Why not use the scientific method?

Do we take the statement from an elephant before we can figure out what it does, how and why? Of course not, because we can't. Nevertheless, we are perfectly capable of deducting everything we want to know about that elephant.

Yet, take the FED, and your intellectual might vanishes. Suddenly, we need FED to explain us what is it they doing. Can't you see with your own eyes, without asking the FED, the perpetrator?

I assume your question is rhetorical, and you already understand, that FDIC (nor FED) does not guarantee anything, nor was it ever designed to guarantee anything. Contrary, of course, to what we all are continuously fed by the various media and government propaganda.

I find it extremely interesting, that the main purpose of FED, while in plain sight, continues to evade even the most determined. For some reason, people do place a value in propaganda. I don't trust propaganda, may-be by some freak of nature, I don't know, but the absolute majority does.

Even when I see folks determined to find the truth, they would still predictably go and read the propaganda statements, to either:
- allow propaganda to be the center of their research, or;
- to at least influence their judgment.

Why? There is no necessity to know anything official about what FED or the state says about baking, but only to examine what we can observe, to come to a conclusion of what is the purpose and meaning of the FED.

Where is this a priori trust coming from? How to repudiate it?

Curious, isn't it?

If I hit your scull with my fist, and attempt to give you a story, would you listen? Not if you sober. You already know everything from simply observing my actions.

But turn to the dealings of the people and the bureaucrats, and the sober judgment disappears. FED tells you that it took your money away from you by force for your own good, and you listen! Why? Don't you already see it's actions? FED took the gold of every American, by physical force. You still trust anything it says? You even listen?

As for the very existence of the gold in F. Knox, stop watching those cheep TV shows. It is called "movie magic". Anything can be done on the screen. It proves nothing, unless you trust the makers, but then if you do, you shouldn't need a movie, since you trust their word.

The gold was sold out, during a number of years, and it is being sold daily. Where have you been?

Look up "Gold lease rates". I believe I have personally posted at least twice on this very forum, in detail, about the mechanism of gold sales under the disguise of "leasing".

Do you see now, Fanta, why I don't want to live in a tyranny that you keep advocating? Even if I trust you personally (which I do), I still cannot trust such system.
Turns out the whole gold stock might be missing, and you wouldn't even take a notice, nor see the difference between an audit by a real auditor and that of a government thug.

All there was, an audit of FED by the government. This is exactly as devastating as an audit of Al Capone by his mother.

Hey Fanta, I am well armed too. Therefore, it should immediately follow to you, that I have a bridge in my possession. Want to buy it?

The presence of armed forces does not guarantee that:

1. there is something to guard.
2. that even if there was, it is not stolen yet, by the bureaucrats who control the armed forces.

Devastating? There is nothing new.

Listen, ANY DEMOCRAT, is capable of murder and torture. Why would I say that? Because any democrat by definition must support an armed extortion of private property, which is exactly the same thing that a street thug does.

Alexander Hamilton was a proponent of a communism, as he supported the central bank. It is, therefore, of no consequence, whatever he did or said. His whole deal is tarnished by him advocating socialism, and even communism through central bank (as we are now being proved that the existence of central bank leads to economic crisis, and then to socialist measures), and to me, it is the question of what did he REALLY wanted to achieve. Certainly, he did not seek freedom, not independence, although he may have held a position that could have been interpreted that way. But his true intentions speak loudly by his advocacy of central bank and federal power.

He was the worst of all founding fathers, and should probably be removed from the list, and mentioned only as a contemporary or an ally of founding fathers.

An analogy: You may have a father who was documented advocating your conception in order to sell your organs. While he is your biological father, it is not in your benefit to promote his ideas.

Something of that kind...

You don't know that. This could have been simply bad English. They may have wanted to say "how many have died", but it did come out as "how they died".

Shouldn't we be democratic about it? Ask the morons? Everyone should have an equal say, even those who do not have children of their own.

So, what is the fallacy in this argument?

I would say that they must have died, and died before they have even become corpses!

No, why? I am proud of Obama, and of my right to your money!

Type in google: "photoshop serial", and make sure that google isn't pulling a "safe search" trick on you.

There is no such thing as "American Capitalism", even though you seem to think there is. Just like there is no meaning to "American Freedom".

I am just wondering if I should stop being productive now, or should I wait for some more goodies from Obama, since it only gets better for those who don't want to work.

This used to be said of England, but I guess it fits us now as well:

America, the country where only suckers work!

Some people didn't actually learned all they know from internet sites.

Besides, if you want a reference, copy one line and paste it into google text box. Vuala!

We can't allow some kids to be smarter then others. Whatever it takes, and usually, we choose to dumb everyone down equally.

According to late American history, Fanta.

Or, should I say:

According to late American history, Fanta! ?


And Japan was bombed to escape possible huge losses of soldiers!
!

No escape now.

Reverend Wrong? LOL