100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Twice Weekly Sex Contract...Would You Sign One? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship. Getting legally married is a contract. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship. It's not about his/her ability to make love in the short term, it's about long term...say 5 - 10 from getting married and one of you looses interest in making love. He's just trying to prevent that from happening by have her sign a contract. Maybe if and when that times comes they can change things up. Not just in the sack, all aspects of their lives that got them to the point of complacency, boredom and lack of interest. Anyone who is mostly happy has an interest in sex, imo. Awareness is half the battle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It doesn't make much sense to me... twice a week or else I'll divorce you??? 
contract or not... divorce is the end game. so why bother mentioning a unenforceable contract? Again, playing devils advocate...I think that it’s more of a symbolic contract that says to a partner...babe, I love you and want to spend the rest of my life with you BUT sex is an integral part of any relationship that I have AND I will kick you to the curb is you lose your sex drive. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd have to have a contract that says NO sex ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. why..... he should work on that Playing devil's advocate...why should HE work on it..he doesn't have a problem with his sex drive! 'marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost an interest in sex' if he believes that is truly why they both ended, it really is up to him to figure out why that happened..both times, to him. Maybe he has a tiny weany |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the sex is good, it will be happening. If I were married to someone, sex twice a week would not be too much at all to expect. I would think that if I lost interest in having sex with someone I was married to, something would be wrong. That reason needs to be worked on, rather than being forced to have sex because of some silly contract. I agree. ID sign it because, for me, it wouldnt be a 'forced' issue, but just something I would be naturally doing anyway,, Me too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. why..... he should work on that Exactly. Women dont say no to the big O, so obviously he was not providing it. Women DO say NO to the big O if it's more pain than pleasure  but I take your point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
42BlackBBW
on
Fri 01/27/12 02:33 PM
|
 double post
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A contract....or, you could just rub my shoulders a little and nibble on my ear....probably would make for better sex anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Married or not, I would have sex with him and ONLY him, as many times as I want, whenever I want. No contract needed. The perk of being young a spry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only twice a week? Thats just wrong. Should be at least 5-7 times a week.
And for how long each time? 15 mins? 30 mins? 2 hours? What if he gets off and she is not done yet? What happens if it is friday night and saturday morning? Do they have to wait a whole week before going again? So no, I would not sign. And really, only twice a week? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A contract....or, you could just rub my shoulders a little and nibble on my ear....probably would make for better sex anyway. It is the little things that do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. He says he wants an undertaking that before he marries any woman, they would have to agree to have sex at least twice a week, unless one of us is ill or away. Would you sign a contract that states you have to have sex/make love to your partner twice a week? I have a dilemma with this because I wouldn't sign a contract like this if it was a condition of him marrying me and in principle, I object to a contract that would effectively take away the spontaneity...I also don’t think sex and how often it occurs can be legislated by a contract....IDK...I kinda disagree but agree in a weird way. Nope, I wouldn't sign a contract like that. Sounds too much like a control freak to me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only twice a week? Thats just wrong. Should be at least 5-7 times a week. And for how long each time? 15 mins? 30 mins? 2 hours? What if he gets off and she is not done yet? What happens if it is friday night and saturday morning? Do they have to wait a whole week before going again? So no, I would not sign. And really, only twice a week? I guess he figured that twice a week was achievable 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. why..... he should work on that Playing devil's advocate...why should HE work on it..he doesn't have a problem with his sex drive! 'marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost an interest in sex if he believes that is truly why they both ended, it really is up to him to figure out why that happened..both times, to him. Maybe he has a tiny weany Maybe his ex and g/f both had low sex drives to start off with and gradually lost interest over time whereas his remained the same? Idk.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship. It's not about his/her ability to make love in the short term, it's about long term...say 5 - 10 from getting married and one of you looses interest in making love. He's just trying to prevent that from happening by have her sign a contract. So, then you would sign the contract to ensure he stays happy? I have a problem with the contract, not what it represents...and it's not about his happiness that I'd be concerned with, it would be both of ours! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only twice a week? Thats just wrong. Should be at least 5-7 times a week. And for how long each time? 15 mins? 30 mins? 2 hours? What if he gets off and she is not done yet? What happens if it is friday night and saturday morning? Do they have to wait a whole week before going again? So no, I would not sign. And really, only twice a week? this is a joke. this station is conducting a test of the Emergency Broadcast Joke System. this is only a joke dang girl, if you're that horny, i would make like blue bell cream. i'd eat all i can and sell the rest 
if this had been an actual insult, you would have been instructed where to tune in your area for official fight information. this concludes this joke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. why..... he should work on that Playing devil's advocate...why should HE work on it..he doesn't have a problem with his sex drive! Oh, but there's so much more to great sex than just a high sex drive. I agree but I said sex drive...not high sex drive!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would sign no contracts. If you can't properly make love without one, maybe you should not be in a relationship. Getting legally married is a contract.
So is a pre-nup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
His marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost interest in sex. why..... he should work on that Playing devil's advocate...why should HE work on it..he doesn't have a problem with his sex drive! 'marriage and last relationship ended because both women lost an interest in sex if he believes that is truly why they both ended, it really is up to him to figure out why that happened..both times, to him. Maybe he has a tiny weany Maybe his ex and g/f both had low sex drives to start off with and gradually lost interest over time whereas his remained the same? Idk.. Maybe..I don't know either. I do know, the ONLY time I lose interest in sex, is when I have lost interest in the one I'm having sex with. Maybe that's just me... |
|
|
|
|
