Community > General Religion Chat

Topic: RE-INCARNATION LOTS OF QUESTIOnS AND
funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 11:58 AM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said ..so come on how you do it ..tell us this "new unknown knowledge" that you brought back from the spiritual world ...let me guess your response ...when you popped backed into your body it cause you to lose your memory

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 11/17/08 12:11 PM
Funches nobody could ever have any unknown knowledge because if they know it then it is not unknown. I have some little known knowledge, but then you would ask for proof if I told you and I can't give you any proof. (Its classified.)

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 12:48 PM
your reference to seeing someone snoring and they deny it, yes that has happened before, though I don't see any relevance to what's being discussed. "Ahaloaskewed" ..the relevance is that people do fall asleep and not realize it ..the same can be said about an out of body experience ...one of the most popular phrase when it comes to dreams are ..."it seem so real" that why during research it's a logical question to ask the one that supposely had the experience "can you supply any information that may indicate that the experience was more than what would take place in ones dream" ...the answer is either yes or no ...the same question applies to reincarnation

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 12:52 PM
Funches nobody could ever have any unknown knowledge because if they know it then it is not unknown. I have some little known knowledge, but then you would ask for proof if I told you and I can't give you any proof. (Its classified.) well "JennieBean" enquiring minds want to know ...why is the information classified and who classified it

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 11/17/08 12:56 PM Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 11/17/08 01:01 PM
Funches nobody could ever have any unknown knowledge because if they know it then it is not unknown. I have some little known knowledge, but then you would ask for proof if I told you and I can't give you any proof. (Its classified.) well "JennieBean" enquiring minds want to know ...why is the information classified and who classified it Barack Obama is not qualified to be president because he was born in Kenya. Of course it could be just a rumor or "urban legend." Exerpt from letter to Chief Justice John G. Roberts from Stephen M. St. John: "It would be a relatively simple matter to visit Obama's paternal grandmother in Kenya and confirm her alleged claims that she witnessed the President Elect's birth in Kenya in 1961. If this claim is true, Barack Obama is not a natural born citizen of the USA, and therefore, according to our Constitution of the USA, he is not eligible to be president. Also, consultation with the Government of Indonesia will confirm or rule out claims that Obama, known as Barry Soetoro, was enrolled as an Indonesian citizen in a grammar school in Jakarta, and that in the early 1980s he traveled in the Indian subcontinent with an Indonesian passport. If these claims are true, Barack Obama is not a naturalized citizen of the USA, and therefore he is not eligible to hold any federal office.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 01:06 PM
Funches nobody could ever have any unknown knowledge because if they know it then it is not unknown. I have some little known knowledge, but then you would ask for proof if I told you and I can't give you any proof. (Its classified.) well "JennieBean" enquiring minds want to know ...why is the information classified and who classified it Barack Obama is not qualified to be president because he was born in Kenya. well "JennieBean" information that anyone can "google" is most likely not considered as being classified so ...er.. is that all the classified information you have?......

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Mon 11/17/08 01:13 PM
Funches, Nope. That was just food for the fishes.

SkyHook5652 Joined Sat 08/23/08 Posts: 4063	Mon 11/17/08 01:36 PM Edited by SkyHook5652 on Mon 11/17/08 01:38 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all.

invisible Joined Mon 04/09/07 Posts: 7692	Mon 11/17/08 01:49 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. More than likely he overheard and overlooked because it wouldn't fit with his argument, in real life you call that selective hearing.

SkyHook5652 Joined Sat 08/23/08 Posts: 4063	Mon 11/17/08 02:09 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. More than likely he overheard and overlooked because it wouldn't fit with his argument, in real life you call that selective hearing. I think it's significantly more than likely. I think it's a certainty.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 02:34 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. "Skyhook" ..you're making it up as you go along because I remember the thread ..but anyway claims of OBE are that it was either entered in a dream or through meditation and you just denied those methods ...all that left is through drug inducement, delusion or a lobotomy ... I vote lobotomy

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 02:36 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. More than likely he overheard and overlooked because it wouldn't fit with his argument, in real life you call that selective hearing. "Invisible" the thread is in the archives ..maybe you should check it before you start meowing

invisible Joined Mon 04/09/07 Posts: 7692	Mon 11/17/08 02:38 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. More than likely he overheard and overlooked because it wouldn't fit with his argument, in real life you call that selective hearing. "Invisible" the thread is in the archives ..maybe you should check it before you start meowing Look, you are in the habit of twisting and turning other peoples words in their mouths until they fit what you want. Don't get upset when you are called out on it

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 02:40 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. More than likely he overheard and overlooked because it wouldn't fit with his argument, in real life you call that selective hearing. I think it's significantly more than likely. I think it's a certainty. "Skyhook" it funny how you rant but never leave the answer ... come on ..here's your chance to sprew how you entered into OBE

KoolAidWoman Joined Thu 09/20/07 Posts: 1079	Mon 11/17/08 02:49 PM
Looks like all of you guys are in R E M!Koolaid;

AhaloAskewed Joined Wed 02/14/07 Posts: 190	Mon 11/17/08 02:49 PM
I see your point in saying that now funches. Even still, in the scenario that I gave, that isn't present. Perhaps other cases, yes, it is possible it would apply, as long as those conditions I stated aren't met. I'm sure it has happened before. I'm not speaking for anyone here through my posts, I'm speaking of the OBE itself.

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 02:50 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. More than likely he overheard and overlooked because it wouldn't fit with his argument, in real life you call that selective hearing. "Invisible" the thread is in the archives ..maybe you should check it before you start meowing Look, you are in the habit of twisting and turning other peoples words in their mouths until they fit what you want. Don't get upset when you are called out on it "Invisible" who's getting upset ..I got 'Skyhook" in a perry mason moment ...he can't give a answer because he is bound by what he say in that OBE thread which can be easily checked ...so that is why I was saying that you was meowing about something prematurely without checking ...so retract those claws

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 02:59 PM
I see your point in saying that now funches. Even still, in the scenario that I gave, that isn't present. Perhaps other cases, yes, it is possible it would apply, as long as those conditions I stated aren't met. I'm sure it has happened before. I'm not speaking for anyone here through my posts, I'm speaking of the OBE itself. 'Ahaloaskewed" the experience of OBE seems to have no specific purpose or function beyond a lucky guess.. without any more evidence than that ..OBE is little more then wishful dreaming

invisible Joined Mon 04/09/07 Posts: 7692	Mon 11/17/08 03:08 PM
Nope. You either misread or misunderstood or forgot what I said. I stated very specifically that it was not while in a dream or meditative state. "Skyhook"...that's the point I'm making... you never said But in fact I did say. So you haven't made any point at all. More than likely he overheard and overlooked because it wouldn't fit with his argument, in real life you call that selective hearing. "Invisible" the thread is in the archives ..maybe you should check it before you start meowing Look, you are in the habit of twisting and turning other peoples words in their mouths until they fit what you want. Don't get upset when you are called out on it "Invisible" who's getting upset ..I got 'Skyhook" in a perry mason moment ...he can't give a answer because he is bound by what he say in that OBE thread which can be easily checked ...so that is why I was saying that you was meowing about something prematurely without checking ...so retract those claws Skyhook gave you the answers you were asking for. YOU dismissed them because you couldn't cope with them, they were not what YOU wanted to hear. Yet, they were Skyhooks answers. He can only answer for himself, not for YOU. Therefore you just overlooked them, or twisted them your way, so you could dismiss them as wrong (wrong for YOU

funches Joined Sat 12/01/07 Posts: 12948	Mon 11/17/08 03:56 PM
Skyhook gave you the answers you were asking for. YOU dismissed them because you couldn't cope with them, they were not what YOU wanted to hear. Yet, they were Skyhooks answers. He can only answer for himself, not for YOU. Therefore you just overlooked them, or twisted them your way, so you could dismiss them as wrong (wrong for YOU ok then "Invisible" what answer did "Skyhook" give as how he entered into his "Out of Body Experience" if you don't know or to lazy to check that OBE thread then you are just babbling ..you are like a false witness aiding and abetting in the promotion and deception of mis-information from the facts ...shame on you little kitty cat