Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: fox news
supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 08:21 AM
the Obama bashing channel.

TheresMyFriend Joined Sat 05/19/07 Posts: 2565	Wed 07/15/09 08:27 AM
the Obama bashing channel. Yeah! The best news channel in the world!

Winx Joined Fri 08/31/07 Posts: 39051	Wed 07/15/09 08:28 AM
Faux News.

Dragoness Joined Wed 10/17/07 Posts: 23320	Wed 07/15/09 08:32 AM
the Obama bashing channel. Not only that but they bend their news to fit a right wing agenda. Liberal becomes a bad word on their channel but liberal is no worse than conservative in reality.

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 09:01 AM
fox news[fixnews]

damnitscloudy Joined Sat 04/07/07 Posts: 11293	Wed 07/15/09 11:10 AM
No worse than CNN

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 11:11 AM
fox news is the worse, when i want real news i watch cnn if i want to no about sarah palin i watch fox

Winx Joined Fri 08/31/07 Posts: 39051	Wed 07/15/09 11:23 AM
No worse than CNN CNN is more factual then Fox.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Wed 07/15/09 11:24 AM
If this were russia, Obama would have fox news headquarters blown up and then blame the chechens.

Winx Joined Fri 08/31/07 Posts: 39051	Wed 07/15/09 11:29 AM
If this were russia, Obama would have fox news headquarters blown up and then blame the chechens. You know what Obama would do?

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Wed 07/15/09 11:32 AM
what he is doing is rather obvious.

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Wed 07/15/09 11:33 AM
If this were russia, Obama would have fox news headquarters blown up and then blame the chechens. if this was the united states they would fly airliners into the largest financial building in nyc and blame it on terrorists

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 11:36 AM
but this is not russia, i guess obama could do like bush and make up facts to invade a country.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Wed 07/15/09 11:37 AM
yeah... thats a good one..

damnitscloudy Joined Sat 04/07/07 Posts: 11293	Wed 07/15/09 11:38 AM
CNN has a bad habit of mixing celeb news with actual news. And don't get me started on Lou Dobbs

supermike48 Joined Sat 06/20/09 Posts: 335	Wed 07/15/09 11:40 AM
lou dobbs is a hipocrute i dont like illegal either but he is married to one.

InvictusV Joined Sun 11/23/08 Posts: 5282	Wed 07/15/09 11:42 AM
I thought Obama was going to end the wars? Seems to me he is escalating the war in afghanistan. By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press Writer Robert H. Reid, Associated Press Writer – 5 mins ago KABUL – July is shaping up as the deadliest month of the Afghan war for U.S.-led international forces, with the number killed already matching the highest full-month toll of the nearly eight-year conflict, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press. As of Wednesday, at least 46 international troops, including 24 Americans, had been killed in Afghanistan this month, according to statements by the U.S. military and the NATO command. That matches the tolls for the two previous deadliest months — June and August of 2008. The rate of deaths in July — about three a day — is approaching some of the highest levels of the Iraq war. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090715/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan Why aren't you in the streets protesting the new war monger in the white house?

damnitscloudy Joined Sat 04/07/07 Posts: 11293	Wed 07/15/09 11:46 AM
Because Obama is the chosen one! HE CAN DO NO WRONG!

cas6285 Joined Mon 10/29/07 Posts: 222	Wed 07/15/09 11:55 AM
I thought Obama was going to end the wars? Seems to me he is escalating the war in afghanistan. By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press Writer Robert H. Reid, Associated Press Writer – 5 mins ago KABUL – July is shaping up as the deadliest month of the Afghan war for U.S.-led international forces, with the number killed already matching the highest full-month toll of the nearly eight-year conflict, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press. As of Wednesday, at least 46 international troops, including 24 Americans, had been killed in Afghanistan this month, according to statements by the U.S. military and the NATO command. That matches the tolls for the two previous deadliest months — June and August of 2008. The rate of deaths in July — about three a day — is approaching some of the highest levels of the Iraq war. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090715/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan Why aren't you in the streets protesting the new war monger in the white house? Because the Afghanistan war is actually a legitimate one? One that we where winning before President Bush pushed his luck with Iraq.

Drivinmenutz Joined Wed 11/14/07 Posts: 4290	Wed 07/15/09 12:01 PM
I thought Obama was going to end the wars? Seems to me he is escalating the war in afghanistan. By ROBERT H. REID, Associated Press Writer Robert H. Reid, Associated Press Writer – 5 mins ago KABUL – July is shaping up as the deadliest month of the Afghan war for U.S.-led international forces, with the number killed already matching the highest full-month toll of the nearly eight-year conflict, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press. As of Wednesday, at least 46 international troops, including 24 Americans, had been killed in Afghanistan this month, according to statements by the U.S. military and the NATO command. That matches the tolls for the two previous deadliest months — June and August of 2008. The rate of deaths in July — about three a day — is approaching some of the highest levels of the Iraq war. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090715/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan Why aren't you in the streets protesting the new war monger in the white house? Because the Afghanistan war is actually a legitimate one? One that we where winning before President Bush pushed his luck with Iraq. So are we losing now? We never declared war in Afghanistan either. They are both occupancies. They are both poorly run. We will never pull our troops out of either country completely. And btw, don't forget Obama himself plans to permanently station 50,000 troops in Iraq. And don't forget, even his campaign website spoke of needing more "military and civilian" involvement in foriegn countries. So the question still stands; "Why aren't you in the streets protesting the new war monger in the white house?"