Community > Posts By > RKISIT

 
RKISIT's photo
Wed 05/08/13 06:09 PM
Religious faith doesn't require a degree or intelligence for that matter.
People choose to believe what they want.I can choose to believe in an invisible fluffy puppy that floats on a white fluffy cloud below the firmament.With religious faith i don't have to prove it exist because i believe it does.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 05/08/13 05:27 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Wed 05/08/13 05:30 PM
Most men are rude i fart and burp a lot.
Although i would never call my mama "woman" all the time,well not to her face at least.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 05/08/13 05:15 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Wed 05/08/13 05:17 PM
One thing people forget about religious faith.It doesn't require evidence or facts because they believe what was written or what they were told to be true.So they choose to accept myth as truth.
In their eyes mythological theology is true because they believe it is.
Or they are really really big wishful thinkers.

RKISIT's photo
Mon 05/06/13 05:26 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Mon 05/06/13 05:26 PM

God is God, God can never be satan. Please! Fear God for He is wonderful, He is mighty. He sees all.

So is Santa Claus and your point is?

RKISIT's photo
Mon 05/06/13 05:19 PM
Because the bible has to have a bad guy to keep the drama going,always remember even abrahamic mythology doesn't require common sense.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 05/04/13 08:00 AM
He's not really a philosopher but Addy Pross is one of my favorites

RKISIT's photo
Mon 04/29/13 04:31 PM


I will never say Einstein is wrong but i'm wondering how the 4 billion light year across LQG discovered earlier this year and the 1.2 billion light year across cosmological principle will play out?

To be continued.


The Huge-LQG is estimated to be approximately 1240 megaparsecs (4 billion light-years) in its longest dimension, by 640 Mpc and 370 Mpc in the others[4] and is the largest known structure in the universe. It has a mass of \begin{smallmatrix}6.1\times10^{18} M_\odot\end{smallmatrix} (solar masses). The Huge-LQG was initially named U1.27 due to its average redshift of 1.27, and is located in the sky in the constellation of Leo.[5]

The Huge-LQG is 615Mpc from the Clowes-Campusano LQG (U1.28), a group of 34 quasars discovered in 1991.
Cosmological Principle
Main article: Cosmological Principle

The cosmological principle implies that at a sufficiently large scale, the universe is homogeneous; different places will appear similar to one another. Whilst Yadav et al have suggested a maximum scale of 260/h Mpc for structures within the universe according to this heuristic, other authors have suggested values as low as 60/h Mpc.[6] Yadav's calculation suggests that the maximum size of a structure can be about 370Mpc[3]

The Sloan Great Wall, discovered in 2003, has a length of 423Mpc,[7] which is only just consistent with the cosmological principle.

The Huge-LQG is three times longer than, and twice as wide as is predicted possible according to these current models, and so challenges our understanding of the universe on large scales.[3]


This structure has little to do with Einstein.
Well i do have quite a bit of knowledge in astrophysics and you're trying to make like i'm clueless.Einstiens cosmological principle and the LQG that was discovered earlier this year don't match up,period.Anyone with knowledge in astrophysics will admit this.
If you truly look at models of galaxy clusters and the distribution of matter throughout the universe it really doesn't support the "homogeneous and the isometric crap people keep getting spoon fed all the time.
The radial vector[r] has matter scattered all over the place in the universe in clusters.Just one slipped by observers that questions the integrity of the cosmological principle.

RKISIT's photo
Sun 04/28/13 11:25 AM
I will never say Einstein is wrong but i'm wondering how the 4 billion light year across LQG discovered earlier this year and the 1.2 billion light year across cosmological principle will play out?

To be continued.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 04/27/13 05:12 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Sat 04/27/13 05:18 PM
In other words according to Samuel,god created evil souls and spirits and it has to be true cause it's in the bible.
Wait though it's a metaphor and it's in the old testament so christians will say it's how you interpret it.No matter how specific and verbatim it is it still relies on the old hoax of interpretation.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 04/27/13 04:57 PM


Hmmm
I thought Muslimism was the biggest ?
At least i would have sworn i read that somewhere...
Learn something new every day
That is my philosophy...
Thanks for that info !
But i have to say that What ever faith we believe in is good
as long as we bELIve ...
...in GOODNESS !
happy

Be Blessed EVERYONE !

:heart:

KiK


Gotta agree with that.

But I thought Hindu or Buddhist was the largest.
It's amazing how christians brag that their myth is great like frosted flakes because it's so popular yet they can't even prove jesus existed.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 04/27/13 04:36 PM






With my belief all I need is ONE book! I can say "God did it" and have almost no holes.

I agree with most of what you said, but this ^^ is hopelessly flawed. The biblical canon is only part of what the Catholic and Orthodox churches use. It's a very new, Protestant notion that laymen can can understand the text without context or understanding passed down through church tradition. This is one reason the "evangelicals'" theology is so confused.

You forgot to add that there are tons of holes when saying "god did it".
First of all where did god come from?
How come god can always have existed yet energy and matter can't?
Why is genesis debunked by science?
What is a firmament?
How come abrahamic followers say god didn't create evil,yet in Samuel 18:10,19:9 and 16:15 says he did?

RKISIT's photo
Sat 04/27/13 04:57 AM
Edited by RKISIT on Sat 04/27/13 04:58 AM
The fact is the universe doesn't care about theological myth.It just does what it does.
When man evolved and couldn't figure out how they became to be then gods were created.
As time went on man decided to actually work on how things work and realized that gods aren't required for this to happen.
Unfortunately there is a lot of humans that still believe imaginary beings are at work.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 04/24/13 05:06 PM


I'm not claiming anything about evolution,evolution is both fact and theory i'm giving what i accept as the origins of life prebiotic synthesis.Evolution is the diversity of species.I accept evolution as fact and theory It's fact cause it's empirical.Theories are used to explain how it happened to become a fact.
When someone mentions intelligent design it's a foundation of what creationist call science.So in other words ID is a pseudoscience creationist use to cover up the word god.So they can try to put it in schools.
There's nothing to be open minded about science shows that there's no need for a deity or "intelligent designer" for the origins of life or the universe.
Anyone can wishful think but that's their choice.


Science does not show that there is "no need for a deity or intelligent designer." If they did, then you could state that there is scientific proof that God or this "designer" does not exist.

All that can be said is "We have no evidence that a designer exists."

But even that is a weak statement because they lack so much knowledge of how things work or the true nature of the universe.

Reality itself is called "The grand illusion." And Einstein even said that "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one."

So everything we think we know may only apply to this particular vacuum (universal bubble) we find ourselves in.

Truth is, we don't know how we got here.




Science does show it's plausible for the nothing to become what is observed today.I really don't understand why spiritualist and theist and deist can't comprehend that science can show how it's possible.Fideism will eventually make you stupid.

RKISIT's photo
Sun 03/31/13 07:17 AM

My understanding is that we share genes...but no more than we share genes with every other living mammal.

While our DNA is different from our newest "pre human" link, they HAVE been shown to share about 5% of the same DNA as native New Guineas. That alone will not allow me to state that we are "nothing" like them.

Considering that we know DNA mutates at a much faster rate than genes, and given how little experienced we are, of yet, with the study of DNA mutation over the 50,000 year period that spans that race with our own, I would say we really know very little about it to conclusively state anything yet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

If your interested there's some sites that have lot of info on haplogroups.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 03/30/13 07:29 PM

What scientists do is observe and report.

("This does this and then this happens. Combine this with this and this happens. etc."} They observe and report, and sometimes they figure out a way to explain why things happen.

But material scientists are still confounded by the quantum world and they can't quite figure out how it relates to and effects the macro world.

In the quantum world, the act of observing something changes it. But in the macro world, we all know that when we stop observing the moon it still exists.

Of course it does. Because consciousness is observing it. Consciousness is the thing that connects everything in this reality. Everything exists within consciousness. In short, consciousness is "God" and all things exist within it. All things arise from it.

A single atom contains DNA with all the information needed to create an entire universe with every conceivable living creature you can imagine in it. There is no such thing as a 'simple' cell. A cell is loaded with information.

That information comes from its connection to consciousness.








Atoms make up DNA there is no DNA in atoms.DNA is in living organisms.Atoms make up the elements and compounds required for living organisms to exist.So in others words inorganic subatomic and fundamental particles are the origins of life.Once again prebiotic synthesis is the origins of life.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 03/30/13 06:44 PM


I'm not claiming anything about evolution,evolution is both fact and theory i'm giving what i accept as the origins of life prebiotic synthesis.Evolution is the diversity of species.I accept evolution as fact and theory It's fact cause it's empirical.Theories are used to explain how it happened to become a fact.
When someone mentions intelligent design it's a foundation of what creationist call science.So in other words ID is a pseudoscience creationist use to cover up the word god.So they can try to put it in schools.
There's nothing to be open minded about science shows that there's no need for a deity or "intelligent designer" for the origins of life or the universe.
Anyone can wishful think but that's their choice.


Science does not show that there is "no need for a deity or intelligent designer." If they did, then you could state that there is scientific proof that God or this "designer" does not exist.

All that can be said is "We have no evidence that a designer exists."

But even that is a weak statement because they lack so much knowledge of how things work or the true nature of the universe.

Reality itself is called "The grand illusion." And Einstein even said that "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one."

So everything we think we know may only apply to this particular vacuum (universal bubble) we find ourselves in.

Truth is, we don't know how we got here.




Was Albert around when mtDNA and RNA became a lot more knowledgeable?No.
Science puts god as unknowable because there's absolutely no physical evidence or any empirical evidence of a god or gods existing.
It's just a suggestion of ancient writings.
Science has theories but not 100% facts on the origins of the universe or life.I just take the rational path not the supernatural path.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 03/30/13 06:11 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Sat 03/30/13 06:17 PM
I'm not claiming anything about evolution,evolution is both fact and theory i'm giving what i accept as the origins of life prebiotic synthesis.Evolution is the diversity of species.I accept evolution as fact and theory It's fact cause it's empirical.Theories are used to explain how it happened to become a fact.
When someone mentions intelligent design it's a foundation of what creationist call science.So in other words ID is a pseudoscience creationist use to cover up the word god.So they can try to put it in schools.
There's nothing to be open minded about science shows that there's no need for a deity or "intelligent designer" for the origins of life or the universe.
Anyone can wishful think but that's their choice.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 03/30/13 01:25 PM
The human body itself is made up of inorganic and organic matter.We have more bacteria than cells in our bodies.Our bodies are made up of amino acids which convert to protein.We have living microscopic organisms all over us.Yet an imaginary being made man from dust?
We are made up of organic molecules that exist all over the universe.We are made up of hydrogen bonding molecules.Nitrogen bonding molecules.Most of all life is made up of the same chemical elements.
The origins of life is from prebiotic synthesis.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 03/30/13 06:52 AM
Yeah another creationist pseudoscience video.I like how the guy says "It's impossible" funny thing it is possible cause it happened.Next.

RKISIT's photo
Mon 03/25/13 05:21 PM
well most physicist accept that the universe is a finite expanding brane with energy and matter inside it.Outside the brane is nothing.

1 2 5 6 7 9 11 12 13 24 25