$75, and that is without even having to be a good worker.

You never did buy from them? Then you're not the problem.

Yep. This thread had literally "blown up". Wow.

I am not jealous. I have stated this above, I am proud.

You can't first offer your version, by saying that I am jealous, and then proceed to question me why am I jealous, as if I have already confirmed. This is a logical fallacy. It makes you sound like a school teacher.

Fanta, when you simply use a regular period, (.), it looks so rare, in your hands.

Why doesn't Obama just stop the lay-offs?

You did? You gave them money for failing to be the best? Then you're part of their problem. You have enabled them to become complicit and to forget about customer. They money (your's) were flowing to them whether they were doing the right thing or not!

So, they should not have extended the credit to the poor? Only to the rich?

No, honey. Many others can feel too.

You're the only one to run with a stupid, wide brush idea, though.



Why did you put "if" there?

What if it is exactly the opposite? Would you then all arm up and live your life carrying loaded gun, and being wrapped around by ammo belts?

I doubt it. Therefore, I must be doubting your feelings.

Thank you.

So, we have a usual dumb criminal then. I don't care what did hi think. He shot somebody, and now has nothing to show for it.

Rot him in jail.

Stupidity of the argument in it's full shine.

Yes, it will help to start it. At some point, none of the law-abiding citizens will have guns. O.K. Next?

How do you plan on getting the people who never cared what the law says, to get rid of their guns? You must believe then, that their source is the legally sold weapons. Far from being true! Their source is governments of many nations, including this one. That is something you can't stop. People who sell guns outside of law, usually do so because they control the law. They are the ones to pay Obama, for instance, and he will do every little thing that they order. Thus, you will only ever succeed in part one of your show, disarming the law-abiding citizens.

Same as your war against drugs. The war on guns will have equally disastrous results.

So, you're saying they were on private property?

We can't. But it is better than government media, as that is a 100% lie.

With internet, at least, the truth is available, it is simply a task of finding a good source.

Of course, as an old joke says, with newspapers it is simply a task of adding "not" to every word you read...

Feel big and proud? About what? Protecting one's property from one who started trespassing as early as 7 years old?

How old do you really like them boys, Dragoness?

I thought it wasn't very clear from the article, if they were or were not.

I don't? That is what you think?

You better check with your head doctor, before trespassing on my property.

But, I support your right to do whatever you want with your's.

So, were they or were they not on private property?

The article doesn't clearly say.

If they were, well, they have learned a lesson.

If they were not, the shooter needs to rot in jail.


Now, what does this have to do with guns? Would you like that boy to be shot with an arrow, or trapped?

What was the last time you read a newspaper? I, don't remember.

Secondly, because a single man can not easily publish a newspaper, only a governmental propaganda will be their content. With this in mind, I say, good riddance, controlled media!