Community > General Religion Chat

Previous 1 2 … 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next

Topic: Why we Shouldnt have Faith In Science
Krimsa Joined Fri 04/25/08 Posts: 9960	Mon 09/29/08 04:14 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all.

Redykeulous Joined Thu 11/09/06 Posts: 6052	Mon 09/29/08 07:58 PM
Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. Funniest think I've read in a long time. I read it three times and couln't stop laughing. VERY GOOD KRIMSA!

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Mon 09/29/08 08:12 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. long ago people thought that rabbits or hares chewd the cud, it is now known they do not making the cotton tail rabbit anyway, a clean food.

SkyHook5652 Joined Sat 08/23/08 Posts: 4063	Mon 09/29/08 08:18 PM Edited by SkyHook5652 on Mon 09/29/08 08:22 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. long ago people thought that rabbits or hares chewd the cud, it is now known they do not making the cotton tail rabbit anyway, a clean food. Which would seem to indicate that either 1)God did not know that rabbits do not chew their cud, or 2)That particular passage of the bible was not "inspired by god" - which gives rise to the question: What else in the bible was not inspired by god? [edit: Or 3) That god did inspire that passage but decided to lie for some reason - which gives rise to the same basic question: What else might he have lied about?]

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Mon 09/29/08 08:26 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. long ago people thought that rabbits or hares chewd the cud, it is now known they do not making the cotton tail rabbit anyway, a clean food. Which would seem to indicate that either 1)God did not know that rabbits do not chew their cud, or 2)That particular passage of the bible was not "inspired by god" - which gives rise to the question: What else in the bible was not inspired by god? [edit: Or that god did inspire that passage but decided to lie for some reason - which gives rise to the same basic question: What else might he have lied about?] It was erroneously thought by the ancient Jews to have chewed the cud. They were no doubt misled by the habit these animals have of moving the jaw about. These are food laws for good health. not obeying them are not a sin to hell anyway, a sin against your body maybe, God made us and the food laws are a way of keeping our bodies healthy. The main point being, don't eat scavengers, they will make you sick in the long run.

MorningSong Joined Mon 02/11/08 Posts: 4505	Mon 09/29/08 08:26 PM
http://www.comereason.org/bibl_cntr/con055.asp http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/rabbits.asp

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Mon 09/29/08 08:26 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. long ago people thought that rabbits or hares chewd the cud, it is now known they do not making the cotton tail rabbit anyway, a clean food. Which would seem to indicate that either 1)God did not know that rabbits do not chew their cud, or 2)That particular passage of the bible was not "inspired by god" - which gives rise to the question: What else in the bible was not inspired by god? [edit: Or 3) That god did inspire that passage but decided to lie for some reason - which gives rise to the same basic question: What else might he have lied about?] God knew, the people of that time didn't

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Mon 09/29/08 08:32 PM Edited by SharpShooter10 on Mon 09/29/08 08:56 PM
http://www.comereason.org/bibl_cntr/con055.asp http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/rabbits.asp [/quote

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Mon 09/29/08 08:40 PM Edited by SharpShooter10 on Mon 09/29/08 08:48 PM
http://www.comereason.org/bibl_cntr/con055.asp http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/rabbits.asp NT says all foods are now clean, but if you follow the object and subject and read a few verses above, it says All Foods that God gave to be recieved, he did not give scavengers and certain animals to be recieved But I choose not to eat rabbit because while they may not bring anything up as Krimsa stated, they do eat their own dung. yuck, they don't bring it up and re chew like a cow, instead it passes through and they eat it to get the nutrients

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Mon 09/29/08 08:42 PM
http://www.comereason.org/bibl_cntr/con055.asp http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/rabbits.asp Interesting sites

Belushi Joined Sat 04/07/07 Posts: 2995	Mon 09/29/08 08:54 PM
Belushi...when I mentioned that muslims say the Name Jesus in their own language, I was referring to born again muslims, who are accepting Jesus as not only a prophet, but as their own personal Saviour too..and yes, many are coming to Christ. BUT my point in my earlier post was...these born again muslims are saying the Name of Jesus in their OWN native Language, and NOT in the English language....and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. Where do you get the information from, that there are "born-again" muslims?

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Mon 09/29/08 08:58 PM
probably meant muslims that converted to christianity, not sure, still trying to read and catch up on all this, been a few days since i was online.

Belushi Joined Sat 04/07/07 Posts: 2995	Mon 09/29/08 08:59 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. Here's another thing that god didnt know about ... Bats are not birds! LEV 11:13 And these are they which ye shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray, LEV 11:14 And the vulture, and the kite after his kind; LEV 11:15 Every raven after his kind; LEV 11:16 And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind, LEV 11:17 And the little owl, and the cormorant, and the great owl, LEV 11:18 And the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle, LEV 11:19 And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat. DEU 14:11 Of all clean birds ye shall eat. DEU 14:12 But these are they of which ye shall not eat: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray, DEU 14:13 And the glede, and the kite, and the vulture after his kind, DEU 14:14 And every raven after his kind, DEU 14:15 And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind, DEU 14:16 The little owl, and the great owl, and the swan, DEU 14:17 And the pelican, and the gier eagle, and the cormorant, DEU 14:18 And the stork, and the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat. Insects do NOT have four feet LEV 11:21 Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth; LEV 11:22 Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind. LEV 11:23 But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you. Snails do not melt PSA 58:8 As a snail which melteth, let every one of them pass away: like the untimely birth of a woman, that they may not see the sun. Odd genetic engineering GEN 30:39 And the flocks conceived before the rods, and brought forth cattle ringstraked, speckled, and spotted. Is god sub-contracting this stuff out and the "subbie" is not following the plan. Dayyyum!! Dont you hate with a plan falls apart?

SkyHook5652 Joined Sat 08/23/08 Posts: 4063	Mon 09/29/08 09:08 PM
I stand corrected.

Krimsa Joined Fri 04/25/08 Posts: 9960	Mon 09/29/08 09:11 PM Edited by Krimsa on Mon 09/29/08 09:16 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. long ago people thought that rabbits or hares chewd the cud, it is now known they do not making the cotton tail rabbit anyway, a clean food. Huh, you dont say? I thought these "divinely inspired" folks would be able to get it right but I guess not. Oh well. I wonder if there are any other points they are confused on like referring to the moon as " the lesser light." The moon is not a light by the way. The OT is part of the bible otherwise it would not have been included. They were pretty darn picky about who's "divine inspiration" was more credible so they must have just chosen unwisely I guess?

Krimsa Joined Fri 04/25/08 Posts: 9960	Mon 09/29/08 09:29 PM Edited by Krimsa on Mon 09/29/08 09:31 PM
http://www.comereason.org/bibl_cntr/con055.asp http://www.answersingenesis.org/creation/v20/i4/rabbits.asp NT says all foods are now clean, but if you follow the object and subject and read a few verses above, it says All Foods that God gave to be recieved, he did not give scavengers and certain animals to be recieved But I choose not to eat rabbit because while they may not bring anything up as Krimsa stated, they do eat their own dung. yuck, they don't bring it up and re chew like a cow, instead it passes through and they eat it to get the nutrients Rabbit is considered a delicacy now and is sold generally in the $25 a plate range in fancy pants restaurants. I sell them to a meat supplier. Im breeding particular types of domesticated rabbits that are larger and designed for human or animal consumption however. Wild hares are skinny but some people prefer their gamy flavor. Either way, they dont chew their cuds. They nibble and swallow.

quiet_2008 Joined Sat 08/30/08 Posts: 11138	Mon 09/29/08 09:43 PM
mmmmmm rabbit I just walk outside and shoot em. they are every where. but not the jack rabbits, they are really tough and stringy

Krimsa Joined Fri 04/25/08 Posts: 9960	Mon 09/29/08 09:48 PM
mmmmmm rabbit I just walk outside and shoot em. they are every where. but not the jack rabbits, they are really tough and stringy Yeah I like it. It has caught back on in popularity because its extremely lean, white meat so people that are health conscious prefer it to fowl. Also, those who raw feed their animals like it. Dogs and cats. Dogs seem to take to rabbit instinctively probably due to their wolf origins.

Krimsa Joined Fri 04/25/08 Posts: 9960	Mon 09/29/08 11:10 PM
This one caught my eye because I raise rabbits. Leviticus 11:6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you. Rabbits do not bring up anything; they let it go all the way through, then eat it again. This description given in Leviticus is inaccurate, and that's that. Rabbits do not bring anything up and chew on it.There is no "cheweth of the cud" taking place here at all. long ago people thought that rabbits or hares chewd the cud, it is now known they do not making the cotton tail rabbit anyway, a clean food. Which would seem to indicate that either 1)God did not know that rabbits do not chew their cud, or 2)That particular passage of the bible was not "inspired by god" - which gives rise to the question: What else in the bible was not inspired by god? [edit: Or 3) That god did inspire that passage but decided to lie for some reason - which gives rise to the same basic question: What else might he have lied about?] God knew, the people of that time didn't Oh, whats the point of being "divinely inspired" then? Arent you supposed to know what god knows in those moments and that is why you are writing this stuff down? So in fact most all of these writings are what men's perceptions were at the time and not actually anything to do with god? Oh. Why is it called the bible then and so much fuss made over it?

SharpShooter10 Joined Tue 11/20/07 Posts: 11271	Tue 09/30/08 12:18 AM
I may have been wrong on the rabbit thing, may still be considered unclean, not important enough for me to read up on it very much.