Topic: has the "big bang theory" become a religious belief?
no photo
Mon 10/27/08 06:58 AM


Don't forget funches law

Paragraph 1:

funches is always right

Paragraph 2:

Should funches for some reason or other not be right, paragraph 1 applies automatically.

tongue2 waving


hi I, took note of that on the other post, if you do it on everyone maybe that will save some nubies from wasting there time - laugh


I well remember him from earlier times, that's why I'm so quiet in here, there is no point in saying anything.:laughing:

tribo's photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:01 AM



Don't forget funches law

Paragraph 1:

funches is always right

Paragraph 2:

Should funches for some reason or other not be right, paragraph 1 applies automatically.

tongue2 waving


hi I, took note of that on the other post, if you do it on everyone maybe that will save some nubies from wasting there time - laugh


I well remember him from earlier times, that's why I'm so quiet in here, there is no point in saying anything.:laughing:


aw c'mon - he can be fun when things get slow like now - laugh

adj4u's photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:05 AM
hey where did the stuff that banged together come from

insert head scratching emoticon here

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:14 AM





"RAISING" a child is a >duty<,[parentally] - loving a child or anything is an ""emotional"" involvement. i love my niece's and nephews, but i have no duty to them.


"Tribo" that's what I mean you form an emotional attachment but an emotional attachment takes time which means you have the time to choose if you want that attachment ..that's the same thing as building up an addiction


sorry - i should have used your words " it's greasy food beer watch a crappy sci-fi movie time now" i concidered pizza to be a greasy food that you maybe eating, evidentally it was one of numerous other greasy foods. :tongue:


pizza looks to weird to eat ...in fact it has the appearance that it already been eaten and barf back up




well if you like bread and you like spaghetti sauce on your speghetti and you like the types of meats and veggies that you can choose to use and you like cheese - then you would like pizza. i didn't like the look of lobster when i first saw it or shrimp either, but i grew up and tried it - you may not like how it' looks but the taste waaayyyyy makes up for it.

im through argeing over love, i have no love for it -


I never ate cheese before either ..or lobster because it look like a giant mutant cockroach


get over it funch, grow up, enjoy the finer taste in life. bigsmile


"Tribo" to partake in that type of activity I would be guilty of engaging in one of the deadly sins known as Gluttony

how can I remain pure as the driven snow if I was to participate in that

beside feasting on a Lobster that has big buggily eyes looking at you just seems unappetizing


tribo's photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:19 AM






"RAISING" a child is a >duty<,[parentally] - loving a child or anything is an ""emotional"" involvement. i love my niece's and nephews, but i have no duty to them.


"Tribo" that's what I mean you form an emotional attachment but an emotional attachment takes time which means you have the time to choose if you want that attachment ..that's the same thing as building up an addiction


sorry - i should have used your words " it's greasy food beer watch a crappy sci-fi movie time now" i concidered pizza to be a greasy food that you maybe eating, evidentally it was one of numerous other greasy foods. :tongue:


pizza looks to weird to eat ...in fact it has the appearance that it already been eaten and barf back up




well if you like bread and you like spaghetti sauce on your speghetti and you like the types of meats and veggies that you can choose to use and you like cheese - then you would like pizza. i didn't like the look of lobster when i first saw it or shrimp either, but i grew up and tried it - you may not like how it' looks but the taste waaayyyyy makes up for it.

im through argeing over love, i have no love for it -


I never ate cheese before either ..or lobster because it look like a giant mutant cockroach


get over it funch, grow up, enjoy the finer taste in life. bigsmile


"Tribo" to partake in that type of activity I would be guilty of engaging in one of the deadly sins known as Gluttony

how can I remain pure as the driven snow if I was to participate in that

beside feasting on a Lobster that has big buggily eyes looking at you just seems unappetizing




aw c'mon funch you can order lobster tails no head, or even just the meat, your missig out instead your a "glutton for grease" thats no good!!

Milesoftheusa's photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:24 AM
I prefer listening to the Big Bang song from the guy from American Idol myself. You can choose your own music to your ears.laugh Shalom...Miles

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:25 AM





funches please entreat me this question.

what is proof?

what does it take to prove something?





well "Bushidobillyclub" ..you supposedly took a math test the other day ..math is not about claiming belief as truth it's about facts ..and that is what I consider as proof

OK, so math can prove things, ok we are getting somewhere. Is math the only way to prove things?


well in fact ...yes ...couldn't everything in reality be calculated mathematically to an absolute ..I'm surprise since you just took a math test you didn't know that ....

You did not answer my question. Is math the only way to prove things?

No other ways? reason? observation? Math can model more things than you can shake a stick at. We can model universes where a big bang never occurred . . . that doesn't make it true. The math is essential.

Again what proves things? What is proof for you? What would it take to reasonable prove a theory such as the big bang?

What about germ theory? What about the theory of gravity?

or dare I say it the "E" word?


"bushidobillyclubs" I already given you that answer ...math proves everything ...observation can equate to delusion unless that which was observed can be prove beyond a theory or delusion

theories are no different than beliefs and neither should be regarded as being truth or fact

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:27 AM






funches please entreat me this question.

what is proof?

what does it take to prove something?





well "Bushidobillyclub" ..you supposedly took a math test the other day ..math is not about claiming belief as truth it's about facts ..and that is what I consider as proof

OK, so math can prove things, ok we are getting somewhere. Is math the only way to prove things?


well in fact ...yes ...couldn't everything in reality be calculated mathematically to an absolute ..I'm surprise since you just took a math test you didn't know that ....

You did not answer my question. Is math the only way to prove things?

No other ways? reason? observation? Math can model more things than you can shake a stick at. We can model universes where a big bang never occurred . . . that doesn't make it true. The math is essential.

Again what proves things? What is proof for you? What would it take to reasonably prove a theory such as the big bang?

What about germ theory? What about the theory of gravity?

or dare I say it the "E" word?


are you looking for human proof or "funch proofs"

there's a big difference! - :tongue:


"Tribo"...the quest for proof absolute is called funchism

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:35 AM

funch said:

"Tribo" that's what I mean you form an emotional attachment but an emotional attachment takes time which means you have the time to choose if you want that attachment ..that's the same thing as building up an addiction

tribo:

so you've gone from - craving, to duty, and now addiction? funch it's an emotion no more no less, prove to me by definition it is concidered by anyone else but you or those with like minds as yours that is other than i state - copy and paste if you like -

craving
duty
addiction

those are things that may be "connected" with love but are not ""love""!!


that's where you keep getting screwed up in your debates - you keep talking of things that surround or are attached to what you mean to say or state, instead of staying on target. it's like if we talked of diamond's you would argue about the facects or the color or the shape or the weight instead of the diamond itself - the core article of the debate. thats why it keeps going and going and going - :tongue: waving


"Tribo" ...your concept of Love is the result of your christian programming ...didn't you once upon a time when you were a christian claim to love God and/or Jesus ...so now that you are no longer a christian do you still love God and Jesus

wow I can't wait to hear your answer ..of course can you also apply a brief explanation

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:36 AM

It's like your core question:

has the "big bang theory" become a religious belief?

in a nut shell - no it has not!! end of discussion - :tongue:


ok "Tribo" wow...I guess we can all pack our bags turn off our computers and call it a day

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:42 AM

well "Skyhook" a Pantheist supposely worship a God or themselves as God...those that don't are not Pantheists
Thank you for giving me your definition of pantheist. My definition is different.


"Skyhook" you always say your definition is different...but oddly never submit a definition ..but anyway

your definition of a Pantheist is not different ...because if it is you wouldn't be describing a Pantheist ...

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:45 AM


well "Skyhook" a Pantheist supposely worship a God or themselves as God...those that don't are not Pantheists
Thank you for giving me your definition of pantheist. My definition is different.


laugh laugh Now why couldnt I have thought to handle it in that manner. happy


because "Krimsa" that's not debating

Krimsa's photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:50 AM
Edited by Krimsa on Mon 10/27/08 07:51 AM
Yeah but you dont actually debate funches, at least not the academically accepted form of debate that most of us are accustomed to. :tongue:

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:51 AM

Don't forget funches law

Paragraph 1:

funches is always right

Paragraph 2:

Should funches for some reason or other not be right, paragraph 1 applies automatically.

tongue2 waving


geez "Invisible" you post the same thing in this thread too? ....can't you just send secret e-mail and backstab me like everyone else does

to display your anger against me in public just makes you look bad

isn't your avatar that of a angel? ...well when I think about it I guess satan was also an angel

let the anger against me go my child ...don't you christians suppose to forgive or something

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:53 AM

well "Skyhook" a Pantheist supposely worship a God or themselves as God...those that don't are not Pantheists
Thank you for giving me your definition of pantheist. My definition is different.
laugh laugh Now why couldnt I have thought to handle it in that manner. happy
Oh I have no illusions that it is possible to "handle it" at all - other than by just walking away from it. I'm just poking at it to see it jump. :wink:


"Skyhook" you know your argument about manifestation was wrong now you're just trying to save face ...you give up to easy ..be like Krimsa she's a fighter

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 07:56 AM


Don't forget funches law

Paragraph 1:

funches is always right

Paragraph 2:

Should funches for some reason or other not be right, paragraph 1 applies automatically.

tongue2 waving


hi I, took note of that on the other post, if you do it on everyone maybe that will save some nubies from wasting there time - laugh


oh oh..."Invisible" have managed to activate "Tribo's" ex-communication program

tribo's photo
Mon 10/27/08 08:07 AM
Edited by tribo on Mon 10/27/08 08:09 AM


funch said:

"Tribo" that's what I mean you form an emotional attachment but an emotional attachment takes time which means you have the time to choose if you want that attachment ..that's the same thing as building up an addiction

tribo:

so you've gone from - craving, to duty, and now addiction? funch it's an emotion no more no less, prove to me by definition it is concidered by anyone else but you or those with like minds as yours that is other than i state - copy and paste if you like -

craving
duty
addiction

those are things that may be "connected" with love but are not ""love""!!


that's where you keep getting screwed up in your debates - you keep talking of things that surround or are attached to what you mean to say or state, instead of staying on target. it's like if we talked of diamond's you would argue about the facects or the color or the shape or the weight instead of the diamond itself - the core article of the debate. thats why it keeps going and going and going - :tongue: waving


"Tribo" ...your concept of Love is the result of your christian programming ...didn't you once upon a time when you were a christian claim to love God and/or Jesus ...so now that you are no longer a christian do you still love God and Jesus

wow I can't wait to hear your answer ..of course can you also apply a brief explanation



??? funch my friend - are you saying that only Christians have or express "love"????? or that only religious people do? are not atheist capable of love or agnostics? are vulcans not capable of love? even JB's dracos love each other. hmmm???

i grew up funch, someday you will to. I need no more santas or easter bunnies in my life. i need no presents. colored eggs, or gifts from mythical beings to please me. - bigsmile

But!! if were talking the lobster and filet mignon god welllllll - i can't give them up, maybe the pizza god , no i'm not sure of that one either?? can you give up your greasy gods??

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 08:10 AM



funch said:

"Tribo" that's what I mean you form an emotional attachment but an emotional attachment takes time which means you have the time to choose if you want that attachment ..that's the same thing as building up an addiction

tribo:

so you've gone from - craving, to duty, and now addiction? funch it's an emotion no more no less, prove to me by definition it is concidered by anyone else but you or those with like minds as yours that is other than i state - copy and paste if you like -

craving
duty
addiction

those are things that may be "connected" with love but are not ""love""!!


that's where you keep getting screwed up in your debates - you keep talking of things that surround or are attached to what you mean to say or state, instead of staying on target. it's like if we talked of diamond's you would argue about the facects or the color or the shape or the weight instead of the diamond itself - the core article of the debate. thats why it keeps going and going and going - :tongue: waving


"Tribo" ...your concept of Love is the result of your christian programming ...didn't you once upon a time when you were a christian claim to love God and/or Jesus ...so now that you are no longer a christian do you still love God and Jesus

wow I can't wait to hear your answer ..of course can you also apply a brief explanation



??? funch my friend - are you saying that only Christians have or express "love"????? or that only religious people do? are not atheist capable of love or agnostics? are vulcans not capable of love? even JB's dracos love each other. hmmm???

i grew up funch, someday you will to. I need no more santas or easter bunnies in my life. i need no presents. colored eggs, or gifts from mythical beings to please me. - bigsmile


"Tribo"...show how much you have grown and answer the question ...you once claim to love god and jesus ...why would the concept of love change or as "Skyhook' would say "Manifest" just because you claim you are no longer a christian


tribo's photo
Mon 10/27/08 08:13 AM
well you must first read my edited post and answer my questions

no photo
Mon 10/27/08 08:18 AM



Don't forget funches law

Paragraph 1:

funches is always right

Paragraph 2:

Should funches for some reason or other not be right, paragraph 1 applies automatically.

tongue2 waving


hi I, took note of that on the other post, if you do it on everyone maybe that will save some nubies from wasting there time - laugh


I well remember him from earlier times, that's why I'm so quiet in here, there is no point in saying anything.:laughing:


"Invisible" ..you are limited by your beliefs and it's taboo to think beyond those beliefs.....all I have to do is ask a question that goes beyond your belief and you are not allow to answer it....that's why you are quiet

don't blame me for the limitations you have imposed upon yourself