Topic: A moral ethical God? | |
---|---|
Ok - time for a little athiesm 'logic' here.
Well, I’ve learned something today. This post and a couple other recent posts have led me to validate the word god through many different souces. What I have found is that Art, tends to be more correct than others, when he says that “God can not be defined”. What I find most often in my sources is a “listing” of phrases in which the word god is used. HOWEVER, there are still many other sources that make an attempt at a definition, almost all of them include the word “being”. Indicating that god is considered to be some kind of contained intelligence. Other words, continually used are: supreme, supernatural (power or attributes), all-knowing, all-powerful, omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe. Almost all these have commonality in definition. But the most impressive definition I found, is actually a historical perspective: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From the Online Etymology Dictionary: God = O.E. god "supreme being, deity," from P.Gmc. *guthan (cf. Du. god, Ger. Gott, O.N. guð, Goth. guþ), from PIE *ghut- "that which is invoked" (cf. Skt. huta- "invoked," an epithet of Indra), from root *gheu(e)- "to call, invoke." But some trace it to PIE *ghu-to- "poured," from root *gheu- "to pour, pour a libation" (source of Gk. khein "to pour," khoane "funnel" and khymos "juice;" also in the phrase khute gaia "poured earth," referring to a burial mound). "Given the Greek facts, the Germanic form may have referred in the first instance to the spirit immanent in a burial mound" [Watkins]. Cf. also Zeus. Not related to good. Originally neut. in Gmc., the gender shifted to masc. after the coming of Christianity. O.E. god was probably closer in sense to L. numen. A better word to translate deus might have been P.Gmc. *ansuz, but this was only used of the highest deities in the Gmc. religion, and not of foreign gods, and it was never used of the Christian God. It survives in Eng. mainly in the personal names beginning in Os-. "I want my lawyer, my tailor, my servants, even my wife to believe in God, because it means that I shall be cheated and robbed and cuckolded less often. ... If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him." [Voltaire] First record of Godawful "terrible" is from 1878; God speed as a parting is from c.1470. God-fearing is attested from 1835. God bless you after someone sneezes is credited to St. Gregory the Great, but the pagan Romans (Absit omen) and Greeks had similar customs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ At any rate the reason I was curious is because I often wonder if people are using the word ‘god’ correctly when attempting to explain what their belief is. What I have learned is that ANYONE who believes that this universe was ‘created’ by an ‘other’ intelligent source can call that source God, as long as they are willing to believe that source to be a: “being”, Indicating that god is ‘considered’ to be some kind of contained intelligence, supreme, supernatural (power or attributes), all-knowing, all-powerful, omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe. So now all of you who so ardently fight to get out of the doctrine ‘pittfalls’ of a religion, have but to create your own doctrine. Just remember to define the word god, before you declare your belief in the being, lest you be categorized under a label you have a great distaste for! |
|
|
|
Edited by
creativesoul
on
Tue 01/08/08 04:05 PM
|
|
Hi Di...
Interesting information...as always... If I had the time, I would go through this entire thread and nullify all of the false statements concerning me... Ah but what does it truly matter what another's perspective is of my intent? It is all causual... Start where we can agree, I suppose is the best way to direct this topic... so I posed a question, which your post actually verified, to get somewhere without the unneccesary content of individual anthropomorphism... Lets talk about 'God'... not religion... Is God all powerful, all knowing, and all good? |
|
|
|
Man! Look around at the world that we have created by not following God. I’m sorry Art, but this is total bull crap! Most of the problems facing our world today were indeed created by people who supposedly have Christian values!!! The Christians came to the Americas and murdered the pantheists who lived here calling them ‘savages’! The Christians went to Africa and brought back “black men” that they enslaved and treated as sub-human! Even today many commercial enterprises that pollute and rape mother earth are run by people who supposedly have “Christian values”. Sure you can argue that all of these people and their actions are not supported by the religion, but if so then all you are doing is denouncing 99.9% of the Christians in the world!!! If we had all lived our lives according the pantheistic views of Sitting Bull the world would be a beautiful place. This CRAP that the world is screwed up because mankind didn’t live according to the laws of the Bible is just that, total CRAP! There are many philosophies, and even atheists who have lived lives that would have produced a beautiful world had everyone lived like them. Any sincere pantheist has morals that far exceed those of the Bible. How can I say that? Simply, take all of the moral values of the Bible and add to them a respect for mother earth, nature, and the animal kingdom. That increases their value and places them are a much higher plateau than the Bible holds them. The Bible dose not preach respect for the natural world the way pantheism does! So don’t even think about trying to claim to me that the reason the world is so screwed up is because people aren’t following the biblical laws. Those laws do no prevent people from raping planet earth. Those laws are inadequate. Just look at what Christianity has done to the USA!!! It’s clearly a devastating religion! You blame it on a lack of Christianity, I blame it on Christianity! Christianity is the religion that taught people to be so egotistical and to have no respect for the physical world or nature!!! It’s a devastating religion. As a religion it clearly doesn’t work to instill good morals in people. It had its chance and fell flat on its face. |
|
|
|
I have to go but Im not familiar with the countless tales of virgin birth that predates Jesus. Please enlighten me. http://www.pocm.info/getting_started_pocm.html |
|
|
|
I have to go but Im not familiar with the countless tales of virgin birth that predates Jesus. Please enlighten me. Please point out the specific myths cristianity is copying, please dont utilize dogma or anything thats was changed to get converts, specifically during Roman tims. I am asking for myths that copy the generic version of Christianity, the virgin birth and creationism. What I was saying before that wasnt clear was, just becasue one thing was written before something else was written doesnt mean the one that was written about first happened first. My apologies to Creative for getting off topic. Steve, No one wants to do your homework for you, but here are few names to google. I'm not saying all the virgin birth narratives surrounding these mythical (some historical) figures predate Christianity, but it'll give you some ideas. Here's what I recall: Amenkept Horus Hathor Apis Ra Attis Dionysis Jason (son of Persephone) Perseus Adonis Mithra Romulus Remus Plato Pythagoras Gautama Alexander the Great Throw in some Caesars... Again, sorry for the interruption, Creative. Thanks. |
|
|
|
I have to go but Im not familiar with the countless tales of virgin birth that predates Jesus. Please enlighten me. http://www.pocm.info/getting_started_pocm.html Damn you, Abra! I wrote my email for nothing. J/K. |
|
|
|
Hi Di... Interesting information...as always... If I had the time, I would go through this entire thread and nullify all of the false statements concerning me... Ah but what does it truly matter what another's perspective is of my intent? It is all causual... Start where we can agree, I suppose is the best way to direct this topic... so I posed a question, which your post actually verified, to get somewhere without the unneccesary content of individual anthropomorphism... Lets talk about 'God'... not religion... Is God all powerful, all knowing, and all good? Yes.....and again as with me.....I see Art as not shoving anything down anyone throats.....He like you.... when you post your beliefs is doing the same with his.....And he does a beautiful job.......He doesn't get mad, he doesn't say believe this or you are going to hell....He is giving you facts as he and others believe it to be.....And just as Redy has posted her beliefs as an athiesm which is her right.......so do all that believe in the Bible and Believe in the God of the Bible. You know what I find so interesting is that people that are versed on the Bible, are the same people that believe it to be so from personal experience.....and were led to learn more of God's word.....They didn't just wake up one day and say..."Hey I believe in God......Jesus Christ.....and The Bible to be the inspired word of God. And I also believe that studying the word is the greatest tool to believe or not to believe.... |
|
|
|
Whiteboy:
|
|
|
|
feral votes yes to the notion of an omniGod...
ok... I want to get a concensus of all those who agree... feral, I appreciate your particpation... I do not feel anything being is being shoved... so... I just want to find a 'plane' to where the conversation can indeed begin on an agreement, if this is ok with everybody... I claim that the description of 'God', as claimed within the bible is inaccurate. To establish a starting point I have posed a question. Is God omniscient(all-knowing), omnibenevolent(all-good), and omnipotent(all-powerful)? We must find a reference to discuss the topic. We must define either 'God' or some character of 'God'... some attribute... any attribute... While some claim to not define 'God' they describe what 'God' is and what 'God' is not. We could go on and on about this... I want to establish a reference point... something tangible to discuss... again... Is God omniscient(all-knowing), omnibenevolent(all-good), and omnipotent(all-powerful)? |
|
|
|
Edited by
ArtGurl
on
Tue 01/08/08 04:55 PM
|
|
I claim that the description of 'God', as claimed within the bible is inaccurate. I agree with that... |
|
|
|
Is God omniscient(all-knowing), omnibenevolent(all-good), and omnipotent(all-powerful)?
Let's see if we can break this down to fit what others believe. Is what you believe to be God/Higher Being all knowing? Is what you believe to be God/Higher Being all Good? Is what you believe to be God/Higher Being all powerful? |
|
|
|
Edited by
BillingsDreamer
on
Tue 01/08/08 05:53 PM
|
|
Art This is amazing to me, the lengths we will go to reject God. Hello I don't see this as a rejection of God but rather a rejection of a biblical definition that does not seem to fit. I don't think many can claim a better smile than yours--wow! But, in answer to your comment, where exactly does the Bible not fit? It really is the other religious systems that don't fit. For the Atheist it is a creation without a creator. For the Buddhist, it might be chanting to change the world. But words don't change the world, actions change the world. For the Hindu it is a belief that we are reincarnated, and must keep coming back until we get it right. But, then the world never gets better. No one is learning the lesson, and the population keeps growing it is not static like it would have to be in their scenario. The pagans and witches worship gods that don't really exist, and they think that god is in every rock and tree. Wow! the rock wears away in the stream, and god becomes minerals in the water. The tree dies, and God becomes fertilizer. It is nuts. You get my point. These religions are goofy. They don't make sense. They are the ones that don't fit. The Bible tells us the way that works. Like for example, work hard, don't be lazy. Discipline your children, so later they can discipline themselves. It tells us to keep the ten commandments, don't commit adultery, lie, steal or murder. It tells us to respect our parents. It tells us not to worship these other gods. To me, it really is good advice. Why all the hatred for the common sense approach to life? There are many traditions outside of Christianity which speak of God. If our relationship with God is indeed a personal one should our understanding not also be personal? Sure, but then keep it personal. Don't try to push it on others. Don't try to minimize the God of the Bible and expect no one to protest. You see, it is not personal when we put it on the forum. So, if you tell us that something is true, we have the right to challenge it. There seems to be this notion that if, for example, my definition of God does not fit the prescribed one allowed by the bible that my view is wrong. I would suggest rather than my perspective has broadened to encompass a more wholistic view based upon study and experience. It is what resonates and sits well within me ... just me. We all have our own path back to our source. I don't agree with you. No one said your views are wrong because they are not the bible views. I don't really know your views. However, you state that they are superior to the Bible. In that, you are actually denigrating the Bible and its values and morals. In your mind, and now in your print, you are superior to it. I challenge such a view. Any why not? This is forum for that. Further, you are telling everyone on this forum that you have a better, bigger view than the Bible. It is a little arrogant to me, but you can believe what you want. However, if you tell others these things, I will challenge if I have the time. There is often an assumption made, and I see it here in relation to creativesoul and abra (I use them as examples as I know both men), that there is a desire to denounce God or that they fail to or are incapable of understanding Christianity and its basis. Nothing could be farther from the truth. So, you speak for them? I don't get this. I mean I have been wrong lots of times, but do you really think that they do not put down the God of the Bible? Of course they do. They, like you are superior to it. They have risen above it. They know better than the God of the Bible. Where have you been. Or, ok, that is right, one of them said they like the bible and read it sometimes. That has no real meaning. Lots of people read the Bible. They don't understand it. Do you really think that they understand the Bible by what they say? Why am I defending the Bible in the light of their attacks. It flies in the face of the obvious reality. I know I have not read every post of theirs, but I have never heard them speak of a positive thing about the Bible or its God. I don't see why it has to be science or God. Religion and science both are trying to describe and understand the same thing...the nature of the universe. I suspect when you get beneath all the dogma that both views are not so far apart. Yes, and when the astronomers found the lingering noise of the big bang, and when they calculated to see if it could be an expanding or contracting universe, they found it is only expanding. Thus they crawled over the mountain of ignorance and as they get closer to the top, science found that there was a beginning--a creator. Creative I believe that 'God' is everything... everything and nothing... I absolutely agree. We live in a world that seems pretty real. I trust that the table at which I eat dinner is solid enough to hold the plate. Yet, at a quantum level what is really there? Tiny particles and a whole lot of empty space - anything but solid. And at a deeper level there are even smaller particles with even more space... bits of which flit in and out of 'our' reality. Everything and no-thing at the same time...depending upon my perspective at the time. But in this view, you are treating nothing as if it is something when it really is not. There is matter, light, electrons, and quarks that are material and measurable. These things are real and they exist. Take them away, and there is nothing. The matter was created and now fills the space where there once was nothing. The nothing that exists between all these things has no reality. It is nothing. It is the absence of something. It is like space. There are planets, and suns and asteroids, and moons, and all that stuff that exists, but they are something. The emptiness, the space that is between them is absence of anything. The God of my belief is in a state of constant creation. This cannot be true. The truth is that everything is subject to entropy. Everything is winding down. All energy moves from a point of high intensity to low intensity. Thus, if you put a pot of steaming water on the counter, it will become the same temperature as the room. This is also true of the universe. It is winding down. The suns in all the galaxies will eventually burn out. Nothing is winding things up again. It is not an ego in the sky....a separate 'thing' ... [/quite] See, you say you are not against God. But you call the God I worship an ego in the sky. This is so denigrating to God and self aggrandizing. Here is God's response: Isa 40:13 Who hath directed the Spirit of the LORD, or being his counsellor hath taught him? Isa 40:14 With whom took he counsel, and who instructed him, and taught him in the path of judgment, and taught him knowledge, and shewed to him the way of understanding? Isa 40:15 Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the balance: behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing. Isa 40:16 And Lebanon is not sufficient to burn, nor the beasts thereof sufficient for a burnt offering. Isa 40:17 All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity. Isa 40:18 To whom then will ye liken God? or what likeness will ye compare unto him? My first point is that God is not an ego. He is not bragging here. This is simply the understated truth. He is just telling you who He is. God is far greater and more powerful than this. The people then did not know about the far flung galaxies so far away that our modern Hubble can't see them. He could not talk to them about the power it takes to send galaxies spinning millions of miles per hour out into space. So, He used analogies they could understand. Second, This God is not some sort of force like star wars. He is not in every rock, tree, and piece of the material world. He is spirit, not anything to do with matter. He is a separate powerful awesome being. He is NOT in the nations or the trees. He burns them. He destroys them if they become too self destructive or harmful to others. By the belief you have created in your mind, you put yourself above this magnificent God. You make Him a part of the the nothing that is in the plate you eat from. You make Him a part of the world that you use. This is a belief that does not fit. By it, you create a painting, a home, or other project of your choosing. You can destroy it, but you think God has no such power. Perhaps you don't see it yet, but God is not an ego in the sky. We are the egos run a muck! {quote] it is the source of everything which comes into physical reality. The source of all holds the potential of all things ... but it is undefined ... a no-thing ... until it is manifested into the physical world. This is your god. Certainly it is a controllable god. It is not a being. Does not think, does not love or hate. Your god is a nothing until somehow it is able to manifest itself into our physical world. And you think that this is the better view of God? Well sure it is to you. Your god has no power. It is just a nice thought in your head. But, I ask you to think real thoughts. What about when the world no longer exists. There is coming a time when our sun burns out, and when it does, it will take the rest of the planets with it. Your god will not be able to manifest itself anymore. It will cease to exist. But, then, I guess it doesn't matter to you because your god is only one of your personal choice, designed to fit your needs for now. I say it is no god. It is just your thoughts. Art |
|
|
|
Edited by
creativesoul
on
Tue 01/08/08 05:14 PM
|
|
Ok... as I wait for those to respond to the question posed, I am going to go through this post and show you, piece by piece, and respond to that which I have not been able to...
Art, I will go through your statements first. My Op said... I mean when you are the only entity in existence how can relative value be established to measure anything of a relative nature(morality, ethics, good, bad)without a 'community' of some sort?
Art responded with... There is a community.
God is not the same person as Jesus. One is a Father, the other a Son. Both Divine, but both different. Thus Jesus would ask if there was any way to avoid the beating and crucifixion. His will was different than that of the Father, but He submitted to the Father's will. In addition there are millions of angels in the heavens that God lives and works with. My response to this is... Art, I did not ask about what all 'God' created after 'God' decided to create.Before he created anything he was just 'God' nothing else. Before all creation.You have claimed that the trinity exists prior to the creation of man... Is this correct? If so, then... Now the only way that Jesus could possibly exist before man is if 'God' knew that Jesus would need to exist.In other words... The invoking of Jesus prior to man's existence presupposes 'God's' knowledge of the 'need' for Jesus. Jesus would not exist prior to man unless 'God' foresaw the need. Can we agree here? |
|
|
|
Art, are you going to answer my question or keep on posting a bunch of unfounded 'scientific' information?
|
|
|
|
Man! Look around at the world that we have created by not following God. I’m sorry Art, but this is total bull crap! Most of the problems facing our world today were indeed created by people who supposedly have Christian values!!! The Christians came to the Americas and murdered the pantheists who lived here calling them ‘savages’! The Christians went to Africa and brought back “black men” that they enslaved and treated as sub-human! Even today many commercial enterprises that pollute and rape mother earth are run by people who supposedly have “Christian values”. Sure you can argue that all of these people and their actions are not supported by the religion, but if so then all you are doing is denouncing 99.9% of the Christians in the world!!! If we had all lived our lives according the pantheistic views of Sitting Bull the world would be a beautiful place. This CRAP that the world is screwed up because mankind didn’t live according to the laws of the Bible is just that, total CRAP! There are many philosophies, and even atheists who have lived lives that would have produced a beautiful world had everyone lived like them. Of Course this is all true. However, you really did miss my point. I was talking about the values and standards of the Bible, not the values and standard of men who only profess belief in the Bible. That was the point of my list of changes to show that people are not following the Bible. The middle ages, and all of its religious superstition did not come from the bible. It came from pagans who worshiped the mystery religion and who put Christ's name on it. You understand that the Saturnaila was named Christmas. Easter that still retains the name of the goddess of fertility over laid the passover. The bible teaching of Christ coming and setting up a kingdom for a thousand years was reinterpreted by the Roman Church and its Emperors so that the church was the kingdom, then they put out the people who held to the truth, and they killed others thinking they did God a service, exactly like the scriptures said they would . Joh 16:2 They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. What I am saying is that the God of the Bible and the values and standards that are His have not been lived. That is the point of this thread. Not that we should look to what people who call themselves Christian have done, but what Christ said we are to do. There is a vast difference. To put it another way, if Lexus has made quality luxury cars for years, but suddenly there is a hostile take over by their competitors and they make a car that is of terrible quality, it does not mean that the original Lexus was inferior. But this is what you are doing. You are judging the God of the Bible by the acts of those who cooperated in a hostile take over of Christianity. Any sincere pantheist has morals that far exceed those of the Bible. How can I say that? Simply, take all of the moral values of the Bible and add to them a respect for mother earth, nature, and the animal kingdom. That increases their value and places them are a much higher plateau than the Bible holds them. The Bible dose not preach respect for the natural world the way pantheism does! And well it should not. Pantheism puts man on the same level as beasts. In case you did not notice, we are superior. We are made in God's image and the animals in a lower image of angels. That is why angels are shown to have faces of an eagle, ox, lion, and have wings, and so on. For example Christ comes back on a white horse, and that horse is not a physical one. It is a spirit being. Thus the Bible does not want us worshiping animals, like so many of the false religions do. Further, you are again absolutely wrong on your point about God's teaching regarding animals. God said that even the animals are to have rest on the Sabbath. He said we are to break even God's rule to save their lives. He says that you cannot restrict the animal from eating when it is treading out the grain. God says you don't even eat a calf boild in it mother's milk. Regarding the environment, God told the people to bury their excrement, not to leave it laying around. He knew about bacteria before we did. He also warned people not to build crowded cities. He said they were not to build house to house. We should not live in apartments. Now science finds that this overcrowding causes us to be more violent. God says when He comes back, He will punish those who destroy the earth. God told us to dress and keep the environment. He did not tell us to rape it. God required that everyone who lost property due to bad financial decisions must have the property returned to them every fifty years. His economic system was designed so that no one single entity could take over everyone else like the huge corporations have done today. His system was so fair, so just, and so perfect. Ours is the problem. and ours did not come from true Christians or from people following the Bible. It came from people who professed Christianity and did not live it. So, I don't know how to take you. You put down the Bible, but you don't even know what it says. It is just all empty talk. So don’t even think about trying to claim to me that the reason the world is so screwed up is because people aren’t following the biblical laws. Those laws do no prevent people from raping planet earth. Those laws are inadequate. Again, you know better. You act as if we followed your laws everything would be fine. But, the truth is you don't know God's laws or why they exist. Just look at what Christianity has done to the USA!!! It’s clearly a devastating religion! You blame it on a lack of Christianity, I blame it on Christianity! Christianity is the religion that taught people to be so egotistical and to have no respect for the physical world or nature!!! Here you are again blasting what you don't know. Christianity taught people to be egotistical? Mat 23:12 And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted. 1Pe 5:6 Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that he may exalt you in due time: Jam 4:10 Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up. Jesus taught us to be humble. But human nature has made us egotistical. In fact it is not the teachings of Jesus that is egotistical. In an era when women were not allowed to talk to men or especially a Rabbi, Jesus talked with Gentile women. He listened to them, and in some cases, their argument caused Him to change His judgement. It’s a devastating religion. As a religion it clearly doesn’t work to instill good morals in people. It had its chance and fell flat on its face. But again, and again, and again, it is not Christianity that you see. It is a counterfeit you see. They worship the god of this world, and call him Christ. I have said this so many times, and you just by pass it. You are not seeing God's religion. You are seeing the devil at work. art |
|
|
|
feral votes yes to the notion of an omniGod... ok... I want to get a concensus of all those who agree... feral, I appreciate your particpation... I do not feel anything being is being shoved... so... I just want to find a 'plane' to where the conversation can indeed begin on an agreement, if this is ok with everybody... I claim that the description of 'God', as claimed within the bible is inaccurate. To establish a starting point I have posed a question. Is God omniscient(all-knowing), omnibenevolent(all-good), and omnipotent(all-powerful)? We must find a reference to discuss the topic. We must define either 'God' or some character of 'God'... some attribute... any attribute... While some claim to not define 'God' they describe what 'God' is and what 'God' is not. We could go on and on about this... I want to establish a reference point... something tangible to discuss... again... Is God omniscient(all-knowing), omnibenevolent(all-good), and omnipotent(all-powerful)? Ok ---first show us where in the Bible God says He is omiscient? Where does it say that God is Omibenevolent and all powerful? This shows again that people talk about the bible without knowing what it really says. God is not omiscient. He is not all knowing. Thus, he said to Abraham when he was willing to offer up his son, "Now I know." God always does what is in the best interests of all concerned, but that does not mean that He always does things are are benevolent. He punishes the wicked. Isa 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: (calamity) I the LORD do all these things. God is not all powerful. He has given us free will. Therefore, by choice, He does not have the power to force us to do His will. It is our choice to follow Him, not His. The point I make is that the opponents of the Bible do not know the Bible. Why even listen to them? Art |
|
|
|
Edited by
creativesoul
on
Tue 01/08/08 05:53 PM
|
|
Deleted to respond to your answer...
|
|
|
|
Oh...
I am sorry I asked... You my friend, are quite presumptive... you know not. So according to Art.. God is not all-powerful...not all-good...and not all-knowing.... Yup Art... I agree. |
|
|
|
Thank you for the dialogue...
Peace. |
|
|
|
I have heard it said that God is moral and just, etc., etc. How moral, just, good, etc. can an entity be all by itself? I mean when you are the only entity in existence how can relative value be established to measure anything of a relative nature(morality, ethics, good, bad)without a 'community' of some sort? u r making the wrong questions morality and ethics are human terms, thus God can be measured by those terms the only definition that we can use about God is love |
|
|