1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 18 19
Topic: States declaring and reaffirming their sovereignty
damnitscloudy's photo
Tue 02/24/09 11:33 PM
How did this go from seceding states to race and back again? noway

nogames39's photo
Tue 02/24/09 11:39 PM

How did this go from seceding states to race and back again? noway


This trip is our everyday thing, since if we do not like something, it is definitely because we're racists.

damnitscloudy's photo
Tue 02/24/09 11:44 PM


How did this go from seceding states to race and back again? noway


This trip is our everyday thing, since if we do not like something, it is definitely because we're racists.


I wonder if i can use that while playing Street Fighter 4 online. If i know i'm about to get beat just shout "racist!" over the head set and see if that throws them off laugh

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 02/25/09 05:11 AM
did I hear the "token" comment??? wow

willing2's photo
Wed 02/25/09 07:41 AM
And, it's not a secession thang either.
The 10th amendment is, in case we get an out-of-control Gov., we can pull power out from under them.
I wonder how many times an abusive person has to be reported before action is taken?

nogames39's photo
Wed 02/25/09 11:04 AM

And, it's not a secession thang either.
The 10th amendment is, in case we get an out-of-control Gov., we can pull power out from under them.
I wonder how many times an abusive person has to be reported before action is taken?



No no no, you're not getting it , old man. They way commies understand contract is as follows:

Example one:
1) States and the fedrales agree on some terms. Their agreement includes some conditions, on which either side can pull out of a deal at any time.

2) Communist Federal Government acts against America, against freedom.

Communists argue that any talk of exercising the contractual options of the states is a secession talk. You are expected to blindly follow and be unconditionally happy. It is not o.k. to break the deal, even if the other side has clearly overstepped it's original terms 100 folds.

Example two:
1) Home buyer and a home seller enter into a contract. Both sides can freely examine their terms, before they decide to agree on them. There are no conditions on which one side can pull out of a deal, short of fraud.

2) Home buyer has clearly underestimated the situation, and now everything turns against the speculator.

Communists argue that the only fair bet is the bet where you eventually win. Communist work to break contractual bonds, and to allow one side to pull out of a deal, without having need to prove any contractual condition to their favor.

You can never win with a communist, for his definition of a fair game is when he wins.

AndyBgood's photo
Wed 02/25/09 12:52 PM
For those who refuse to accept that Obama has at least racist roots look back on some of his rhetoric of the past.

"Corporate greed is white man's greed," Barrack Hussein Obama


When I heard those words I get a cold feeling in me he is a wolf in sheep's clothing.
I also oppose him because of his lack of facing congressional spending a lick except for token travel issues. Now he is all dog and pony. Where is his "rolling up his sleeves and getting dirty?"

He can't get his hands dirty. He has to look pretty for the camera!

I think he is going to worsen the damage a lot with his chosen course of action. I do not like or appreciate weak leadership and I do not see him being anything more than a figure head for a DNC dominated congress and we are going to begin facing even greater misrepresentation at the hands of our "elected" leaders.

With the protections of the constitution don't you think that the erosion of one civil right is going to lead to the erosion of another right granted by amendment? Can you not see an erosion of everything we hold dear? Not really. Its "Praise Obama our savior!"

Why is it Congress cannot straighten out its financial act? You are aware it was deemed unconstitutional for personal funds of yours to be reallocated to other things by the fed. That has since changed since the late 1960's. GEE, What next? Tax the air we breath? How about our farting? TAX Tax Tax...

Obama's tax cuts are not squat! His spending is already outrageous.
If I wasn't proud as an American I wouldn't care about shoddy leadership taking over. Problem is I do at least.

I know!!!!offtopic


Still, those of you who feel social spending is the answer tell me where all this money is coming from??? Magic money trees?surprised

Now back to the topic at hand, There is no way a state can legitimately break from the union. There is no back door or back out clause they can fall back on. Once in, always in.

Ain't contracts a beyatch???

norslyman's photo
Wed 02/25/09 01:08 PM

The Communist Takeover Of
America - 45 Declared Goals
From Greg Swank
12-4-2

You are about to read a list of 45 goals that found their way down the halls of our great Capitol back in 1963. As you read this, 39 years later, you should be shocked by the events that have played themselves out. I first ran across this list 3 years ago but was unable to attain a copy and it has bothered me ever since. Recently, Jeff Rense posted it on his site and I would like to thank him for doing so. http://www.rense.com

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963


Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.



Dragoness's photo
Wed 02/25/09 01:24 PM
I think some do protest too much. Things that make you go, hmmmmmm???

The State Sovreignty Movement is a joke.

Not only is it a haven and heaven for every racist in this country, the whole concept is ridiculous. Not in the sense of states having their own power because they already do but in the sense of this is a challenge which I am not sure that the intelligent American people are ready to entertain.

These statements of sovreignty are a challenge and the only follow through for them if the feds don't react the way they want is to militarize their state and declare civil war.

HOW MANY INTELLIGENT AMERICANS WILL FOLLOW THIS KNOWING THAT CIVIL WAR WOULD BE THE ONLY END IF THE FEDS DON'T FOLLOW WHAT THE STATES ARE DICTATING????

Come on folks, I know you are smarter than that.

think2deep's photo
Wed 02/25/09 02:01 PM

I think some do protest too much. Things that make you go, hmmmmmm???

The State Sovreignty Movement is a joke.

Not only is it a haven and heaven for every racist in this country, the whole concept is ridiculous. Not in the sense of states having their own power because they already do but in the sense of this is a challenge which I am not sure that the intelligent American people are ready to entertain.

These statements of sovreignty are a challenge and the only follow through for them if the feds don't react the way they want is to militarize their state and declare civil war.

HOW MANY INTELLIGENT AMERICANS WILL FOLLOW THIS KNOWING THAT CIVIL WAR WOULD BE THE ONLY END IF THE FEDS DON'T FOLLOW WHAT THE STATES ARE DICTATING????

Come on folks, I know you are smarter than that.



How much is your country worth to you?

Andrew Jackson quotes
If the Union is once severed, the line of separation will grow wider and wider, and the controversies which are now debated and settled in the halls of legislation
will then be tried in fields of battle and determined by the sword.


No one need think that the world can be ruled without blood. The civil sword shall and must be red and bloody.


Peace, above all things, is to be desired, but blood must sometimes be spilled to obtain it on equable and lasting terms.


The great constitutional corrective in the hands of the people against usurpation of power, or corruption by their agents is the right of suffrage; and this when used with calmness and deliberation will prove strong enough.


There is nothing that I shudder at more than the idea of a separation of the Union. Should such an event ever happen, which I fervently pray God to avert, from that date I view our liberty gone.


abraham lincoln quotes:

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.


Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world.


This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it.

Dragoness's photo
Wed 02/25/09 02:13 PM


I think some do protest too much. Things that make you go, hmmmmmm???

The State Sovreignty Movement is a joke.

Not only is it a haven and heaven for every racist in this country, the whole concept is ridiculous. Not in the sense of states having their own power because they already do but in the sense of this is a challenge which I am not sure that the intelligent American people are ready to entertain.

These statements of sovreignty are a challenge and the only follow through for them if the feds don't react the way they want is to militarize their state and declare civil war.

HOW MANY INTELLIGENT AMERICANS WILL FOLLOW THIS KNOWING THAT CIVIL WAR WOULD BE THE ONLY END IF THE FEDS DON'T FOLLOW WHAT THE STATES ARE DICTATING????

Come on folks, I know you are smarter than that.



How much is your country worth to you?

Andrew Jackson quotes
If the Union is once severed, the line of separation will grow wider and wider, and the controversies which are now debated and settled in the halls of legislation
will then be tried in fields of battle and determined by the sword.


No one need think that the world can be ruled without blood. The civil sword shall and must be red and bloody.


Peace, above all things, is to be desired, but blood must sometimes be spilled to obtain it on equable and lasting terms.


The great constitutional corrective in the hands of the people against usurpation of power, or corruption by their agents is the right of suffrage; and this when used with calmness and deliberation will prove strong enough.


There is nothing that I shudder at more than the idea of a separation of the Union. Should such an event ever happen, which I fervently pray God to avert, from that date I view our liberty gone.


abraham lincoln quotes:

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.


Any people anywhere, being inclined and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable - a most sacred right - a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world.


This country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it.


Considering the "reasons" for the movement. Blood shed is not a viable option. If the citizens of this great nation did not shed blood when Bush started removing civil rights from it's citizens in the name of "national security", none of what is listed on any of these proposals is valid.

Plus how many Americans will be willing to support a movement that is riddled with racist ideals? The racists would love to have less control from the feds so they could exercise their hate agenda on those they feel deserve it.

Most important nullifying the constitution is what it says will happen if the feds do not do what the states are dictating to the feds. The constitution being nullified is the antithesis to the whole movement to begin with so it doesn't even make sense if you really think about it.

think2deep's photo
Wed 02/25/09 02:25 PM
just who are you calling racists? and why?

Dragoness's photo
Wed 02/25/09 02:36 PM

just who are you calling racists? and why?


Do you want a list of the people in our government who are racist and follow racists ideals or the many ways some Americans still practice it in their everyday lives? I would have to start it's own post for that.

Just stop and listen to people around you sometimes and look for the reasons behind what they are saying. You will find that the anti entitlement people are almost always racially motivated. The federal government haters are quite often racists too. This counts for those in our government.

I found out all of this being exposed to them. There are more of them than people think and they are not obvious nowadays like in the old days.

think2deep's photo
Wed 02/25/09 02:41 PM
well, I don't doubt that there are plenty of racists out there, but the ones that we should be concerned about is the dual american/israeli people in our government. they are the ones that are racist against us in a bad way, they're loyalties lie with israel and not the U.S.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 02/25/09 04:14 PM

just who are you calling racists? and why?



scroll back to previous posts....it's insane

think2deep's photo
Wed 02/25/09 04:28 PM
who are you guys saying that these people are racist against?

think2deep's photo
Wed 02/25/09 04:41 PM
oh, i was just informed that she thinks that everyone is being racist about obama. what i have to say about that is this.... it doesn't matter what color the president is. if it was a purple president in the office with the same agenda and goals as obama (mcain had the same ones) then that president will bring us to ruins. this isn't a race issue until someone throws in the race card, then there can be no more logical advancing in that subject. it just turns to crap and might as well let the president, no matter what color he is, ruin the friggin country. because now no one can say anything bad, whether true or not, about him to keep him in line and inform others. race card, not a good choice to throw out there, stifles free thinking and conversation.

willing2's photo
Wed 02/25/09 04:44 PM
Edited by willing2 on Wed 02/25/09 04:47 PM


just who are you calling racists? and why?


Do you want a list of the people in our government who are racist and follow racists ideals or the many ways some Americans still practice it in their everyday lives? I would have to start it's own post for that.

Just stop and listen to people around you sometimes and look for the reasons behind what they are saying. You will find that the anti entitlement people are almost always racially motivated. The federal government haters are quite often racists too. This counts for those in our government.

I found out all of this being exposed to them. There are more of them than people think and they are not obvious nowadays like in the old days.

Here is a direct question.
Who, on theses boards, in your eyes, are Racists?
Name them, please.

My opinion is, all the States should have been prepared to instill the 10th Amendment before now.
It's not been any surprise, Gov. becomes more oppressive each passing year.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 02/25/09 04:46 PM
are you two just now picking up on the racist jabs???? slaphead

walk with me - talk with me here :laughing:

that's ok...i still loves ya

think2deep's photo
Wed 02/25/09 04:49 PM
I have to say I think this issue is racial and my reasoning for this is that all who hated Bush did not talk of secession, they were still proud to be Americans, just did not like Bush at all.

There is one exception to this and that was Todd Palin who wanted Alaska to secede, he did not want to be an American anymore.

So those who hated Bush do not think of not being Americans anymore but those who have an issue with Obama want to secede and not be Americans anymore, hmmmmmmm I have to wonder.......

Sure they cover with the "policies" talk but it goes deeper than that because they don't want to be US citizens anymore.

My opinion of course.


i spent alot of time arguing with that nut case already lol...i'm worn out


you are so cheapening this dillemma!!!! and that is horrible. you need to do some research and get off this racist kick thats stupid!!!

1 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 18 19