you ladies can believe what you want, you will not convince us that have actually studied that situation that there isn't more to it period, our beliefs on this is more than just an "i think" situation.
we are smart enough to know. and i just happen to know that you ladies haven't even looked into it.

we're going in the same direction as korea as far as the communism goes and there's some people on this site that actually look forward to it lol.

cute!!!

oh well, you guys are cute anyway.

it doesn't matter, they have us by the things that count any way.

rose, everyone who posts a cut and paste on here is putting someone else's opinion, i don't see you guys scrutinizing those. i'm just going to have some fun with you guys lol.

i never even said it was a conspiracy. you guys are getting paranoid lol.

you guys are getting scary. i would call you a conspiracy theorist for thinking that i'm trying to present a form of conspiracy. you guys are paranoid about that now lol. you think i'm cospiring to present you nothing but conspiracies lol.

are you guys reading it or did you read a couple lines and figure there was nothing to it.

yeah, any news website that has articles, usually has a place at the bottom,that their subscribers can make comments on the article. nothing fishy about that.

LMAO!!!!!!!! i'm glad that you ladies aren't in forensic science. the first sentence on the article states this bill is sitting in committee and the blogger is't sure when it's going to come out. lol.......


"This bill is sitting in committee and I am not sure when it is going to hit the floor."

it's just a coincidence that it's happening globally lol.

that's a trillion dollars of 100 dollar bills, not a trillion dollars worth of $1 bills

go to this website this website to see what it looks like from 1 $1oo bill to the $10000 packet, 1 million bunch, then 100 million.

http://www.pagetutor.com/trillion/index.html

good, lets get this started. might as well be now.

i can vouch for andrew, he is very good at actually reading what you post and if you write something that he is skeptical about, he will actually read your source and doesn't have a problem telling you that he thinks your right after reading it. he is a very honest person.

wow, that would be a kicker.

explain andrew, i'm not up on that stuff yet.

didn't you invent them mirror?

this actually comes from a well known jewish website publication.


Last update - 08:07 08/03/2009
U.S. Army document describes Israel as 'a nuclear power'
By Amir Oren
Tags: nuclear, U.S., Israel

In a rare breach of official American adherence to Israel's policy of nuclear ambiguity, the U.S. military is terming Israel "a nuclear power" on a par with Russia, China, India, Pakistan and North Korea, all of which have declared their nuclear weapon status, and ahead of "nuclear threshold powers" Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, and the "emerging" Iran.

The reference to Israel as a nuclear power is contained in a document published late last year by the U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFCOM), the Norfolk, Virginia-based headquarters in charge of preparing American forces for their military missions worldwide, including in Iraq and Afghanistan. JFCOM's chief, U.S. Marine Corps Four-Star General James Mattis, also heads NATO's Allied Command Transformation.

Israel's nuclear program is rarely, if ever, explicitly mentioned in public, unclassified U.S. official documents. Classified assessments are usually published only years later, in response to Freedom of Information requests, in former officials' recollections or as part of historical research. It is virtually unheard of for a senior military commander, while in office, to refer to Israel's nuclear status.
Advertisement
In December 2006, during his confirmation hearings as Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates referred to Israel as one of the powers seen by Iran as surrounding it with nuclear weapons. But once in office, Gates refused to repeat this allusion to Israel, noting that when he used it he was "a private citizen."

JFCOM's "Joint Operating Environment" (JOE) document, with a forward by Mattis and drafted by a team of officers and civilians he selected, was signed in mid-November 2008 and posted on the Pentagon's Web site. It has generated protests by the governments of Mexico - whose potential collapse is depicted as a grave threat to U.S. national security - and South Korea, which resented the reference to North Korea as a nuclear power. Following the Korean controversy, JFCOM issued a clarification, noting that this reference does not reflect U.S. government policy, which has vowed never to accept North Korea as a nuclear power.

Asian arsenals

Regarding Israel, the JOE document warns of the danger of nuclear exchanges between countries in and around Asia. It notes that India and Pakistan have nuclear arsenals and delivery systems, that North Korea has tested a nuclear weapon and has enough fissile material to produce more nuclear weapons, and that Iran is "driving forward aggressively" toward its nuclear goals, unchecked by the international community's "confused reaction." This could serve as a proliferation incentive for other countries, the document warns.

"In effect," the document continues, "there is a growing arc of nuclear powers running from Israel in the west through an emerging Iran to Pakistan, India and on to China, North Korea and Russia in the east. Unfortunately, that nuclear arc coincides with areas of considerable instability [which] are of enormous interest to the United States."

General Mattis, a tough, thinking marine with several friends in the Israel Defense Forces, including a former military college classmate (retired Major-General Shai Avital, a former commanding officer of the Sayeret Matkal commando unit), conferred with Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi in NATO's Brussels headquarters last November, within days of signing the JOE document.

Mattis condemned the U.S. Air Force's "Effects Based Operations" approach to warfare, as employed by the IDF in the Second Lebanon War of 2006, citing lessons learned reported by IDF officers "in a very blunt way," as he recalled in a Washington speech last month. He praised the courage shown by Israeli soldiers, but noted that being brave is not enough to stop a rocket-propelled grenade.


http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1069303.html