Topic: Twice Weekly Sex Contract...Would You Sign One?
no photo
Sat 01/28/12 10:08 AM


I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship.


It's not about his/her ability to make love in the short term, it's about long term...say 5 - 10 from getting married and one of you looses interest in making love.

He's just trying to prevent that from happening by have her sign a contract.


the best way for him to work on that is to talk to his exes and find out why they lost interest and then work on his lovemaking skills

and other general skills in learning to become a better partner all around - women can also lose interest in sex because a man isn't treating them well - as well as when he is a selfish bed partner

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 10:09 AM







His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex.


why.....

he should work on that



Exactly. Women dont say no to the big O, so obviously he was not providing it.



too many just expect that 'o' to happen though

people need communication to express what works for THEIR bodies where their partner is concerned, and we need to stop seeing sex as some innate ability instead of a learned skill


Certainly. Those are all things needed to provide the big O in my opinion. I cant imagine anyone needing a contract if they understand that.


maybe the contract should require male reciprocation...his job's not done till she is:wink:
i know how to remedy that power tools i mean gas powered toys wait thats not right, ahh hell i forgot what i was gonna say

laugh ya prolly best to forget that commentlaugh

ishimcity's photo
Sat 01/28/12 10:10 AM
My opinion when you lose interest in a private plan, there is no sense to hold for each other. Or just a change of attitude about sex )). And to draw up contracts there is no sense if there is no desire.

irisheyes79's photo
Sat 01/28/12 10:19 AM







I wouldn't sign it. No effing way. Because A. I can't stand being told I HAVE to do something. I would be more than likely jumping his bones way more times a week then that anyways ...but would refuse to if I was told I HAD to BC of a stupid contract AND B. The fact that he's neurotic enough to want me to sign something like that would send up Mega red flags for worse, even more controlling things to come.

But that's just me. I don't speak for, well, anyone else. laugh
doesnt 2 times a month sound better?

No!!! That sounds HORRIBLE!! Who the freak only wants it twice a month or even just twice a week? But I still wouldn't do it twice a month on principal. Not signing it! Hahaha


You will sign my contract to take me out for ice cream 2 times a week! :angry:


FINE!! But I want chocolate peanut butter ice cream. Its only fair.


Im willing to amend. Its all about compromise.


The love I feel right now in this thread is beautiful ...just beautiful. Now come here and give me a hug and lets go get some ice cream!
after ice cream you n i need some bed timebigsmile

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 10:19 AM

I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship.

I agree. A contract????
flowerforyou

irisheyes79's photo
Sat 01/28/12 10:23 AM








His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex.


why.....

he should work on that



Exactly. Women dont say no to the big O, so obviously he was not providing it.



too many just expect that 'o' to happen though

people need communication to express what works for THEIR bodies where their partner is concerned, and we need to stop seeing sex as some innate ability instead of a learned skill


Certainly. Those are all things needed to provide the big O in my opinion. I cant imagine anyone needing a contract if they understand that.


maybe the contract should require male reciprocation...his job's not done till she is:wink:
i know how to remedy that power tools i mean gas powered toys wait thats not right, ahh hell i forgot what i was gonna say

laugh ya prolly best to forget that commentlaugh
laugh

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 11:50 AM

It's sex 101.



I could never understand how a man could be that selfish and not take the time kiss, caress, nibble his woman to orgasm before his own. Sorry I'm late for class Professor, hope I didn't miss too much.



Apparently you tested out of that class -- or should be teaching it! glasses

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 11:54 AM
I could not possible sign any contract such as this.

Twice a week.......

Just AIN'T........

ENOUGH!!!!!!

smokin devil smokin

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 12:00 PM
I know, I mean, come on -- not to be greedy but what about twice a day??

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 12:34 PM


I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship.

I agree. A contract????
flowerforyou


same here I agree! If both partners are doing all (or even most of ) the right things, a contract is sillyflowerforyou

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 12:51 PM





His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex.


why.....

he should work on that



Playing devil's advocate...why should HE work on it..he doesn't have a problem with his sex drive!


Oh, but there's so much more to great sex than just a high sex drive.


I agree but I said sex drive...not high sex drive!:smile:


And I'm just saying perhaps there were other issues that were going on which caused the lack of sex. Making a woman sign a contract to have sex twice a week would be a huge red flag as to problems that may happen in the future.

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 12:59 PM

As much as i hate to say it, women are always being degraded. Whether it's the media doing that, or the porn industry. I think women have basically had enough of feeling like they have to be a energiser bunny. Nobody ever talks about it. With some men, they're like "Oh, if a woman doesn't sleep with me on the first night meet her, i dump her". I just wish women WOULD talk about it more. Not saying men never feel degraded. Just that it happens with women moreso. Ignore me, i'm just ranting. lol.


Maybe we meet completely different kinds of men. I don't feel degraded. I don't meet men who tell me that if I don't sleep with them on the first night that things won't go any farther.

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 01:14 PM



I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship.


It's not about his/her ability to make love in the short term, it's about long term...say 5 - 10 from getting married and one of you looses interest in making love.

He's just trying to prevent that from happening by have her sign a contract.


the best way for him to work on that is to talk to his exes and find out why they lost interest and then work on his lovemaking skills

and other general skills in learning to become a better partner all around - women can also lose interest in sex because a man isn't treating them well - as well as when he is a selfish bed partner


and this works both ways - ladies also - I am not intending to pick on men - it's just that the subject of the OP is a man

Seakolony's photo
Sat 01/28/12 01:30 PM

His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. He says he wants an undertaking that before he marries any woman, they would have to agree to have sex at least twice a week, unless one of us is ill or away.

Would you sign a contract that states you have to have sex/make love to your partner twice a week?

I have a dilemma with this because I wouldn't sign a contract like this if it was a condition of him marrying me and in principle, I object to a contract that would effectively take away the spontaneity...I also don’t think sex and how often it occurs can be legislated by a contract....IDK...I kinda disagree but agree in a weird way.

Yeah, I see your point.....definitely....not enough sex in the contract. I wouldn't sign it either

JML510's photo
Sat 01/28/12 03:48 PM
It depends on how much I find my girlfriend attractive. If she's attractive enough, I could have my weekly dose of her by Sunday afternoon.

Kat1974's photo
Sat 01/28/12 03:55 PM
No to the contract. To me it takes away from the romance, the spice and would just take away from the experience and I think harm the relationship. Obligation is a huge romance killer.

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 04:01 PM


His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. He says he wants an undertaking that before he marries any woman, they would have to agree to have sex at least twice a week, unless one of us is ill or away.

Would you sign a contract that states you have to have sex/make love to your partner twice a week?

I have a dilemma with this because I wouldn't sign a contract like this if it was a condition of him marrying me and in principle, I object to a contract that would effectively take away the spontaneity...I also don’t think sex and how often it occurs can be legislated by a contract....IDK...I kinda disagree but agree in a weird way.

Yeah, I see your point.....definitely....not enough sex in the contract. I wouldn't sign it either


exactly to you & sing both

what is this guy missing that he;s gotta get a woman to sign a contract to keep her in bed w/ him???? uh - no thankslaugh

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 04:20 PM

Female Sexual Dysfunction: Evaluation and Treatment

Estimates of the number of women who have sexual dysfunction range from 19 to 50 percent in “normal” outpatient populations3–6 and increase to 68 to 75 percent when sexual dissatisfaction or problems (not dysfunctional in nature) are included.5,7 Yet, one review of physicians' chart notes revealed a recorded sexual problem in only 2 percent.5 In another review, physician inquiry of patients in a gynecologic office setting about sexual problems increased reported complaints about sexual dysfunction sixfold.3 This discrepancy demonstrates a need for physician education in this area.


Maybe you ladies were all lucky enough to be born with a healthy sex drive, but 19-50 percent of women weren't. Yes, sexual dissatisfaction ups that number to 68-75%, but 50% is nothing to sneeze at. Unless you ladies have been spending a lot of time dating and having sex with other women, it seems to me that men would have a better perspective on this.

navygirl's photo
Sat 01/28/12 04:20 PM


As much as i hate to say it, women are always being degraded. Whether it's the media doing that, or the porn industry. I think women have basically had enough of feeling like they have to be a energiser bunny. Nobody ever talks about it. With some men, they're like "Oh, if a woman doesn't sleep with me on the first night meet her, i dump her". I just wish women WOULD talk about it more. Not saying men never feel degraded. Just that it happens with women moreso. Ignore me, i'm just ranting. lol.


Maybe we meet completely different kinds of men. I don't feel degraded. I don't meet men who tell me that if I don't sleep with them on the first night that things won't go any farther.


I gues you are lucky. I meet guys whose first question is what kind of sex positons do you like; how often do you like sex; etc. I do feel degraded when asked those questions. For once; I would like to meet a guy that doesn't use sex as his main subject. Oh wait; I have met men like this but these are just my good friends.

no photo
Sat 01/28/12 04:27 PM


Female Sexual Dysfunction: Evaluation and Treatment

Estimates of the number of women who have sexual dysfunction range from 19 to 50 percent in “normal” outpatient populations3–6 and increase to 68 to 75 percent when sexual dissatisfaction or problems (not dysfunctional in nature) are included.5,7 Yet, one review of physicians' chart notes revealed a recorded sexual problem in only 2 percent.5 In another review, physician inquiry of patients in a gynecologic office setting about sexual problems increased reported complaints about sexual dysfunction sixfold.3 This discrepancy demonstrates a need for physician education in this area.


Maybe you ladies were all lucky enough to be born with a healthy sex drive, but 19-50 percent of women weren't. Yes, sexual dissatisfaction ups that number to 68-75%, but 50% is nothing to sneeze at. Unless you ladies have been spending a lot of time dating and having sex with other women, it seems to me that men would have a better perspective on this.


It seems to me that perhaps you might consider that statistics are a huge turn off AND any man who is part of a couple who blames his spouse for her "lack of a sex drive" needs to examine his own ability to please her

I daresay I have far more experience in these matters.