if she had control of her body, then she would not get pregnant.
as far as I know it still takes 2 people to make a child.. even if is came from a test tube.
part of having free will and making choices is living with them after words. life is a verry precious thing.
ablack man dies from a white cop pressing too hard on his back. and the world goes into an outrage.
A white doctor that aborts 200 or more black lives a year, before they can even take a breath. so their mothers dont have to accept the results of the choices they made. gets praised. (sorry just a point of comparison of social values nothing more ).

it's a hot topic ,and one not easily answered. it is up to the woman, and her doctor. the father has no rights.
the mother dont even have to tell him. either way. she chooses, it is something she has to live with.. that is why so many women find they cant, and kill them selves afterwords.

if R V W gets overturned, all that happens is it becomes a state issue and it will no longer be a federal one.
their right to end a pregnancy wont be taken from them.

sorry double posted.

my personal statement was based on our past conversations blondie, , and I was not speaking for you, I was sharing what I knew we had discussed.
you state you have no evidence that the CDC lied (or them admitting to lying) to us about the effectiveness of masking.
but, here try attempt to deflect the current discussion, by using the exact excuse they gave for lying.
to protect the supply of N95 masks availability for the first responders and medical PPE.


to your question: yes,, here in America, we do have manufacturing base for N-95 masks, and when the demand hit, there was a drop off in supply.
but we as a nation quickly responded(so did Canada).
those all ready making them, expanded their manufacturing.
companies that also had similar manufacturing (such as making industrial hepa filters) adapted some of their manufacturing to meet the needs.
in less then 6 months, I could go into most any store and buy multiple styles of N-95 rated masks. that was about the same time the first lock downs here were lifted.

as for my self personally, I had no problems .
because, I had an added advantage, being in the line of work I am in.
I had a stock pile of masks and respirator filters. rated much higher then N 95, for hazmat protection (chemicals biologicals) around the properties. I believe in keeping my emergency supplies well stocked.

something that many of our local hospitals did not do was re stock after the last major flu outbreak. so when covid hit, they were not properly stocked. so they rushed to resupply. and over taxed the existing production base at that time.. but as I said it did not take them long to adapt. and because of the CDC saying that even an open face sheilds or bandana could protect people going out in public. soon the domestic supplies of n-95 masks were verry high. the yet the CDC sat on telling people that they should be wearing N-95 masks for over a year, while also canceling other groups that were trying to get the word out to wear them.
it was not until a couple months ago that the CDC admitted this to the public while encouraging those who are at high risk to now use the N-95 masks. at which time I shared some of the medical communities responses to it. do you remember that??

people with multiple health risks that were all ready verry sick died with omicron. the CDC admitted there are no reported deaths from omicron thus far.
you as a medical professional know the difference between dying with an illness and dying from an illness, I showed you their internal reports on delta also. where they admitted those death counts were also inflated. because in most cases, while they might have had delta,
the direct cause of their deaths was one of their multiple pre existing health conditions. That they were all ready being treated for.

sorry blondie, but it is also disrespectful to feign ignorance by pretending that I dont know you were informed .
I personally showed you confessions from the CDC's own reports admitting that they lied to the public about what face coverings were safe, and that people were not only being told ,by them, to use un safe face coverings , but that most people were using them incorrectly that further caused other illnesses that likely quickened the spread of the virus.. some weeks ago.
and here you are still supporting forcing people to mask up. knowing the results of those reports.

so what I said was not based on ignorance of what you know. it' just based on what you seem to choose not to accept after being showed the truth.

it was you and your reactions to information I shared with you. that formed my comments.
and you entered into this topic of conversation willingly.
you keep bring up being a health professional like it is some sort of shield against being wrong.
yours is an opinion like any one else's.
and as I have shown there are a great many health science professionals that dont agree with you. sorry, it is not disrespectful to disagree with you. nor to point out why.
you might not like it, just as I dont like it when it happens to me. but it is the risk we take when we choose to engage in an open forum.

that would fall under other animals ;-). LOL but I cant eat it... allergic to pork.

biden swore an oath of loyalty to this country in which he swore to uphold and defend the constitution.
he then started undermining peoples ability to communicate information that he disapproved of regarding his son, hunter, and his extended family,.
calling it mis information. that has since been proven factual.
he also attempted to cancel news during the covid outbreak, that could have saved more lives, if it was widely known.
(N 95 masks being the lowest rated masks that could have slowed the spread of the virus.
the injections would not prevent those having them from spreading it.
nor keep them from getting it. ect..) and that is just part of a single attack against the first amendment.
he has now authorized a governance board to silence "mis information and punish those that would spread it.
he has also made moves against the nations free commerce (also protected by the constitution) by restricting energy production ( oil, natural gas and coal).
as well as lock downs on production, transportation, and sales of product. that is now threatening to put us back into a recession,
while inflation keeps growing out of control.

and he is allowing an invasion of our southern boarder. as millions of foreign nationals continue to flow into our country un checked, and are even being shipped to other states, by his administration. rather than be sent back to their home countries.

this includes un attended minors that are smuggled across the boarder with only a name and address on a piece of paper( where is the out rage about human trafficking of minors, by our own government??).

by not acting in this countries best interests, but his own political agenda. he is putting us at risk.
and once upon a time it would be considered a subversive act of betrayal of his oath of office.
so call it what you want.

first off, this is not anything but an internal discussion at this point. that has been leaked to the media.
second it would only remove it out of the federal governments control, and put it in control of the states.
third it would not out law abortions. if people want to end a pregnancy. they will still be allowed to do so, under STATE LAWS.

once upon a time.. this would have been considered treason against the country and the constitution.

I dont know either, I cook with butter, or use an air frier I also use the fat from chicken and the other animals I cook as it has more flavor.

so now they are talking about suspending the first amendment, guaranteeing the right of free speech and the ability to speak out against the government, if we disagree with it??
using the dept of home land security to create a dis-information board.
I cant wait to see the fall out over this in the courts.

yah but thats just because of that blown nitro injected alcohol ram induction duel quad 454 big block sticking out of the hood of your car...

I have heard, that this is a good way to find yourself missing and never heard of again.
it is best not to do this, but if you do, make sure you know the person you travel with . dont go with some one you met on the internet.

I heard today that bidens freaking out about his concerns about mis information getting out and spread more easily.
you know like all that mis-information that got cancelled during the pandemic and the election, that turned out to have been true and later reported accurate by those who were canceling it as mis information in the first place??
hunters lap top, cutting domestic energy production, (the green new deal) most hospitalizations & deaths were because of pre existing conditions not covid it's self, people in accidents being counted as covid cases , ect...
it will be good to see twitter used the way it was suppose to be used as an uncensored free exchange of information.

you know, for some people it is harder to trust one of the most trusted scientific organizations on the planet, then it is to trust the CDC, and other government organizations, who have admitted to lying to us from the start. and shown proof of their own deceit to the public.

blondie knows about them lying about the effectiveness of masking, but she's still willing to fall on their sword to protect wearing them.

honestly I dont get the back lash. no one is saying people can not wear masks if they wish.
they are only no longer forcing you to do so.
if you dont.

How clean is the air on airplanes?
In simple terms, the air you breathe on a plane is almost certainly cleaner than the stuff you’d be breathing indoors on land. It may not be as pure as getting out to nature, but it’s better than the air you breathe in coffee shops, movie theaters or grocery stores.

This is as a result of the efficient air circulation systems and HEPA filters that are found on the majority of modern commercial flights.

According to National Geographic, 40% of the cabin’s air is recycled through this system while 60% is taken from outside. On most planes, the air in the cabin is completely replaced every three minutes.

What does HEPA stand for?
HEPA stands for High Efficiency Particulate Air and is a common type of filter used on planes.

What HEPA filters do, essentially, is to remove any impurities in the air, no matter how small. A New York Times report and this NASA study show that this includes tiny COVID-19 microns.

In fact, according to NASA research, HEPA filters remove impurities of COVID size with 99.97% efficiency.

How clean is the air on airplanes?
In simple terms, the air you breathe on a plane is almost certainly cleaner than the stuff you’d be breathing indoors on land. It may not be as pure as getting out to nature, but it’s better than the air you breathe in coffee shops, movie theaters or grocery stores.

This is as a result of the efficient air circulation systems and HEPA filters that are found on the majority of modern commercial flights.

According to National Geographic, 40% of the cabin’s air is recycled through this system while 60% is taken from outside. On most planes, the air in the cabin is completely replaced every three minutes.

What does HEPA stand for?
HEPA stands for High Efficiency Particulate Air and is a common type of filter used on planes.

What HEPA filters do, essentially, is to remove any impurities in the air, no matter how small. A New York Times report and this NASA study show that this includes tiny COVID-19 microns.

In fact, according to NASA research, HEPA filters remove impurities of COVID size with 99.97% efficiency.

blondie, in a mixed class of students while going to JR high school(male/female) we were shown films on genitalia including frank discussions of oral and physical sex. this lasted 3 days before parents reacted shut it down. as being in appropriate content. the state of california was sued over it. and it was removed from the curriculum as being to involved with the sexual practice, and over stepping the established guidelines of responsible health education.
(in layman's terms, it was considered too pornographic to be taught in public schools).
and this was back in 1981.

porn is by literal translation is the public display of nudity or sexuality that may result in the state of sexual arousal or exploitation, of those viewing it.
in the right context, a woman eating an ice cream cone can be considered pornographic. even if she's fully clothed.
just the basic strait exposure to children about their bodies "sexually" starting at kinder garden, is morally corrupt. children do not need to be exposed to that.
and any saine person who is not a deviant should know the right and wrong of exposing them it.
if that sounds judgmental.
imagine the confusion of being a 5-7 year old and being asked if you ever think you might be a member of the opposite sex and that it would be OK to think that way.
when your just beginning to learn what " your just being a boy or girl really means" in terms of being different.

double posted. sorry

they do what they did befor, learn.
they learn life skills from birth, and continue learning them till death, the only thing stopping them from being qualified in other ventures, is not having tried them,
teachers can stand against this in a united front, and use their unions
( thay are suppose to defend their interests. not the states). to refuse to allow this into their class rooms, in any case they do have a choice in what they teach, if they have the courage to make the stand.