Community > Posts By > RKISIT

 
RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/16/12 10:44 AM
I been known to give women the rod and spank themshades

RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/16/12 09:46 AM
Unfortunately like most humanitarian awards they are givin to a popular name i'm positive theres people out there of certain races that have done more to contribute to society than Sharpton but it is what it is.

RKISIT's photo
Sat 06/16/12 08:35 AM
Edited by RKISIT on Sat 06/16/12 08:37 AM
Penrose is well known for fringe speculation. If something like this pans out it would be world shattering, but that is the same with most of his ideas, he loves extraordinary ideas . . . sadly they usually have a lot of problems to overcome, so far he is striking out.

I have not looked very hard, but somewhere out there is some fairly good criticisms of the research paper linked in the OP, basically that they failed to rule out the concentric circles being caused by some other mundane source that would be within the universe or caused by inflation. Cant remember its been a while.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yep i agree with this people forget that Penrose and Hawkings removed quantum mechanics when they came up with the "singularity theorem".In other words if you remove quantum mechanics then their theorem is possible.

RKISIT's photo
Fri 06/15/12 06:49 AM




Theres one astronomer who was studying a shot of the CMB and saw what might appear to be patches of other galaxies from another universe which is the multiverse theory and she believes the CMB to be from matter of this universe colliding with matter from another universe.Slim chance but we'll see what the planck shows.I'm kind of excited.


Does this astronomer have a name?
What is her definition of "universe"?

Her name is lisa randall unfortunately i read her article in a astronomy mag i can't find it on the net yet.it was some pics from WMAP she seen some patches that maybe be linked to a multiverse.She also is into the string theorygrumble



The Wikipedia entry about string theory say, ". . . finding a way to experimentally verify string theory via unique predictions remains a major challenge."

If string theory (or any of Randall's theories) cannot be tested to see if it is falsifiable, then what good is it?
well the string theory in my opinion is a little far fetched i'm not saying it's not possible just unlikely,then again i'm not a big fan of the universe coming from a tiny itty bitty pulsar(singularity) object created from a math formula for inflation.

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 07:22 PM

only to those who worship the flesh, which is temporary

some believe the spirit is eternal and therefore demands much more reverence and attention
Big word is "believe" meaning they don't know for sure aka faith.So if someone kills their child cause a voice inside their head they believe to be their deity said so,well then good luck with that.

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 06:46 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Thu 06/14/12 06:47 PM


Theres one astronomer who was studying a shot of the CMB and saw what might appear to be patches of other galaxies from another universe which is the multiverse theory and she believes the CMB to be from matter of this universe colliding with matter from another universe.Slim chance but we'll see what the planck shows.I'm kind of excited.


Does this astronomer have a name?
What is her definition of "universe"?

Her name is lisa randall unfortunately i read her article in a astronomy mag i can't find it on the net yet.it was some pics from WMAP she seen some patches that maybe be linked to a multiverse.She also is into the string theorygrumble

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 04:52 PM


That assumes that the "big bang" happened and was "the beginning" of the universe.
i agree, i have never been a supporter of the the big bang, thats why i like penrose's ideas
do you believe the universe is infinite?

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 02:41 PM
Theres one astronomer who was studying a shot of the CMB and saw what might appear to be patches of other galaxies from another universe which is the multiverse theory and she believes the CMB to be from matter of this universe colliding with matter from another universe.Slim chance but we'll see what the planck shows.I'm kind of excited.

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 02:33 PM
the big crunch theory where the universe continues to expand and retract,then theres the big bang.The Planck Satellite is suppose to prove one of the theories correct and maybe actualy record a gravity wave.

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 02:08 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Thu 06/14/12 02:08 PM
noway





Not after the Lord specifically told them both it was a test.


so you admit that before they knew it was a test..that God was asking Abraham to mentally abuse his child




It's called a test Funches. We are God's creation, he can test us any way he wishes. There is no mentally abusing any child. Obviously he was willing to be sacrificed, there is no sign of him refusing or fighting to stop the sacrifice.

noway

Cowboy....so if God commands you to offer your child up as a burnt offerring...you actually would?


Absolutely. God is and always will be the priority in my life. Priority above what I want, what other's want, over anything and everything.
noway that's sick

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 12:43 PM


Genesis 22:2
"And he said, Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell thee of."


in the case of Creflo

God said unto Creflo..take now thine shoe, thy only shoe, thine oldest daughter and beat her upon one of her mountains which I will tell thee of



Again, taking things out of context. It was a test, to test his faith. God didn't really want him to sacrifice his child.

Genesis 22:1

Now it came to pass after these things that God tested Abraham, and said to him, “Abraham!”

And he said, “Here I am.”

Funches didn't take it out of context God did tell Abraham to sacrifice his child then when Abraham was about to do it then the "Just kidding" came from God by an angel.Cowboy you're the one claiming it's taken out of context you can't face the fact that God like messin with his puppets because noone truly has free will when they worship this myth.

RKISIT's photo
Thu 06/14/12 06:42 AM
Edited by RKISIT on Thu 06/14/12 06:43 AM
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001SPIE.4378...90M

RKISIT's photo
Wed 06/13/12 07:46 PM
the US Government should stop spending $15 billion dollars a year on the "war on drugs" it's a war they ain't winning cause Florida and Kentucky proved it.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 06/13/12 07:04 PM




Mankind created religions,mankind created God(s),mankind believes in what it created so i guess mankind won.


if only things were that black and white

mankind also created the gun (for protection and hunting),, but in the age where few americans have to hunt for food, and violent crime is some of the worst in the western world,,,

does that mean 'mankind' won?
i'm referring to religion,mankind has done other things but i was basically typing that mankind won cause the majority of people follow the God(s) myth that mankind created.


I dont get how thats a win for mankind....

if it werent true, than man lives with a lie
if it is true,, seems its Gods win,,,,
Which God(s) we talking here that would win "I am",the trinity God,Allah,Vishnu?

RKISIT's photo
Wed 06/13/12 04:51 PM




Mankind created religions,mankind created God(s),mankind believes in what it created so i guess mankind won.


if only things were that black and white

mankind also created the gun (for protection and hunting),, but in the age where few americans have to hunt for food, and violent crime is some of the worst in the western world,,,

does that mean 'mankind' won?
i'm referring to religion,mankind has done other things but i was basically typing that mankind won cause the majority of people follow the God(s) myth that mankind created.


What are you talking about? It's not about winning or loosing, being right or being wrong. It's about serving our ever loving God. There is nothing to "win" by serving God. It's not done to promote oneself, not to gain anything for oneself. It's to love God and love the world.
Why do you use "our" and what are you talking about?cowboy i know God doesn't exist so why do you keep trying to push Gods love on people,not everyone accepts your God.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 06/13/12 04:38 PM


Mankind created religions,mankind created God(s),mankind believes in what it created so i guess mankind won.


if only things were that black and white

mankind also created the gun (for protection and hunting),, but in the age where few americans have to hunt for food, and violent crime is some of the worst in the western world,,,

does that mean 'mankind' won?
i'm referring to religion,mankind has done other things but i was basically typing that mankind won cause the majority of people follow the God(s) myth that mankind created.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 06/13/12 04:22 PM
Mankind created religions,mankind created God(s),mankind believes in what it created so i guess mankind won.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 06/13/12 03:38 PM
The only trusted news source is from The Sun newspaper.

RKISIT's photo
Wed 06/13/12 03:28 PM
It's John Larroquettes minime

RKISIT's photo
Tue 06/12/12 04:11 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Tue 06/12/12 04:15 PM
the only CT i can say might have been the cold fusion theory from Fleischmann and Pons,i think they were on to something but nuclear power corporations along with nuclear physicist played a big role in claiming their theory false.

1 2 9 10 11 13 15 16 17 24 25