Fran and all.Please think before you write.Fran thinks it is better to put folks in jail...hmm...let's see at a cost of 30,000 dollars a year to incarcerate ,why not give the child the 30,000 dollars a year...let the deadbeat go on in life and the state has lost nothing except the income from the judiciary branch..Follow the money trail and figure out why the state is involved in collecting child support...It is big business..for all who do not know about how child support started ,it is from the social security act...in an effort to save the states money...How are we saving money by incarcerating folks and what does that really do for the child? One does not earn too much from a jail cell.....hmmmmmm...so the child does without more because of what...money ,money money...and your belief that debtors prison is the way to go...What do you get done with a jail cell...Tell me please..........

Fran and all.Please think before you write.Fran thinks it is better to put folks in jail...hmm...let's see at a cost of 30,000 dollars a year to incarcerate ,why not give the child the 30,000 dollars a year...let the deadbeat go on in life and the state has lost nothing except the income from the judiciary branch..Follow the money trail and figure out why the state is involved in collecting child support...It is big business..for all who do not know about how child support started ,it is from the social security act...in an effort to save the states money...How are we saving money by incarcerating folks and what does that really do for the child? One does not earn too much from a jail cell.....hmmmmmm...so the child does without more because of what...money ,money money...and your belief that debtors prison is the way to go...What do you get done with a jail cell...Tell me please..........

Fran and all.Please think before you write.Fran thinks it is better to put folks in jail...hmm...let's see at a cost of 30,000 dollars a year to incarcerate ,why not give the child the 30,000 dollars a year...let the deadbeat go on in life and the state has lost nothing except the income from the judiciary branch..Follow the money trail and figure out why the state is involved in collecting child support...It is big business..for all who do not know about how child support started ,it is from the social security act...in an effort to save the states money...How are we saving money by incarcerating folks and what does that really do for the child? One does not earn too much from a jail cell.....hmmmmmm...so the child does without more because of what...money ,money money...and your belief that debtors prison is the way to go...What do you get done with a jail cell...Tell me please..........

That is just what I think - you are entitled to your opinion as I am mine. Yes, incarcerate the man/woman - why let him/her be free, be able to work, be able to enjoy life without assuming parental responsibility. Parental responsibility includes among other responsibilities financial support. Just my opinion.

We get license plates done , highways cleaned.

if they would fix the system and make it fair

there would be less non-payers

if you are still together and have money issues

do you send your sig other to jail because of lack of money


just a thought


and it is not really about the child very often

it is about the money

if they would fix the system and make it fair

there would be less non-payers

if you are still together and have money issues

do you send your sig other to jail because of lack of money


just a thought


and it is not really about the child very often

it is about the money

Hey you will fit right in. Another arrogant azz whose right and everyone else is wrong. Welcome you will fit right in!! We sure dont want to put any extra burdon on you since you are the only one who pays for anything. Yea thanks for the trillion $ bailout. Might as well give it to the crooks after all hungry kids will eat anything. Thats right their not hungry all their parent has to do is sign up for help. We will give them enough. What a fffnnn JOKE

(((((tempt))))

not sure what I said to have him single me out

I try to be understanding especially during this holiday season, can be hard on some.

He called everyone out. Seems we are all just puppets of the system.

<~~~ not a puppet ()

i am not talking about the family structure on the issue

i am talking about the govt intervention on the issue

unless the custodial parent is recieving some kind of govt assistance they very rarely get involved in recovery of child support

and when the gov gets involved they do knot look at the details

they say pay x amount then they keep most of it to apply on the help the custodial parent received in the past

kind of what i expected for responses tho

everyone is ready to attack anyone questioning the support of a child issue

after all who does not care about the children they must be cold hearted azzholes

-------

the govt also runs the animal shelter (they kill the animals after three days (some shelter)

i am not talking about the family structure on the issue

i am talking about the govt intervention on the issue

unless the custodial parent is recieving some kind of govt assistance they very rarely get involved in recovery of child support

and when the gov gets involved they do knot look at the details

they say pay x amount then they keep most of it to apply on the help the custodial parent received in the past

kind of what i expected for responses tho

everyone is ready to attack anyone questioning the support of a child issue

after all who does not care about the children they must be cold hearted azzholes

-------

the govt also runs the animal shelter (they kill the animals after three days (some shelter)

Adj,

I disagree with this statement of yours, "unless the custodial parent is recieving some kind of govt assistance they very rarely get involved in recovery of child support."

They do get involved when the women aren't receiving government assistance. Some men are good at going underground.

not hugging me back Robin

Agreed the government does seek repayment from those absent parents of public assistance, it does also go after those who do not receive public assistance.

the govt should be repaid for financially supporting those on public assistance, so yes, when non custodial parent is ordered to pay child support, shouldn't they recoup what they have paid out???

I would never attack you, I rather enjoy our differences.