Topic: Life arises from consciousness and other choices.
creativesoul's photo
Wed 06/18/08 10:31 PM
My heightened awareness is a direct result from having a good memory which retains the knowledge of what has been perceived.

laugh

Get it yet?

no photo
Wed 06/18/08 10:58 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 06/18/08 10:59 PM




The teachings of Eckankar are Hindu in origin.


Yes I know, that really is no big secret, even when I was involved with it, it was clearly an eastern religion.


Abra said:

I thought at one time you had said that Eckankar was also based on ideas of Christianity. That they believed in Satan and that Satan was behind the Bible somehow?

That's something I could believe. laugh

But how did they fit that in with Hinduism?


Eckankar implies that the earth is the dominion of a god called Kal Nirangin who is both good and evil. Kind of like the yin and yang, positive and negative. That is the duality of this world ruled by a dual natured god.

This god is worshiped as both the creator ~ and is also the negative aspect ~ or the devil. If you worship the creator, as Christians do, Eckankar claims that you are worshiping Kal, the dual natured god who is also "the devil" which is the negative aspect of that god.

Eckankar's book "The flute of God actually was quite freeing in nature." If frees you from the Dogma of religion. I think that was Twitchell's intent. I did get a lot from the spiritual teachings he compiled.

JB

:smile: Whatever Paul Twitchell was, it is clear his Eckankar was based upon ancient and powerful sacred truths. :smile: Seperate the message from the messenger.:smile:


"Separate the message from the messenger."flowerforyou

I always try to do that.

Jane Roberts, Channeled material called "The Seth books." I was not all that excited about reading channeled stuff but I read her book "The Nature of Personal Reality" and I really liked it.

I didn't much care where the information came from. It was great stuff.

JB

no photo
Thu 06/19/08 12:53 PM
In contemplating the non-existence of nothing, infinity and the fabric of the universe I have an idea about its nature that is very abstract.

If reality is holographic in nature that would mean that everything is a reflection of light projected from a two dimensional surface. All information for this universe is stored on this two dimensional surface and projected into the area of this three dimensional world in which we live. Yes, it is like a holographic program powered by some kind of light energy. Think of it as a giant microchip or holographic film.

The true self behind the life living within the matrix is contained within the light that powers the hologram, and like a hologram, the self is splintered into infinite points of view.
(That would be all things including us.) The true self does not exist within the matrix, but is "plugged into it."

Later..
JB





Abracadabra's photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:30 PM
Edited by Abracadabra on Thu 06/19/08 02:56 PM

5) No derogatory or offensive references to sex, gender, ethnicity, religions, or sexual orientation.

I swear that I will Report every single post that you make which is derogatory to Christianity or any other religion.


Stating that all deity-based religions must necessarily reduce to pantheism is hardly a derogatory statement. It's just an observation of fact.

It could only be considered to be derogatory if a person views pantheism in a negative way.

This is certainly not my view. Patheism merely states that all thing arise from spirit. There's nothing derogatory about that. flowerforyou

feralcatlady's photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:37 PM


In making a comparison to Religion, the Father, the son, and the holy spirit this is what I imagine:

"The father," is the I AM of the entire universal body.
"The holy spirit" is consciousness, a moving current and this is "the word."
"The son" is the body or bodies it creates as environments to inhabit.

JB



"The Father God" The Creator and Father of all the universe.

"The Holy Spirit" Is what enters you when you have a personal
relationship with The "Father God" and His Son Jesus Christ.

"The Son" The living Son of the Creator and One that brings "Salvation"

no photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:38 PM


I'm perfectly calm. But if you notice that I quoted the forum rules and Abra breaks them. Surely you realized that.


I don't break any rules that proselytizers of Christianity don't break.

If they can come onto the forums proclaiming that Jesus Christ is the only true God and everyone who doesn't bow down to him is rejecting God and is a hell bound heathen,...

Then I can certainly proclaim that the Bible appears to be totally fabricated by man and can't possibly have anything to do with any supreme being.

Christian proselytizers have been breaking the forum rules forever, and they continue to do so. If you want to get technical about it. :tongue:




Abra,

If someone breaks the rules, you should report that person. Or ignore their posts. You should not also break the rules. Two wrongs do not make a right.

MirrorMirror's photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:38 PM

I find it interesting that mirror holds consciousness(awareness) contingient upon senses also...

And because Mirror is not at odds with JB...

James agrees! laugh

Do you not remember these words from me, at the very beginning of this?

Awareness(the ability to think consciously) requires perceptual capability...

Perceptual capability is completely contingient upon the physiological constructs of the five senses.

Try to visualize something without having vision nor touch.

Consciousness is bi-product of having a physiological existence.

Thought is non-existent without the five senses.


laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Can I say double standard out of both sides of my mouth? :wink:

----------------------------------------------------------------

Mirror states...

Ive thought about this:

I can offer my explanation in terms of Karma.

The more senses a living thing possesses

The higher its conciousness

This (the senses)has been the standard for determining Karma

In the eastern world for centuries.

So it stands to reason that conciousness

would be measured by the same standard


Then Abracadabra says this in response... huh


Sounds good to me Mirror.



I am so done with such nonsense...

Some folks seem historically and culturally retarded, by sheer will!

Let us not forget the claim that it does not require knowledge to be intelligent either...

laugh

Oh my... I gotta get outta here before I truly do tempororarily become that which I have been falsely accused of out of sheer vengeance...

And quote at least ten different times someone here has contradicted their own previous words.

I am better than that!

Enjoy your sarcasalad...

I need something a little more substantive... like a coffee bean, Kona style...

ohwell









flowerforyou Sorry Creative,flowerforyou


flowerforyou I see now that I said the same thing as you.flowerforyou

Abracadabra's photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:44 PM
The rules state that you can't make derogatory statements about another's religion.


When Chistians say that Jesus Christ is the ONLY GOD and everyone who doens't believe in him is a hell bound heathen, they are automatically making a derogatory statement about every non-Christian belief system.

I've been here for a long time and I've had my fill of his hate and vitriol for Christianity.


Then don't read my posts. No one is forcing you to read them. You know what my positon is.

I see Christian proselytizing as spewing hatred to all non-believes of Christianity, yet they hide behind the facade that they are spreading love.

Yeah right. You're just upset because I make such great points and you can't compete with them.

You know that I'm right and it angers you.

You're allowing you emotions to overwhelm you.

You disagree with my position and you can't stand it.

You would love to see me kicked off the forums.

But I don't make personal attacks on people like you are currently attacking me. flowerforyou

Abracadabra's photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:49 PM

Abra,

If someone breaks the rules, you should report that person. Or ignore their posts. You should not also break the rules. Two wrongs do not make a right.


I'm sorry Spider but I'm not breaking the rules.

When I suggest that the Bible appears to have been written by men with an agenda to control people. That is not breaking the rules.

I'm not saying that anyone is wrong for believing it.

I'm not claiming that anyone is rejecting God.

I'm not suggesting that anyone is hell bound for how they believe or don't believe.

I'm just stating a perfecly legitamate position that I feel the bible was written by men and can't possible be from an all-wise creator of this universe.

That is not breaking any rules. It's just an opinion.

Christians on the other hand do break the rules because they are telling other people that they are rejecting God if they don't believe in the bible.

I don't tell anyone how to interact with God. flowerforyou

I don't break the rules Spider.











no photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:56 PM

When Chistians say that Jesus Christ is the ONLY GOD and everyone who doens't believe in him is a hell bound heathen, they are automatically making a derogatory statement about every non-Christian belief system.


There is a huge difference between believing your own beliefs to be the truth and proclaiming that another's beliefs are not true.


You know that I'm right and it angers you.


No, you are very wrong. You interpret scripture like you have an agenda to make Christianity look as bad as possible. You rarely say anything positive about your beliefs without throwing in a handful of insults for Christianity.


You're allowing you emotions to overwhelm you.


I'm perfectly calm.


You disagree with my position and you can't stand it.


Yes, I disagree with your position. I have stood it quite long enough. I find the insulting of another's beliefs unnecessary. You don't have to insult Christianity to disagree with Christians.


You would love to see me kicked off the forums.


That is simply not true. I have asked you to stop speaking in a derogatory manner about Christianity for months. If I wanted you kicked from the forums, I would have reported your posts before now. I would love to see you discuss religion wouldn't trying to be offensive.


But I don't make personal attacks on people like you are currently attacking me. flowerforyou


I have not made any personal attacks. I believe you make derogatory comments about Christianity, so I warned you that I would start reporting your posts with derogatory language. What you posted is a personal attack, by falsely claiming that I made a personal attack against you.

no photo
Thu 06/19/08 02:59 PM
Abra,

I'm not going to waste any more time or space debating this with you.


5) No derogatory or offensive references to sex, gender, ethnicity, religions, or sexual orientation.


Derogatory

1. Disparaging; belittling: a derogatory comment.
2. Tending to detract or diminish.


If you believe that you haven't made derogatory statements about Christianity, then you have clearly not been reading your own posts.

feralcatlady's photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:08 PM
When Chistians say that Jesus Christ is the ONLY GOD and everyone who doens't believe in him is a hell bound heathen, they are automatically making a derogatory statement about every non-Christian belief system.



who said this......OMG let me at em.....this is such a bad bad filty lie........Christ is not the only GOD.....GOD IS TO


laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh



sorry abra couldn't resist.....



ok 10 lashings for Debbie with a wet noodle.

Abracadabra's photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:11 PM
ok 10 lashings for Debbie with a wet noodle.


Ok, you're just trying to get in on the spankings now.

laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:14 PM

I find it interesting that mirror holds consciousness(awareness) contingient upon senses also...

And because Mirror is not at odds with JB...

James agrees! laugh


So here you have admitted that you are "at odds with JB."
(And so many times you pretended not to be.)
I'm really sorry you feel "at odds" with me.


As for the rest of your post, Mirror was not saying the same thing that you were saying. I will go into it in more detail if you are confused on the issue.

JB

feralcatlady's photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:19 PM

ok 10 lashings for Debbie with a wet noodle.


Ok, you're just trying to get in on the spankings now.

laugh laugh laugh



I was really bad.....so lashings for me.....

feralcatlady's photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:21 PM


I find it interesting that mirror holds consciousness(awareness) contingient upon senses also...

And because Mirror is not at odds with JB...

James agrees! laugh


So here you have admitted that you are "at odds with JB."
(And so many times you pretended not to be.)
I'm really sorry you feel "at odds" with me.


As for the rest of your post, Mirror was not saying the same thing that you were saying. I will go into it in more detail if you are confused on the issue.

JB




I just have massive loves for JB.....we have each others backs......

no photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:26 PM
There is a huge difference between believing your own beliefs to be the truth and proclaiming that another's beliefs are not true.


noway Oh Really? huh Well if I believe a thing to be a lie or an untruth, I should not be disallowed or refrained from saying so.

It's called freedom of speech.

Are you against freedom of speech? Are you against freedom of expression? Are you against freedom of religion?

You are acting like you would love to be able to silence anyone who speaks out against your beliefs or says anything that slightly offends you.

Instead of complaining and trying to silence dissent for your beliefs, why don't you present a logical argument in an intelligent manner, that is positive and enlightening?

JB


no photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:34 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 06/19/08 03:49 PM


What?


Holy schmoly JB... enough of the holier than thou crappola....

You have your opinions, Michael has his..

Enough of the "I am right, and can hide behind my Brutal Truth banner. and all others MUST be wrong and watch me disseminate them all over the place, and shoot off my intellectual barbs"...

ENOUGH! It's offensive. and unintelligent and completely dispassionate.

Compassionate my arse!!!

Showing off, and attempting to PROVE you are right and someone else is wrong...

All I see is interegator and authoritarian guff.

ENOUGH!



Quite a lil stomp ya got there Jess ... laugh I have to agree with you on the barbs ...

sarcasm ... personal attacks ... language intended to demean ... all offensive ... and completely unnecessary ...


To Jesse and Artgirl,

I have re-read this entire thread and I honestly don't see any personal attacks, no language intended to demean, and nothing offensive from me to your friend Creative, so please enlighten me as to why you would make a statement like this. ...with a laughing head no less... huh

JB




feralcatlady's photo
Thu 06/19/08 03:37 PM



Here is the bottom line.

1.Either life arises from consciousness or

2.consciousness arises from life.

If consciousness arises from life, then perhaps life (and consciousness) is just a freak accident. This creates more questions than answers.

Of course the third option (answered by religion) is that a separate creator, the "All Mighty God" created everything.

But if this is the case, then where did this creator come from?
Therefore this solution also creates more questions than answers and just goes in a circle.

These are the three basic choices on the table you can explore for answers.

My evidence and personal experience, so far, point to number one.

The other two lead no where.

#2 leads to a finite (hence 'dead') accidental universe.

and #3 leads you in circles.. who created God?

I have yet to see a glimmer of any proof or evidence or reason that would shake me from path #1.

Life arises from consciousness.

JB


Where does consciousness come from?



Where does "god" come from?





God just is, was, and always will be

feralcatlady's photo
Thu 06/19/08 04:02 PM
Is It Edible?

Even without a brain to analyze what it's eating, the Venus Flytrap still manages to differentiate between insects and non-edible debris that might fall into its trap. This step is also mediated by the six sensitive trigger hairs. An insect caught inside the partially closed trap will continue to thrash about in an attempt to escape. It's guaranteed that at least one (if not all) of the trigger hairs will be tweaked by the insect's movement. This serves as the signal to close the trap entirely.

Inanimate objects like stones, twigs and leaves that fall into the trap, or objects that are placed there (what child can resist sticking the tip of their pencil into the trap to watch it close?), will not move around and fire the trigger hairs. If there is no further stimulation of the hair, the trap stays in its partially shut state until tension can be re-established in the leaves of the trap. This process takes about 12 hours, at which point the leaves spread apart again. The unwanted object either falls out as the leaves re-open or is blown out by the wind.

The selection process obviously isn't perfect; while the trap is out of commission, real food in the form of flies and spiders may be crawling all around the plant. Imagine if you had to sit with a chicken bone or peach pit in your mouth for 12 hours while the rest of your dinner sat on the table in front of you! The difference is that you are conscious of what you're eating, while the Venus Flytrap is a passive participant in choosing what it's going to eat for dinner. The process is actually a nifty way for the Venus Flytrap to get around two problems:

* It lacks a brain to tell it that it's biting down on something inedible.

* It lacks the musculature to spit it out.