1 2 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 49 50
Topic: 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Get Destroyed
Lpdon's photo
Tue 08/09/11 08:15 PM


The piece-nik's and conspiracy theroists need to shut their mouths, close their eyes and listen to these two songs, I guarantee there will be some excuse they will make but oh well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6yLQRF-cEU&ob=av2n

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruNrdmjcNTc&ob=av2n


Those are good songs and great tools of manipulation. Music is a great tool to manipulate people's emotions.

"Have you forgotten 9-11?" Nope we haven't, that's why we are still talking about it.

That first song said we need to find out who is behind Bin Laden. That is what we hope we do. It might not be who you think it is.

The second song is great to sing to the troops so they can feel good about what they are doing.

Not very many people really understand the reason for wars, but if they can feel good about them, it makes them feel better.




And to think Toby Keith is a Democrat. He would really write a song to motivate us into war if he believed the idiots who think 9/11 was an inside job.

no photo
Tue 08/09/11 08:17 PM


Jessie Ventura:
Goes to show you how mad people are with politicians when they elected that num nut into office.

I do like what he says in this video though....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9mbotpeuJM&feature=related

He made the interviewer look like idiots.

Reporters are usually not very bright.


Jesse Ventura the proven liar. Figures you would take what he says as gospel.


I never take what anyone says as gospel. But if they say something i like, I listen.

He made that reporter look like a fool. I liked that. laugh laugh

Lpdon's photo
Tue 08/09/11 08:37 PM



Jessie Ventura:
Goes to show you how mad people are with politicians when they elected that num nut into office.

I do like what he says in this video though....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9mbotpeuJM&feature=related

He made the interviewer look like idiots.

Reporters are usually not very bright.


Jesse Ventura the proven liar. Figures you would take what he says as gospel.


I never take what anyone says as gospel. But if they say something i like, I listen.

He made that reporter look like a fool. I liked that. laugh laugh


He's a proven LIAR, anything he says or does isn't credible, even if he makes someone look like a fool.

He;; the guy couldn't act and can't keep a job. He lasted how long in the WWF or how long in politics? laugh

no photo
Tue 08/09/11 08:49 PM




Jessie Ventura:
Goes to show you how mad people are with politicians when they elected that num nut into office.

I do like what he says in this video though....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9mbotpeuJM&feature=related

He made the interviewer look like idiots.

Reporters are usually not very bright.


Jesse Ventura the proven liar. Figures you would take what he says as gospel.


I never take what anyone says as gospel. But if they say something i like, I listen.

He made that reporter look like a fool. I liked that. laugh laugh


He's a proven LIAR, anything he says or does isn't credible, even if he makes someone look like a fool.

He;; the guy couldn't act and can't keep a job. He lasted how long in the WWF or how long in politics? laugh


Your opinion and you are entitled to it.
He still made that reporter look ridiculous. Good for him.

no photo
Tue 08/09/11 09:36 PM




Jessie Ventura:
Goes to show you how mad people are with politicians when they elected that num nut into office.

I do like what he says in this video though....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9mbotpeuJM&feature=related

He made the interviewer look like idiots.

Reporters are usually not very bright.


Jesse Ventura the proven liar. Figures you would take what he says as gospel.


I never take what anyone says as gospel. But if they say something i like, I listen.

He made that reporter look like a fool. I liked that. laugh laugh


He's a proven LIAR, anything he says or does isn't credible, even if he makes someone look like a fool.

He;; the guy couldn't act and can't keep a job. He lasted how long in the WWF or how long in politics? laugh


yep he was a governor and now he lives in mexico what does that

tell you

you forgot he was vietnam veteran too.

not to wish you death or anything like that but if your so right

that were all crazy.

why dont you enlist and go fight these so called terrorists then

you can be a veteran

oh by the way did you figure out that the fda is letting these

food and water companys poison you yet?

s1owhand's photo
Wed 08/10/11 06:31 AM

Slowhand1,

I am reading the stuff on that Popular Mechanics site when I can find it in the maize of advertisements.

I also ordered the 9-11 debunking book by Popular Mechanics and a two other books:

"The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False."

and:

"Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory."

I will spend some serious time on this information before I proceed with any further discussions on this subject.

I also downloaded the entire 565 page official 9-11 report. That's going to be hard to read.

Have you read all of that stuff yourself? Has anyone in this thread even read the official 565 page report? I doubt it. I haven't.


Yeah - I've read a fair bit of it. Enough to make it clear that
everything seen so far really is consistent with Al-Qaida hijacked
aircraft bringing down all the buildings. Structural damage on
impact plus fires weakened steel supports and down they came. The
mechanical engineers and architects are all in agreement on it.

Really despite the innuendo there is no actual evidence to support
any other conclusion.

Nothing linking any US officials to it. Bldg 7 damage and fires
weakened it to the point of collapse. No evidence of any other
explosives. Larry misquoted about pulling the firefighters from
the building etc. Some Israelis filming the event like everyone else
with a camcorder in Manhattan. There is nothing - no evidence that
there was any conspiracy despite all the rumors.

no photo
Wed 08/10/11 08:55 AM


Slowhand1,

I am reading the stuff on that Popular Mechanics site when I can find it in the maize of advertisements.

I also ordered the 9-11 debunking book by Popular Mechanics and a two other books:

"The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False."

and:

"Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory."

I will spend some serious time on this information before I proceed with any further discussions on this subject.

I also downloaded the entire 565 page official 9-11 report. That's going to be hard to read.

Have you read all of that stuff yourself? Has anyone in this thread even read the official 565 page report? I doubt it. I haven't.


Yeah - I've read a fair bit of it. Enough to make it clear that
everything seen so far really is consistent with Al-Qaida hijacked
aircraft bringing down all the buildings. Structural damage on
impact plus fires weakened steel supports and down they came. The
mechanical engineers and architects are all in agreement on it.

Really despite the innuendo there is no actual evidence to support
any other conclusion.

Nothing linking any US officials to it. Bldg 7 damage and fires
weakened it to the point of collapse. No evidence of any other
explosives. Larry misquoted about pulling the firefighters from
the building etc. Some Israelis filming the event like everyone else
with a camcorder in Manhattan. There is nothing - no evidence that
there was any conspiracy despite all the rumors.


Larry wasn't "misquoted" he was video taped.
Building # 7 would never have fallen on its own in my opinion. Never.
The Israeli's were celebrating and actually said on television that they were there "to document the event." So they knew about it in advance.

You can't ignore details like that. And I doubt if you read the official report. It's over 500 pages long and probably not easy reading.

So I think you are full of it.laugh laugh

Lpdon's photo
Wed 08/10/11 10:00 AM





Jessie Ventura:
Goes to show you how mad people are with politicians when they elected that num nut into office.

I do like what he says in this video though....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9mbotpeuJM&feature=related

He made the interviewer look like idiots.

Reporters are usually not very bright.


Jesse Ventura the proven liar. Figures you would take what he says as gospel.


I never take what anyone says as gospel. But if they say something i like, I listen.

He made that reporter look like a fool. I liked that. laugh laugh


He's a proven LIAR, anything he says or does isn't credible, even if he makes someone look like a fool.

He;; the guy couldn't act and can't keep a job. He lasted how long in the WWF or how long in politics? laugh


Your opinion and you are entitled to it.
He still made that reporter look ridiculous. Good for him.


No, it's a lot of people's opinion. He didn't make it big in the WWF or any Wrestling orginization and hasn't been the star of any major hollywood picture ever.

Lpdon's photo
Wed 08/10/11 10:01 AM



Slowhand1,

I am reading the stuff on that Popular Mechanics site when I can find it in the maize of advertisements.

I also ordered the 9-11 debunking book by Popular Mechanics and a two other books:

"The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False."

and:

"Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory."

I will spend some serious time on this information before I proceed with any further discussions on this subject.

I also downloaded the entire 565 page official 9-11 report. That's going to be hard to read.

Have you read all of that stuff yourself? Has anyone in this thread even read the official 565 page report? I doubt it. I haven't.


Yeah - I've read a fair bit of it. Enough to make it clear that
everything seen so far really is consistent with Al-Qaida hijacked
aircraft bringing down all the buildings. Structural damage on
impact plus fires weakened steel supports and down they came. The
mechanical engineers and architects are all in agreement on it.

Really despite the innuendo there is no actual evidence to support
any other conclusion.

Nothing linking any US officials to it. Bldg 7 damage and fires
weakened it to the point of collapse. No evidence of any other
explosives. Larry misquoted about pulling the firefighters from
the building etc. Some Israelis filming the event like everyone else
with a camcorder in Manhattan. There is nothing - no evidence that
there was any conspiracy despite all the rumors.


Larry wasn't "misquoted" he was video taped.
Building # 7 would never have fallen on its own in my opinion. Never.
The Israeli's were celebrating and actually said on television that they were there "to document the event." So they knew about it in advance.

You can't ignore details like that. And I doubt if you read the official report. It's over 500 pages long and probably not easy reading.

So I think you are full of it.laugh laugh


How do you know they were Isralei? They could have been palestenian's or their supporters. Talk about guillable.

s1owhand's photo
Wed 08/10/11 10:28 AM




Slowhand1,

I am reading the stuff on that Popular Mechanics site when I can find it in the maize of advertisements.

I also ordered the 9-11 debunking book by Popular Mechanics and a two other books:

"The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False."

and:

"Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory."

I will spend some serious time on this information before I proceed with any further discussions on this subject.

I also downloaded the entire 565 page official 9-11 report. That's going to be hard to read.

Have you read all of that stuff yourself? Has anyone in this thread even read the official 565 page report? I doubt it. I haven't.


Yeah - I've read a fair bit of it. Enough to make it clear that
everything seen so far really is consistent with Al-Qaida hijacked
aircraft bringing down all the buildings. Structural damage on
impact plus fires weakened steel supports and down they came. The
mechanical engineers and architects are all in agreement on it.

Really despite the innuendo there is no actual evidence to support
any other conclusion.

Nothing linking any US officials to it. Bldg 7 damage and fires
weakened it to the point of collapse. No evidence of any other
explosives. Larry misquoted about pulling the firefighters from
the building etc. Some Israelis filming the event like everyone else
with a camcorder in Manhattan. There is nothing - no evidence that
there was any conspiracy despite all the rumors.


Larry wasn't "misquoted" he was video taped.
Building # 7 would never have fallen on its own in my opinion. Never.
The Israeli's were celebrating and actually said on television that they were there "to document the event." So they knew about it in advance.

You can't ignore details like that. And I doubt if you read the official report. It's over 500 pages long and probably not easy reading.

So I think you are full of it.laugh laugh


How do you know they were Isralei? They could have been palestenian's or their supporters. Talk about guillable.


Regardless of their nationality EVERYONE was documenting it

laugh So that don't prove SQUAT. laugh

The Larry excerpt was taken out of context. Watch his whole
interview if you can find it and you will see them discussing
"pulling the firefighters".

whoa

Your opinion about whether Bldg 7 could be taken down is nothing
more than a vague notion. The engineers and architects after
careful analysis uniformly disagree with that notion.

laugh

There is no real evidence of any of the conspiracy theories being
anything more than hot air and blather!

drinker

laugh

no photo
Wed 08/10/11 11:09 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 08/10/11 11:12 AM




Slowhand1,

I am reading the stuff on that Popular Mechanics site when I can find it in the maize of advertisements.

I also ordered the 9-11 debunking book by Popular Mechanics and a two other books:

"The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False."

and:

"Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory."

I will spend some serious time on this information before I proceed with any further discussions on this subject.

I also downloaded the entire 565 page official 9-11 report. That's going to be hard to read.

Have you read all of that stuff yourself? Has anyone in this thread even read the official 565 page report? I doubt it. I haven't.


Yeah - I've read a fair bit of it. Enough to make it clear that
everything seen so far really is consistent with Al-Qaida hijacked
aircraft bringing down all the buildings. Structural damage on
impact plus fires weakened steel supports and down they came. The
mechanical engineers and architects are all in agreement on it.

Really despite the innuendo there is no actual evidence to support
any other conclusion.

Nothing linking any US officials to it. Bldg 7 damage and fires
weakened it to the point of collapse. No evidence of any other
explosives. Larry misquoted about pulling the firefighters from
the building etc. Some Israelis filming the event like everyone else
with a camcorder in Manhattan. There is nothing - no evidence that
there was any conspiracy despite all the rumors.


Larry wasn't "misquoted" he was video taped.
Building # 7 would never have fallen on its own in my opinion. Never.
The Israeli's were celebrating and actually said on television that they were there "to document the event." So they knew about it in advance.

You can't ignore details like that. And I doubt if you read the official report. It's over 500 pages long and probably not easy reading.

So I think you are full of it.laugh laugh


How do you know they were Isralei? They could have been palestenian's or their supporters. Talk about guillable.


Well that is a matter of record.:smile: They held these guys for 6 weeks. The only reason they let them go is because they were Israeli and two of them were Mossad.


no photo
Wed 08/10/11 11:12 AM





Slowhand1,

I am reading the stuff on that Popular Mechanics site when I can find it in the maize of advertisements.

I also ordered the 9-11 debunking book by Popular Mechanics and a two other books:

"The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False."

and:

"Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory."

I will spend some serious time on this information before I proceed with any further discussions on this subject.

I also downloaded the entire 565 page official 9-11 report. That's going to be hard to read.

Have you read all of that stuff yourself? Has anyone in this thread even read the official 565 page report? I doubt it. I haven't.


Yeah - I've read a fair bit of it. Enough to make it clear that
everything seen so far really is consistent with Al-Qaida hijacked
aircraft bringing down all the buildings. Structural damage on
impact plus fires weakened steel supports and down they came. The
mechanical engineers and architects are all in agreement on it.

Really despite the innuendo there is no actual evidence to support
any other conclusion.

Nothing linking any US officials to it. Bldg 7 damage and fires
weakened it to the point of collapse. No evidence of any other
explosives. Larry misquoted about pulling the firefighters from
the building etc. Some Israelis filming the event like everyone else
with a camcorder in Manhattan. There is nothing - no evidence that
there was any conspiracy despite all the rumors.


Larry wasn't "misquoted" he was video taped.
Building # 7 would never have fallen on its own in my opinion. Never.
The Israeli's were celebrating and actually said on television that they were there "to document the event." So they knew about it in advance.

You can't ignore details like that. And I doubt if you read the official report. It's over 500 pages long and probably not easy reading.

So I think you are full of it.laugh laugh


How do you know they were Isralei? They could have been palestenian's or their supporters. Talk about guillable.


Regardless of their nationality EVERYONE was documenting it

laugh So that don't prove SQUAT. laugh

The Larry excerpt was taken out of context. Watch his whole
interview if you can find it and you will see them discussing
"pulling the firefighters".

whoa

Your opinion about whether Bldg 7 could be taken down is nothing
more than a vague notion. The engineers and architects after
careful analysis uniformly disagree with that notion.

laugh

There is no real evidence of any of the conspiracy theories being
anything more than hot air and blather!

drinker

laugh


Well since you haven't read the official report or the book debunking 9-11 or the book debunking the debunking of 9-11, excuse me if I don't take your word for it.

I will reserve judgement after I read all of that and then I'll get back to this subject with another thread that has my conclusions.


s1owhand's photo
Wed 08/10/11 11:49 AM






Slowhand1,

I am reading the stuff on that Popular Mechanics site when I can find it in the maize of advertisements.

I also ordered the 9-11 debunking book by Popular Mechanics and a two other books:

"The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False."

and:

"Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory."

I will spend some serious time on this information before I proceed with any further discussions on this subject.

I also downloaded the entire 565 page official 9-11 report. That's going to be hard to read.

Have you read all of that stuff yourself? Has anyone in this thread even read the official 565 page report? I doubt it. I haven't.


Yeah - I've read a fair bit of it. Enough to make it clear that
everything seen so far really is consistent with Al-Qaida hijacked
aircraft bringing down all the buildings. Structural damage on
impact plus fires weakened steel supports and down they came. The
mechanical engineers and architects are all in agreement on it.

Really despite the innuendo there is no actual evidence to support
any other conclusion.

Nothing linking any US officials to it. Bldg 7 damage and fires
weakened it to the point of collapse. No evidence of any other
explosives. Larry misquoted about pulling the firefighters from
the building etc. Some Israelis filming the event like everyone else
with a camcorder in Manhattan. There is nothing - no evidence that
there was any conspiracy despite all the rumors.


Larry wasn't "misquoted" he was video taped.
Building # 7 would never have fallen on its own in my opinion. Never.
The Israeli's were celebrating and actually said on television that they were there "to document the event." So they knew about it in advance.

You can't ignore details like that. And I doubt if you read the official report. It's over 500 pages long and probably not easy reading.

So I think you are full of it.laugh laugh


How do you know they were Isralei? They could have been palestenian's or their supporters. Talk about guillable.


Regardless of their nationality EVERYONE was documenting it

laugh So that don't prove SQUAT. laugh

The Larry excerpt was taken out of context. Watch his whole
interview if you can find it and you will see them discussing
"pulling the firefighters".

whoa

Your opinion about whether Bldg 7 could be taken down is nothing
more than a vague notion. The engineers and architects after
careful analysis uniformly disagree with that notion.

laugh

There is no real evidence of any of the conspiracy theories being
anything more than hot air and blather!

drinker

laugh


Well since you haven't read the official report or the book debunking 9-11 or the book debunking the debunking of 9-11, excuse me if I don't take your word for it.

I will reserve judgement after I read all of that and then I'll get back to this subject with another thread that has my conclusions.




Reserve all the judgement you want. I have read them though....
as I said in my earlier post. I've read enough. You are simply wrong.

flowerforyou

no photo
Wed 08/10/11 12:04 PM
Your opinions are irrelevant.

s1owhand's photo
Wed 08/10/11 01:46 PM
Edited by s1owhand on Wed 08/10/11 02:08 PM

Your opinions are irrelevant.


The last bastion of those who will not learn the truth is
to ignore all arguments which go against their cherished (even
if unsupportable) beliefs.

The analyses are widely available online read all the official reports at the links I posted earlier.

drinker

no photo
Wed 08/10/11 01:56 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 08/10/11 01:58 PM


Your opinions are irrelevant.


The last bastion of the those who will not learn the truth is
to ignore all arguments which go against their cherished (even
if unsupportable) beliefs.


That would be YOU describing YOURSELF.

I'm the one who ordered the book 9-11 debunked, and the book debunking that book and a book on the collapse of building #7 and I downloaded the whole official report. Over 500 pages that you claim you read only part of it.

So for you to make the above remark in reply to my post is only a statement about yourself because it does not apply to me.

laugh laugh laugh

My post was regarding YOUR opinion. THAT is what is irrelevant. It is irrelevant because you do not have the qualifications to impress me.

InvictusV's photo
Wed 08/10/11 02:03 PM



Your opinions are irrelevant.


The last bastion of the those who will not learn the truth is
to ignore all arguments which go against their cherished (even
if unsupportable) beliefs.


That would be YOU describing YOURSELF.

I'm the one who ordered the book 9-11 debunked, and the book debunking that book and a book on the collapse of building #7 and I downloaded the whole official report. Over 500 pages that you claim you read only part of it.

So for you to make the above remark in reply to my post is only a statement about yourself because it does not apply to me.

laugh laugh laugh

My post was regarding YOUR opinion. THAT is what is irrelevant. It is irrelevant because you do not have the qualifications to impress me.


I am going to wait until the movie comes out.

Loose Change Volume 666 .. The devil did it..


no photo
Wed 08/10/11 02:24 PM
This official 9-11 report reads like a movie script more than an official report. They could easily make a movie out of it.laugh laugh


no photo
Wed 08/10/11 03:08 PM
Edited by volant7 on Wed 08/10/11 03:15 PM
i saw video of the cia/fbi helping them make bigger explosives the

first time they blew it up.

why would they show them how to make a bigger bomb?

why wouldnt they stop them?

timothy McVeigh same thing.

they had bigger bombs already planted in the building.

why would he show up with a truck bomb if he already hid more

explosive bombs inside.

same people investigated 911

you can talk about anything on tv except the nwo/satanic plan

there was a guy here in pittsburgh shot 3 cops

his friends say he was against the nwo and thought they were coming

to kill him.

they put a gag order on him and gave him the death penalty

he didnt even get to talk

dont worry they did the talking for him

they said he was crazy and hated cops not the nwo

i just happened to be up when they were live at 7 am

then someone stepped in and changed things

you mention nwo here and they look at you crazy like they dont

exist.

look at the building on 911 shaped like a pyramid on top by the

towers.

they had front row seats


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZCyOWLrRTE

no photo
Wed 08/10/11 03:13 PM

This official 9-11 report reads like a movie script more than an official report. They could easily make a movie out of it.laugh laugh




that because it was a movie with wonderful hollywood special effects.

just like bluebeam will be

1 2 27 28 29 31 33 34 35 49 50