I've been thinking about this myself. It seems to me that there would be far more responsibility involved if we can affect the reality of others than there would be if we couldn't.

So from my point of view we would be relieved from a lot of responsiblity by beliving that everyone is 100% responsible for their own reality. That would mean that there would be nothing we could do to adversely affect someone else's reality. That would be a great relief actually.

As it is now, I'm under the delusion that my actions can affect other people's reality, and that's a DEEP responsiblity!




You should say goodbye to Mirror first, or at least give him a project to work on whilst you're gone.

Well actually, I guess this thought stems from my delusional belief that we do indeed affect other people's realities.

I can't help it. I was brought up to believe this and it seems to still be true today.

I may never be able to get past this view.

I sent mirror a message.

You're such a nice gal.

will someone finally pass the darn mashed potatoes!

good to see some compromises again

JB and Abra always end up making up. I love them both.

Thank you HWC,

It's always nice to know that I may not be as delusional as I think.

- - - - - - - - - ? - - - - - - - -

... on the other hand, I may be delusional myself -- thinking that you aren't! LOL! ! !

What is interesting to me is how this understanding of origination does the same thing.

Buddhism tries to get us to understand how our emotions effect ourselves, which in turn effects our behaviors, which is turn effect other people's emotions which in turn effect their behaviors.

When we can analyze the origination of our emotions and then determine how that effects our actions, we get to then choose whether that action, if that behavior is going to help or hurt us and those around us.

Traffic is a great example. Traffic is a community of actions where each person contributes to the harmony of the community.

There needs be no universal law of attraction for us to see how emotion effects behavior and how that starts a chain reaction. We see it every day in traffic.

I would like to know whose Laws are these? Whose Laws are you keeping? Who governs your life? Who are you asking these things for and what is his/her name? Why should they give you anything?

JeanniebeanJeanniebeanJeanniebeanJeanniebean and Jeanniebean

They are universal laws. They are our laws. They do not "belong" to science either. They are part of the program in this holographic mind matrix. They are the rules of the game we play in this universe.

You ask for a thing by thinking about it. This thought is recieved by the universal mind or subconscious. Wallace D. Wattles calls it "the thinking stuff."

You purposefully and consciously ask for a thing by visualizing it in your mind, by imagining it, intending it, thinking it into existence. This is a thought universe and you are a thinking center. Thought comes first, desire, intention and then action.

You govern your own life if you take responsibility for that. If you don't want to govern your own life there are others who will govern your life for you and even take care of you.

Who's 'mind' is this that we send our thoughts to? It is the collective mind of this living universe. Some call it God, but it is OUR COLLECTIVE MIND.

IT WORKED!I SAID HER NAME 5 TIMES AND SHE APPEARED!

Awwwwww.... wittel miwwow missed JB...



Hi JB!!!

Thoughts are things.

They do not "belong" to science because there is no evidence to support them.




Here we see that the Law of Attraction is not an absolute but only applies to those who accept responsility for using it. Those who don't accept it are appointed baby-sitters.

Just on a personal note, I have nothing againts this philosophy. I think it would be super great if it turns out to be true. It would relieve us from any an all responsibility toward other people since they have either taken control of their own reality or are being protected by guardian baby-sitters.

It would be a universe where there would be no need for responsiblity toward others. The only responsibility would be for accepting the creation of our OWN reality.

Clearly if we could have an affect on someone else's reality that would violate the "Law of Attraction" because they would no be attracting that affect.

If a "Law of Attraction" is in play in this universe then we have been completely freed from any responsiblity of how we interact with other people. We could not possibly affect them in ways that they did not attract. For to do so would violate the "Law of Attraction"

The presumption is that eveyone creates their OWN reality or that babysitters protect them until they are able to do so.

In the meantime, there is no room left for anyone to adversely affect anyone else's reality.

Thus if the "Law of Attraction" is true we have all been completely freed from any responsiblity toward each other. We can only be responsible for our OWN reality. We can have no affect on other people's reality becasue that would violate the LAW that they attract and create their OWN reality.

I personally don't see how this can work, but if it's true I think it's great. We can know that it would be impossible to adversely affect someone else's reality then, even if we WANTED to!

So it would be a universe where there was absolutely NO RESPONISBILITY required toward other beings. If I accidently hurt someone it can only be because they drew that into their reality.

In fact, theoretically, even if I hurt people on purpose it must be that they are attracting and creating that event. Otherwise it would be impossible for me to carry it out.

It seems like a universe where the is NO RESPONSIBILY whatsoever!

In some ways I guess that would be great. No one could be responsible for every hurting another person either intentionally nor unintentionally.

Each person creates their OWN reality via the Law of Attraction.

There would be no other options left without violating that LAW.

A universe of NO RESPONSIBLITY toward other beings whatsoever.

Yes, that would be nice!