Community > Posts By > italian_half

 
italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:47 PM


iF MEN werent such idiots then maybe we didnt have to get jobs and take full responsibilty for our kids......how about that OP????


now thats the kind of bs i'm talking about, yes lets all bash men because you got a dud. sorry lady most men are not idiots and you don't do all the raising of the kids ok? how bout i turn this right around huh? maybe if women weren't such self absorbed sluts i wouldn't have had to quit my job, lose my house and have most my possessions stolen when she walked out on me and my kid for a quick piece of ass.

just because thats me ex, doesn't mean all women are that way. maybe you should try looking beyond your past.


Sorry to hear that, sir.

That's one of the other problems that men and women face. A man can make 70% of the income in a marriage, but after a divorce, walk away with 50%.

Women can make 70% of in the income (though in lower percentages of married couples), but a man will be less likely to try to get the "his share" of the joint property.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:41 PM

I think you are all being too hard on him. I think that the feminist movement made us lose alot. I like having a man who will take care of the manly stuff. I like having the door opened for me. I like being taken out to dinner and not having to pay half, lol. I embrace being and acting like a woman. All he is saying is that he doesnt want to date a man. Some of his views are questionable, from how he words it, but I totally see what he is saying.


Maam, you rock! I guess I need someone to work on my wording. :)

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:39 PM

Let's get real, it may not be attractive to you but if I were you, I wouldn't speak for anyone but you and I surely wouldn't put myself in the same category as a real man.


I am speaking for real men. Sorry to offend the folks in the John Mayer camp. I wish you well in a relationship with someone who tries to show that she doesn't need a man, or shows you how much better she is than you.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:34 PM

I'm just wondering if women in their "50's" could be part of this topic. I love a strong decisive man that can make decisions that I admire. And I love being a soft, supportive partner who is a part of the decision making process in a relationship. I have a high powered position that requires me to make major decesion all day long, it is nice to have a partner that can take over the stesses of live.


Maam, you rock! I think women in their 50's could be included in this group. But, it seems that women in their 50's might have been influenced by the culture of the 50's. Consequently, they would be more pre-disposed to thinking that they should not try to show up a man, in a relationship.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:31 PM

I think alot of women have CHANGED through the years BECAUSE,
MEN, who are in power at many companies have VIEWED employee's based on their thoughts, and habits and life styles,BUT
20 years ago, most of the top white color jobs were held by MALES.
WOMEN seeing the boss being IMPRESSED with THEIR desire to watch and KNOW SPORTS, gave THEM an EDGE in their position at work.
So WOMEN have change to ACT, and BE, more in the LIFE-STYLES of males, to BE,,,,in their boss's minds,,,JUST AS INTELIGENT, and GOOD as their MALE EMPLOYEE'S.
WE NOW have MANY WOMEN CEO'S, 20 years ago, we had but a few.

WE ARE AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN EQUAL, but its NOT been SEEN by corporate, until the last 20 years and really the last 10 years.

Women were held REPRESSED by us men for to damm long.
So they have had many hurdles and LEARNED to ADJUST to the THOUGHTS that employers have.:wink: Just my THOUGHTS!!:heart:



Very interesting thoughts here.

Women may have become more "masculine" because they saw that as a way to get ahead in the business world. And, through cultural interaction, passed this trait along to other women. That may explain how we got to where we are today.

This cultural change has created a fundemental problem in the relations between men and women. Men and women are now both competing for the same prizes, which in some ways makes them competive against each other. However, the problem is, for a man to be attracted to a woman, or to have a successful relationship with her, he doesn't want to compete with her.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:22 PM




It seems that you come across more "career women" these days. Women who are in their thirties and forties, with looks fading fast, that still don't quite understand what men want.

For some reason, with all the intelligence and value this group gives to themselves, this miss a fundamental truth. Men are not attracted to women who try to compete with them.

Men, for the most part, excepting for contentious objectors, peace-niks, and fans of John Mayer, tend to like women to be feminine, soft, sensitive, etc - qualities that men typically do not (except as above) possess.

Why can't these women, take off the suit, stop watching Sports Center, and just be a girl?


You are entitled to your view, but please only speak for yourself, and do NOT equate you to men in general. Are you threatened by successful women?


In this case, I will only speak for manly men...

Sorry chief

There's nothing threatening about a successful women. I admire anyone who is successful, a good politician, or makes a lot of money, regardless, of race, creed, or gender. The point is: most men, even John Mayer fans, will agree that deep down we want a women - no matter how successful - to be the women in the relationship. Even if she's 100 times more successful that us, we don't want to compete with her.

As a man, we biologically (blame it on Darwin), don't want to be beaten by a girl. It's hard wired. So, if a women is very successful, she can find success in dating by not being so manly, and by not trying to show her worth to us. There are certainly many chauvinists, who don't respect women regardless of what they do, but, in general, successful women can find greater success in a relationship by being more of girl than the guy their dating.



Tell me, why would a woman, or anyone for that matter, want to become involved in a relationship that she is required to change herself for? If you don't like these particular kinds of women that you are describing then stay away from them. Maybe these women don't want more success in dating men that can't handle the way they really are.


Sir, you have a good point. I do stay away from women that:

1.) Want to give me knucks
2.) Want to bounce chests after a particually good pass of the football
3.) Want to show me how successfull they are and compare their success to mine
4.) Play basketball
5.) Brag about how much they don't need a man.

My thought here is that a women, who could brag about her position, or try to compete with a man, should not do so in a relationship. It's not attractive to men.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:17 PM

manly men? it's hard wired? dude where the hell are you getting this stuff? nothing says a man genetically has to win, thats called AN INFERIORITY COMPLEX. if you can't stand a women doing anything better then you, you better give up on life and just roll over and die. happens every day, no matter how good you are somebody is always better and it's a 50/50 shot that it could be a woman so get used to the idea.


The results of almost all athletic competitions suggest that men almost always win.... Perhaps being beaten by a women, in a physical contest doesn't bother some men. And perhaps, her coming home every night talking about how she is more successful than you at work wouldn't bother some men...

There's no inferiority complex here. It's just how men are wired. We don't want a women, who we are involved with sexually, to try to "one up" us.

Some men may not be wired in a manly way, sorry to hear that. For them, I have two tickets to John Mayer.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:06 PM

I don't NEED to compete with a man. I can take care of myself. I don't desire to take on masculine traits, and thoroughly enjoy being a woman. I seldom watch sports. I don't change tires.
Just because a woman is successful, does not mean she is not feminine. And just because she is older, doesn't mean her looks went down the toilet. BTW...any man who is intimidated by me is not the right guy for me anyway.


Maam, you rock!

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:03 PM


It seems that you come across more "career women" these days. Women who are in their thirties and forties, with looks fading fast, that still don't quite understand what men want.

For some reason, with all the intelligence and value this group gives to themselves, this miss a fundamental truth. Men are not attracted to women who try to compete with them.

Men, for the most part, excepting for contentious objectors, peace-niks, and fans of John Mayer, tend to like women to be feminine, soft, sensitive, etc - qualities that men typically do not (except as above) possess.

Why can't these women, take off the suit, stop watching Sports Center, and just be a girl?


You are entitled to your view, but please only speak for yourself, and do NOT equate you to men in general. Are you threatened by successful women?


In this case, I will only speak for manly men...

Sorry chief

There's nothing threatening about a successful women. I admire anyone who is successful, a good politician, or makes a lot of money, regardless, of race, creed, or gender. The point is: most men, even John Mayer fans, will agree that deep down we want a women - no matter how successful - to be the women in the relationship. Even if she's 100 times more successful that us, we don't want to compete with her.

As a man, we biologically (blame it on Darwin), don't want to be beaten by a girl. It's hard wired. So, if a women is very successful, she can find success in dating by not being so manly, and by not trying to show her worth to us. There are certainly many chauvinists, who don't respect women regardless of what they do, but, in general, successful women can find greater success in a relationship by being more of girl than the guy their dating.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 11:49 AM

Maybe women got smart and found a way to provide for themselves since history has shown as a woman ages, their husbands trade them in for a younger model. God forbid a woman depend on a man for security!!

I have a high powered position but neither wear a suit nor watch ESPN. I have bigger balls than a lot of men but that doesn't mean I can't be the woman in a relationship. I enjoy being a girl but by no means think you can run over me OR chain me to the stove.


You may be on to something here... Not depending on a man may the best choice for a women in her 30's and 40's, considering the posibillity that a man may "trade up". But, it's a paradox... How do you find a man, who by nature is looking for someone with a soft, non competetive side, and yet maintain your independence? (rhetorical)

I think you will find great success in dating because you "get it". You realize that men completely respect your position and success, and we don't need you to be chained to the stove, but at the same time, we don't want you high fiveing us during the super bowl, or trying to compete with us.

Maam, you rock!

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 11:41 AM

italian...

This is the year 2007, DUH

Not all women want to be in the kitchen, barefoot and pregnant. That was in the 50's....you know my MOM's generation of thinking.

Women of today, feel the NEED to participate in the world. If it wasn't for the fact that I had such a great job with good benefits I would not have survived with my sons.

Sorry but your way of thinking is just toooo OLD fashioned for me.

Good luck finding a woman who feels the way that you do.....



I love it when women point to the calendar and use that as an excuse. "It's 2007. That's old fashioned". It doesn't matter if it's 2007 or 2207, women and men are biogically different and a man, a true man, doesn't desire a women, who wants to compete with him. It's hard wired into us. Men are the hunter gatherers, and women are the support staff. That's not to say there's anything wrong with being on the support staff, but the point is: it's hard wired. We each have a role to play.

The point was not to say that women should be in the kitchen and not contributing. I work with many professional women that I respect, and admire, however, the point I am making here is not to compete. Don't get into a relationship with a guy and try to show him how you can do everything he can (or better). We all respect the accomplishments of women. However, when it comes to an intimate relationship. Blue is for boys and pink is for girls.

Unless you're interested in the same sex...

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 11:31 AM
Having worked in the credit card industry, I can tell you why rates are going up...

It's really not the fault the of credit card companies. It's simple math. More and more people have become irresponsible with their credit debt and are defaulting on the cards. Guess who has to pay back the $5000 credit card debt that someone defaults on? You do. All of the people who have cards pay, in the form of higher interest rates, for all the people that default on their cards.

Sorry guys, it's the american consumer, and their lack of responsible spending that's driving up the credit card rates.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 11:22 AM
It seems that you come across more "career women" these days. Women who are in their thirties and forties, with looks fading fast, that still don't quite understand what men want.

For some reason, with all the intelligence and value this group gives to themselves, this miss a fundamental truth. Men are not attracted to women who try to compete with them.

Men, for the most part, excepting for contentious objectors, peace-niks, and fans of John Mayer, tend to like women to be feminine, soft, sensitive, etc - qualities that men typically do not (except as above) possess.

Why can't these women, take off the suit, stop watching Sports Center, and just be a girl?

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 01:54 AM
Ear - Rear

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 01:48 AM
Thanks Rodney Dangerfield....

Back from the grave.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 01:38 AM
a first date?

It seems risky to me. Is it really safe?

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 01:30 AM
Gay porn?

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 01:01 AM
I so have the answer to this one - having done this many times myself...

The reason men do this is simple: SEX.

If a guy leaves you and immediately moves on to another girl that he's hot about, you're forgotten.

BUT... if the guy finds a girl that sucks in bed, or is not that hot. He might start thinking about the great sex he had with you and want you back.

THAT GOES DOUBLE... if he's solo for a while. A few months without sex and suddenly... "I have to have her back" (translation) "I have to have sex with her again"

We're basically animals.

My advice. Never go back to some guy who wants you back. Unless it's within a week of the break up.

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:52 AM
Maybe a take some of the RED out your photo...

italian_half's photo
Sun 12/09/07 12:08 AM

given my dating history i don't believe i've ever had a woman in love with me. but my dog on the other hand, he loves me to death and all i got to do is give him food and throw his ball. that help any?


Maybe try the ball thing on your next date...