Topic: TODAY IN TRUMPLAND. PART 2. - part 2 | |
---|---|
Democrats: dig, dig, keep digging. Got to find something if we are to have any chance in 2020!!
|
|
|
|
Trump's Efforts To 'Influence' Russia Probe Got Foiled By His Staff, Mueller Says
" Trump might be in substantially more legal trouble if not for top administration aides and officials, according to the redacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report released by the Justice Department on Thursday. Though Mueller did not reach a conclusion as to whether Trump obstructed justice by seeking to shut down the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, the special counsel presented evidence of the president’s efforts to “influence” the probe and the witnesses who cooperated with it". http://www.yahoo.com/news/mueller-report-trump-staff-171055950.html Read Robert Mueller’s Written Summaries of His Russia Report "Attorney General William Barr released Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s full report on Thursday. The report details Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election and details 10 episodes the special counsel examined related to obstruction of justice. The Internet Research Agency (IRA) carried out the earliest Russian interference operations identified by the investigation—a social media campaign designed to provoke and amplify political and social discord in the United States". http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/04/mueller-report-release-summaries-barr-trump/587182/ Mueller report summary - live reading: Analysis of the explosive document on special counsel's Trump investigation "Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report has finally been released to the public — and we're beginning to get a sense of what's inside. The Department of Justice released a redacted version of the report into Russian interference in the 2016 election Thursday following a press conference held by Attorney General William Barr. The Independent is reviewing the report while reaching out to legal and national security experts who are also combing over the nearly 400-page document. Follow along with the most explosive revelations and interesting details below". http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/mueller-report-read-live-doj-pdf-download-summary-full-release-trump-justice-department-latest-a8876821.html |
|
|
|
Nadler prepares subpoena for full Mueller report
"Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., is tired of waiting. The chairman of the House Judiciary Committee said Thursday that he would issue a subpoena to obtain the full version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s report on Russian interference into the 2016 presidential election and whether Donald Trump cooperated with those efforts". http://news.yahoo.com/nadler-prepares-subpoena-for-full-mueller-report-182942692.html |
|
|
|
If nadler has the clearance, he can go read it all. If he doesn't, then he gets the redacted version.
|
|
|
|
Just downloaded Mueller's report. Interesting that the title is "Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election".
The Title does not say "Report on the Investigation into Donald Trumps collusion with Putin in the 2016 Presidential Election". For two years the democrat's and their media buddies quoted the Mueller investigation as primarily into Donald Trump. Now that the democrat's don't have a smoking gun they're changing tactics: demanding his tax returns. Democrat's sure are getting desperate. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Thu 04/18/19 02:37 PM
|
|
Trump sought to obstruct Mueller — but White House aides wouldn't do it, report finds
"WASHINGTON — President Trump committed “multiple acts” aimed at obstructing the Russia investigation, but was ultimately saved from being charged with a crime in part because his top aides refused to carry out his orders". http://news.yahoo.com/trump-sought-to-obstruct-mueller-but-white-house-aides-wouldnt-do-it-report-finds-190027416.html The biggest revelations in the Mueller report Like we didn't already know she was just as much a lier as Trump is. This just proves it. "Sanders admits to lying about Comey firing". The report released Thursday also revealed that White House press secretary Sarah Sanders admitted to lying following Comey’s firing. At a May 2017 White House briefing, Sanders said the White House had heard from “countless” FBI agents who said they had lost confidence in Comey. Those claims were questioned immediately, but Sanders confirmed she had personally heard from FBI agents disappointed in Comey. In interviews with investigators, Sanders acknowledged that her comments were “not founded on anything". |
|
|
|
Anti-Trump star Cher:
I understand Helping struggling immigrants, but my city (Los Angeles) ISN'T TAKING CARE OF IT'S OWN. WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+ American citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS. PPL WHO LIVE BELOW THE POVERTY LINE & HUNGRY. If my state Can't take Care of it's own (many are vets) How Can It take Care of More? Cher -------------------------- The Pelosi's say the want open boarders but not in their back yard or they have to see them from their Starbucks. The president is calling their bluff. The democrat's are using the immigration problem to influence Hispanic. They could care less about Hispanics themself. Hypocrites all. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Thu 04/18/19 03:03 PM
|
|
Don't just tell part of it, tell it all.
Cher Claps Back at Donald Trump as a 'Thug' and a 'Lizard Brain' After He Said They Agreed on Something "Cher had harsh words for President Donald Trump after he said he agreed with her on what he apparently thought was her support for his anti-immigration politics". The 72-year-old songstress tweeted on Sunday that Los Angeles, where she lives, wasn’t “taking care of its own” and that 50,000 people live on the streets, many of them veterans. “I Understand Helping struggling Immigrants, but MY CITY (Los Angeles) ISNT TAKING CARE OF ITS OWN,” she wrote. “WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+Citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS. PPL WHO LIVE BELOW POVERTY LINE,& HUNGRY? If My State Can’t Take Care of Its Own (Many Are VETS) How Can it Take Care Of More.” http://people.com/politics/cher-calls-donald-trump-thug-lizard-brain-after-immigration-comments/ Really, for the right to try to use Cher to shore up their argument, is really not a good analogy. Cher says it flat and plain what kind of idiot she really thinks Trump is. And when you get right down to it, he is an idiot for even considering that idea. Not just because of the burden that doing that would put on each individual state. The simple fact is, he will piss off a whole lot of people. But not just that. These pissed off people will vote Democrat in response. So will all those migrants he dropped on those states. We have two counties here in Ga. Large counties that are sanctuary counties. Ga has always been a red state. But it has already started circulating around here that if he pulls some shyt like that on this state, at least half the state will go blue come 2020. That's millions of lost votes for Republicans. If Ga is already thinking about that, you can bet so are the others. So, yeah, let him keep showing his stupidity. I want him to do it. In 2020 any Democrat can run against him and win if he is that dumb. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Thu 04/18/19 03:07 PM
|
|
Anti-Trump star Cher: I understand Helping struggling immigrants, but my city (Los Angeles) ISN'T TAKING CARE OF IT'S OWN. WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+ American citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS. PPL WHO LIVE BELOW THE POVERTY LINE & HUNGRY. If my state Can't take Care of it's own (many are vets) How Can It take Care of More? Cher -------------------------- The Pelosi's say the want open boarders but not in their back yard or they have to see them from their Starbucks. The president is calling their bluff. The democrat's are using the immigration problem to influence Hispanic. They could care less about Hispanics themself. Hypocrites all. Is there a link to a quote of Pelosi saying she supports or wants 'open borders'? If there were million dollar homes SITTING AT THE BORDER, most would probably want more of a border (re emphasizing that we do ALREADY have border walls and security points at the border, which is, therefore, not OPEN) There aren't million dollar private properties on that line for which the millionaires can pay security on their investment. But there are mountains and hills and rivers and land and an arbitrary line. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Thu 04/18/19 03:17 PM
|
|
Don't just tell part of it, tell it all. Cher Claps Back at Donald Trump as a 'Thug' and a 'Lizard Brain' After He Said They Agreed on Something "Cher had harsh words for President Donald Trump after he said he agreed with her on what he apparently thought was her support for his anti-immigration politics". The 72-year-old songstress tweeted on Sunday that Los Angeles, where she lives, wasn’t “taking care of its own” and that 50,000 people live on the streets, many of them veterans. “I Understand Helping struggling Immigrants, but MY CITY (Los Angeles) ISNT TAKING CARE OF ITS OWN,” she wrote. “WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+Citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS. PPL WHO LIVE BELOW POVERTY LINE,& HUNGRY? If My State Can’t Take Care of Its Own (Many Are VETS) How Can it Take Care Of More.” http://people.com/politics/cher-calls-donald-trump-thug-lizard-brain-after-immigration-comments/ Really, for the right to try to use Cher to shore up their argument, is really not a good analogy. Cher says it flat and plain what kind of idiot she really thinks Trump is. And when you get right down to it, he is an idiot for even considering that idea. Not just because of the burden that doing that would put on each individual state. The simple fact is, he will piss off a whole lot of people. But not just that. These pissed off people will vote Democrat in response. So will all those migrants he dropped on those states. We have two counties here in Ga. Large counties that are sanctuary counties. Ga has always been a red state. But it has already started circulating around here that if he pulls some shyt like that on this state, at least half the state will go blue come 2020. That's millions of lost votes for Republicans. If Ga is already thinking about that, you can bet so are the others. So, yeah, let him keep showing his stupidity. I want him to do it. In 2020 any Democrat/Moderate/Center or another Republican with a brain and a moral center can run against him and win if he is that dumb. |
|
|
|
Anti-Trump star Cher: I understand Helping struggling immigrants, but my city (Los Angeles) ISN'T TAKING CARE OF IT'S OWN. WHAT ABOUT THE 50,000+ American citizens WHO LIVE ON THE STREETS. PPL WHO LIVE BELOW THE POVERTY LINE & HUNGRY. If my state Can't take Care of it's own (many are vets) How Can It take Care of More? Cher -------------------------- The Pelosi's say the want open boarders but not in their back yard or they have to see them from their Starbucks. The president is calling their bluff. The democrat's are using the immigration problem to influence Hispanic. They could care less about Hispanics themself. Hypocrites all. Is there a link to a quote of Pelosi saying she supports or wants 'open borders'? If there were million dollar homes SITTING AT THE BORDER, most would probably want more of a border (re emphasizing that we do ALREADY have border walls and security points at the border, which is, therefore, not OPEN) There aren't million dollar private properties on that line for which the millionaires can pay security on their investment. But there are mountains and hills and rivers and land and an arbitrary line. She has never said that. It's just another far right lie. Listen for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZHddAyzLKk |
|
|
|
AOC responds to Mueller report by accusing of Republican's 'double standards on impeachment'
"Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has responded to the publication of the Mueller report by accusing Republicans of double standards on the issue of impeachment. As the White House and Republicans sought to claim the special counsel’s report contained no evidence of criminal wrongdoing and that Democrats had no grounds to try and impeach Donald Trump, she tweeted a video that contained several members of the GOP explaining why they had censured Bill Clinton two decades ago". http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/aoc-mueller-report-response-trump-impeachment-alexandria-ocasio-cortex-twitter-republican-a8877176.html |
|
|
|
If you like Trump than you see the Mueller report as a end to a which hunt, if you don't like Trump than you see this as a dagger in your heart, so you hang on to a last ditch effort to build support for a possible impeachment, Could this be a blessing in disguise to revenge a twenty year old scar ( the impeachment of Bill Clinton). It is well known that this is not a important topic for voters. It will not influence the voters choice for president.The democrats have invested two years worth of stating false narritives of having seen evidence of collusion,it's not easy to just let it go after being wrong time and time again. Who thinks that it is time to get on with the important problems we face? #1 the crisis at the border.
|
|
|
|
Ivanka Trump’s Russian contacts included a Kremlin-linked fashion blogger
"WASHINGTON — Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter and a top White House adviser, was involved in several of the contacts between Russia and the commander in chief’s inner circle that are detailed in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report. The document, which was released on Thursday, describes Ivanka Trump’s work on the Trump Tower Moscow project, her role in the response to the infamous 2016 meeting between a lawyer linked to the Russian government and the Trump campaign, and an interaction with a fashion influencer who approached her on behalf of the Kremlin". http://news.yahoo.com/ivanka-trump-russian-contacts-mueller-report-215819313.html |
|
|
|
A repost for those who haven't seen it. We have Deleted several post on this thread.. This is happening way to often.. This thread was left Open in order to keep it all in one thread. If you want to Quote what someone else post then site your sources or at least give some info to prove your side..That is what this Forum is for. All responses must be keep Civil. Opinions are great but if you want to respond then at least prove your side of what you say by citing sources or some kind of info.. For those that keep Quoting and only commenting with insults towards others or the topic you might be Suspended or Banned. Please make sure you read the Specific Rules for this Forum we will start enforcing them within the Political Forums due to many choose not to follow these rules.. If you can not cite sources and only degrading remarks your post will be deleted and you may be Suspended or Banned, all comments need to be about the Topic's.. So Quote the Topic you are referring to or the poster since there is many within this thread and Respond according to the Rules! Here is the link to the rules as well as the rules~~~ https://mingle2.com/topic/249154 In this forum, we will not allow users to bash other users for their political beliefs. We know that politics is a topic that many people feel extremely passionate about, both conservatives and liberals. However, if you wish to participate in this forum, discussions must remain civil at ALL times. If you wish to have a reasoned discussion about politics, current events, etc., you may do so, but users who resort to insults or attacks as part of these discussions will be banned without notice. Also, topics which are designed to bait others into a response, start a flame war, etc. and are not meant for serious discussion will be deleted. The poster may also receive a suspension as a result. For example, topics like "George Bush is the devil", or "Hillary sucks" are not productive. The Political Forums are for Debates.. Please make sure you have a Topic and willing to cite sources about Topics. Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Forum Admin Kristi |
|
|
|
Ivanka Trump’s Russian contacts included a Kremlin-linked fashion blogger "WASHINGTON — Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter and a top White House adviser, was involved in several of the contacts between Russia and the commander in chief’s inner circle that are detailed in special counsel Robert Mueller’s report. The document, which was released on Thursday, describes Ivanka Trump’s work on the Trump Tower Moscow project, her role in the response to the infamous 2016 meeting between a lawyer linked to the Russian government and the Trump campaign, and an interaction with a fashion influencer who approached her on behalf of the Kremlin". http://news.yahoo.com/ivanka-trump-russian-contacts-mueller-report-215819313.html Why Ivanka Trump & Wendi Deng Murdoch's Friendship Is Suddenly Under Scrutiny "According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, U.S. counterintelligence officials warned Trump's senior adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner in early 2017 that one of his close friendships could present a problem for the American government. Kushner and Ivanka Trump's friend Wendi Deng Murdoch could be a lobbyist for China, the officials claimed, saying they thought she might try to use Javanka to further the interests of Beijing. What officials were particularly concerned about was a counterintelligence assessment that showed Murdoch was reportedly lobbying for a high-profile construction project in Washington, D.C., funded by the Chinese government. It was planned to be a $100 million Chinese garden at the National Arboretum, that included a 70-foot-tall white tower. Officials were afraid the tower would pose a security risk because it could potentially be used for surveillance, sources close to the matter told the Journal. A rep from China's embassy in Washington called the Journal's report "full of groundless speculations". http://www.bustle.com/p/why-ivanka-trump-wendi-deng-murdochs-friendship-is-suddenly-under-scrutiny-7914700 |
|
|
|
If you like Trump than you see the Mueller report as a end to a which hunt, if you don't like Trump than you see this as a dagger in your heart, so you hang on to a last ditch effort to build support for a possible impeachment, Could this be a blessing in disguise to revenge a twenty year old scar ( the impeachment of Bill Clinton). It is well known that this is not a important topic for voters. It will not influence the voters choice for president.The democrats have invested two years worth of stating false narritives of having seen evidence of collusion,it's not easy to just let it go after being wrong time and time again. Who thinks that it is time to get on with the important problems we face? #1 the crisis at the border. By definition, I believe 'important' problems should always be addressed. By practicality, they cant all be addressed all at once, but can be addressed several at a time. I don't believe the border should be priority of those problems. Priorities, to me, are things like poverty and drugs, which are claiming many more lives than any immigrants at the border. I believe, as Trump himself nailed it, that he could MURDER someone and his supporters would not bat an eye in support. The investigation was into Russian interference, a TANGENT and relevant off shoot of that would be if a POTUS was involved. The investigation happened as it should. I understand the reasons for it and I believe any honest POTUS would welcome and understand it as well. They neither cleared nor charged the POTUS. I still feel, as is rightly assumed, that he is a sneaky con man and much of what is in the report points to how sneaky he is. In offices of political power, even an appearance of impropriety gets investigated. Ask Hilary about her emails, or Clinton about his affair. it comes with the territory. If there is nothing to find, so be it. But no one knows what there is to find without trying to look first. Congress will decide its next steps and more will come. I never believed he would be impeached, although I do personally believe his dealings are much more dangerous than a POTUS having an affair or lying about it. I didn't believe Clinton should be impeached, nor do I believe there is enough to impeach Trump. I just would like someone to replace him sooner than later, and hope enough educated voters turn out to make that happen at the polls. |
|
|
|
If you like Trump than you see the Mueller report as a end to a which hunt, if you don't like Trump than you see this as a dagger in your heart, so you hang on to a last ditch effort to build support for a possible impeachment, Could this be a blessing in disguise to revenge a twenty year old scar ( the impeachment of Bill Clinton). It is well known that this is not a important topic for voters. It will not influence the voters choice for president.The democrats have invested two years worth of stating false narritives of having seen evidence of collusion,it's not easy to just let it go after being wrong time and time again. Who thinks that it is time to get on with the important problems we face? #1 the crisis at the border. By definition, I believe 'important' problems should always be addressed. By practicality, they cant all be addressed all at once, but can be addressed several at a time. I don't believe the border should be priority of those problems. Priorities, to me, are things like poverty and drugs, which are claiming many more lives than any immigrants at the border. I believe, as Trump himself nailed it, that he could MURDER someone and his supporters would not bat an eye in support. The investigation was into Russian interference, a TANGENT and relevant off shoot of that would be if a POTUS was involved. The investigation happened as it should. I understand the reasons for it and I believe any honest POTUS would welcome and understand it as well. They neither cleared nor charged the POTUS. I still feel, as is rightly assumed, that he is a sneaky con man and much of what is in the report points to how sneaky he is. In offices of political power, even an appearance of impropriety gets investigated. Ask Hilary about her emails, or Clinton about his affair. it comes with the territory. If there is nothing to find, so be it. But no one knows what there is to find without trying to look first. Congress will decide its next steps and more will come. I never believed he would be impeached, although I do personally believe his dealings are much more dangerous than a POTUS having an affair or lying about it. I didn't believe Clinton should be impeached, nor do I believe there is enough to impeach Trump. I just would like someone to replace him sooner than later, and hope enough educated voters turn out to make that happen at the polls. I agree with you. I never really believed he would be impeached. But, it's already crystal clear that he's dirty. One proof of that is how he was running the Trump charity. He and family treating it like it was there own personal piggy bank. As far as I know, at least at this point, the New York AG is waiting his turn at Trump. It's not like we don't already know he's crooked. I think Mueller knows it. Back in the day when I was a cop, sometimes we knew someone was dirty. But they always seemed to fly just under the radar. Just enough that it made it hard to make a good case against them. But sooner or later they would finally screw up and leave one small speck of evidence. And that small speck was enough to put them away forever. They know Trump is dirty. But is it dirty enough? That's the question. That's why Mueller left it the way he did. Now, it's up to the Democrats in the house to find that dirt. That dirt that they can add to what they already know. The dirt that will make a prosecutable case that will stick. Dirt that Trump can't talk his way out of. It remains to be seen. It ain't over yet. Today was just the beginning. |
|
|
|
If you like Trump than you see the Mueller report as a end to a which hunt, if you don't like Trump than you see this as a dagger in your heart, so you hang on to a last ditch effort to build support for a possible impeachment, Could this be a blessing in disguise to revenge a twenty year old scar ( the impeachment of Bill Clinton). It is well known that this is not a important topic for voters. It will not influence the voters choice for president.The democrats have invested two years worth of stating false narritives of having seen evidence of collusion,it's not easy to just let it go after being wrong time and time again. Who thinks that it is time to get on with the important problems we face? #1 the crisis at the border. By definition, I believe 'important' problems should always be addressed. By practicality, they cant all be addressed all at once, but can be addressed several at a time. I don't believe the border should be priority of those problems. Priorities, to me, are things like poverty and drugs, which are claiming many more lives than any immigrants at the border. I believe, as Trump himself nailed it, that he could MURDER someone and his supporters would not bat an eye in support. The investigation was into Russian interference, a TANGENT and relevant off shoot of that would be if a POTUS was involved. The investigation happened as it should. I understand the reasons for it and I believe any honest POTUS would welcome and understand it as well. They neither cleared nor charged the POTUS. I still feel, as is rightly assumed, that he is a sneaky con man and much of what is in the report points to how sneaky he is. In offices of political power, even an appearance of impropriety gets investigated. Ask Hilary about her emails, or Clinton about his affair. it comes with the territory. If there is nothing to find, so be it. But no one knows what there is to find without trying to look first. Congress will decide its next steps and more will come. I never believed he would be impeached, although I do personally believe his dealings are much more dangerous than a POTUS having an affair or lying about it. I didn't believe Clinton should be impeached, nor do I believe there is enough to impeach Trump. I just would like someone to replace him sooner than later, and hope enough educated voters turn out to make that happen at the polls. I agree with you. I never really believed he would be impeached. But, it's already crystal clear that he's dirty. One proof of that is how he was running the Trump charity. He and family treating it like it was there own personal piggy bank. As far as I know, at least at this point, the New York AG is waiting his turn at Trump. It's not like we don't already know he's crooked. I think Mueller knows it. Back in the day when I was a cop, sometimes we knew someone was dirty. But they always seemed to fly just under the radar. Just enough that it made it hard to make a good case against them. But sooner or later they would finally screw up and leave one small speck of evidence. And that small speck was enough to put them away forever. They know Trump is dirty. But is it dirty enough? That's the question. That's why Mueller left it the way he did. Now, it's up to the Democrats in the house to find that dirt. That dirt that they can add to what they already know. The dirt that will make a prosecutable case that will stick. Dirt that Trump can't talk his way out of. It remains to be seen. It ain't over yet. Today was just the beginning. |
|
|
|
Has the tomb been raided, I wonder? I do find the bias here to be quite amazing. Saying that 'Trump can do no wrong' is beginning to look very silly. Just read the pages and pages of stuff quoted by Charles and you will see what I mean.
|
|
|