Topic: evolution vs creationism | |
---|---|
....learning from mistakes and survival of the fattest isnt
evolution as you are still a human..... its learning and adapting. not changing into another species. |
|
|
|
I just read sometime interesting about evolution and cancer: here's a
link you can copy and paste http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/04/070416160429.htm "No Solution To Cancer: Have Our Genes Evolved To Turn Against Us?" I don't have any remark to say because I'm still wondering the implications, the last two paragraphs inparticular, article brings up. |
|
|
|
What really cracks me up are the people who denounce evolution for lack
of ‘proof’ and then go running off to believe in an ancient fairytale that has much less proof behind it. It’s obvious that such people are totally irrational so attempting to convince them of anything rational would be hopeless. I say let them believe whatever they want. That won’t change the fact that rational people can still understand that evolution most certainly did occur. Religious people tried to denounce scientists when they said that the stars are actually other suns. But now everyone knows that this is true. Religious people tried to denounce scientists when they said that there was no such thing as a homunculus and that women actually contribute to the features of their offspring. But now everyone knows that this is true. Religious people tried to denounce scientists when they said that the earth is not the center of the universe. But now everyone knows that this is true. Religious people tried to denounce scientists when they said that the earth is over four billion years old. But now everyone knows that this is true. The list goes on and on and on. Evolution is no differnet. Religious people will finally give up and embrace it. They have no choice because like all the other discovers of science evolution is also true. It’s just a matter of time before the religious people finally accept it. It takes religious people a long time to accept these things. Religious people are slow. But they’ll eventually have no choice but to face the truth once again. But not to worry, somehow, they’ll fix up their interpretation of their doctrine and keep their fairytale alive. They always do! Gotta give em credit for that! |
|
|
|
Ram - At one time people only knew other people who looked like them.
Eventually, the Romans, the Greeks extended beyond the little villiages and towns and people who looked different than what each was used to seeing came into view. Many considered these people outside the species. As late as just 100 years ago, the African was considered some other species, by many, mostly Christians. The point is, that when talking about transformation, we are not talking about transforming from one species to another. Recent information indicates that we may have intermingled our DNA with another species, but they were still people. They looked different, just like many people do today, but they had every human attribute we still posess today. Crossing the lines of evolution does not mean changing from a bird to a human. It simply means that what we began as, has changed over eons. Our DNA holds every part of every change that has been made as far back as our first ancester. How far is that? Recent DNA studies of several populations suggest that modern humans: * originated in Africa * appeared in one founding population * evolved around 170,000 years ago * migrated to other parts of the world to replace other hominids What that means, is that we can only be traced as to 170,000 years ago. What did we look like then? Check out eveolution. Now consider what we might have looked like 2 or 3 billion years ago? A group of cells? Why not? After all, there were other species of a human nature, some developed close enough to our own DNA that we could have mated with them. |
|
|
|
I believe that we are created for an action of God, but through
evolution. |
|
|
|
abra... still looking for one (1) example based on science that shows
how creationism is merley a myth. ive got thousands that question evolution. also, you seem to think that evolution is a fact, which it is not. its a theory. darwinism has been a religion for what? 150 years? and its full of holes. i wont go into them you can review my posts if you wish. creationism has been around as a theory for thousands of years and no one has been able to blow a hole in it yet. hmmmmmm keep in mind that i used to be just like you. i believed what i was taught in the govt sponsered schools... when i researched it myself, looking at it obj=ectivly and using the scientific method, guess what? i folded on evolution, recognising it as a religion for athiests, and those who would believe what they are told instead of really digging ibnto it. as for the early churches and thier mistakes... i wasent there. wasent behind thier nonsense. Please dont declare me in the dark ages because i believe in creationism. i have very solid science and math behind my decision on this matter. |
|
|
|
rambill “Please dont declare me in the dark ages because i believe in creationism. i have very solid science and math behind my decision on this matter.” You have science and math supporting what? A compelling reason to believe in creationism? Or a compelling reason not to believe in evolution? Can you list the conclusions of your major points in a bullet form? No need to prove them. I’m just curious what your major points are. I might actually agree with them. Who knows? Maybe you’ll convince me to change my view. |
|
|
|
read the posts in this thread. thats a good start. theres TONS OF INFO
out there , and more comming every day that shows how laughable evolution is on its face. Darwin himself said that ther was no fossil record to collaborate his claims, and that the future should show his theory, which of course it hasent. The bible says all species reprouduce ACCORDING TO THIER KIND. What does the record actually show when we look at it? every species pops up, exists for a time, and then goes extinct, exactly as the bible said. a germ that adapts and becomes more resistant is not evolving, it is adapting. it is still the same germ species in the microscope. the odds against even a single celled organism creating itself is 10 to the 123rd power. Realise that this number is larger than all the atoms in the universe! are you sure you want to bet against me with odds like that? |
|
|
|
Ram, sorry, but it seems that you are, once again the focus of the
hours. You wrote: """when i researched it myself, looking at it obj=ectivly and using the scientific method, guess what? i folded on evolution, recognising it as a religion for athiests, and those who would believe what they are told instead of really digging ibnto it.""" Exactly how far did you have to dig to believe in creation. How many archialogical expeditions have turned up more proof for creationism than for eveolution. How many of this planets creatures/species did you discover in you biblical studies. For that matter, how many hominids? See definition, and by the this is the standard definition in the vast majority of dictionarys in use today. hominid (plural hominids) 1. Any primate of the family Hominidae; Homo sapiens is the only surviving member - the others now being extinct. In fact how much further did you or anyone go, to what lenghts did creationists go to prove creation, outside a single book. As I have said in the past, to use a book to prove the information in that same book, is not science, creative thinking, maybe, but wasted effort. If science is so insufficient that you can not bear to see any truth whatsoever within the study of eveolution, perhaps you also grow your own food, and do not rely on so much as an asparin. True? |
|
|
|
Well, ram, since you wouldn’t list your major points I just went go back
and read all your posts in this thread to see what your points are. You haven’t made a single solitary point in this entire thread that is even worth responding to. Everything that you object to is based on a total misunderstanding of science. You keep comparing evolution to things coming together by ‘accident’. That single point right there shows that you have absolutely no clue whatsoever how evolution even works. Have you ever heard of DNA and genetics? Things are hardly evolving by pure accident. Moreover, there are very sound physical reasons why molecules aligned themselves to form into earl cells even before DNA had developed. In fact evolution began long before the earth even existed in the center of stars with the creation of the elements. After reading your posts it’s clear to me that you don’t understand the theory of evolution at all. You talk about the chances of a house blowing together by accident from scattered debris like as if that should somehow be an argument that evolution couldn’t have occurred. Or the chance of type letters accidentally coming together to form written words if a printing shop exploded. Those examples just clearly show that you don’t understand how evolution works. Evolution is not about things just accidentally coming together for no apparent reason. The processes of evolution are extremely well understood. from why and how the elements formed in stars (that was no accident), to how the very first cells come to be. To how DNA would have ‘naturally arisen’ from the bonding of the known the chemicals elements. To the how living creatures evolved via genetics after that. I mean, all of your assertions about it just merely being ‘chance’ are totally incorrect and unwarranted. Your posts clearly show that you are totally uneducated concerned the theory of evolution. So your claim that you have scientific proofs for your position is absurd. You don’t even understand the principles behind the scientific method much less have any proofs to challenge the conclusions of the theory of evolution. Nothing personal ram, but your claim to have ‘scientific’ proofs of your position is simple untrue. You have nothing but a lot of misguided ideas that have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the scientific theory of evolution. |
|
|
|
The thing is, the facts, the "evidence," are the same NO MATTER WHAT you
believe. The points made in this argument from both sides, therefore, are moot, because you can't PROVE either one. It all boils down to what your personal beliefs and perspectives are. I believe in evolution, but I believe we were CREATED by God first, and then further EVOLVED to what we are today. I don't believe mankind, however, evolved (originated) from apes. I believe apes are apes and humans are humans. There's no sense, really, in arguing with a "nonbeliever" about any of these kinds of issues because I don't think they'd ever be convinced of any of it, unless God Himself came down and proved He really does exist. And even then I'd still think some of them would claim it was all "smoke and mirrors." |
|
|
|
Very good point JeanC
The idea of CREATED EVOLUTION puts me even more in awe of the big guy. to think that god created us knowing what we would need in the future and making it possible for us (and all things) to EVOLVE at the time we would be ready to do so. Makes me wonder what we might evolve into as we continue to move into the next level of our creation. |
|
|
|
watt came first the chicken or the egg.as far as i know there is no
evidence for evolution plenty of evidence for extinction though.the biodiversity of life on this planet is deminishing faster than we can name watt is already in existence and is mostly due to the activities of humanity.i dont no how it all came about and i know i never will there are mysteries in life and they will never be solved Darwin doubted his own theory .and a theory is only an idea that is intended to explain something in the end darwin was a confused man . |
|
|
|
ya know i was gone for about one week from this subject and you guys are
still fighting over which came first?The creationists or evolutionists. Why doesn't everyone just say that there are conflicting theories, it is one of those world mysteries, it will never be settled, and be done with it. Start a new thread. Like how to stop world hunger, the drug problem, working toward world peace and so on. ![]() |
|
|
|
I absolutely agree with those who wish to believe in a 'created
evolution". I certainly believe this way. The theory of evolution is NOT a religion. It makes absolutely no statements about whether or not there is a supreme being. People who believe that evolution is somehow an atheistic religion are totally wrong. Evolution is a scientific theory based on observations and nothing more. People who want to pit Evolution against Christianity are simply saying that if evolution is true then Christianity must be false. THEY are the ones who are coming to that conclusion. I personally have a myriad of reasons to reject Christianity as a possible religion of my choice without even thinking about evolution. So I have no need to worry about any incompatibilities that might exist between Christianity and evolution. |
|
|
|
evolution vs creation make up ya mind Abra in one breath you speak of
creation of elements in stars and then evolution took place due to that creation ??????i dont have a clue watts goin on. |
|
|
|
Well, Abra, I agree..but I suppose it does, if a person uses it to
"prove" or "disprove" one versus the other. |
|
|
|
KariZman wrote:
“evolution vs creation make up ya mind Abra in one breath you speak of creation of elements in stars and then evolution took place due to that creation ??????i dont have a clue watts goin on.” Using the word ‘create’ does not imply a deity at work. Your car creates pollution. Creation by physical processes. Besides, I’m not an atheist in the strictest sense of the word. I just don’t believe in the dogma of Christianity. I believe that god is this universe. And so are we. Therefore we are directly connected with god. We cannot exist without god. Precisely how it all works I don’t pretend to know. I just know that the idea of god as a completely separate judgmental egotistical entity is a very cold and uninviting concept to me. And if we are completely separate from god like that then what they hell are we? For that to be true we’d have to be individual entities in our own right. In other words we have to exist independent of god in our own right if god is completely separate from us. I much prefer to believe that this universe is god and that I am directly connected and part of god. I have no separate existence of my own. I am this universe. I arose from it, and I will go back into it when my physical body dies. I have always existed and I will never cease to exist because I am this universe. I am very comfortable with this picture of god. Christians are always searching for a ‘higher purpose’. From my point of view god’s purpose for me is to simply be who I am in this life. That *is* my purpose. There is no higher mystery to solve. Life is the answer to its own riddle. There is no other answer to seek. God is this universe. Is so simple. No need to keep searching for answers. Life is the answer. Appreciate it, stand in awe of it. Realize that the universe is your home, it’s where you belong, and every other living creature in this world is your spiritual brother. The idea of a separate egotistical god is so detrimental to this beautiful picture. It causes people to think that life is just a temporary place and we are all somehow separate little egos competing to get into heaven. we lose respect for our home, our planet, our brothers. We see people as being completely separate egos. Let those basta*d find their own way to god! If they don’t shape up they’ll all go to hell where they belong! That’s the kind of attitudes that spring from thinking of god as an external separate entity. Religions like Christianity breed bigotry and hatred. They cause people to think of the is universe as just a temporary place that they will be leaving when they go to heaven. They show no respect for the universe or each other and instead of loving each other and the universe they just want to kill each other and get the hell out of here and go to heaven for the rest of eternity. That kind of thinking is what destroys the human spirit. Down with separate egotistical gods and idol worship! Learn to love the universe that you are. Learn to love your fellow man who is genuinely your brother in every imaginable sense of the word, and not just in some artificial philosophical or moral sense. We are all one. We are this universe. We are god. God is us. There is no separate ego in the sky. No confusion here KariZman. All my beliefs fit together perfectly. And evolution fits right in like a glove. |
|
|
|
Abra I so agree with you.
God is this universe. I merely say it with diferent words. God is in all things. Because God is all things. _______________________________________ Extinction... What happens to creatures that can not evolve or adapt to the changing environment. Possible proof of evolution... The recent discovery that T-Rex has the same DNA as a chicken (if true) would mean that T-Rex evolved. |
|
|
|
Oh boy....How I could talk for hours on this one
![]() |
|
|