest of men!

Yup, I smell a bromance!


lol