What three places?

no, I mean egotists, the taxpayers I know don't whine about the existence of welfare,,,,

lol, and I live here NOW,,,,the system does not go EVERYWHERE

and you are gonna show up with cleaning supplies for a house that you carried by BUS?

smh


not everyone can work in a casino, and very few 'churches' hire

plenty of people who want to work are unemployed in vegas,,,,

and many of the 'jobs' that people assume hire anybody( although that is a myth too,, employers want people who want THAT job, not people who just want ANY job)

still don't pay enough for them to be out of poverty or for them to not need assistance

not to mention they usually have 'flexible' schedules that most single parents with SMALL CHILDREN wont be able to meet,,,kids need routine and stability,,,

how does your daughter know the reason the girl got pregnant,, ? sounds like an irresponsible child,,,which isn't specific to impoverished parents,,


, and I heard of some people who robbed a bank, but that's really not a reason to shut the banks down

and I heard that having some people perform mass shootings is no reason to regulate guns

looking at the 'charts' and information provided in this thread . less than 1 in 5 people are receiving the kind of 'welfare' people complain about (some don't consider social security or medicare in their welfare , government handout philosophy) for more than 5 years

and federal guidelines set a limit of 3-5 years PER LIFETIME,

your story and experience is like that anomaly of a bank robbery and not the rule, its a CRIME and not the standard and not a reason to lump everyone in the same fraudulent boat of the minority we hear stories about,,,

yea, well... are they needed on our streets?

lol, yeah, because no danger came to them doesn't mean the weren't in danger

like I Said, having a child who just started school, and needs me available to get them to school, leaving about five hours that they are supervised by others, and not being in a position to work somewhere where my child was free to 'wait for me' and not having a crystal ball to know that the FATHER would decide not to provide any of his share of support for HIS child

I used a different option

I expect my kids not to suffer danger or starvation because I hit hard time for a couple of my FORTY SOME years on this earth,

I Expect to provide (through taxes) for others to be confident their kids wont either

I suppose crime would be the next thing, as I don't plan to allow my children to starve or be without SAFE shelter,,,

its hard to become 'dependent' on something that lasts 3-5 years of lifetime

its like telling mothers not to let babies use a pacifier because as they grow they will STILL depend on it

its not gonna happen

and its not designed as a 'lift' , we have pulled off the myth of meritocracy allegedly responsible for 'lift'

its merely about helping people GET THROUGH,,,

my claim is not that poverty is the wrath of God, that is the verbiage of the person whose blog is included in the OP

my claim is that people think popverty is a type of 'wrath' (retributory punishment for an offense or a crime ) for the crime of not earning enough or having enough saved for unexpected situations like sickness, lay offs, cutbacks, etc, etc, etc,,, to not EVER need to rely on the assistance of anyone but the self,,

do you disagree with,,,?

1. do you not believe who we ARE is different than who we WERE?
2. do you not believe the economic dynamic of the family has changed with the growth of two income families and the shame on parents who don't work (at a paid job anyway)?
3. do you not believe many have the mindset that poverty is a sort of 'wrath' deserved by those who struggle in it?
4. and finally, do you not agree that we need to focus more on who we COULD be (instead of the fantasy of some ideal that some believe we once were,,,?)

Summer with you prophecy. I wonder where you got it and it at all "prophecies exists, how they came into being and who really prophets are." You're so amusing :)

Doesn't matter what they call it, don't have to give it up. And like the people in Connecticut if you don't register it, they don't know where to find it.

But also like Connecticut, it is high time they are held accountable for their actions. Posting just who they are is a start but not the conclusion. Now they need to take action, start filing lawsuits for fraud, a marvelously remarkable little dilemma.

Who has taken our country? As a result of advertising creating needs that are imagined, we Americans spend more than we earn. Because of the money in politics today, we elect people who have little connection with Main Street or the next-door neighbor, we elect people to Washington who make laws that create millionaires with dependencies on Washington�s largesse and make laws that benefit Wall Street and the 1 percent. Laws that benefit the middle class and the working classes are subjugated to the wants and wishes of corporations and their lobbyists. We want to take our country back so that anyone who wants an assault weapon can have it even though more young and old Americans will be being murdered.

Exactly to what do we want to go back? We remember who we were and how life was a couple of generations ago. But what we can�t seem to get our minds around is who we were is not who we are. We are a nation of two-salary families, a nation of plutocrats and leaders whose selfish policies protect a privileged few, and a religious nation that idolizes lucre and claims that poverty is the wrath of an angry God. Instead of taking our country back, let�s take it forward to a future where the hungry are fed, the sick are healed, and the values of our faith are honored regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, politics, or the size of one�s bank account. Rather than focusing on who we were, let�s plan on who we will be.


Read More: http://cubie1944.com/2013/11/19/the-way-we-were/

police also carry tasers to take people 'down', because shooting isn't the only option

and I think there are plenty of trigger happy police officers who shouldn't be on the streets with guns too,,,

Did the guy not think that the old man, was confused for a reason? Or does logic and common sense not play a part in real life anymore? That guy should be charged with murder? Plain and simple, he shot an old man in cold blood! Shooting someone once is enough? Four times though? That's an execution, from a trigger happy ex-soldier, that's what that is and there's no excuse for that!

and, thus by being married, you avoided the dating scam which was the topic?

Not enough money to educate the kids but then.....

And speaking of educating kids, has your community been bribed into common core? After a common core education, his salary would probably double.