100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
Topic:
Minnesota sports
|
|
Big game tomorrow!! Hope I get to see part of it someplace.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Lovin' the 50's
|
|
50s not so much, 60s got worse, 70s showing a little promise yet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Sugar daddy and sugar baby
|
|
hey everyone cheryl here from auburndale florida looking for a sugar daddy to take me out tonight any takers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
define casual
|
|
A casual relationship is sometimes referred to as a "no strings attached" relationship. Your both free to date who you wish, and will get together from time to time.. There are some that are in a casual relationship that don't date anyone else but more or less to everyone else your just friends.. It is best to define what you want to the other person,or if they are asking for it..Always make it clear.. 
 great thoughts!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Right the old "I ain't got time" go to excuse. Well maybe if you took the time , before wanting to show her your sausage then maybe you wouldn't have such a negative, whiny,demeaning opinion of women. Like I've posted before who knows what kind of person you really are like unless you take the TIME to know them, so talking about sex right from the start shows just what you are interested in, not them as a person just a object for your sexual gratification. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Impeachment
|
|
That is not an issue of her being female so much as her being sounding board for Trump. As usual Ms. Harmony, you make a sweeping statement that makes further argument fruitless so allow me to put up a hypothetical situation. Let's say in 2024 elections the Republicans nominate this lady and assume that the Democrat nominee is a man. 
Carly Fiona is a soft spoken, highly respected lady but is through and through a Conservative that makes Trump look like a school boy carrying his back pack of books. Would you vote for her - if she were the only woman candidate? And Gentlemen, the reason I enjoy posting pictures of these ladies is because it's rare to find such women of unusual caliber - excluding our few Mingle ladies of course. I was responding to a sweeping statement that democrats would have hated a female. And no, I don't vote for genders, I vote for candidates. I would vote for her IF I thought she was the best candidate, and I would not if I did not. Other black candidates ran before Obama. He was the first one I voted for because I thought he was the best candidate. Other females ran besides Hilary in my lifetime, and she is the first I voted for because I thought SHE was the best candidate. The best candidates, for me, 1, have experience working within the THREE branches of Government to understand the authority and limitations of their position and branch and a demonstrable understanding and knowledge of the constitution 2, have experience working in the non profit or public sector showing actual interest in helping people and/or military leadership that shows understanding of the duties of a CIC 3, and a character of maturity, respectability, diplomacy and integrity so they represent us well when interacting on the global stage with other leaders. Democrats have so far put a female and a minority candidate up for their presidential nominations, so again, I question why there would be any concern as to gender or race in how democrats align with candidates? What is 'progressive' about wanting to fill a position with someone that has experience, knowledge, integrity and respectability? Are those negatives for 'fiscal conservatives'? In my opinion, most politicians fall far short in many of those areas. I know there are people who would make an excellent President but they are too intelligent to even consider getting into the political quagmire! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please explain the "90 hours"? If your date lasts one hour per week, then after 90 weeks If it lasts two hours per week, after 45 weeks If it lasts ten hours per day... after 9 days! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Impeachment
|
|
That is not an issue of her being female so much as her being sounding board for Trump. As usual Ms. Harmony, you make a sweeping statement that makes further argument fruitless so allow me to put up a hypothetical situation. Let's say in 2024 elections the Republicans nominate this lady and assume that the Democrat nominee is a man.
Carly Fiona is a soft spoken, highly respected lady but is through and through a Conservative that makes Trump look like a school boy carrying his back pack of books. Would you vote for her - if she were the only woman candidate? And Gentlemen, the reason I enjoy posting pictures of these ladies is because it's rare to find such women of unusual caliber - excluding our few Mingle ladies of course. I was responding to a sweeping statement that democrats would have hated a female. And no, I don't vote for genders, I vote for candidates. I would vote for her IF I thought she was the best candidate, and I would not if I did not. Other black candidates ran before Obama. He was the first one I voted for because I thought he was the best candidate. Other females ran besides Hilary in my lifetime, and she is the first I voted for because I thought SHE was the best candidate. The best candidates, for me, 1, have experience working within the THREE branches of Government to understand the authority and limitations of their position and branch and a demonstrable understanding and knowledge of the constitution 2, have experience working in the non profit or public sector showing actual interest in helping people and/or military leadership that shows understanding of the duties of a CIC 3, and a character of maturity, respectability, diplomacy and integrity so they represent us well when interacting on the global stage with other leaders. Democrats have so far put a female and a minority candidate up for their presidential nominations, so again, I question why there would be any concern as to gender or race in how democrats align with candidates? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While it is possible, I don't think it is practical for most people. Their morality and their self image will not allow them to accept any type situation outside of monogamy. For those few who can embrace a polyamory lifestyle, it probably is an almost perfect loving, supportive relationship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really? Men who message inquiring about sex are just desperate ho's who don't have any self esteem and that's their way of picking the easy ones out of the herd . I mean who in there right mind is going to have sex with someone they don't even know? 90 hours is a good time to at least find enough out about that person, if they a psycho, a retard, or just wanting sex. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Minnesota sports
|
|
What a poor game to watch. Vikings chocked and had their butts kicked for it. Neither one of them is going anyplace in the playoffs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, shocking!!!! Why would someone think others would be interested in talking about sex? Terribly unpleasant conversation topic. Worse than religion or politics!!! All should be banned from the internet!!!!!!!
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Are you alone or lonely?
|
|
Force yourself to be out in public most days. Start to build a social life for yourself. So many ways to do this from being a volunteer for something, to taking some type of class, visiting a mid morning coffee shop, to doing a happy hour several times a week. Find what is a "fit" for you; try different things until you get there!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Addictions
|
|
This is simple!
NO drugs Limited gambling Limited shopping May not smoke in my presence Most things from there we can deal with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Impeachment
|
|
1. the House votes on Articles of impeachment (2 charges) 2. the leaders of House & Senate agree on rules of trial 3. AFTER agreement on rules the trial commences 4. the Senate acting as jurors take an oath to be fair and unbiased 5. the evidence is provided according to the rules of agreement 6. the jurors decision is limited to remove/or not remove the president... that is it, nothing else---if the Senate votes to remove the president he now is considered no more than any other citizen and can be prosecuted for any criminal charges brought against him... if they vote not to remove he will remain and business of the government will go forth as usual... Trump HAS been IMPEACHED, that will never change it is still unknown if he will remain... at present we are on step number 2 Thank you for the concise explanation. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Impeachment
|
|
It is becoming more obvious that it is all about politics. The vote totals reflect that and now Pelosi is talking about not forwarding the articles of impeachment to the Senate. That will give the democrats the ability to claim Trump has been impeached during the 2020 election. They only have to stretch this whole political mess out 11 months!! It will also free up the democrat senators running for president to continue with their campaigns. It is almost the same as you being arrested, charged with a crime and have it on the front page of your newspaper but never having a trial to prove your guilt or innocence. I heard that. In the news conference, however, which happened the same day as the vote to impeach, all I actually HEARD her say was that they were not making a choice about that YET, which sounds reasonably like they are actually going to make an INFORMED choice instead of just appeasing press with quick soundbytes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Impeachment
|
|
Things like giving military secrets to our enemies. Ordering our military or others to attack our citizens. Taking taxpayer money for personal use. Taking away some group's constitutional rights. Giving taxpayer money away to others. how about withholding taxpayer money from others in return for personal favors? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are you talking about the laws passed in 2018? I'm not aware of any new legislation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Enabling_Sex_Traffickers_Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Impeachment
|
|
It is becoming more obvious that it is all about politics. The vote totals reflect that and now Pelosi is talking about not forwarding the articles of impeachment to the Senate. That will give the democrats the ability to claim Trump has been impeached during the 2020 election. They only have to stretch this whole political mess out 11 months!! It will also free up the democrat senators running for president to continue with their campaigns. It is almost the same as you being arrested, charged with a crime and have it on the front page of your newspaper but never having a trial to prove your guilt or innocence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Impeachment
|
|
Things like giving military secrets to our enemies. Ordering our military or others to attack our citizens. Taking taxpayer money for personal use. Taking away some group's constitutional rights. Giving taxpayer money away to others.
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
