Community > Posts By > YouAndImake1

 
no photo
Fri 05/22/09 06:12 PM

Fill in the blank! happy


When you go from not giving a damn what people think to,,,
Definitely considering what she'll think...

no photo
Fri 05/22/09 06:11 PM

Isnt it proven scientificly, with body chemicals, like hormones, and pheromones? YEAH, of course im a "believer"


Bingo

no photo
Fri 05/22/09 06:08 PM

So I got my matches...Did the guys on my list get my name too?
And if so...Why haven't you e-mailed me ...ya Big jerks!!!

sad sad


Ummm, she hasn't posted for the guys to do any emailing yet

(_!_)

no photo
Fri 05/22/09 01:21 PM




The 8th Of July ? ?

What is so different about the 8th of July this year?

At five minutes and six seconds after 4 am on the 8th of July this year, the time and date will be 04:05:06 07/08/09.

This will never happen again.


Yes it will, one month later in Europe. WHY? HOW? Because they write the date differently. 04:05:06 07/08/09 in Berlin, say, is 4:05:06 am on the 7th of August, 2009. And it will happen here AGAIN in another 100 years, in 2109.


LMAO
Buzz Killington

no photo
Fri 05/22/09 01:19 PM

:angry: What do you say to get rid of someone who bugs you? grumble

:laughing:


On here,,,
"hey, just wanted to let you know you're blocked from here on out. If you want to continue to type, please forward them to admin here and they will go around my block. You have to do it 7 times before they'll consider you to be serious though. I would suggest 8 times for good measure...

In R L,,,
Sorry, I'm getting older inside as we're speaking and I don't want the rest of my body catching the disease you've obviously given me.
Then I spray them with Lysol

no photo
Fri 05/22/09 01:11 PM



Hmmmm.... I guess we need the details of your ex-friends girlfriend dont we..... What did she do or "not" do to you???? Just askin????
slaphead


Nothing, I have absolutely no interest in her. She tried to play the field between me and him, I ended up meeting up with her once to see a movie and she didn't want to tell him...even though I said we should just tell him. He took her word, didn't discuss what happened with me, and the friendship ended. Not that it bothers me much as I really don't need friends like that.


Bruthuh, since when do you take someone's advice that goes against your better judgement? I am not grinding you but you need to set the record straight with this guy whether he likes it or not. Odds are, she's doing it with someone else now and you might be doing him a favor?

no photo
Fri 05/22/09 01:09 PM

Start playing pranks on the guy. Put a rubber snake in his desk drawer. Move sh!t around and when he's looking all over for it, put it back. Sort of the "Gaslight" approach.


Then the guy has a valid harrassment claim on him,,,
nuh uh
noway

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 08:17 PM


whoa rofl


I must be getting old...
I can see her eyes, her decision to close them, the almost deep sigh,,,
I'm laughing my ass off
am I too cynical?

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 08:01 PM
Edited by YouAndImake1 on Thu 05/21/09 08:10 PM
Wow, three weeks and she has a significant other?
How should you feel?
I think the word used would be appropriate...

As for approaching the guy, not your place really, she is the one acting irresponsibly. He should "feel" like he doesn't want the kids to see stuff but she has the "responsibility".

So, you've moved on and already have a "few different" and you still receive her late at night...

Why are you two split up again?

You sound like you fit each other well....

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 07:57 PM

besides everyone in my congregation knows that you can't cure cancer without rattlesnake venom



I heard the side effects are killer...
:banana:

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 07:52 PM
Yes, walls are built for a reason.
Yes, it is for protection.
Only we can take them down.
Only we know when the time is right.
Yes, when we feel safe.
Yes, when we trust our judgement.


not
until
then
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 07:39 PM
Naturopathy Principles
Naturopathic ideology focuses on naturally-occuring and minimally-invasive methods, trusting to the "healing power of nature." Such treatments as "synthetic" drugs, radiation, and major surgery are avoided, and rejection of biomedicine in favor of an intuitive and vitalistic conception of the body and nature is common. Prevention through stress reduction and a healthy diet and lifestyle is emphasized. The philosophy of naturopathic practice is self-described by six core values. Multiple versions exist in the form of the naturopathic doctor's oath,various mission statements published by schools or professional associations, and ethical conduct guidelines published by regulatory bodies:

1. First, do no harm; provide the most effective health care available with the least risk to patients at all times (Primum Non Nocere).
2. Recognize, respect and promote the self-healing power of nature inherent in each individual human being. (Vis Medicatrix Naturae, a form of vitalism).
3. Identify and remove the causes of illness, rather than eliminate or suppress symptoms (Tolle Causum).
4. Educate, inspire rational hope and encourage self-responsibility for health (Doctor as Teacher).
5. Treat each person by considering all individual health factors and influences. (Treat the Whole Person).
6. Emphasize the condition of health to promote well-being and to prevent diseases for the individual, each community and our world. (Health Promotion, the Best Prevention)
This would be as vital to living a good life as living by the teachings of the Bible. It is a set of guidelines.

It is not medicine by definition

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 07:31 PM
Edited by YouAndImake1 on Thu 05/21/09 07:32 PM

Nowhere in these definitions has anyone defined what "SPECIAL MEDICAL TREATMENT" is?

Nice spin there, give it a name that you do not understand.
The definition for what they are doing is "Naturopathy"

The parents were providing special medical treatment.

Special medical treatment is defined as when someone gets preferential treatment above and beyond due to wealth or stature.

Point two:
No state, no state supreme court can crass the boundaries of the U.S. Constitution. If the parents are, in effect, claiming sanctuary under the freedom of religion act then no state can be justified in prohibiting a parent from treating thier own child as they would treat themselves under similar condtions (based on thier religious beliefs).

So let me get this straight here,,, if the parents believe through religion that using rattlesnake bites and hemlock will cure them of their ills, they have a right to give their child the same "cure". What if the proclaimed disease is human suffering in general and the only cure is death? That would make Jamestown ok?

Point three:
Any government web site that upholds that all AMA (American medical association) and FDA approved medical treatments are the only and best ones available is conforming to the FDA and the AMA.

And if any of you buy the idea that the AMA and FDA function in YOUR best interest - then YOU are welcome to follow thier instructions implicitely.

However, you would be the wiser if you did a lot of research at who runs those institutions, who they're in bed with and how often they change partners between themselves. Just for starters:
pharmaceutical companies – the chemical companies (GMO, Monsanto, Dow, Dupont, etc) – the radiological industries. They ALL fund their OWN research and the FDA and the AMA add their approvals to their research - without conducting their own. Furthermore, outside research is almost always dispelled by all of these industries. Of course some very well known names have been known to use a revolving door - earning wages from one institution, then another, back to the first, to another and right into - government office... imagine that!

This is why it takes so many years for the word to get into the mainstream and for people to complain - by then some NEW medical miricle treatment is being offerd, with the appropriate approval (of course).

Now I don't expect the parent of this child to know all this - most people believe in the "system". So those of you who think any child under the age of 18 has a chance in h e ll in making an informed decision is not being realistic.

But it shouldn't matter, the point is that every parent, barring known abuses, has a right to determine for themselves the forms of medical treatment they will deem appropriate for their own children. No other person, group, or government has the right to decide what is appropriate medical treatment for your children.

In fact, I would personally say that every parent that feeds their children boxed and otherwise 'processed' foods are committing child abuse. But the FDA and the AMA think that genetically altering food, through radiation, and chemically treating crops, fields and feed for livestock causes no harm. If you agree with them, that there is no harm from these foods, even though there's no real nutritional value in them either - then keep feeding it to you kids.

Because I don't have the right to take you to court and make you change how you 'treat' (feed) your child. Just as I don't right to detemine how you will 'treat' them medically when they become obese, diabetic, asthmatic, or have cancer.

OK, so you say because parents are feeding their kids cereal, it's abuse but basically sentencing the kid through beliefs to death is ok...
Gotcha...

noway rofl

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 05:38 PM
Please look at the original post on this
While he allowed Daniel to stay with his parents, the judge gave the Hausers until Tuesday to get an updated chest X-ray for their son and select an oncologist.
If the evaluation shows the cancer had advanced to a point where chemotherapy and radiation would no longer help, the judge said, he would not order the boy to undergo treatment.

Seems to me the decision was to address the growing tumor
Doctors have said Daniel's cancer had up to a 90 percent chance of being cured with chemotherapy and radiation. Without those treatments, doctors said his chances of survival are 5 percent.
Daniel's parents have been supporting what they say is their son's decision to treat the disease with nutritional supplements and other alternative treatments favored by the Nemenhah Band.

The son has a learning disability
"My son is not in any medical danger at this point," Colleen Hauser testified at a court hearing last week. She also testified that Daniel is a medicine man and elder in the Nemenhah Band.

a. The parents names are Colleen and Anthony, does this mean the kid himself is a "medicine man and elder"?
b. She is right in saying he is not in medical danger as he was not being treated medically
The family's attorney, Calvin Johnson, said Daniel made the decision himself to refuse chemotherapy, but Brown County said he did not have an understanding of what it meant to be a medicine man or an elder.

This is basically saying the kid is treating the cancer by himself...
Court filings also indicated Daniel has a learning disability and can't read.

Great, so this kid can't read so whatever he is fed by the Mom becomes the truth? Again, he's the medicine man and elder?
As to the Nemenhah Band themselves, they are new organization that hold beliefs similar to that of local Native Americans as well as the Mormon Church — although neither group recognizes the Nemenhah Band as a part of them. Their leader, Philip “Cloudpiler” Landis has a criminal past and spent a few months in jail several years ago for charges of fraud. After leaving jail he started the group which he allows others to join for a small fee of $250. To top it off, whenever members of the Nemenhah Band get sick they also have to pay Landis for the natural medicines too.

What church allows you to "join" for a fee? Oh, that's right, they're usually cults or con games.

Now, from the update on the story where they have disappeared...
"She should have gone to court," Landis said. "It's how we work these things out. You don't solve anything by disregarding the order of the judge."

For some reason, she decides she does not want to listen to her spiritual guide?
Anthony Hauser now agrees that Daniel needs to be taken back to a doctor for re-evaluation for the best treatment, said Calvin Johnson, an attorney for the parents.

So now, having evaluated the situation, the Father even wants to reconsider. Seems to me he wants the kid to have a better chance of surviving.
The family's doctor, James Joyce, testified by telephone that he examined Daniel on Monday, and that an X-ray showed his tumor had grown to the size it was when he was first diagnosed.
"He had basically gotten back all the trouble he had in January," the doctor said.
Joyce testified that he offered to make appointments for Daniel with oncologists, but the Hausers declined. He also said he tried to give Daniel more information about lymphoma but the boy, his mother and lawyer Susan Daya left in a rush.

Since when does the damned lawyer go to the doctor with the patient. Before the conspiracy theory comes out, the lawyer could've been in the front of the office if there was a concern about a Gestapo like squad coming to take away "Elian" Daniel Hauser.

This whole thing stinks. The father even wants things to be thought out now.

Let me see, since you've argued about rights and gov't, will you now argue that the mom should have rights over the dad?
What about neglect in the point that the kid can't read, yet believes he knows chemo will kill him and he's a medicine man?

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 05:35 PM
Edited by YouAndImake1 on Thu 05/21/09 05:39 PM
double post
grumble

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 04:28 PM

its a religious chain letter?


Blended in with a lesson in life...

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 03:41 PM

Well i had a blind date last night, and unlike previous ones she actually showed up, but i dont know what to think, we were to meet today but she got called into work(or so she says) is this a blow off??


Dear (_____),
I had a great time last night and thought about you today. Too bad you got called in to work. That must stink. Hey, if you want, why don't you give me a call (or email) if you're not too tired. If you are tired, call me later. Maybe we can have coffee or (____).

*offer void where prohibited by law or lack of interest

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 02:36 PM

"I wonder if now that I've taken time with the others, the good ones might go bad?"
hmmmmmmmmmmm....do strawberry people go bad?bigsmile

They tend to get a little moldy, well, at least that's what I think the fine hairs are,,, maybe they just get moustaches?
:smile:

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 01:50 PM




laugh
That one pic reminds me of that damned "My name is nannerpuss nannerpuss" commercial...

no photo
Thu 05/21/09 01:39 PM
rofl


Grrr baby


rofl

1 2 10 11 12 14 16 17 18 24 25