..Hmm.

Maybe because I love my mother? Holy crap!

That totally contradicts every point you've been trying to make for the last 50 posts.

Way to go.

*claps*

...by the way; this wouldn't work.

I'm over 18 now.

Duh.

nope...it means you have no clue and are now attempting to deflect from the question

I asked you to simply tell of something that you need for no logical reason

apparently you can't ...which means you have become enlighten that your statement that Logic has no need is delusional

I already gave you like six examples.

Apparently you can't read.

Then I gave you, recently, examples of logic without need.

Since that's what you asked for.

Apparently, you are so lost in your own stupidity you don't even realize what you're asking for.

You want examples of either; skim back.

Here, I'll give you a hint as to what you are searching for.

After those examples, you tried to diagnose me with anger and autism.

Go on playa, keep proving how simple minded you are.

You're doing an awesome job at it.

well I can't find it...but for the sake of argument...let's say that the moderators accidently deleted it

can you show empathy and.....ooops...I meant ...er..can you repost at least one of them

..dude.

READ.

For once.

READ.

One example: Lead to you going on about me having repressed anger.

Two example: Lead to you going on about me having autism.

You've been served like 900 times over bro.

Just do the logical thing and walk away.

Unless, you need to stay.

jeez...quit deflecting...I asked you ...to give an example of you having a need with no logical reason

also as for autism...your need to watch television upside is a clear indication that you have it

and for repress anger...you even admitted that you slide your body over your mother's car....and you did perform actions that would get her placed in jail....clearly signs of repress anger

..it's not deflecting.

You just can't accept the fact I am right, yet again.

BECAUSE I've already 'won' that debate, remember?

Why you feel the need to relive it, well, it's kind of sad and pathetic to go over it all again.

..unless, you'd truly like to go back on your 'ok you win the debate' statement yet again?

To think you can win something you already admitted defeat to is delusional, sad, and pathetic. Hey, look, another thing that has no logic in it.

Fancy that.

no problem...as I said you have a habit of lying...to prove me wrong simply present the post...you stated that there were six of them...but even if you can't find any of those posts then it's even ok to present a new one...but you won't be able to ...and that is how I will know that you have reach enlightenment

Since I don't feel like digging:

Pushing the cat off the bed.

You agreed wasn't anger, however, now you are taking that back.

Watching TV upside down, however, now you are taking that back and again trying to imply it's autism.

Running around my block for no reason.
Eating the filling from the inside of oreos.

Any of this ringing a bell?

Ringing a neighbors doorbell and running.

Peeing in the sink instead of the working toilet.
(That was a funny video)

I could keep going but you only asked for six..

Well, I'm done proving you're a completely and total waste of oxygen.

I got work to do.

Have fun conjuring up a fake sense of logic for illogical situations once again. I'm sure you have disorders to label them for to.

Speaking of which...

Feeling that everything that is illogical is associated to a disorder, is illogical.

Repeatedly arguing points you've lost, conceding defeat, and then promoting the other has to once again repeat himself; is illogical

Later.

you stated that you kicked the cat off the bed ,now you are trying to claim that you pushed it off the bed ...a need to lie? ...a need to show that you are not angry



I stated that kicking the cat was repress anger



you stated that lying on the couch upside down took the pain from your knees....which means that it was you that supplied the logical need for doing it ...and if you did it before you had pain...it points to autism as the need and logical reason



so is there a warning on the oreo package not to do this? ..if there is not... then who gives a sh_t

now if you ate the package the oreos can in...then that would be something to discuss....

ringing doorbells and running is just what kids do because they are immature

do you ring bells now as an adult and run? .....

I can push you with a kick . . . well maybe not YOU funches you look pretty large!

Have you ever seen Ceasar Milan push with a "hit"?

I can "hit" you with my little finger also . . . doesnt mean it was in anger, nor that I hurt you.

I can punch you in the same way and it be playful or purposeful without anger or any attempt to damage you.

When my dog jumps up (or used to as he has been corrected of that bad behavior) I would knee him in the chest, not hard, it didnt hurt, it was pretty slow without any sharp spikes of force and just had the effect to push him off.

Words . . . how delightfully they can be used to express a range of actions and intentions. It helps if you take for granted what a person tells you instead of trying to assume they are being dishonest and harping on and on and on as if you are some kind of psychic psychoanalyst.

It seems you have done the opposite in this thread for many pages.

so would you also knowingly do things that would place your mother in jail...would you kick a cat off the bed...do you slide your body across the hood of your mother's car or other people cars ...if so...generally those that resort to this type of behavior have a anger problem

would not simular question be asked of God...hey God why did you flood the planet or kill the first born of pharoah's people...would such questions and the answers not play a factor in why God would create the Universe as "first cause"

Dono maybe >>>

ok then...would you knowingly and intentionly start a thread in an attmept to kick our best buddy "Spidercmb" over the head with your agnostics beliefs and call it The Cosmological Argument

Nope I had every intention of actually discussing the merits of the argument, but it got hijacked, and he didn't really want to engage anyways. So clearly if you build it they may not come.

I even left my rebuttals of the argument until after someone was able to promote why they felt it was compelling. I try to be as fair as possible. In fact that is kinda what I am criticizing you for now . . .

Fairly arguing is a hallmark of intellectual honesty, not a trait I find widely distributed . . . at least not here.

agnostics/believers will not say anything bad about their God which is the reason you left out any rebuttal ....you can search the web for all eternity and will never find an example of The Cosmological Argument making it beyond agnostics battling believers because both are taboo to suggest anything negative about their God...

this is why I attmepted to take the debate beyond your petty disputes with Spidercmb and push it into the psychology of God that supposedly have no need to create anything ..which would be one of the logical ways to "first cause"

so far you have suggest nothing else...unless you believe that spidercmb is "first cause"

See..
Now who's going back on what they said?

You proclaim me.

Yet, if you for once listened and read your own words..

You conceded defeat to this.

Yet here you are, proclaiming the same bs.

It's sad.

Go on, do what you will.

I needed someone to argue my point that when someone performs actions without a need or logical reason that the behavior leans towards sociopathic...and you became that test subject for the experiment...

you also gave some excellent examples of some of the your actions that you did without a logical reason or need in which a few was clearly done without any empathy and fell into the realm of sociopathic

which is why if God have the habit of performing actions without a need or logical reason such as creating the Universe.,.it would be because he was a sociopath

...fine, whatever...