Community > Posts By > jaish

 
jaish's photo
Thu 08/19/21 07:02 AM
Edited by jaish on Thu 08/19/21 07:10 AM


Guardian's cover this week examines President Xi Jinping’s assault on China’s $4trn tech industry.


Chinese regulators have mounted over 50 actions against scores of firms for a dizzying array of alleged offences, from antitrust abuses to data violations, costing investors around $1trn.

Not clear who the investors are ... Hong Kong Chinese and ...

Mr Xi’s immediate goal may be to humble tycoons and give regulators more sway over unruly digital markets. But the Communist Party’s deeper ambition is to redesign the industry so as to sharpen its country’s technological edge while boosting competition and benefiting consumers.

In this, it echoes many of the concerns that motivate regulators and politicians in the West: that digital markets tend towards monopolies and that tech firms hoard data, abuse suppliers, exploit workers and undermine public morality.

China is about to become a policy laboratory in which an unaccountable state wrestles with the world’s biggest firms for control of the 21st century’s essential infrastructure.





jaish's photo
Wed 08/18/21 11:42 PM
For many, if not most, U.K. lawmakers, the evacuation represents a huge failure for the Afghanistan mission, which saw 457 British troops die in the effort to stabilize the nation.

“Let's stop talking about forever wars. Let's recognize that forever peace is bought not cheaply, but hard through determination and the will to endure,” said lawmaker Tom Tugendhat, chairman of the influential Foreign Affairs Committee.

“And the tragedy of Afghanistan is that we're swapping that patient achievement for fire and a second war," said Tugendhat, who served both in Afghanistan and Iraq.


I have not met Mr. T but I agree with him that this could be a hard lesson to learn; a realization on all sides that the world has changed and now that Biden’s US is willing to discard it’s role of being the ‘leading light of the world’ it’s an invitation to Republicans, Indians, terrorists, et all, to coexist ..., like in Mingle?

Except that the Chinks have other plans.




jaish's photo
Mon 08/16/21 11:16 PM
Hi John,
Why list troops in NATO nations when costs / expenses are shared?

jaish's photo
Mon 08/16/21 01:50 PM

Quite interesting.

:thumbsup:

jaish's photo
Mon 08/16/21 01:38 PM
In today’s UN Security Council meeting the Russian rep announced that the Troika will take care of Afghanistan.

Troika - Russia, China & Pakistan

jaish's photo
Mon 08/16/21 01:26 PM
Edited by jaish on Mon 08/16/21 01:29 PM

Why the generalization?...SOME men do and also some women do...


Hello M,

Initially posted under Jokes, this thread gained momentum under Sports

May be I should’ve posted in 'Mysterious Phenomena & The Paranormal' ?


jaish's photo
Sat 08/14/21 12:53 PM
Thanks Cleve.

jaish's photo
Sat 08/14/21 03:54 AM
Edited by jaish on Sat 08/14/21 04:01 AM

Interesting.

why in caps? just curious.

jaish's photo
Sat 08/14/21 02:15 AM

Funnylaugh .




The other baldy joke was:

Man dressing for dinner asks his wife,"Will you love me when I'm old & bald?"

She said, "I do"

jaish's photo
Sat 08/14/21 02:05 AM

Why women don't feel the same.. If same hormones are involved?


Because women don't get hit by the 'big hammer' often - as Roy mentioned;
maybe it takes hammer to release those hormones.

jaish's photo
Fri 08/13/21 09:52 PM
Why Men Fall Asleep After Sex (and Women Don't)

IT’S A CHEMICAL THING.



As per the article 'After orgasm, both men and women release the chemicals oxytocin, prolactin, gamma amino butyric acid (GABA), and endorphins.


Each of these contributes to that roll-over-and-snore feeling.'


If these hormones didn't kick in, then men would be like praying mantises: The males keep copulating even after they're decapitated by their lovers.



jaish's photo
Fri 08/13/21 07:59 AM

With Kabul in sight Taliban are asking maulvis to prepare list of girls and widows aged 12 to 45 so that they can be negotiated to marriage.

jaish's photo
Thu 08/12/21 10:43 PM
Edited by jaish on Thu 08/12/21 10:46 PM



And we all know the death tolls for WWI and WWII, at least with a quick bible, err...google search.

After world war two the U.S. and allies decided economic interdependence was the way to go to prevent the massive death tolls from all those wars and invasions and manifest destiny and such. "Spread democracy and capita...err...freedom!"

Can't really nuke the country that provides the materials for your nukes, and you can't nuke the country that grows the food for the country that provides the materials for your nukes, and you can't nuke the country that provides the clothes and the luxuries and the debt and the financing and the protection and the whatever of the country that provides for the country that provides for the country and so on.

Another response was mutually assured destruction. You nuke me, I nuke you, no one wins.

Wars are expensive. They kill a lot of people. Destroy a lot of wealth. And there's no guarantee of winning or surviving.


Or probably more personal, what happens if you and the people you work with just went and murdered your boss and stole all of the boss and company's money on hand, sold all of the assets? Let's say there are no laws and you would receive no legal penalty for doing so.

How do you think company's would respond and protect themselves from that happening to them and how do you think they would then treat you?


How long until other people saw what you had and said to themselves "hey! They did it, why can't we?" and then came after you because it's easier than going after a now protected company? Which could be the case if you decided to just take over the company and run it yourselves.


Is that preferable to cooperating and collaborating with your boss/employer to keep producing something that other people want? Do you want to go to war with your suppliers or customers?

Think of each individual person as their own country.


Is it better to "unify" (i.e. group up and, say, form a stable business), or individually compete and prey upon each other?
Why? There's an answer.

it will not make people happy to lose their country, their culture, their language, their currency, sovereignty, and so on.


The point is not in making them "happy."
It's keeping them from world war III.
It's keeping people distracted with social media and coca cola, fast food, vacations, consumption and working/producing to keep the status quo.

Were you under the impression people go into politics, or people form governments, or empires were founded and flourished for the sake of tripping peoples "happy" button, that being what is in peoples minds: "how can I make everyone else happy?"

People aren't going to be "happy" at change. But are they going to be upset enough to re-dig the trenches, throw nuclear bombs, send out the mustard gas, tanks, and corona viruses?


and with malice towards none!







jaish's photo
Thu 08/12/21 05:08 PM
A balding man was getting a haircut
The man’s barber said, “Do you know what they say if you’re bald in the front?”

“No,” the man said.

“They say you’re a thinker.”

“Oh?” the man said.

“Do you know what they say if you’re bald in the back?”

“No,” the man said.

“They say you’re a lover,” the barber said.

The man perked up. “What do they say if you’re bald in the front and the back?”

“That you only think you’re a lover.”

jaish's photo
Thu 08/12/21 05:46 AM
If you were ever bummed out that someone beat you to the top of your high school's graduating class, allow us to offer up a little refreshing, research-backed schadenfreude.

A study of more than 80 valedictorians and salutatorians (that's second-place finishers, guys) reveals that making straight A's means you're almost destined for middle management, says Karen Arnold, author of Lives of Promise: What Becomes of High School Valedictorians. "More than 90 percent of them ended up holding nicely paid positions in professional fields."


So that's 90 percent.
What's the percentage of them that go on to become heads of state, millionaires, and inventors of society-shifting technology? What's the percentage of them that go on to "change," "run," or "impress" the world?

Zero.

In fact, a survey of more than 700 American millionaires showed that the average GPA among this ruling class was 2.9.

- Ari Nottis in BestLife








jaish's photo
Sun 08/08/21 12:10 AM
Edited by jaish on Sun 08/08/21 12:16 AM

From Mother Jones


Last year, after Rudy Giuliani’s effort to dig up dirt on Joe Biden in Ukraine had already helped lead to the impeachment of his client, President Donald Trump, Giuliani continued the effort.

The former New York mayor joined with George Dickson III, the owner of California cannabis and earthquake warning businesses, to try to produce a documentary advancing allegations about Joe and Hunter Biden’s involvement in Ukraine during the Obama administration.

The would-be producers wanted to help Trump. And they also wanted to make money, people involved in the project said, plotting ways to profit off material they had assembled. - Mother Jones

The venture produced no movie, only about 15 minutes of notably low-quality footage. And now the FBI is investigating the project.



The Cast:


jaish's photo
Wed 07/28/21 11:04 PM
The 2024 elections will be decided by FB, YT and the Twit.
Sorry people, no CNN. Already sold to Admiral General Aladeen.

jaish's photo
Tue 07/27/21 02:44 PM
If as you say, God is a life force
then what for is 'good' n 'evil'?

jaish's photo
Tue 07/27/21 07:32 AM

Reminded me of epic lines / searched and found:

https://mingle2.com/topic/608726

jaish's photo
Tue 07/27/21 06:56 AM

It is not the fault of the U.S. or any other country for the collapse of Afghanistan to the taliban. They've had support, financially, equipment, and training for 20 years. if they can't establish some form of national defense in 20 years then the failure is on them, not us. blame your own government for sitting on ts heir hands and letting the rest of the world fight their wars for them. one question tho: who in the Afghanistan government pockets the trillions of dollars they were given?



Bare facts:
CIA / Pak Army trained Taliban for 10 years to resist Russian occupation.

Trillions sent to Pak Army to reinforce Taliban

After 9/11

CNN report / interview of Osama bin Laden was reason enough for Bush to send troops to Afghan.

Note: Osama had nothing to do with 9/11 - he had just laughed at being called the iconic figure for the 'might of Islamic whatever'; and for same reason, Pak Army could not oblige handing over ObL .......

Obama paid out another 9 billion to P army after Osama was killed.


-----

-----
On a positive note,

Geo survey found substantial quantities of Lithium in the mountains – potential export

China’s rail/roadie link to Europe runs thro’ Afghanistan

New UN chief is a Muslim from Turkey, pro Pak and pro Talib; likely to channel UN funds to Afghan