Community > Posts By > aaronlyric

 
no photo
Tue 02/05/08 07:28 PM
agreed

no photo
Tue 02/05/08 04:07 PM



The Senate is looking to turn North America into a "ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT" by 2010!!!! That would mean our country would consist of Canada, United States AND Mexico!! VOTE NO ON THIS!!!!! WOULD BE PURE CHAOS!!! What do you think about it!!!! Let the opinions flow!!!!


This is an urban legend.

http://lighthousepatriotjournal.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/rebuttal-snopes-article-concerning-the-nau/


Please don't believe everything
you read on the internet.

Do some fact checking first.


this is NOT an urban legend, it has been reported on the news dozens of times over the last year! here is one instance on cnn..highlight, copy, paste:

http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/business/2007/03/27/tucker.states.rights.nau.cnn?iref=videosearch

there is a short commercial before the news relays..please do some FACT checking yourself brother

if you type in "north american union news" on youtube or "security and prosperity partnership news" you'll get a plethora of alternative yet coinciding news channel views..

no photo
Tue 02/05/08 03:47 PM

ammo never expires.


WRONG!!!!

Only if properly stored in cool, dry place.


not storing your ammo in a puddle in the basement was a given..but thx for trying to be contrarily ornery.

no photo
Tue 02/05/08 03:39 PM


sure,if you want to add some knowledge of preparedness..i thought that there would be more people wanting to learn instead of bash..so i've jsut been communicating email with those that are concerned so they will more likely survive, if on the Off chance there is chaos that i've mentioned. if anyone's interested just em me, if not then good journey


aaronlhyric.... You make the statement that you thought "there would be more people wanting to learn instead of bash." That sounds to me, as if you do not want a healthy debate. You want people to agree with you. That is nothing more than a one-sided discussion.


notice the title of the thread is for preparedness, not a debate of whether we should or shouldn't but rather HOW. The only debating that i would like to do in this thread would be on the best ways of doing the things necessary to survive an economic collapse, now stop tryin to waste my time and you'll stop wasting your's seeing as you don't believe any of this anyways. thx

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 08:39 PM
sure,if you want to add some knowledge of preparedness..i thought that there would be more people wanting to learn instead of bash..so i've jsut been communicating email with those that are concerned so they will more likely survive, if on the Off chance there is chaos that i've mentioned. if anyone's interested just em me, if not then good journey

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 08:28 PM
stolen our money System that is.

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 08:26 PM




smo..... you are painting too broad a picture. The Federal Reserve doesn't regulate our money up and down until no one has anything, but them. The Federal Reserve is responsible for the interest rates we pay.

The Constitution doesn't regulate our money; it just states that the dollar is to be our monetary system.

A dollar could never be worth the same forever, as you put it, because we are not isolated from the rest of the world. We are in a global economy.

Why are you calling the Federal Reserve ruthless crooks? I go along with the fact that they sometimes make poor judgment calls. Incidentally, Greenspan is no longer there.

Government employees cannot vote raises for themselves. The only ones who can do that are members of Congress.

Why are you calling the 1913 Amendment a fraud? Prior to that senators were appointed. The Amendment to the Constitution made way for senators to be elected.

Host/parasite?

I do go along with your thinking that we would be better off with less government.






it is a very broad picture, pan back, way back. the constitution states taht congress should have the sole authority to print and regulate our currency and it's value..not the federal reserve or international bankers. if at very least they are crooks for being the first to undermine our constitution..and when you realize the power of money and that they have stolen ours, it's a much bigger crime.

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 08:15 PM


for the rich 1% to keep getting richer, and the poor to not use what strength and resources they have left for change, the bilderberg group(The International Bankers/Monopoly men/illuminati) would have to keep us distracted,scared and at times sedated. like that could happen


aaronlyric..... It does appear that the rich are getting richer, and the poor people are getting nowhere. So, I will agree with you on that point.

However, you cannot say that the above is being manipulated by the Bilderberg Group since they keep their meetings secret, and no one has a clue as to what they are doing.

The illuminati is a conspiracy theory, which does not exist. A figment of one's imagination cannot influence the economy.


i am not sayin i think they manipulate because they meet behind closed doors. they do influence the economy because most countries borrow their money from them and it is no longer backed by anything as it used to be backed by gold. so essentially they have an unlimited supply of cash to pay politicians to influence our laws and consequently our lives. "Give me control of a nations currency, and i care not who makes it's laws"

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 08:02 PM
i agree we haven't in the past, but we've only just begun to stand up brother. there is an exponential factor to it that will be beautiful

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 07:54 PM
don't like it either

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 07:46 PM

Lol... sorry just have to toss in my blunt 2 cents here...

It occurs to me that a large percentage of the people that talk about world politics in this forum are for peace, and against war... yet the idea of unification of 3 countries upsets, even angers them? Is it just me, or does this seem hypocritical?


they are for peace from war.. and the north american union is being done behind our backs, without our approval and yes are rightfully upset..what's hypocritical?

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 07:27 PM
yeah, most of our posts are trying to explain ourselves after a post was misunderstood, argg lol

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 07:23 PM
war is the most profitable thing for the international bankers because the countries at war have to fund it and to do this they borrow more money from the bankers. since they are the bankers for most countries nowadays, most wars have earned them money on both sides. since they can "influence" the countries that are in debt to them, some people have deduced that they might actually want war between their "customers". war is profit

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 07:17 PM

What I think was the real Reason the Bush Gang started the Iraq War Was: Money!! An American puppet by the name of Saddam seemed to forget that He was a puppet and decided He no longer answered to the US, so he changed his oil selling methods, He started selling oil for EUROS, instead of federal reserve notes, I guess Russia also quit using federal reserve notes,and now Iran has quit using federal reserve notes for oil, a few days ago Bush made a quick trip to Saudia Arabia, to talk, I guess they informed Bush ,that they also have plans to quit using federal reserve notes in oil sales, same thing with Chavez. So the latest rumour is that the Us cut internet cables under the ocean to places in the Mideast banking systems, It looks like the oil people know how to put the federal reserve out of business ,by not doing any more business with the federal reserve. There is a terrible money system battle going on as we speak.Federal reserve is fighting for its life. It needs to be dumped I believe it is responsible for lots of wars . Plus, I believe it is a CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION< and is Totally, UnConstitutional, and I have doubt that the federal reserve Act, was ever legally passed!! Saddam dealing in Euros ,brought the planes in a hurry, that is the same reason they want to get Iran, (dumping the federal reserve system,One main reason why JFK was murdered, HE too was dumping the federal reserve system ,and was already printing US NOTES, which did not pay any interest to the PRIVATE federal reserve system.I had some of those us notes, but after Kennedy was shot, the banks removed them out of circulation. Hey Guys, It is the Money system behind it all, the wars , the recession, the stock market, It is the PARASITE federal reserve system!!!Go Gettum!!They cause INFLATION< AND DEFLATION< RESESSION< MORTGAGE CRISIS!!ETC<


this is a very large topic that you are tryin to educate people on so it may have been hard for some people to believe/follow, but it's true. the us printed it's own money before 1913 as our constitution demanded, then woodrow wilson signed the federal reserve act of 1913 which required us to start borrowing our money from the federal reserve(international bankers) they have been able to "influence" our economy ever since. most all of the other countries of the world have also been promised a "more elastic currency" by these men and have signed on to have them "mediate" their currencies with the rest of the world's. and we're all wakin up to their subterfuge

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 06:51 PM
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
pa·tri·ot /ˈpeɪtriət, -ˌɒt or, especially Brit., ˈpætriət/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[pey-tree-uht, -ot or, especially Brit., pa-tree-uht] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun 1. a person who loves, supports, and defends his or her country and its interests with devotion.
2. a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, esp. of individual rights, against interference by the federal government.

he's a patriot, he has his country's best interests in mind and stands up to a tyrannical government

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 06:44 PM
his ideas will permeate the american collective forever..thanx dr. paul

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 06:42 PM
Re-Legalize Freedom Ron Paul 2008

"JUST COME HOME" Ron Paul 2008

Jokes Over Bring Back the Constitution

Win A Free Country Vote Ron Paul In the Primaries Offer Expires May 2008

Ron Paul/ Get a Free Country AND Your Money Back

Who Owns YOUR Candidate? opensecrets.org

We All Support the Troops/ Who Do the Troops Support?

STOP Corporate Welfare & Political Corruption RonPaul2008

Straight Talk Not Double Talk RonPaul2008

An Honest Paulitician

Democrats For Ron Paul

Washington Needs a Dr. Not a Lawyer RonPaul2008.com

Vote Like the Constitution Matters Ron Paul

Protect Our Borders Not Iraq's

History Will Remember 2008 As the Year The People Saved America RonPaul2008.com

JOIN US RonPaul.Meetup.com



you can defeat a candidate, but they can't defeat his ideas

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 06:40 PM

If elections were held under the process described in the Constitution, it would be solely a popular vote with the winner being President, and the runner-up being Vice President. Those founding fathers were pretty smart back in their day.


and the truth shall set us free, keep it comin with the dissent

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 06:31 PM
yeah, indoctrination is scary..no matter what the program is..leave them free-minded to choose for themselves what to believe

no photo
Mon 02/04/08 06:22 PM
that dissent is patriotic..sorry for using the definitions, just tryin to make points without them being spun or misunderstood, definitions are clear-cut.