100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Are Atheists Open for a Chat? - part 2 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
JennieBean ...first you said that you were the creator and when I asked you to create some evidence then you claim that you weren't the creator and now you claiming that you are the co-creator and bumped it up to again claiming to be The creator.....I know it's a woman" prerogative to change her mind ...but jeez Funches I have no evidence that you exit. JennieBean...you are playing the same games that Christians try to do with the trinity either you are the creator or not...if you are ...then create some evidence and stop creating the bull unless of course the bull you keep creating is your evidence I have no reason to follow orders from a figment of my imagination. did the voices tell you that Yes, and it was unanimous. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JennieBean ...first you said that you were the creator and when I asked you to create some evidence then you claim that you weren't the creator and now you claiming that you are the co-creator and bumped it up to again claiming to be The creator.....I know it's a woman" prerogative to change her mind ...but jeez Funches I have no evidence that you exit. JennieBean...you are playing the same games that Christians try to do with the trinity either you are the creator or not...if you are ...then create some evidence and stop creating the bull unless of course the bull you keep creating is your evidence I have no reason to follow orders from a figment of my imagination. did the voices tell you that Yes, and it was unanimous. are those the same voices that told you make the post below posted by JennieBean: Well this thread is reaching the end times, and when on the 50th page it is locked. It's creator has disappeared into cyberspace. I won't be creating another one so I will bid you all good by, or until next time --all believers and unbelievers, its been nice chatting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JennieBean ...first you said that you were the creator and when I asked you to create some evidence then you claim that you weren't the creator and now you claiming that you are the co-creator and bumped it up to again claiming to be The creator.....I know it's a woman" prerogative to change her mind ...but jeez Funches I have no evidence that you exit. JennieBean...you are playing the same games that Christians try to do with the trinity either you are the creator or not...if you are ...then create some evidence and stop creating the bull unless of course the bull you keep creating is your evidence I have no reason to follow orders from a figment of my imagination. did the voices tell you that Yes, and it was unanimous. are those the same voices that told you make the post below posted by JennieBean: Well this thread is reaching the end times, and when on the 50th page it is locked. It's creator has disappeared into cyberspace. I won't be creating another one so I will bid you all good by, or until next time --all believers and unbelievers, its been nice chatting.  Of course it would have to roll over for jeannie. It just wouldn be as funny any other way.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
massagetrade
on
Thu 04/21/11 12:34 PM
|
|
I don't recall ever meeting an atheist (edit: in person) who insists there is no God.
(But I have met atheists who insist that high standards of evidence have not been met. There is a difference.) Edit: Well, we have Funches...but I think Funches exaggerates his claims for a semi-trolling effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall ever meeting an atheist (edit: in person) who insists there is no God. (But I have met atheists who insist that high standards of evidence have not been met. There is a difference.) Edit: Well, we have Funches...but I think Funches exaggerates his claims for a semi-trolling effect. There's nothing "semi" about Funches's trolling.   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I told a Christian woman that I was an atheist once and she seemed shocked. She said "How can you say that? How can you not see that there is a God? Look at all of the beauty in the world and the miracle of birth! How can you deny God?
I said, "I'm not denying the existence of reality, I just don't believe in your version of God. But if you are telling me that this universe is God, then okay, God exists. But don't start making rules and reciting commandments about how I am supposed to live or how I need to accept Jesus Christ as my savior to be saved." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall ever meeting an atheist (edit: in person) who insists there is no God. (But I have met atheists who insist that high standards of evidence have not been met. There is a difference.) Edit: Well, we have Funches...but I think Funches exaggerates his claims for a semi-trolling effect. yes "massagetrade"...it's funny how self-righteous Christians have a tendecy to troll from the Christian's single forum made especially for them and come into this forum to call those that disagree with their views trolls good thing heretics are now called Trolls....being a heretic will get you burned at the stake ...or perhaps nailed to a cross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JennieBean ...first you said that you were the creator and when I asked you to create some evidence then you claim that you weren't the creator and now you claiming that you are the co-creator and bumped it up to again claiming to be The creator.....I know it's a woman" prerogative to change her mind ...but jeez Funches I have no evidence that you exit. JennieBean...you are playing the same games that Christians try to do with the trinity either you are the creator or not...if you are ...then create some evidence and stop creating the bull unless of course the bull you keep creating is your evidence I have no reason to follow orders from a figment of my imagination. did the voices tell you that Yes, and it was unanimous. are those the same voices that told you make the post below posted by JennieBean: Well this thread is reaching the end times, and when on the 50th page it is locked. It's creator has disappeared into cyberspace. I won't be creating another one so I will bid you all good by, or until next time --all believers and unbelievers, its been nice chatting. Of course it would have to roll over for jeannie. It just wouldn be as funny any other way.. some would say it was Karma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was not aware that the threads roll over automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was not aware that the threads roll over automatically. well I guess that ends our debate on whether you are The Creator or not ....The Creator being omniscient would have been aware |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall ever meeting an atheist (edit: in person) who insists there is no God. (But I have met atheists who insist that high standards of evidence have not been met. There is a difference.) Edit: Well, we have Funches...but I think Funches exaggerates his claims for a semi-trolling effect. yes "massagetrade"...it's funny how self-righteous Christians have a tendecy to troll from the Christian's single forum made especially for them and come into this forum to call those that disagree with their views trolls good thing heretics are now called Trolls....being a heretic will get you burned at the stake ...or perhaps nailed to a cross Hey, I'm not singling you out as a sometimes-troll - a lot of people on here exaggerate, overstate, use sarcasm or other methods to encourage others to debate with them. And I'm not trying to discredit you in any way by commenting on this - whenever you make a valid argument, it stands on its own merits. I'm was singling you out only as an atheist who might (and my sincere apologies if I'm wrong!) state that there definitely, absolutely is no God. Most atheist I know say they don't believe in God, they see insufficient evidence for God, the idea of God is unnecessary, and some may even say that the belief is foolish, but they would not absolutely assert the definitive non-existence of God. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall ever meeting an atheist (edit: in person) who insists there is no God. (But I have met atheists who insist that high standards of evidence have not been met. There is a difference.) Edit: Well, we have Funches...but I think Funches exaggerates his claims for a semi-trolling effect. yes "massagetrade"...it's funny how self-righteous Christians have a tendecy to troll from the Christian's single forum made especially for them and come into this forum to call those that disagree with their views trolls good thing heretics are now called Trolls....being a heretic will get you burned at the stake ...or perhaps nailed to a cross Hey, I'm not singling you out as a sometimes-troll - a lot of people on here exaggerate, overstate, use sarcasm or other methods to encourage others to debate with them. And I'm not trying to discredit you in any way by commenting on this - whenever you make a valid argument, it stands on its own merits. I'm was singling you out only as an atheist who might (and my sincere apologies if I'm wrong!) state that there definitely, absolutely is no God. Most atheist I know say they don't believe in God, they see insufficient evidence for God, the idea of God is unnecessary, and some may even say that the belief is foolish, but they would not absolutely assert the definitive non-existence of God. massagetrade...I would agree with you if you can find one post where I claimed to be an Atheist.....if you can not find any posts then perhaps you should think twice before you start(as you said)) "singling" people out as being an Atheist.... but the cool part about what you are doing is that you are providing lessons on how and why witch burnings would take place .... but anyway what I stated was I have undisputable evidence that God exist as a character in a book and that no one including yourself have provided any undisputable evidence that the character called God exist beyond that book ..... so in other words I would never claim that God doesn't exist...because he does exist as a character in a book...I learned that parable trick from Jesus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall ever meeting an atheist (edit: in person) who insists there is no God. (But I have met atheists who insist that high standards of evidence have not been met. There is a difference.) Edit: Well, we have Funches...but I think Funches exaggerates his claims for a semi-trolling effect. yes "massagetrade"...it's funny how self-righteous Christians have a tendecy to troll from the Christian's single forum made especially for them and come into this forum to call those that disagree with their views trolls good thing heretics are now called Trolls....being a heretic will get you burned at the stake ...or perhaps nailed to a cross Hey, I'm not singling you out as a sometimes-troll - a lot of people on here exaggerate, overstate, use sarcasm or other methods to encourage others to debate with them. And I'm not trying to discredit you in any way by commenting on this - whenever you make a valid argument, it stands on its own merits. I'm was singling you out only as an atheist who might (and my sincere apologies if I'm wrong!) state that there definitely, absolutely is no God. Most atheist I know say they don't believe in God, they see insufficient evidence for God, the idea of God is unnecessary, and some may even say that the belief is foolish, but they would not absolutely assert the definitive non-existence of God. massagetrade...I would agree with you if you can find one post where I claimed to be an Atheist.....if you can not find any posts then perhaps you should think twice before you start(as you said)) "singling" people out as being an Atheist.... but the cool part about what you are doing is that you are providing lessons on how and why witch burnings would take place .... but anyway what I stated was I have undisputable evidence that God exist as a character in a book and that no one including yourself have provided any undisputable evidence that the character called God exist beyond that book ..... so in other words I would never claim that God doesn't exist...because he does exist as a character in a book...I learned that parable trick from Jesus Evidence is not needed. The ONLY one that can prove God to you is yourself. The only one that can prove anything to you is yourself. I can not prove to you planet Earth has gravity less you test it for yourself. I can not prove to you water freezes as a certain degree less you test it yourself. Again, no one can prove to you God is real and or what God is the true God but yourself. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I don't recall ever meeting an atheist (edit: in person) who insists there is no God. (But I have met atheists who insist that high standards of evidence have not been met. There is a difference.) Edit: Well, we have Funches...but I think Funches exaggerates his claims for a semi-trolling effect. yes "massagetrade"...it's funny how self-righteous Christians have a tendecy to troll from the Christian's single forum made especially for them and come into this forum to call those that disagree with their views trolls good thing heretics are now called Trolls....being a heretic will get you burned at the stake ...or perhaps nailed to a cross Hey, I'm not singling you out as a sometimes-troll - a lot of people on here exaggerate, overstate, use sarcasm or other methods to encourage others to debate with them. And I'm not trying to discredit you in any way by commenting on this - whenever you make a valid argument, it stands on its own merits. I'm was singling you out only as an atheist who might (and my sincere apologies if I'm wrong!) state that there definitely, absolutely is no God. Most atheist I know say they don't believe in God, they see insufficient evidence for God, the idea of God is unnecessary, and some may even say that the belief is foolish, but they would not absolutely assert the definitive non-existence of God. massagetrade...I would agree with you if you can find one post where I claimed to be an Atheist.....if you can not find any posts then perhaps you should think twice before you start(as you said)) "singling" people out as being an Atheist.... but the cool part about what you are doing is that you are providing lessons on how and why witch burnings would take place .... but anyway what I stated was I have undisputable evidence that God exist as a character in a book and that no one including yourself have provided any undisputable evidence that the character called God exist beyond that book ..... so in other words I would never claim that God doesn't exist...because he does exist as a character in a book...I learned that parable trick from Jesus Evidence is not needed. The ONLY one that can prove God to you is yourself. The only one that can prove anything to you is yourself. I can not prove to you planet Earth has gravity less you test it for yourself. I can not prove to you water freezes as a certain degree less you test it yourself. Again, no one can prove to you God is real and or what God is the true God but yourself. And besides that, no one is here to prove anything to anyone. This is a discussion forum, purely for DISCUSSION. That would involve sharing of one's thoughts and beliefs on certain things, what ever may be the subject at the time. And again, no one can prove anything to you less YOU are willing to accept the evidence. We're for the enlightened discussion. NOTHING can be proven here. You can even prove the world is round here. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence is not needed. The ONLY one that can prove God to you is yourself. The only one that can prove anything to you is yourself. I can not prove to you planet Earth has gravity less you test it for yourself. I can not prove to you water freezes as a certain degree less you test it yourself. Again, no one can prove to you God is real and or what God is the true God but yourself. Cowboy...evidence is required that God exist beyond a book....it's just that you don't have any evidence..that's why it's called a "belief" .. a belief needs no evidence beyond faith ...the truth does |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence is not needed. The ONLY one that can prove God to you is yourself. The only one that can prove anything to you is yourself. I can not prove to you planet Earth has gravity less you test it for yourself. I can not prove to you water freezes as a certain degree less you test it yourself. Again, no one can prove to you God is real and or what God is the true God but yourself. Cowboy...evidence is required that God exist beyond a book....it's just that you don't have any evidence..that's why it's called a "belief" .. a belief needs no evidence beyond faith ...the truth does You can not prove the world is round beyond a book. You can not prove the world is covered by a lot of water without a book You can not prove anything not immediately right in front of someone without a book. What does it being in a book have to do with anything? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... if you can find one post where I claimed to be an Atheist..... I would never claim that God doesn't exist...because he does exist as a character in a book I really thought you claimed to not believe in any Gods. My apologies. Of course, if God's existence as a character is the only reason you'd not claim that God doesn't exist, it seems likely you would deny the existence of a God as a reality. no one including yourself have provided any undisputable evidence that the character called God exist beyond that book ... Yep. Not likely to happen, either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence is not needed. The ONLY one that can prove God to you is yourself. The only one that can prove anything to you is yourself. I can not prove to you planet Earth has gravity less you test it for yourself. I can not prove to you water freezes as a certain degree less you test it yourself. Again, no one can prove to you God is real and or what God is the true God but yourself. Cowboy...evidence is required that God exist beyond a book....it's just that you don't have any evidence..that's why it's called a "belief" .. a belief needs no evidence beyond faith ...the truth does You can not prove the world is round beyond a book. You can not prove the world is covered by a lot of water without a book You can not prove anything not immediately right in front of someone without a book. What does it being in a book have to do with anything? I think you guys are using the phrase 'beyond a book' in different ways. Cowboy, I believe you are saying "you can't prove X without intermediary sources, or indirect evidence, such as one might find in a book". I think Funches was saying 'you can't prove God exists as more than a fictional character in a book' I could be wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence is not needed. The ONLY one that can prove God to you is yourself. The only one that can prove anything to you is yourself. I can not prove to you planet Earth has gravity less you test it for yourself. I can not prove to you water freezes as a certain degree less you test it yourself. Again, no one can prove to you God is real and or what God is the true God but yourself. Cowboy...evidence is required that God exist beyond a book....it's just that you don't have any evidence..that's why it's called a "belief" .. a belief needs no evidence beyond faith ...the truth does You can not prove the world is round beyond a book. You can not prove the world is covered by a lot of water without a book You can not prove anything not immediately right in front of someone without a book. What does it being in a book have to do with anything? Cowboy...I said that God does exist in a book...but there is no undisputable evidence that God exist beyond that book...you said that no evidence is needed...and of course without any evidence is why it can only be nothing more than a "belief" in God |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evidence is not needed. The ONLY one that can prove God to you is yourself. The only one that can prove anything to you is yourself. I can not prove to you planet Earth has gravity less you test it for yourself. I can not prove to you water freezes as a certain degree less you test it yourself. Again, no one can prove to you God is real and or what God is the true God but yourself. Cowboy...evidence is required that God exist beyond a book....it's just that you don't have any evidence..that's why it's called a "belief" .. a belief needs no evidence beyond faith ...the truth does You can not prove the world is round beyond a book. You can not prove the world is covered by a lot of water without a book You can not prove anything not immediately right in front of someone without a book. What does it being in a book have to do with anything? I think you guys are using the phrase 'beyond a book' in different ways. Cowboy, I believe you are saying "you can't prove X without intermediary sources, or indirect evidence, such as one might find in a book". I think Funches was saying 'you can't prove God exists as more than a fictional character in a book' I could be wrong. That is same thing I was saying as well. You can not prove the world is round beyond a book. You can not prove the world is covered by a lot of water beyond a book Same thing as him saying I can not prove God beyond a book. Nothing but something immediately seen/felt can be proven beyond a book. You can not prove to me these things definitely without any form of doubt beyond a book. You can not positively show these things beyond a book. |
|
|
|
|
