100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: What is wrong with being Gay? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I've never understood people who don't like sex for pleasure. they're liars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. lol, not really adults are adults, even if they are related,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've never understood people who don't like sex for pleasure. they're liars. It almost seems like they're ashamed of sex and feeling good because of sex. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i wonder what your thoughts are on strap ons. but anyways, heterosexual couples participate in all of the above too. they must have underlying issues as well then, no? damn all these sexual acts used for pleasure. D: I've never understood people who don't like sex for pleasure. And who only like missionary position... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i wonder what your thoughts are on strap ons. but anyways, heterosexual couples participate in all of the above too. they must have underlying issues as well then, no? damn all these sexual acts used for pleasure. D:  hush u tart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. lol, not really adults are adults, even if they are related,,, Using that logic, adults are adults, even if they're the same sex. So, none of it should matter to you, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i wonder what your thoughts are on strap ons. but anyways, heterosexual couples participate in all of the above too. they must have underlying issues as well then, no? damn all these sexual acts used for pleasure. D: I've never understood people who don't like sex for pleasure. And who only like missionary position... How boring to do the same thing all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Wed 11/02/11 07:31 PM
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. lol, not really adults are adults, even if they are related,,, Using that logic, adults are adults, even if they're the same sex. So, none of it should matter to you, right? nope, remember, Im the one it DOES matter to,, it matters beyond just whether they were adults,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've never understood people who don't like sex for pleasure. they're liars. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. lol, not really adults are adults, even if they are related,,, Using that logic, adults are adults, even if they're the same sex. So, none of it should matter to you, right? nope, remember, Im the one it DOES matter to,, it matters beyond just whether they were adults,,, Hey, I was just using your logic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i wonder what your thoughts are on strap ons. but anyways, heterosexual couples participate in all of the above too. they must have underlying issues as well then, no? damn all these sexual acts used for pleasure. D: I've never understood people who don't like sex for pleasure. And who only like missionary position... How boring to do the same thing all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc not lovers unless they're in mississippi or utah then I think it's OK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this might be a little random,
but i'd like to watch msharmony, or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure, have sex. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this might be a little random, but i'd like to watch msharmony, or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure, have sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this might be a little random, but i'd like to watch msharmony, or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure, have sex. that's voyeurism playboy dictionary not M&J this time |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc not lovers unless they're in mississippi or utah then I think it's OK no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that's voyeurism playboy dictionary not M&J this time eh. simple curiosity. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this might be a little random, but i'd like to watch msharmony, or anyone who believes sex isn't for pleasure, have sex. pleasure is an incentive for sex, pleasure is a by product of sex, it is meant to be pleasing, if it wasnt we probably wouldnt procreate,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc not lovers unless they're in mississippi or utah then I think it's OK no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,, Incest is illegal in many places. Homosexuality is not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
because of the notion that all that should matter is whether two people are adults who 'consent' and love each other adult incest would fall under that category We're still talking about two consenting adults having sex. Not two relatives. You're comparing very different things. totally different - homosexuals who are related are cousins or uncles or sisters , etc not lovers unless they're in mississippi or utah then I think it's OK no, relatives can be siblings, or parents and children, or any other combination and if Im to accept that any adult should be able to consent with another adult without it being disapproved of, than Id have to also accept those occasions in which adults who are ALSO related choose to have a sexual relation to express their love in such a 'healthy' way,,, Incest is illegal in many places. Homosexuality is not. homosexuality is illegal in many places outside of america too but we have more 'freedom' here to do things that are not right like , for instance, calling people out of their names, belittling people, even (as I mentioned before) sleeping with a different person every night being legal, is not the definition of being 'right' |
|
|
|
|
