1 2 6 7 8 10 12 13 14
Topic: Religion Endangers Humanity And Its Future
msharmony's photo
Sun 01/24/10 11:48 AM
healthy debate is well,,,healthy..lol



Dragoness's photo
Sun 01/24/10 11:57 AM

Love, forgiveness, spirit, allowing, tolerance, kindness, compassion, empathy...ALL these gifts can be experienced and expressed without religion.

We do not have to be part of one of the big religions to have such things in our lives...

Once I was able to dump my childhood religion and lose the salvation theory all together...then I was able to truly experience what spirituality really is. I know there is something bigger than me behind the wheel. It is when I am hiking the mountains, or sitting along the river that I feel a presence of pure love, not in a church building.


I actually believe the only way for peace in this world is for humans to outgrow religion.

Which if they would examine without reverence associated with it, they would discover it is useless.

msharmony's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:00 PM
I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.

Dragoness's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:02 PM

I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?

msharmony's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:05 PM


I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.

Dragoness's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:09 PM



I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.

msharmony's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:19 PM




I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.


My logic is more like common sense actually, Far too many people since the beginning of time have been atheists for me to believe NONE of them encouraged or supported war.

Most wars are fought over property and power, not things that only the religious are guilty of wanting.

Dragoness's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:21 PM





I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.


My logic is more like common sense actually, Far too many people since the beginning of time have been atheists for me to believe NONE of them encouraged or supported war.

Most wars are fought over property and power, not things that only the religious are guilty of wanting.


I know you cannot find the atheists because most of them were not part of creating the reason for war.

What do you think religion is???

Power.

You cannot dispute it. Not legitimately anyway,

CowboyGH's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:25 PM






I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.


My logic is more like common sense actually, Far too many people since the beginning of time have been atheists for me to believe NONE of them encouraged or supported war.

Most wars are fought over property and power, not things that only the religious are guilty of wanting.


I know you cannot find the atheists because most of them were not part of creating the reason for war.

What do you think religion is???

Power.

You cannot dispute it. Not legitimately anyway,


funny, can you please enlighten us with some ways Christianity in general has anything to do with gaining power for ones self?

msharmony's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:28 PM






I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.


My logic is more like common sense actually, Far too many people since the beginning of time have been atheists for me to believe NONE of them encouraged or supported war.

Most wars are fought over property and power, not things that only the religious are guilty of wanting.


I know you cannot find the atheists because most of them were not part of creating the reason for war.

What do you think religion is???

Power.

You cannot dispute it. Not legitimately anyway,


Well, it would be an endless debate because each side can come up with support for their point of view honestly. I could site that Japan, Vietnam, and Germany are all highly atheist countries and we know the wars they have been part of and the oppression that they have experienced. It would be futile to try to convince me that anyone knows the percentage of those war supporters who believe in Jesus vs those who dont, but it is unreasonable to assume that to not believe in Christ means to not believe in or support war.

Dragoness's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:30 PM







I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.


My logic is more like common sense actually, Far too many people since the beginning of time have been atheists for me to believe NONE of them encouraged or supported war.

Most wars are fought over property and power, not things that only the religious are guilty of wanting.


I know you cannot find the atheists because most of them were not part of creating the reason for war.

What do you think religion is???

Power.

You cannot dispute it. Not legitimately anyway,


funny, can you please enlighten us with some ways Christianity in general has anything to do with gaining power for ones self?


I you use the brain your god gave you you will see it.

Dragoness's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:38 PM







I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.


My logic is more like common sense actually, Far too many people since the beginning of time have been atheists for me to believe NONE of them encouraged or supported war.

Most wars are fought over property and power, not things that only the religious are guilty of wanting.


I know you cannot find the atheists because most of them were not part of creating the reason for war.

What do you think religion is???

Power.

You cannot dispute it. Not legitimately anyway,


Well, it would be an endless debate because each side can come up with support for their point of view honestly. I could site that Japan, Vietnam, and Germany are all highly atheist countries and we know the wars they have been part of and the oppression that they have experienced. It would be futile to try to convince me that anyone knows the percentage of those war supporters who believe in Jesus vs those who dont, but it is unreasonable to assume that to not believe in Christ means to not believe in or support war.


I guess you don't know what you are talking about here.

Example;

Religion in Japan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Japan

There are many religions in Japan that have come along with current times but most follow Shintō or Buddhism. Most Japanese people do not identify as exclusively belonging to just one religion, but incorporate features of both religions into their daily lives in a process known as syncretism. Shinto and Buddhism are even taken to as being interwoven in the country. Japanese streets are decorated on Tanabata, Obon and Christmas. Japan grants religious freedom to all sects of religious people, as evidenced by the fact they allow minority religions like Christianity, Islam and Sikhism to be practiced. According to the CIA World Factbook 84% to 96% adhere to Shinto and Buddhism while 4% to 16% of the demographic population adhere to other religions or non-religious, atheist groups.[1] However, such high numbers come primarily from birth records, following a longstanding practice of family lines being officially associated with a local Buddhist temple and not the people truly following the religion. The majority of Japanese carry on the roles of one or more religious body, but do not consider themselves believers in one particular religion, but are syncretistic.[2]

Religion in Vietnam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Vietnam

The earliest established religions in Vietnam are Mahayana Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism (called the "triple religion" or tam giáo). Significant minorities of adherents to Roman Catholicism, Cao Dai, and Hoa Hao and smaller minorities of adherents to Protestantism, Islam, Hinduism, and Theravada Buddhism were established later, in recent centuries.

The majority of Vietnamese people classify themselves as non-religious, although they visit religious temples several times every year. Their everyday behaviours and attitudes are dictated by the synthesis of philosophies which can be traced from many religions, especially Mahayana Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism. Those religions have been co-existing in the country for centuries and mixed perfectly with the Vietnamese tradition of worshiping their ancestors and national heroes. That special mix explains why the people there find it hard to say exactly which religion they belong to.

Religion in Germany
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Germany

Christianity is the largest religion in Germany with 54,765,265 (67.07%) adherents as of the end of 2006.[1] The second largest religion is Islam with 3.3 million adherents (4%)[1] followed by Buddhism and Judaism. During the last few decades, the two largest churches in Germany (the Protestant Evangelical Church in Germany or EKD and the Roman Catholic church), have lost significant number of adherents, both are down to roughly 30%.[2] [3] With 30.7 % as per the end of 2008, the Catholic Church is still close to its pre-World War II 1939 percentage of 33%.[4]

The most notable losses occurred in the Protestant churches, especially owing to the atheistic policy conducted in former East Germany. However since the fall of the communistic regime two decades ago, the EKD continued losing members.[3]. Other churches in Germany are all rather small (equal or less than 0.5%).[1] As a result of re-unification (of East and West Germany), the number of Germans without a religion has grown, especially owing to the addition of the eastern states with their large non-religious majority. Hamburg has also joined this segment of the non-religious German population.[5]


So try again....


msharmony's photo
Sun 01/24/10 12:48 PM








I dont believe religion is the basis for why we cant live peacefully, if I am wrong point me to the nearest utopian atheist community....


People , by nature, will divide and survive and oppress, with or without religion.


Show me the atheists of war and division?


They are mixed in with everyone else, just like those of peace are, because people are flawed, with or without religion.


If you look through history there are no atheists of war.

So your logic doesn't stand the test of truth.


My logic is more like common sense actually, Far too many people since the beginning of time have been atheists for me to believe NONE of them encouraged or supported war.

Most wars are fought over property and power, not things that only the religious are guilty of wanting.


I know you cannot find the atheists because most of them were not part of creating the reason for war.

What do you think religion is???

Power.

You cannot dispute it. Not legitimately anyway,


Well, it would be an endless debate because each side can come up with support for their point of view honestly. I could site that Japan, Vietnam, and Germany are all highly atheist countries and we know the wars they have been part of and the oppression that they have experienced. It would be futile to try to convince me that anyone knows the percentage of those war supporters who believe in Jesus vs those who dont, but it is unreasonable to assume that to not believe in Christ means to not believe in or support war.


I guess you don't know what you are talking about here.

Example;

Religion in Japan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Japan

There are many religions in Japan that have come along with current times but most follow Shintō or Buddhism. Most Japanese people do not identify as exclusively belonging to just one religion, but incorporate features of both religions into their daily lives in a process known as syncretism. Shinto and Buddhism are even taken to as being interwoven in the country. Japanese streets are decorated on Tanabata, Obon and Christmas. Japan grants religious freedom to all sects of religious people, as evidenced by the fact they allow minority religions like Christianity, Islam and Sikhism to be practiced. According to the CIA World Factbook 84% to 96% adhere to Shinto and Buddhism while 4% to 16% of the demographic population adhere to other religions or non-religious, atheist groups.[1] However, such high numbers come primarily from birth records, following a longstanding practice of family lines being officially associated with a local Buddhist temple and not the people truly following the religion. The majority of Japanese carry on the roles of one or more religious body, but do not consider themselves believers in one particular religion, but are syncretistic.[2]

Religion in Vietnam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Vietnam

The earliest established religions in Vietnam are Mahayana Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism (called the "triple religion" or tam giáo). Significant minorities of adherents to Roman Catholicism, Cao Dai, and Hoa Hao and smaller minorities of adherents to Protestantism, Islam, Hinduism, and Theravada Buddhism were established later, in recent centuries.

The majority of Vietnamese people classify themselves as non-religious, although they visit religious temples several times every year. Their everyday behaviours and attitudes are dictated by the synthesis of philosophies which can be traced from many religions, especially Mahayana Buddhism, Confucianism, and Daoism. Those religions have been co-existing in the country for centuries and mixed perfectly with the Vietnamese tradition of worshiping their ancestors and national heroes. That special mix explains why the people there find it hard to say exactly which religion they belong to.

Religion in Germany
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Germany

Christianity is the largest religion in Germany with 54,765,265 (67.07%) adherents as of the end of 2006.[1] The second largest religion is Islam with 3.3 million adherents (4%)[1] followed by Buddhism and Judaism. During the last few decades, the two largest churches in Germany (the Protestant Evangelical Church in Germany or EKD and the Roman Catholic church), have lost significant number of adherents, both are down to roughly 30%.[2] [3] With 30.7 % as per the end of 2008, the Catholic Church is still close to its pre-World War II 1939 percentage of 33%.[4]

The most notable losses occurred in the Protestant churches, especially owing to the atheistic policy conducted in former East Germany. However since the fall of the communistic regime two decades ago, the EKD continued losing members.[3]. Other churches in Germany are all rather small (equal or less than 0.5%).[1] As a result of re-unification (of East and West Germany), the number of Germans without a religion has grown, especially owing to the addition of the eastern states with their large non-religious majority. Hamburg has also joined this segment of the non-religious German population.[5]


So try again....




This is evidence of how the debate would be endless with 'numbers' and information to support both sides. If you are defining religion as belief in ANYTHING(buddhists dont worship a God they worship the believes of a man who was peaceful, than there will be no getting rid of religion because you will always find groups of people who agree upon a similar moral foundation(whoever they attribute as initiating that foundation).

The debate between philisophical vs religous belief is one for a different forum,,,however

As far as what I was speaking of, consistent with being a Christian, these countries have extremely high populations of people who do not believe in a God or Christ, making it impossible to honestly believe that none of those non believers dont support war.

Ladylid2012's photo
Sun 01/24/10 02:19 PM




Love, forgiveness, spirit, allowing, tolerance, kindness, compassion, empathy...ALL these gifts can be experienced and expressed without religion.

We do not have to be part of one of the big religions to have such things in our lives...

Once I was able to dump my childhood religion and lose the salvation theory all together...then I was able to truly experience what spirituality really is. I know there is something bigger than me behind the wheel. It is when I am hiking the mountains, or sitting along the river that I feel a presence of pure love, not in a church building.


I totally agree, organized religion(or religious titles) are no guarantee of entry into heaven and non involvement in organized religion isnt a guarantee of refusal of entry. It isnt the building but the people inside of it. People can lead good lives(like MOST people) without religion. They just do not enter into the kingdom of heaven without Christ.


Oh, good gawd, give it a rest sister. Who are you to say who gets to enter the kingdom of heaven... it is hardly your decision. I know you really believe you have all the answers, guess what, you only have the answers for yourself!
Your like a broken fricking record... a great reminder of why I stopped coming in these threads...and why I'm leaving again!


sorry that you feel this way,, I am sure Jesus would have been called a broken record too so that is ok. It was he who decided noone sees the Father but through him. That is not my judgement that is His direction. I have stated over and over that the decision will be that of The Lord, which is no different than saying noone sees the father Without Christ. It is not mans decision, but that of Christ. I do not have all the answers, but I have been brought up to respect the example and words of Christ.


Now you are comparing yourself to Jesus...my god girl!
Actually I would love to have a conversation with Jesus, I'm sure he was creative and intelligent enough to not sound like a broken record.

yellowrose10's photo
Sun 01/24/10 02:22 PM
This is a reminder to keep your posts toward the topic or posts and not the poster(s)

Kim

msharmony's photo
Sun 01/24/10 03:00 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sun 01/24/10 03:01 PM





Love, forgiveness, spirit, allowing, tolerance, kindness, compassion, empathy...ALL these gifts can be experienced and expressed without religion.

We do not have to be part of one of the big religions to have such things in our lives...

Once I was able to dump my childhood religion and lose the salvation theory all together...then I was able to truly experience what spirituality really is. I know there is something bigger than me behind the wheel. It is when I am hiking the mountains, or sitting along the river that I feel a presence of pure love, not in a church building.


I totally agree, organized religion(or religious titles) are no guarantee of entry into heaven and non involvement in organized religion isnt a guarantee of refusal of entry. It isnt the building but the people inside of it. People can lead good lives(like MOST people) without religion. They just do not enter into the kingdom of heaven without Christ.


Oh, good gawd, give it a rest sister. Who are you to say who gets to enter the kingdom of heaven... it is hardly your decision. I know you really believe you have all the answers, guess what, you only have the answers for yourself!
Your like a broken fricking record... a great reminder of why I stopped coming in these threads...and why I'm leaving again!


sorry that you feel this way,, I am sure Jesus would have been called a broken record too so that is ok. It was he who decided noone sees the Father but through him. That is not my judgement that is His direction. I have stated over and over that the decision will be that of The Lord, which is no different than saying noone sees the father Without Christ. It is not mans decision, but that of Christ. I do not have all the answers, but I have been brought up to respect the example and words of Christ.


Now you are comparing yourself to Jesus...my god girl!
Actually I would love to have a conversation with Jesus, I'm sure he was creative and intelligent enough to not sound like a broken record.


One never knows, I admit that I could never come up with the briliant parables or have so many of them to explain things.

I guess since I try to follow his example though, in those ways I AM like him. I am no where in the vicinity of his glory though.

Eljay's photo
Mon 01/25/10 01:20 AM



I am assuming no such thing. An atheist is a person who believes in SOMETHING. But God is no one of them. The term atheist means a person who has no belief in God. Any other beliefs you think he may have that you think goes along with that is your own assumption and interpretation of the word.


JB is correct. We can say that atheists have beliefs simply because they are human, not because they are atheists. There is only one belief universal to 'strong atheists' (the positive belief in the nonexistence of deities) , and there are no beliefs universal to 'weak atheists'.



But you are assuming that an Atheist is without belief - however this is not true. The religion of most - if not all atheists is Secular Humanism, and if not that - it's Uniformalism. Just because a "God" isn't involved, or believed in - does not mean there isn't a "religion" present.


This sounds like Fundamentalist Christian Kool Aid to me. If you are talking about a Secular Humanist, the intelligent thing to do is to say "Secular Humanist." To say "atheist" when you mean "Secular Humanist" is both dishonest and contrary to an intelligent development of thought, IMO.

Its obvious to me, from listening to tons of Christian talk radio and reading many books on apologetics (intended for lay people, not theologians) that there is a massive trend of Fundamentalists Christians continuously repeating bizarre ideas, promoting false logic, and taking arguments out of their original context to obtain a kind of 'mass hypnosis' of the ridiculous . Saying that "atheism is a religion" is one of those phrases/memes/beliefs.

It is complete an total nonsense, and obviously so if you just take a look at words composing the sentence.

There are similar statements that an honest and intelligent person could make.... such as, "it looks like all humans, including atheists, have a belief system of some sort" or "it looks like all humans, including atheists, take a lot of their belief system on faith" or "many atheists participate in some cultural phenemona that are atheist in nature and yet which have the same qualities of religions" and on and on.

Saying that "atheism is a religion" is at least as foolish as saying that "theism is a religion".



Forgive my being absent, and trying to catch up here.....

As I said in the second part of the post to Jeannie - that it is a matter of semantics.

The issue is not one of defining an "Atheist" - I think Jeannie nailed it.

However - What is at issue is what one considers "religion" and how one equates an Atheist's not believing in a "deity" to not being religious, and therefore not "quilty" of the OP's original accusation. Which is the point I'm trying to make. I've never met an Atheist who was not religious. And I lived in Harvard Square for years - and have met more than my share of strong-atheists, weak-atheists, strong agnostics, weak agnostics, agnostic-atheists, and atheistic-agnostics. Never met anyone who didn't believe in some religion or another.

Eljay's photo
Mon 01/25/10 01:26 AM









His religion is one of the things I held against Obama but he was still a better choice than McCain.


How so?

Because he won the Nobel peace prize for - what was it - something he MIGHT do?


Religion or believing in one can be a bad mark against someone in power. Because they will make choices based on the philosophy of the religion making them possibly very dangerous.


But that goes to the incapabability of an individual to make sound judgements - not to the core of religious philosophy. If I have a corrupt leader using religion to support a subverted agenda, and I mix that with someone devoid of sound discernmet of what is right or wrong - the issue is not one of religion - but of human nature.


Considering that religion encourages divisiveness, superiority, hypocrisy, I will disagree that it is just a human nature problem. Religion encourages wishing bad on humans who do not believe as you do. Religion encourages less self responsibility. To name a few of the issues with religion. Then add a position of power to all of those issues that religion has and you are asking for trouble.

Until the religious can realize they are the same as all other people in the world regardless to belief with no special priviledges with god and no special treatment when they die and no superior morality or superior judgements, they should not be trusted in places of power.


I've been a member of a religion most of my entire life - and I haven't experienced any of what you "claim" reliigon is responsible for. What are you basing your statements on? What experience do you have with religion? What are some examples that you can site where a religion is to blame - and not an individual or group of individual's interpretation of a religious philosophy is not to blame. The only example I can think of is Satanism and some forms of Witchcraft or Paganism where what you claim is more a part of the religious philosophy than the individuals who are interpreting it.

And I know of no religion with a special priviledge with God. As a matter of fact - it is religion which keeps one from God more often than not.


Obviously you are blinded by your own beliefs to see what I am talking about because the examples you gave are not even slightly on target.

I was raised both Catholic and Baptist and have been around religious folks all my life. So I am speaking from personal observation. I have seen religion take a logical person and turn them into an illogical "righteous" mess. I have seen the damage religion has on children. I have seen personally people who feel "justified" and "righteous" that those who do not believe as them are deserving of bad things to happen to them.

Every religion teaches divisiveness, superiority and hypocrisy. I have studied different religions and it is the same with most of them. The major religions definitely do this. All of Christianity does it.

All of the concepts in most religion contort logical thought and create a twisted sense of reality. So a person in power with this twist is not necessarily the best to make important decisions.


I'm not blinded by my own beliefs - I just don't see the same thing you do through the clouded specticles you see life with.

First off - we are not in disagreement about what goes on in the world - i see the same things you do as far as people doing injustices to themselves, and teaching children to do the same - but I don't see where the blame is on "religion" - and not the people intelligent enough to understand what it is they think they believe.

Your caim that every religion teaches divisiveness, superiority and hypocracy is blatenly false. Period. not only is this not true - i say that you cannot name one religion outside of Satanism that can support this claim of yours. Certainly not christianity. And if that's your claim - I attest that you don't know what christianity is.

Now - I'm not going to sit here and admit that there are not religions in this world who's philosophy is not inherantly damaging and dangerous. I would never make that claim. In fact - for the most part, I would tend to agree with the OP about his initial intent behind the firdt post. But for radically different reasons. I've seen all the damage that has been done since the religion of "Evolution" has been introduced into the main stream, and our children forced to accept it as truth. There has been no other religion throughout time that hs done more damage to the human race than that of evolution. From it we have the autrocities of Hitler and Stalin - euthanasia - abortion, all born out of the philosophies of Evolution.

But my sense is - that this is not the aspects of religion that you'd agree with me on as far as it's destructive influence. Why?

Because you are blinded by your own beliefs.

So who's the blind one here? Who see's only what they want to see?


Obviously you.

You have missed on all of your examples still about the teachings of christianity.

I cannot help you because of your blinders. You will continue to believe what you do, be it right or wrong.

Most religions teach divisiveness, superiority and hypocrisy, there is not way around it and individuality doesn't change it. If you follow the religion you will incorporate divisiveness, superiority and hypocrisy in your beliefs, projections and judgements.


So - are you going to answer my question and name a religion that supports your claim? Or are you merely prefering not to contaminate your opinion with facts.

Eljay's photo
Mon 01/25/10 01:32 AM

athiests use logic? What kind of logic contends that humans came from monkeys when there are still primates in existence?


The logic is only one chromosome being different, the similar skeletal structures, that there are an overwhelmingly large amount of physical similarities. In religion there is no logic, that is where blind faith comes in. In atheism, there is a reliance on the scientific method. A person using this method doesnt necessarily look at something as it being entirely right without testing it rigorously. The science-minded person will take a hypothesis and conduct the tests with the aim of disproving old theories. Religion teaches us not to question our faith. There is no logic in not evaluating something. So, yes, atheists use logic, and are some of the most logical individuals out there. There are sub-species that are formed, but the original creatures in which the sub-species formed from are still in existence. There is absolutely no logic in that a deity made a man out of dirt, then breathed into his nose, then he came to life, or that a rib was taken from a man in his sleep, and formed into a woman. But, then again, thats where blind faith comes in.


While I can't find fault in your claim that there's no logic to creation - as far as the limit's of man's observation and perception go - I can find absolutely nothing to support your argument that Atheism has anything to do with logic what-so-ever. Nor does it have anything to do with science.

A staunch Atheist is as logical as a legalistic religious fundamentalist, because they are both essentially practicing and putting their faith in a philosophy. What is scientific and logical about that?

Eljay's photo
Mon 01/25/10 01:43 AM








This is not Christ like, and I am sorry these are the types of experiences you have had. In trying to follow the example of Christ, I do not feel superior to anyone, I feel we all sin and that is mostly what I get the most flack about. I never say that I am better than anyone because I dont believe I am. I do aknowledge wrong from right though, regardless of if I am the transgressor or someone else,, and I get flack for that as well.


Actually it is Christ like because it is the practice of Christians.

Christianity cannot teach equality because it teaches divisiveness ie "my religion is the one true and right religion", it teaches superiority ie "some humans will go to hell because of what they believe but it won't be me the great Christian", it teaches hypocrisy ie "I am not held responsible for my sins because I go to church on Sunday and get forgiven"

Until religions embrace all other religions and non religious as equal and deserving of heaven including all sexual orientations they will be discriminatory and not healthy for humans to follow.


This is flawed logic in my opinion.


First,Christ like means like Christ, of whom there was only one,, not like any and every one who claims to be christian.

I dont believe anyones RELIGION(religious title or affiliation) makes them any better or worse than anyone else. It is how we live our lives that will be judged by God , not what title we give ourself.

I also dont believe I know who will go to heaven or who will not, I was taught that only God knows or will decide. I do know the paths that Christ set out for us to follow and I choose that path hoping to reach the destination I seek.

I also have never not felt responsible for sin, forgiveness doesnt absolve one of responsibility and I was never taught this either.

I embrace religious beliefs, I dont embrace all actions and words anymore than a non religious person does. I dont think it would be healthy to have an everything is fine to do attitude(regardless of religious or non religious affiliation).

I do think there are paths to heaven and paths which dont lead to heaven, just as some paths will get me from Las Vegas to Los Angeles and others wont. If I am trying to get to Los Angeles, I just follow those paths,, it doesnt mean I feel better than those trying to get to Arizona, or those trying to get to Los Angeles by way of Indianapolis.

I just feel we all choose different paths and they dont all end up at the same destination.


You did not dispute any of what I stated on my post...lol

There is no way around the divisiveness, superiority and hypocrisy of the religion.

I am glad that you feel as though you are doing yourself a favor by believing it.

Humans are not better off because of religion. It hasn't done anything to help the human condition at all.




I am not here just for dispute. I am also here to share. I, as a christian, read many blatantly false things in these posts about what I supposedly was taught to believe. I just try to clarify what is the truth from what is broad generalization. Humans are no worse off because of religion. Humans would commit all the atrocities they commit without religion, they would just find some other scapegoat to blame it on besides personal responsibility. Funny, since christians are being labeled in this thread as those who dont take personal responsibility but the same people are claiming that they do horrible things not because of who they are personally but because they are christian....cant have it both ways

I take full responsibility for my actions, I use Gods laws as a guide just as others use mans laws. When I do things wrong, it is not the fault of laws existing,, it is just my personal bad choice.


I'll admit I do see christians, on the whole, as being inherently evil. Though this is not a predjudice w/o cause, I assure you. I've known far too many professed "good" christains who had no problems commiting blantantly evil acts. And history is repleat with such examples. And that pretty much goes for just about anyone with a belief system that has a godthing or things at it's head.
However, I do make the effort to take into account any individuals actions or words.

I have to disagree with you on the "fault of the laws existing" thing. There have been many many bad laws in human history that good people should've and indeed have, railed against. If I had been born in the mid 1800's or before, I would've been proud to break laws to free slaves. And I would've been quite happy to kill slave owners to do it too. I would've defended indians, women, or whatever group of intelligent lifeforms were being oppressed or enslaved. The laws be damned. God's or man's.
Which brings me to another point, christianity has been an excuse for slavery and the oppression of women. For almost it's entire history. Doesn't that bother you?


Actually - what is historically accurate is that were it not for two devoted Christians - there would still be slavery in England and in America. Christianity is not responsible for the creation or furtherance of slavery - but for the irratication of it.

1 2 6 7 8 10 12 13 14