Wouldn't it be considered sacrilegious to point to any man and call him Jesus or the Messiah or God?

He would make a fine Jesus. The three wise men could be played by Tony Blair Dick Cheney and Binjamen Netanyahu. Sarah Palin for The Virgin Mary.

The Bible's own definition of offspring produced from unions between the sons of God and the daughters of man would be Demi Gods. So unless the son of God is not also a God, this would make Jesus a Demi God too wouldn't it.

Julian Jaynes (February 27, 1920 – November 21, 1997) was an American psychologist, best known for his book The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (1976), in which he argued that ancient peoples were not conscious.

Jaynes defines "consciousness" more narrowly than most philosophers. Jaynes' definition of consciousness is synonymous with what philosophers call "meta-consciousness" or "meta-awareness" i.e. awareness of awareness, thoughts about thinking, desires about desires, beliefs about beliefs. This form of reflection is also distinct from the kinds of "deliberations" seen in other higher animals such as crows insofar as Jaynesian consciousness is dependent on linguistic cognition.

Jaynes wrote that ancient humans before roughly 1000BC were not reflectively meta-conscious and operated by means of automatic, nonconscious habit-schemas. Instead of having meta-consciousness, these humans were constituted by what Jaynes calls the "bicameral mind". For bicameral humans, when habit did not suffice to handle novel stimuli and stress rose at the moment of decision, neural activity in the "dominant" (left) hemisphere was modulated by auditory verbal hallucinations originating in the so-called "silent" (right) hemisphere (particularly the right temporal cortex), which were heard as the voice of a chieftain or god and immediately obeyed.

Jaynes wrote, "[For bicameral humans], volition came as a voice that was in the nature of a neurological command, in which the command and the action were not separated, in which to hear was to obey."[1] Jaynes argued that the change from bicamerality to consciousness (linguistic meta-cognition) occurred over a period of ten centuries beginning around 1000 BC. The selection pressure for Jaynesian consciousness as a means for cognitive control is due, in part, to chaotic social disorganizations and the development of new methods of behavioral control such as writing.[citation needed]

It explains that most ancient gods were the left side of the brain talking to the right side, until the corpus callosum fully developed.

So he believes that the gods were basically the voices in people's heads.


That's an opinion, not an explanation. Perhaps an hypothesis. For him, perhaps the idea of aliens from the stars didn't set right.

Yes, I've read of them. But I was referring to the comment I made earlier that a God and a son of God would produce the same offspring.

I was asking Jeannie, if she was telling me in her response, that she feels any sons of God mentioned in those passages in the Bible are not true Gods themselves, but are also born of a "daughter of men", as Jesus was? And if so, is that assumption based on the lack of a Godess being mentioned as being their Mothers?

It is a generally accepted theory, due to the amount of anthropology, archeology, philology, etc. evidence for it. Whereas, the evidence for aliens consists of a single radio wave picked up in 1977. All that Von Daniken stuff has been debunked.

I was asking Jeannie, if she was telling me in her response, that she feels any sons of God mentioned in those passages in the Bible are not true Gods themselves, but are also born of a "daughter of men", as Jesus was? And if so, is that assumption based on the lack of a Godess being mentioned as being their Mothers?

It is only necessary to have a female to give birth here in this 3D dual reality. There is no distinction between male and female in the heavenly realms. The energies there have all attributes of both polarities.

No disrespect...but can I ask how we could possibly know this?