Community > Posts By > Unknow

 
no photo
Wed 07/15/09 05:57 PM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 05:57 PM


no photo
Wed 07/15/09 02:58 PM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 02:59 PM
Let it continue as it is and it will be the next bailout only they wont be able to print the money fast enough...SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE DONE.......

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 02:51 PM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 02:52 PM


this is one fight he will not win.

I have to agree with you here. A no win with all the afluential people and groups covering up for BHO and their ability to pass false documents.
By all means show the proof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Its a dead horse...Now if you want to talk about some of the stupid things hes doing Im right there with you all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 02:45 PM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 02:54 PM
If the toxicology comes back as cause(Does anyone really think anything else) then yes should be a homicide and Drs should pay the price....

Here in Florida Oxycontins are all over the streets. They walk into a Dr office and pharmacy and get them like candy... A friend of mine died last year of a overdose..HE!! he was prescribed 750 oxys the month he died...THAT IS ONE AN HOUR!!!!!!! I kick myself for not stepping in......


no photo
Wed 07/15/09 02:33 PM
ONE NATION UNDER ONE PARTY!!!! You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see that!!!

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 02:20 PM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 02:22 PM

i no what the problem is, us democrats don't bug phones we don't make up stuff to invade someones country. as for the hippie comment. yes and always will be.we don't claim to the party of high morals. example mark Sanford.
Then why is the PATROIT ACT still law???????

NO PARTY HERE JUST AMERICAN!!!

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 02:18 PM



the Obama bashing channel.


Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda.

Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality.


I think i'm going to come up with a new word for liberal. How about "Neoliberal"? Kinda like "neoconservative".

You see, most "liberals" identify themselves as liberal, when in fact, they want bigger government, and more control over the people. Just like conservatives that are pro-war, or want to bail out businesses.

They are both false identifiers.

Can't claim to be a liberal, when you think we need more laws and regulations.

I think, anyways, that the term "liberal" stands for ones who support "liberty" and "conservatives" are the ones supporting plans that are fiscally "conservative". Or am i wrong?
drinker drinker You can put different dressing on you salad but in the end its the same salad...Just some leaves are browner than others!!!

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 01:43 PM

drool She is gorgeous
drool drool drool drool

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 01:42 PM

that's been a rumor for a few years now but i don't think it's going to happen
Its all about sponsership....Tony and her have dicussed this since he took over Haas....I guess if you put her in a Hendrick car anything is possiable...

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 01:39 PM

I think it would be interesting to see....

I would watch... PLUS, it would be a smart move for her indy is dying a slow death... personally, I see F1 and NASCAR surviving...

smile2
Personally I would love to see her try but think she needs to stay Indy...Gives me a reason to watch that series!

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 01:36 PM

Why would she go from a real sport to a fake one like nascar?:cry:
WOW!!!! Thx for the great imput....

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 10:48 AM
THIS APPEARED ON CRAIG'S LIST

What am I doing wrong?

Okay, I'm tired of beating around the bush. I'm a beautiful (spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I'm articulate and classy. I'm not from New York. I'm looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don't think I'm overreaching at all.

Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 200 - 250. But that's where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won't get me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she's not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?

Here are my questions specifically:

Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars, restaurants, gyms.

What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won't hurt my feelings Is there an age range I should be targeting (I'm 25)?

Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I've seen really 'plain jane' boring types who have nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I've seen drop dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What's the story there?

Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?

How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY!

Please hold your insults - I'm putting myself out there in an honest way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I'm being up front about it. I wouldn't be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn't able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth.

It's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interest.
PostingID: 432279810



THE ANSWER

Dear Pers-431649184:

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament.

Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here's how I see it.

Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a crappy business deal. Here's why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here's the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity...in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won't be getting any more beautiful!

So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you're 25 now and will
likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold...hence the rub...marriage. It doesn't make good business sense to "buy you" (which is what you're asking) so I'd rather lease. In case you think I'm being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It's as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as "articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful" as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn't found you, if not only for a tryout.

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn't need to have this difficult conversation.

With all that said, I must say you're going about it the right way. Classic "pump and dump."
I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of lease, let me know.

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 10:29 AM








"First with the soldier refusing to follow Obama's orders as Commander in Chief, until he produces a "legitimate" birth certificate..."

Unbelievable.laugh slaphead






That is a little extreme, but an "original" b/c was never produced only a questionable copy. All other presidents have provided originals, I can produce an original. He is the president, leading our nation (and wanting to turn total power over to private bankers.... why?) so one would think he, more than anyone, should be above question, able to prove or disprove beyond doubt any allegations.
The soldier could and should be charged under the UCMJ...



I agree, if they can prove he is not justified in his claim.
His claim has NO REVELACE AT ALL!!!!!! War time deserition under the UCMJ


It has all the relevance in the world! It takes a trial, and because of his claim they would have to prove positively that BHO was born a US citizen. How can that NOT be relevent?

Also, it is not desertion, it is failure to obey an order.
LET THE TRIAL(COURT MARTIAL) BEGIN and when hes found guilty 20 years hard labor is the sentence I beleive!!! By all means he has the right to Court Martial proceedings....Proceed away!!!




That is the law, and his right. All I care about, rights, truth and fact.

By the way.... failure to obey an order whether direct or indirect is subject to court martial and can include up to 10 years imprisonment I believe, depending on the nature of the degree and nature of the crime.
I beleive in wartime it can be considered desertion...Either way hes looking at 10 yrs hard labor!!!!!

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 10:17 AM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 10:19 AM






"First with the soldier refusing to follow Obama's orders as Commander in Chief, until he produces a "legitimate" birth certificate..."

Unbelievable.laugh slaphead






That is a little extreme, but an "original" b/c was never produced only a questionable copy. All other presidents have provided originals, I can produce an original. He is the president, leading our nation (and wanting to turn total power over to private bankers.... why?) so one would think he, more than anyone, should be above question, able to prove or disprove beyond doubt any allegations.
The soldier could and should be charged under the UCMJ...



I agree, if they can prove he is not justified in his claim.
His claim has NO REVELACE AT ALL!!!!!! War time deserition under the UCMJ


It has all the relevance in the world! It takes a trial, and because of his claim they would have to prove positively that BHO was born a US citizen. How can that NOT be relevent?

Also, it is not desertion, it is failure to obey an order.
LET THE TRIAL(COURT MARTIAL) BEGIN and when hes found guilty 20 years hard labor is the sentence I beleive!!! By all means he has the right to Court Martial proceedings....Proceed away!!!


no photo
Wed 07/15/09 09:59 AM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 10:05 AM




"First with the soldier refusing to follow Obama's orders as Commander in Chief, until he produces a "legitimate" birth certificate..."

Unbelievable.laugh slaphead






That is a little extreme, but an "original" b/c was never produced only a questionable copy. All other presidents have provided originals, I can produce an original. He is the president, leading our nation (and wanting to turn total power over to private bankers.... why?) so one would think he, more than anyone, should be above question, able to prove or disprove beyond doubt any allegations.
The soldier could and should be charged under the UCMJ...



I agree, if they can prove he is not justified in his claim.
His claim has NO REVELACE AT ALL!!!!!! War time deserition under the UCMJ

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 09:56 AM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 09:57 AM


"First with the soldier refusing to follow Obama's orders as Commander in Chief, until he produces a "legitimate" birth certificate..."

Unbelievable.laugh slaphead






That is a little extreme, but an "original" b/c was never produced only a questionable copy. All other presidents have provided originals, I can produce an original. He is the president, leading our nation (and wanting to turn total power over to private bankers.... why?) so one would think he, more than anyone, should be above question, able to prove or disprove beyond doubt any allegations.
The soldier could and should be charged under the UCMJ...

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 09:20 AM
Edited by Unknow on Wed 07/15/09 09:21 AM
What we needed to and failed to do so was SECURE OUR BOARDERS AND PORTS!!! We spent all that money on two wars yet our boarders and ports are still not secure!!!!!

YEP!!! I feel saferfrustrated

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 08:14 AM


its so amazing how republicans will do or say anything to put down Obama.the fact is you lost the election, time for you people to move on,your hero Sarah palin lost so no matter what you say or whine about, in the end Obama won you lost next.


Funny thing, you speak as if republicans are the ones in these forums putting Obama down.

You may not remember, but everyone that commented so far has never stood for the republican party.

To question ones leadership is only natural. The dangerous mode of thinking, is when you don't question the powers that be, because you assume that it's a different party in charge. This shows evidence of not doing enough homework on the matter.

The Obama administration, thus far, is everybit as shadey as Bush's administration. When you change the engineer on a train, you don't necessarily change the direction the train is headed.
Well said!!!!drinker drinker

no photo
Wed 07/15/09 08:12 AM
I have the same stance....Punish the men to the full extent of the law..They are the scum of the earth!!!!!!

The girl should get the help she needs but to me a slap on the wrist would only make things worst FOR HER IN THE LONG RUN...

Im stating this over the last artivle posted...

Hell I have a daughter and know some will think Im wrong!!!!!

no photo
Tue 07/14/09 09:26 PM
Edited by Unknow on Tue 07/14/09 09:40 PM



http://www.danicaracing.com/main.html
She has got a pretty cool site!!!! Didnt see an article about it though......


http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/bruce_martin/06/22/Inside_racing/?eref=sircrc


hummingbird

you have to go into the site and surf a bit


Thx....You know me Im lazy when it comes to searching...

Ask enough question and someone will do it for you...LOL

Dam she is sweet!!!!

Alot of ifs and whats....

The second article didnt come from a right wing newspaper did it??? I mean really!!!!! LOLlaugh