Peeing

I have found girls like Playboy for the articles, and boys like Playboy for the pictures.

I like American football and baseball! But I don't like men. So we probably don't have enough in common.

With midterms coming up I just wonder if the far right conservatives will still be dancing in the streets when they fail to gain seats in the house and Senate? They should of had no problem doing so with gas prices, inflation, and the over all running of the country. However with gun violence on the rise many people want to see gun laws tightened, not loosened. And with 75% of people saying they accept at least some level of abortion, and woman's right to choose. People want more rights, not less rights, this includes the right to safer streets without guns on them. The far right conservatives somehow think they are gaining ground, however they are just shooting themselves in the foot. People on the fence will have a hard decision on which way to turn. Moderate Republicans could go towards Independents which will never win, but will take votes from the Republicans.

If people take the time to actually see what the overturn of the New York gun law consists of may be surprised at what it really says. Some people on here advertise it like anybody can carry a gun either concealed or open carry anytime without a permit. That is far from truth. The NY law that was on the books since 1913, yes, over 100 years on the books, said you had to have "proper cause" to get a permit to carry and just saying it is for "self defence" isn't enough. That is really the only part of the law that was over turned. States can still require a permit to carry, require fingerprints, do a background check, do a mental health check, and require firearm training. They can also still have laws that bans guns in schools, churches, bars, public buildings. Private companies can also ban guns and post signs that no guns allowed. What really gets me is the Federal government that allows you to carry guns also bans guns in federal buildings. They don't care what is good for anybody else, they just care about what is good for them.

Perfect! You can do the dishes and grab beers for me n the guys while we watch football 🤣🤣🤣

No Bart, I am not anti-gun, i used to hunt, went through gun safety as a kid, been on a trap league, and shoot target practice, I do own guns. But I do not see the need for everybody to carry a gun everywhere they go. When was the last time you had a gun pulled on you? When was the last time you got shot? It is a risk and reward system, I do not see the risk being high enough that I need to carry a gun at all times, however if everybody else starts to carry guns around the risk goes up, too many people have short tempers and the ease of access to a gun will be a power trip they can not resist. Maybe we should all start wearing bullet proof vests everywhere too if it is such a danger? May be we should all start wearing PFDs (personal floatation devices) in case we fall into the water and drown? This just gives thugs an easier way to run around with their guns. The liberal prosecutors in big cities have already stopped prosecuting low level gun violations, and they have turned their heads on contact stops such as traffic violations that used to lead to other major offenses or warrant's. So these thugs are still running around on the streets with their guns, or will be out shortly to do so. If you were not so trapped in your box you would see that this ruling favors the liberals that want to keep these dead beats on the streets as much as it affects the conservatives. Same with the anti-abortion, that just means more people on welfare, not that there are not conservatives getting abortions too, they just don't want anybody at church to find out about it, it's all about keeping that image.
I would have had no problem with more people being shot when they stormed the Capital, I also would have liked to have seen more force including guns used during the "social justice", BLM, "civil unrest" or whatever BS term they want for those riots. If somebody is looting or burning a building shoot them. There are those who say "it's just property, it's not worth taking a life over". Well the United States is "just property" and if we are not willing to fight for that property we may as well just hand the keys over to China, Russia, or BLM. I have no problem with defending the country, or myself, I just don't see a reason for many people to run around with loaded guns, that just means we are failing to either put criminals in jail, or get them the help they need.

Most people down south think it's the right to bare arms, that's why they run around in tank tops. The right to keep and bear arms, it does not say firearms or guns. Arms can be any weapon. So now I have the right to carry a sword, a mace, a bomb, a bow, a knife, a taser,or anything else I want? So now anybody and everybody should be allowed to conceal and carry as well as open carry? I will say the same as I say about coronavirus. If you are really that afraid of what might happen when you go out then STAY AT HOME! Do I need to list all the little kids that have shot somebody with their parents unsecured guns? Do I need to list all the people with a permit to carry that have been shot? Do I need to list how many road rage cases have had shots fired? Do I need to list all the stalkers, and domestics? Look at those rednecks in Georgia that shoot Ahmad Aubrey , it was Aubrey's fault he got shot and died, but they didn't need to be running around the streets with guns and now they are spending the rest of their life in prison. What kind of situation does somebody think they are going to use this gun? Are they going to do an old fashion duel? If you got somebody down to the ground with your gun on them you don't think somebody else will shoot you? What if somebody grabs your gun and used it against you? Trust me I have seen the caliber of the population running around these days and they are already dangerous enough without having a gun strapped to them.

I like that everybody goes back to the constitution that was written 250 years ago. Maybe we should go back to throwing out sewage in the streets and letting it run into the river? That is as bad as people whom follow the bible that has been written (by people) over the last 2000 years. Things change over time, if you want to take your black powder and load a ball into your musket then go right ahead. If somebody wants to carry a semi-auto pistol around with them everywhere they go I want to make sure they are not a nut, unfortunately that is easier to say then do. Besides the accidental discharge, how many guns are used in road rage or domestic abuse cases. It's not that I am anti-gun, it's that too many bad people have spoiled it for everyone else. New York and other states can still make it very difficult for people to conceal and carry. Start with 100 hours of firearm training and a $1000 application fee, then charge $1000 a year for renewing the permit every year and gun refresher classes every few years. That would make it so only the people whom are really serious about this would actually do it. If somebody wants to kill one person or a large number of people there are many ways they can go about doing it. They can go buy a gun or two and some bullets, or they can try figuring out how to make some bombs, or the can buy some gas and set things on fire, or they can take their pickup and drive thru a crowd. The list is endless. One problem with legal guns is often they are stolen or sold and become illegal guns. They just busted a couple in my state that was buying guns "legally" and reselling them to people in the ghetto. Inner city gun crimes have skyrocketed over the last couple years, just because somebody is "legally" carrying a gun doesn't mean they won't use it "illegally".

So the SCOTUS takes away the states rights to make gun laws and yet it turns over the right for states to make abortion laws? It is as bad as all these states that have turned their heads to the federal drug laws and legalized marijuana and in some cases more. So is it up to the Federal government to make all the laws? Or is it up to the state government to make all the laws? Or is it something that we can pick and choose for whatever works for us?
I would agree that it is good that some people can carry a weapon, but for MOST people this is just a dumb idea. If you want to carry there are some things to think about. Are u willing to get shot or die? Are you willing to go to prison the rest of your life? Are you prepared to be sued for everything you own? That split second decision can affect the lives of many people and you need to be willing to live with whatever the outcome. Many of the thugs that don't have a record are also going out and getting a conceal and carry, so when the cops stop them they can not take the guns away. In a place like New York city the cops have very strict regulations on when they can use their guns so as others are not caught in the cross fire, yet the criminals just shoot wherever and whoever because they don't care. A citizen with a gun also has to be well aware of their surroundings and it's pretty good odds of getting shot by a cop if you are running after someone waving a gun around.

I've owned 4 Cougars in my life, currently I have a 1970 that I've had for over 20 years, and yes it runs a little rich once in awhile. And yes it exits from the road when you turn the steering wheel. For the right price anybody can own a Cougar, well a slightly used one anyway being that they don't make Mercury's or Cougars any more.

Some of these people are so hung up on what their party is saying that they fail to take common sense into consideration. If somebody tells you to jump off a bridge you should probably look for a low bridge over a lot of water, verses a bridge over a freeway. If someone tells you to invest all your money into Bitcoin you should probably buy some NFT's to go with that. If a college says you can get a bachelor's degree online in your spare time you shouldn't expect the working class to bail you out when you find out that diploma is useless. If you can't take care of yourself you probably shouldn't be bringing kids into this world that you can't take care of. It's easier for them to blame somebody then to take responsibility for their own actions. Sometimes it's the blind leading the blind, they just hope we don't notice how blind they really are.

You are right, guns don't kill people, it's the bullets that kill people, and usually that bullet is set off by somebody firing a gun. So why do people not talk about restricting bullets? If they just want to own guns for target practice make the bullets non-leathel.
It would be silly for the cops and military not to have guns, do you think this is Europe and they are going to run around with Billy clubs? It's kill or be killed, and they are trained to kill to stop the threat. If you don't want to get shot then don't commit a crime. Just like in any profession their are a few bad apples like Mohammed Noor that shot right in front of his partner and killed Justine Damon, but the majority of the shooting are justified.

I can see how old she is, where she lives, that she's married, and that she is looking for a relationship or intimate encounter. And she has a picture even if her back is to us. She did not ask anybody to leave their contact info. Seems pretty legit to me. I'm not a lesbian and don't live anywhere near her so I have no need to contact her. But for those looking for that there is plenty of information. Besides if you put too much into your profile people feed into that and tell you what you want to hear and not the truth.

If she is looking to explore women she probably can not find that at home if she's married to a man. Looking else where for companionship may be the reason her back is turn to us, but at least it's a picture, better then many. She has plenty information for those in the area that wish to contact her without giving too much info away.

Commenting on his comment only encourages him to do it more because he got reactions out of people. It is also off topic unless you include something about the topic in your comment.

So being that Mary was an unmarried "virgin" at the time she got knocked up and gave birth to Jesus, don't you think it is much more likely that Satan is Jesus' father and not God? Or would you prefer to go with my assumption that Mary's crazy uncle knocked her up?

Just because that is the way a law is written does not mean everyone is running out and doing it. Girls that are 12 and 13 years old can also have children, and now pro life supporters want to make it impossible for these girls to get abortions if they wish. I believe that in most states a girl is considered an adult and is emancipated from her parents if she has a child. There are consent laws for sex, but it's not all that often that those are prosecuted. Is it fair to mark somebody as a sex offender for the rest of their life for being curious at 15?

What is even sicker is the group of people who want to allow children to under go sex transition treatments and procedures, give them some time to figure out if they truly want to be transgender as much of that can not be reversed.

You know Dodo that forcing kids to write sentences on a chalk board is considered physical and mental abuse, not to mention the allergy risk! Homer and Marge could sue the school district for millions and the laws are so stupid that they would actually win the law suit. I can not believe you would promote such degrading and disrespectful actions.

You see the problem here is people have no sense of humor, they take things so literal. I like your little inputs Dodo, but some people just must have the world revolve around them.

I am sorry if I have ever offended anybody on here and if they would just send me their address I will do my best to send them a coloring book and participation award to make up for what I have done. And to all the rest I will just say hail Satan, because in this every widening of divide in the world we all know it has come to those whom are going to heaven verses those whom are going to hell, and it's the people who are deciding for others, not God or the devil.

I can agree on disagreeing, but when you say you disagree with most of what I said I am curious as to the parts that you do agree with and those you do not. So least break it down.

I said "many countries had protests against vaccinations, masks, and government lock downs". Are you disputing this? Or can you agree this is did go on?

I said "has much more to do with people not wanting to be told what to do and how to do it then what Trump was saying". So you believe all these people are just Trump's "puppets"? Do you really think people don't have their own thoughts?

Did Trump get the ball rolling on the vaccine? Well the government under his leadership did anyway, and he did support the use of vaccines to fight coronavirus early on in the pandemic. Is this an argument you can bring up?

"Has Trump lied about the pandemic?" I know if nothing else you agree with this statement!

"Has Biden lied about the pandemic?" Well if you believe you can not get coronavirus after you are vaccinated you truly do have your head in the sand.

"If everybody was vaccinated the coronavirus would go away? No." So depending on how you answered the last question there may be no hope if you think the vaccination is that magic wand that is going to make everything perfect.

"Do masks do anything?" Well if you listen to the flip flop from the get go on masks, and I did agree that masks may help in some areas while they may harm in others.

"Should we live in a bubble?" Should we all wear a HEPA filter 24/7?" Wearing a mask is similar to being in a bubble and using a HEPA filter, but how far are you willing to take it? This topic is not so much about mask wearing, it's more about government control.

"If people are so afraid they should STAY AT HOME" So I am not allowed to say this yet the government is able to force people to do it? So I can say the same thing as the government but some how I am the bad guy and they are the good guy? Makes no sense. The government even went to the extent of telling people who were not afraid to STAY AT HOME!

"If you do not come into contact with germs and viruses their body will never learn what to look for and what to fight off" So these so called "Experts" that you support are right on the things you want them to be right on, and wrong when YOU choose to not want to hear what they say? The reason that vaccines "work" is based on this. Is this one of your "disagreeing of what I said?

Some things in nature we can control, we have gained some control over coronavirus, but for the most part nature is still in control of so many things.

So maybe it is useless to debate when the things that I brought up are mostly just simple facts about the things that have gone on and how nature work. It's as bad of people going "God did it" and "God will save me from everything ' At some point you just have to accept the things going on around you.

"Don't tell me or anyone to stay home"? I couldn't agree with this more, so what do you think the government did? So the government is allowed to force people to stay at home, shut down their businesses, regulate where you could go, and make you wear a mask when you are in public? And I am attacked for saying "if you are so afraid stay at home"? If you do not want to "debate" then do not put any reply. Everybody here has the right to reply, it's known as freedom of speech. If you "disagree" with most of what I said you have either been heavily brainwashed, or you have your head in the sand. I put up valid information and thoughts on what has gone on. The reason you are afraid to debate is because you know you have nothing rational to come back with.