1 2 4 6 7 8 9 12 13
Topic: NAACP gets owned by Tea Party over Rascism
Chazster's photo
Sat 10/23/10 06:25 AM
I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

Seakolony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 06:30 AM

I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?

Seakolony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 06:30 AM
Edited by Seakolony on Sat 10/23/10 06:31 AM
Oops dbl clicked

Chazster's photo
Sat 10/23/10 06:37 AM


I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?


Ha ha are you kidding? You think they would stand for that? What about a White Entertainment Television or a White College Fund. These would would all be considered racist or at the very least not PC... but I am pretty sure they would consider it racst.

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 09:40 AM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/23/10 09:43 AM



I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?


Ha ha are you kidding? You think they would stand for that? What about a White Entertainment Television or a White College Fund. These would would all be considered racist or at the very least not PC... but I am pretty sure they would consider it racst.





lol, am I taking crazy pills or something?,,,laugh laugh laugh


are you serious?

these types of statements always make me chuckle,,,

does ANYONE seriously contend that a media where the networks are PRIMARILY WHITE owned and managed and images are PRIMARILY of WHITE people would need a WEP?

or that UNIVERSITIES which are primarily WHITE owned and operated and networking (alumni based)ivy league colleges which had the benefit of historically segregated policies that gave preference to certain 'circles' would ALSO need added to their assistance a white college fund?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because something doesnt blatantly call itself a racial organization doesnt mean it isnt?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because the network is called BET or the fund is called UNCF doesn't mean it is exclusively for Black or colored people?

,,this is more of that crazy american nonsense...lol


we dont want to help you but if you help yourself or institute the same networking we have, which has caused your basic DISCONNECT in social status and opportunities , you are being racist

I love everyone but some of yall are crazy as hell...rofl rofl rofl rofl

RKISIT's photo
Sat 10/23/10 02:43 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Sat 10/23/10 02:45 PM




I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?


Ha ha are you kidding? You think they would stand for that? What about a White Entertainment Television or a White College Fund. These would would all be considered racist or at the very least not PC... but I am pretty sure they would consider it racst.





lol, am I taking crazy pills or something?,,,laugh laugh laugh


are you serious?

these types of statements always make me chuckle,,,

does ANYONE seriously contend that a media where the networks are PRIMARILY WHITE owned and managed and images are PRIMARILY of WHITE people would need a WEP?

or that UNIVERSITIES which are primarily WHITE owned and operated and networking (alumni based)ivy league colleges which had the benefit of historically segregated policies that gave preference to certain 'circles' would ALSO need added to their assistance a white college fund?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because something doesnt blatantly call itself a racial organization doesnt mean it isnt?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because the network is called BET or the fund is called UNCF doesn't mean it is exclusively for Black or colored people?

,,this is more of that crazy american nonsense...lol


we dont want to help you but if you help yourself or institute the same networking we have, which has caused your basic DISCONNECT in social status and opportunities , you are being racist

I love everyone but some of yall are crazy as hell...rofl rofl rofl rofl

i think what maybe some white people mean is why isn't schools like Georgia southern,florida a&m not recruiting white people into their universities,almost every university has mixed races,except for black colleges

RKISIT's photo
Sat 10/23/10 02:48 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Sat 10/23/10 02:54 PM
also there could be a United White College Fund wondered why there isn't,people are scared i guess

could be the words "United White" that scares people

RKISIT's photo
Sat 10/23/10 03:03 PM
Edited by RKISIT on Sat 10/23/10 03:06 PM
my point is in order to stop racism it has to start with every race not opening certain venues,TVchannels,educational centers for just that particular race...hell i think Lifetime is sexist towards men that station is a man hating station,oxygen is ok cause the show Snapped and i watch it sometimes too

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 04:47 PM





I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?


Ha ha are you kidding? You think they would stand for that? What about a White Entertainment Television or a White College Fund. These would would all be considered racist or at the very least not PC... but I am pretty sure they would consider it racst.





lol, am I taking crazy pills or something?,,,laugh laugh laugh


are you serious?

these types of statements always make me chuckle,,,

does ANYONE seriously contend that a media where the networks are PRIMARILY WHITE owned and managed and images are PRIMARILY of WHITE people would need a WEP?

or that UNIVERSITIES which are primarily WHITE owned and operated and networking (alumni based)ivy league colleges which had the benefit of historically segregated policies that gave preference to certain 'circles' would ALSO need added to their assistance a white college fund?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because something doesnt blatantly call itself a racial organization doesnt mean it isnt?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because the network is called BET or the fund is called UNCF doesn't mean it is exclusively for Black or colored people?

,,this is more of that crazy american nonsense...lol


we dont want to help you but if you help yourself or institute the same networking we have, which has caused your basic DISCONNECT in social status and opportunities , you are being racist

I love everyone but some of yall are crazy as hell...rofl rofl rofl rofl

i think what maybe some white people mean is why isn't schools like Georgia southern,florida a&m not recruiting white people into their universities,almost every university has mixed races,except for black colleges




HBCU also have mixed race, with a majority of one race, just like 'ivy league' schools which are a majority of one race

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 04:50 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/23/10 04:59 PM

my point is in order to stop racism it has to start with every race not opening certain venues,TVchannels,educational centers for just that particular race...hell i think Lifetime is sexist towards men that station is a man hating station,oxygen is ok cause the show Snapped and i watch it sometimes too


so long as one is in the MAJORITY(a female in a matriarchal society, a male in a patriarchal society, a white person in a PREDOMINATELY white society, a black person in a PREDOMINATELY black society)

I dont see how they can view anything the minority do as a network as negative(racist, sexist, etc,,,)

the MAJORITY, by its numbers has a network IN place,, whether it be the media, the school system, or the financial system,,,they never needed to CALL it by whatever the majority title is because it was just understood to be so


organizations like NAACP, NOW, BET, or even HBCU were set up and still exist because they are not part of the UNDERSTOOD and already dominating NETWORK of the society


if I come into a neighborhood where it is predominately brown eyed folks who network and assist each other , it seems preposterous for those folks to label me with some negative association if I choose to set up my own network for blue eyed people, even if I happen to call it NETWORK FOR BLUE EYED PEOPLE(so those people are clear of what resources THEY have, when it is not otherwise understood, as with the majority)

some of the logic here is like the bully on the playground who beats up the little kid so long and then decides, after the kid starts training to fight, that he wants to play fair

yeah, its the little kids fault if he doesnt believe him enough to just STOP The training,,,,,NOT!!

willing2's photo
Sat 10/23/10 04:55 PM
NAACP won't clear their ranks of racists.

Tell them to tell Fairiecan he's no longer welcome.

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 04:57 PM

NAACP won't clear their ranks of racists.

Tell them to tell Fairiecan he's no longer welcome.



Farrakhan is not a member of NAACP, but he has been as welcome to speak at events as President Bush was (who is also not a member)

Chazster's photo
Sat 10/23/10 05:16 PM




I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?


Ha ha are you kidding? You think they would stand for that? What about a White Entertainment Television or a White College Fund. These would would all be considered racist or at the very least not PC... but I am pretty sure they would consider it racst.





lol, am I taking crazy pills or something?,,,laugh laugh laugh


are you serious?

these types of statements always make me chuckle,,,

does ANYONE seriously contend that a media where the networks are PRIMARILY WHITE owned and managed and images are PRIMARILY of WHITE people would need a WEP?

or that UNIVERSITIES which are primarily WHITE owned and operated and networking (alumni based)ivy league colleges which had the benefit of historically segregated policies that gave preference to certain 'circles' would ALSO need added to their assistance a white college fund?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because something doesnt blatantly call itself a racial organization doesnt mean it isnt?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because the network is called BET or the fund is called UNCF doesn't mean it is exclusively for Black or colored people?

,,this is more of that crazy american nonsense...lol


we dont want to help you but if you help yourself or institute the same networking we have, which has caused your basic DISCONNECT in social status and opportunities , you are being racist

I love everyone but some of yall are crazy as hell...rofl rofl rofl rofl



For one, I never said it was exclusively for them. The race is just in the title. There is however no organizations with white or Caucasian in the title. I am not saying they are needed. You miss my point entirely. I am saying that they would be considered racist just because we are the majority in this country.

My argument is if anyone is saying that you can't or shouldn't do the same things as minorities because you are the majority (by race) then that in itself is racist. Doesn't the majority deserve equal representation under the law? Shouldn't they have the same opportunities as everyone else without being considered racist.

My friends and I thought it would be funny to ask our school if we could start a International White Engineering Associations because globally speaking white people are not the majority XD. Just to see how people reacted. We never even asked of course but it would have been a good psychological experiment.

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 05:28 PM





I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?


Ha ha are you kidding? You think they would stand for that? What about a White Entertainment Television or a White College Fund. These would would all be considered racist or at the very least not PC... but I am pretty sure they would consider it racst.





lol, am I taking crazy pills or something?,,,laugh laugh laugh


are you serious?

these types of statements always make me chuckle,,,

does ANYONE seriously contend that a media where the networks are PRIMARILY WHITE owned and managed and images are PRIMARILY of WHITE people would need a WEP?

or that UNIVERSITIES which are primarily WHITE owned and operated and networking (alumni based)ivy league colleges which had the benefit of historically segregated policies that gave preference to certain 'circles' would ALSO need added to their assistance a white college fund?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because something doesnt blatantly call itself a racial organization doesnt mean it isnt?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because the network is called BET or the fund is called UNCF doesn't mean it is exclusively for Black or colored people?

,,this is more of that crazy american nonsense...lol


we dont want to help you but if you help yourself or institute the same networking we have, which has caused your basic DISCONNECT in social status and opportunities , you are being racist

I love everyone but some of yall are crazy as hell...rofl rofl rofl rofl



For one, I never said it was exclusively for them. The race is just in the title. There is however no organizations with white or Caucasian in the title. I am not saying they are needed. You miss my point entirely. I am saying that they would be considered racist just because we are the majority in this country.

My argument is if anyone is saying that you can't or shouldn't do the same things as minorities because you are the majority (by race) then that in itself is racist. Doesn't the majority deserve equal representation under the law? Shouldn't they have the same opportunities as everyone else without being considered racist.

My friends and I thought it would be funny to ask our school if we could start a International White Engineering Associations because globally speaking white people are not the majority XD. Just to see how people reacted. We never even asked of course but it would have been a good psychological experiment.



I understand that too, but the point for me is NOT about the majority not being able to do everything others do,,,,my point is about how RIDICULOUS it would be to create a network that is ALREADY existing, just because it was previously not NAMED in the same manner as the minorities who have decided to network

There is supposed to be fair representation, but historically there hasnt been and for that reason , those UNDERREPRESENTED have every reason and right to point out those places where they WILL , without a doubt, be REPRESENTED

willing2's photo
Sat 10/23/10 05:31 PM


NAACP won't clear their ranks of racists.

Tell them to tell Fairiecan he's no longer welcome.



Farrakhan is not a member of NAACP, but he has been as welcome to speak at events as President Bush was (who is also not a member)

So, Fairycan isn't under their protection???

msharmony's photo
Sat 10/23/10 05:34 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sat 10/23/10 05:36 PM



NAACP won't clear their ranks of racists.

Tell them to tell Fairiecan he's no longer welcome.



Farrakhan is not a member of NAACP, but he has been as welcome to speak at events as President Bush was (who is also not a member)

So, Fairycan isn't under their protection???




If you are asking if NAACP agrees with or supports ANY of his views , yes

If you are asking if they agree with and support ALL of his views, no

If you are asking if the NAACP ensures his physical safety or his public image, no

lol, Farrakhan has never needed protection outside of the NOI,, they cover him pretty well,,


RKISIT's photo
Sat 10/23/10 05:53 PM




NAACP won't clear their ranks of racists.

Tell them to tell Fairiecan he's no longer welcome.



Farrakhan is not a member of NAACP, but he has been as welcome to speak at events as President Bush was (who is also not a member)

So, Fairycan isn't under their protection???




If you are asking if NAACP agrees with or supports ANY of his views , yes

If you are asking if they agree with and support ALL of his views, no

If you are asking if the NAACP ensures his physical safety or his public image, no

lol, Farrakhan has never needed protection outside of the NOI,, they cover him pretty well,,


ok msharmony you and i both know that farrakhan,malcolm x,bobby seale and huey newton were anti white,they all preached the white man is evil and one stated need i type who,"you want a war we'll give you a war"then fled to africa,there are black racist,period

Chazster's photo
Sat 10/23/10 07:21 PM
Edited by Chazster on Sat 10/23/10 07:21 PM






I would argue that an organization like the NAACP is not racist when they wouldn't object to the start of an organization that would be titled the NAANCP for non colored people.

They wouldn't?


Ha ha are you kidding? You think they would stand for that? What about a White Entertainment Television or a White College Fund. These would would all be considered racist or at the very least not PC... but I am pretty sure they would consider it racst.





lol, am I taking crazy pills or something?,,,laugh laugh laugh


are you serious?

these types of statements always make me chuckle,,,

does ANYONE seriously contend that a media where the networks are PRIMARILY WHITE owned and managed and images are PRIMARILY of WHITE people would need a WEP?

or that UNIVERSITIES which are primarily WHITE owned and operated and networking (alumni based)ivy league colleges which had the benefit of historically segregated policies that gave preference to certain 'circles' would ALSO need added to their assistance a white college fund?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because something doesnt blatantly call itself a racial organization doesnt mean it isnt?

does anyone not have the LOGIC to realize that just because the network is called BET or the fund is called UNCF doesn't mean it is exclusively for Black or colored people?

,,this is more of that crazy american nonsense...lol


we dont want to help you but if you help yourself or institute the same networking we have, which has caused your basic DISCONNECT in social status and opportunities , you are being racist

I love everyone but some of yall are crazy as hell...rofl rofl rofl rofl



For one, I never said it was exclusively for them. The race is just in the title. There is however no organizations with white or Caucasian in the title. I am not saying they are needed. You miss my point entirely. I am saying that they would be considered racist just because we are the majority in this country.

My argument is if anyone is saying that you can't or shouldn't do the same things as minorities because you are the majority (by race) then that in itself is racist. Doesn't the majority deserve equal representation under the law? Shouldn't they have the same opportunities as everyone else without being considered racist.

My friends and I thought it would be funny to ask our school if we could start a International White Engineering Associations because globally speaking white people are not the majority XD. Just to see how people reacted. We never even asked of course but it would have been a good psychological experiment.



I understand that too, but the point for me is NOT about the majority not being able to do everything others do,,,,my point is about how RIDICULOUS it would be to create a network that is ALREADY existing, just because it was previously not NAMED in the same manner as the minorities who have decided to network

There is supposed to be fair representation, but historically there hasnt been and for that reason , those UNDERREPRESENTED have every reason and right to point out those places where they WILL , without a doubt, be REPRESENTED


Really? I don't know any networks that try to target white people. Non minority networks cant show biased for white people and against minorities.

There is no college fund to help underprivileged white kids etc.

You call it ridiculous for the majority to do something because they are the majority. (this is a mentality that everyone else can do something but you can't. That is no different than racism. The status of a majority should have nothing to do with equal opportunity) You talk about the brown eyed people helping the browned people. You don't get it do you. There is no unity in the majority.

Here is an example. I have seen plenty of school fights in my day. If a minority is getting messed with than it is not uncommon to see someone of the same race step in to help even if they don't know each other. This does not happen with the majority.

Now living in Japan I actually experience the opposite. A foreigner almost always helps another foreigner if they look like they are in a bind.

mightymoe's photo
Sat 10/23/10 07:25 PM
Really? I don't know any networks that try to target white people. Non minority networks cant show biased for white people and against minorities.


its called BET, Univision, and galavision...

AndyBgood's photo
Sat 10/23/10 07:33 PM
As long as we live within the Minority Complex we will never achieve true equality!

As long as Bull Sh** like PC vocabulary, and still maintaining segregationist thinking like "AFRO AMERICAN," "Mexican American," "Asian American" exist and always having to identify citizens by race we will never be able to look at anyone of any color and embrace them as fellow Americans. Groups like the NAACP and ACLU propagate the problem a LOT more than they are fixing it.

Worst is we are stuck with this whole, "No man left behind" Bull Sh** that also inflames the whole Minority Complex thinking. All these supposed policies are just nothing more than a knee jerk reaction to symptoms, not a treatment for the disease!

We are also stuck under the shadow of a POOR majority that thinks it is OK to bleed people of their success becasue they cannot succeed. The poor are fine with raising taxes on the rich but god forbid we cut back on their handouts becasue we cannot afford to feed them any more.

Socialism always fails! History has repeatedly proven it. We have too many idealistic sell out politicians who have no clue what solvency and responsibility is.

Obama spends way too much time fund raising and Campaigning rather than do some real work helping fix a mess he just inflamed a lot more. worst is he stuck us with a health care system that is basically a loaded gun pointed at our heads with them telling us to pay up or else. Who the FUQUE does he think he is to ramrod this BS down our throats?

On top of this our "Lawmakers" now use deception to use "NO" votes to mean "Yes" and have surreptitiously turned the voting system against us completely!

I hope voters get it through their thick skulls to vote carefully. We need to bring the two party system to an end!

1 2 4 6 7 8 9 12 13