I hear you April....I think the gov. should release the facts of the 280 something terrorist plots foiled in this country since 911 than maybe people would smell what the press is cooking and not be for cia budget cuts

Dont I know it

You people are out of touch.
Where exactly did the UN authorize Bush to invade Iraq?

Show me... and not from something you read on a Republican blog site.

As they say the proof is in the pudding.

Also, What Coalition???? LMAO

it was in with the list of non compliance....they wouldn't give permission because france and germany and russia used their right to veto. hhmmm what did they have to gain. DAAAAA. and they used the fact that the aftermath would be termoil. by the way Iraq wasn't half as bad as germany after ww2. and there was a coalition open your eyes. yes the proof is in the pudding you just need to read the label an see what it is your eating, don't puke

The mind of a hypocrite works in amazing and weird ways indeed. If I've only been rude to women, that only means you lied about your gender then. You've just been too... well... less than intelligent to comprehend it. Oooops, I'm sorry, I should have realized you might have had a serious hormonal imblance with the mustache in your photograph. I apologize. I hope you understand that it is VERY weird and creepy when you know when someone is online and/or seem to "disappear" (unforunately, some of us have to work to support the likes of you and have a life away from here). If it's any consolation, that really should comfort the females here knowing that you track the comings and goings of other males (unless you are a female) here... soley for their protection, uh huh.

Thanks for the laugh, if you're seriously attempting to compare yourself to a coyote (obviously you're not a country person either and have no clue about their hunting tactics). There are only two analgonous comparisons I can think of to validate this claim that you someone of your intellect might readily understand. The bumbling Wile E. Coyote from the Road Runner cartoons or "Sparky", a dog from Southpark.

To show how much of a gentleman I am towards females, I'll be kind and gracious to allow you get the last word on this matter before I get back on topic.

This is true they won't release all the information because of mass panic. you don't think all the chemical plants and stuff catching on fire are all accidents do you. look it up see how they jumped since 911. One things for sure they don't tell us everything for good reason and now that obama is pres. he can see what all the facts are. lets see what he does. is he truely a good man or a nation of islam flunky. for those of you who don't know about the nation of islam i suggest you look them up (before the U.S. gov. stepped in and told them to stop preaching hate or they get deported) And they're is proof about the foiled attachs if you search you will find it and, it is creditable.

The government does not care what we think, and does whatever it wants, so why even bother thinking about it.

Spending too much time in the barn with your hands on the cow-teats aye? This would explain your trouble with recognizing the difference between a human man and woman, and your excessive body fur. (one word-Nair!)

Also, in case you didnt know there is a difference between being a recluse and someone who lives in the country.

For reading references I recommend Field and Stream or Whitetail Hunter. (Oops, didnt mean to get you excited. Its a hunting magazine,,,really I wouldnt pull your leg)

They sometimes even feature women, which will help with your female recognition problems. If that doesn't help buy a Playboy or maybe even get away from the Cows and Chickens a little more.

Its an obvious shame that you relate everything in life to cartoons. Maybe that is why you have such an unhealthy infatuation with Bush and a problem with grasping reality.

Your failure to grasp reality is why you are not able to intellectually debate a subject.

In case you dont get it, this is the reason you are continually forced to be little women when they exhibit an intelligent argument to your blind misguided ramblings.

Time after time I see you resorting to calling them pet names as though this makes you superior or appear more intelligent.

Anyone with a spell checker or any real intellect can see your use of words is well beyond your level of understanding.

Come on man.
This is three times Ive responded to your BS and you are still unable to think of a counterpoint.

SLOWWwwwwwwwwwww,,,,,,,


I dont have a lot of time here..

Well,,
Quit plucking the feathers off the chickens and write something. I'll read it when I get back home.
Promise....

I am so sure everyone has been waiting around for your response!!!

~sits impatiently awaiting the next reply~

I brought the beer and chips...

I have popcorn

To adhere to UN resolutions is to forgo the interest of the United Sates.

I think both sides need to remember this. Every time, not only when UN doesn't suit your case.

Anyway, back to topic...

Obama (the babykiller) has now been called upon to cease drone attacks in Pakistan by the Pakistani PM Gilani.

http://cgi.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/01/28/davos.pakistan.pm/index.html?iref=nextin


According to another a source the Obama administration denies these drone attacks even took place.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090123/wl_afp/pakistanafghanistanunrestusmissilehouse_20090123193140

"The US military as a rule does not confirm drone attacks but it and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operating in Afghanistan are the only forces that deploy drones in the region".

Obviously one administration is lying and there is strong evidence to indicate that it's the Obama one.

"I want to put on record that we do not have any agreement between the government of the United States and the government of Pakistan," Gilani told CNN's Christiane Amanpour in an interview at the World Economic Forum."

Obama lied, innocent people in Pakistan died.

As a neo-liberal, I felt compelled to prove it (in real life) earlier this evening. A neighbor down the road had a large sign in his front yard for the past 2 years that said "President Bush- Bring our troops home NOW". Noticing the sign was still up, I decided to update it (since it was obvious he wasn't going to). Fortunately, I was able to obtain a few Obama bumperstickers. The sign now reads "President Obama- Bring our troops home NOW". It'll be interesting to see if that sign is still up tomorrow.

The CIA is in and out of Pakistan and have foiled terroristic attacks bcs Pakistan is where the terrorists went into hiding into the foothills and mountains. I understand the US government and military are considered "baby killers by you", but really are they in comparison to the terrorists themselves?? How many innocents do they terrorist kill inciting "holy war"?? How many Embassies, train stations, public buildings, and airports do they attack and kill everyday, and if we could end it, forever no matter how long its takes would the end result be the loss of no more innocents, at least by terrorism??

"The CIA is in and out of Pakistan and have foiled terroristic attacks bcs Pakistan is where the terrorists went into hiding into the foothills and mountains".

Yes, that is what we've been told. We were also told by intelligence agencies/analysts that there were WMD's in Iraq as well. We know the CIA also engaged in a drug smuggling ring called "Air America" (not the liberal talk radio station) during the Vietnam War and a role in the Iran-Contra incident. We also shouldn't forget little CIA experiments like "Project MK-Ultra".

" I understand the US government and military are considered "baby killers by you", but really are they in comparison to the terrorists themselves??"

Granted, one persons terrorist is another persons freedom fighter/patriot. Three innocent children were murdered by Obama, mere babies. The best example I can provide is "educator" William Ayres, my dear presidents friend/assiociate/colleague. Guilt by association? If that charge couldn't stick to Obama, it certainly can't stick anywhere else. Bin Laden and other so-called "terrorists" have stated that if we leave the middle east, all attacks would stop. There is no valid reason (only idle speculation) not to heed his suggestions.

Realistically, there is no way to stop people who are willing to sacrifice themselves for the perceived greater good, EVER. You are suggesting that our government/military try to stop people before they MAY commit an act of terrorism? Sounds like something from Orwell's book "1984" or from the movie "Minority Report". Using that logic, I submit you and just about everyone else here are potential terrorist suspects then. You possess items in/around your home/apt. that may be used in making terrorist weapons (IED's). Gasoline, dishwashing soap, drain cleaner, and sugar to name just a few. Does that give the government/military the right to execute you (like those in Pakistan)? Absolutely not. To indulge briefly in my newly adopted liberal conspiracy theories (along the lines of rigged voting machines in 2000)... How do we know that these people that blow themselves up and killing innocents weren't operating under the influence of the CIA's MK-Ultra project? We don't.

It is my belief that those engaging in this "holy war" (from "our enemies" perspective) operate under an almost completely different set of beliefs and value sets. Those not directly responsible for the act we consider "innocent victims" while they may consider them (of the Muslim faith) as martyrs who shall receive their rewards in heaven. There is no disputing that we are the invaders/infidels in this conflict. Pakistan did not attack us.

The people who committed the actual acts (the suicide bombers) are dead and there is nothing we can do about it. Their mission was accomplished. In regards to "pre-crimes", try looking at it from this perspective- Todays US postal worker perhaps tomorrows next mass murderer?