No, I am not infatuated with anyone. Is it because she is not infatuated with you? See, that is the problem: you can't stand the fact that she won't listen to you. Control, control, control. Ever been accused of that? I am sure no more than ........ 99% of the time.)

What an utter waste of time trying to debate such a closed minded person.

And you constantly follow her around to remind her of that.

Hey ............... I'll be your friend!

BTW crap belongs in the bathroom not the kitchen and if it is hot in the bathroom you open the window, NOT inviting your friends in to look at the crap with you.

We should all behave. Our opinions are just that our opinions. If people could leave the personal attacks out of the debate all would go along better.

Yes but there were those WMD's...oh...I guess not....but the terrorists are in Iraq...oh, no there not...hmmmm...what were we there for???

We are there for the gold,
there for the oil
there to protect Israel.

HERE IN QUEBEC THIS LANGUAGE DEBATE HAS ALWAYS BEEN, I PERSONALLY WENT TO ENGLISH SCHOOL ONLY BECAUSE MY MOM DID AND HAD TO PROVE IT TO THE GOVERNMENT, OR ELSE I HAD TO ATTEND FRENCH SCHOOL. IF THEY DON'T ARGUE ABOUT ONE THING THE POLITICANS WILL FIND SOMETHING ELSO TO ARGUE ABOUT........

Quebec law appealed

OTTAWA -- The Supreme Court of Canada announced yesterday it will hear an appeal of the Quebec language law that limits who can attend English-language schools in the province.

The Quebec government is seeking to appeal a ruling by the provincial Court of Appeal, which struck down Law 104 last summer saying it violated the federal Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The law's aim was to plug a loophole in the Charter of the French Language that allowed students who had one year of private English schooling to continue their education in English.

I have watched his body language when he sits in on meetings with black leaders and he is very irritated and unconcerned with what they are saying. He has the new southern form of racism and he shows it.

did ya check out the lyrics

pretty much on tarket

i dont know whether to laugh or cry

that is sad

oseph Stiglitz, a Nobel Prize-winning economist and self-described opponent of the war, puts the final figure at a staggering $1 trillion to $2 trillion, including $500 billion for the war and occupation and up to $300 billion in future health care costs for wounded troops.

They say that the middle class is getting squeezed out. higher cost of goods along with higher taxes.

who is always trying to raise taxes, and who is always trying to lower taxes?

of course the real question in there is who can burden the responsibility to say enough is enough?


the dems say that raising the taxes on the rich will somehow ease the burden on the poorer.
and the republicans say, lowering taxes on everybody(and yes rich included) helps the poorer.

but no, some want redistribution of wealth(dems)

and some want freedom to earn and grow without penalization(repubs)


so who do i think will help the middle class? with 41 percent of my wages going to taxes i think it is reasonable to say which ever party decides to lower my damn taxes- which has been historically the republicans.

hello yanke....i was reading what you wrote to my friend miss symbelmyne..and you were the one who made the first remark..where the insultings are conserned..