1 2 15 16 17 19 21 22 23 37 38
Topic: What is wrong with being Gay?
no photo
Wed 11/02/11 07:50 PM






because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other

adult incest would fall under that category


We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things.


totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc

not lovers

unless they're in mississippi or utah

then I think it's OK



no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination

and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,,


Incest is illegal in many places. Homosexuality is not.


homosexuality is illegal in many places outside of america too

but we have more 'freedom' here to do things that are not right

like , for instance, calling people out of their names, belittling people, even (as I mentioned before) sleeping with a different person every night

being legal, is not the definition of being 'right'


Ah, but we're living in the US. So obviously, I'm talking about here.

Anyway, there's not much else to be said. You like sex for procreation only. Unless you're a couple who can be intimate enough to have sex with their eyes open. Otherwise, sex for pleasure is a no no, especially if you're of the same sex. But, sex with relatives is ok!

I think that about covers it.

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 07:50 PM
Edited by sweetestgirl11 on Wed 11/02/11 07:51 PM




because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other

adult incest would fall under that category


We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things.


totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc

not lovers

unless they're in mississippi or utah

then I think it's OK



no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination

and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,,


do not agree completely. we were not talking about ALL adults just homosexual adults.

incestuous relationships are a separate issue - it is adding a new element that is moot, and detracts from the real issue.

incest is another topic and no one is going to approve of illegal or abusive activities that can occur in both hetero & homosexual relationships

wow what a combination tho - incestuous couples???? that's lot to wrap the mind around

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 07:50 PM


this might be a little random,
but i'd like to watch msharmony,
or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure,
have sex.




that's voyeurism

playboy dictionary

not M&J this time


What does "not M&J this time" mean?

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 07:51 PM
wait,
so is sex the only reason you disapprove of homosexuality?

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 07:52 PM



this might be a little random,
but i'd like to watch msharmony,
or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure,
have sex.




that's voyeurism

playboy dictionary

not M&J this time


What does "not M&J this time" mean?


I consulted playboy dictionary rather than masters & johnson (per my prior reference to masters & johnson) hope that helpsflowerforyou

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 07:55 PM




this might be a little random,
but i'd like to watch msharmony,
or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure,
have sex.




that's voyeurism

playboy dictionary

not M&J this time


What does "not M&J this time" mean?


I consulted playboy dictionary rather than masters & johnson (per my prior reference to masters & johnson) hope that helpsflowerforyou


Oh ok, I think I missed that the first time. Thanks!

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 07:57 PM





this might be a little random,
but i'd like to watch msharmony,
or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure,
have sex.




that's voyeurism

playboy dictionary

not M&J this time


What does "not M&J this time" mean?


I consulted playboy dictionary rather than masters & johnson (per my prior reference to masters & johnson) hope that helpsflowerforyou


Oh ok, I think I missed that the first time. Thanks!

well I usually reference kinsey or the kama sutra

so I am trying to diverselaugh

msharmony's photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:01 PM

wait,
so is sex the only reason you disapprove of homosexuality?



ur catching on, I disapprove of HOMOSEXUAL SEX,,,,

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:17 PM

ur catching on, I disapprove of HOMOSEXUAL SEX,,,,


so if heterosexual couples do the same thing as homosexual couples,
you disapprove of that too?

mightymoe's photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:19 PM





because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other

adult incest would fall under that category


We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things.


totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc

not lovers

unless they're in mississippi or utah

then I think it's OK



no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination

and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,,


Incest is illegal in many places. Homosexuality is not.


should be, still a deviant sex act...

mightymoe's photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:20 PM

wait,
so is sex the only reason you disapprove of homosexuality?

that defines homosexuality...

msharmony's photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:22 PM







because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other

adult incest would fall under that category


We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things.


totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc

not lovers

unless they're in mississippi or utah

then I think it's OK



no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination

and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,,


Incest is illegal in many places. Homosexuality is not.


homosexuality is illegal in many places outside of america too

but we have more 'freedom' here to do things that are not right

like , for instance, calling people out of their names, belittling people, even (as I mentioned before) sleeping with a different person every night

being legal, is not the definition of being 'right'


Ah, but we're living in the US. So obviously, I'm talking about here.

Anyway, there's not much else to be said. You like sex for procreation only. Unless you're a couple who can be intimate enough to have sex with their eyes open. Otherwise, sex for pleasure is a no no, especially if you're of the same sex. But, sex with relatives is ok!

I think that about covers it.


not even that complicated

sex with anyone that has the same immediate relatives or same anatomy is unnatural,,for whatever reason

sex with anyone else that is used as a temporary fix is likewise uhnealthy

sex that is pleasurable is an expectation as unpleasurable sex would certainly deter people from procreating,,

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:32 PM
what category does a girl ****ing me with a strap on fall under?

msharmony's photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:33 PM
alternative ,

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:35 PM

Does it really matter where you find happiness and satisfaction? Same sex relationships or heterosexual relationships?

Ok So I don;t particularly care if anyone doesn't like my opinion. SOOO here it goes.
I see nothing wrong with being gay. I believe this is how you were born. NOONE in their right mind would choose to "become" gay. Why would you choose a lifestyle that you will be looked down on for having? I have two male friends that are gay, they discovered this as they were teens, and found they did not have the same feelings for women as they did men. Both in fact have been in relationships with the same partner for over 15 years.
So in my opinion that is how they were born. And for the record, I feel the same way about someone who is born a transexual. I think it is possible for someone to be born into the wrong body. You brain and feelings may say your female and yet have all the "equipment" of being a man. You feel like a woman trapped in a mans body.

So now that I have said my peace-- bash away. I have a right to my opne minded opinion. Just as alot of people have a right to their tiny, small minded opinions.
happy

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:36 PM

alternative ,


are you concerned about that act?

msharmony's photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:43 PM


alternative ,


are you concerned about that act?


does it matter?



stick whatever you wish wherever you wish,,

consensus is, if you are grown and in love,, its right for you..


Ill concede to being a minority in my opinion, not much else needs saying that hasnt already been pretty much covered.

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:50 PM
does anything really matter?
in conclusion,
some people believe guy on guy and girl on girl is icky.
so make it illegal just cuz they're grossed out by it.

no photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:54 PM






because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other

adult incest would fall under that category


We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things.


totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc

not lovers

unless they're in mississippi or utah

then I think it's OK



no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination

and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,,


Incest is illegal in many places. Homosexuality is not.


should be, still a deviant sex act...


and u know this first hand?spock

msharmony's photo
Wed 11/02/11 08:55 PM

does anything really matter?
in conclusion,
some people believe guy on guy and girl on girl is icky.
so make it illegal just cuz they're grossed out by it.




I would make no type of consentual adult sex illegal


I just wouldnt legistlate it all, except male female unions,,,

1 2 15 16 17 19 21 22 23 37 38