The difficulty with your argument - is the assumed premise that all of the information available is exhaustive. There's no way to demonstrate that, as it may well be that there are buried, somewhere on the planet, documenting the Genesis account from an earlier period. Also, there is no way to adequately determine that either account existed orally, long before they were physically documented. To say that anything preceeded Genesis, or Gilgamesh for that matter - is conjecture at best, since there is no record of supporting documentation outside of that which has been discovered, and no way of knowing if there in fact exists an even older account which predates both of these. The truth of these matters relies more on one's world view than it ever will of empirical evidence. and the same can be said for most of the bible. Correct. However, that doesn't make your post any more credible. |
|
|
|
Well you told me that my statement was incorrect yet you can not prove this...so. Krimsa said: The key tenets of flood geology are refuted by scientific analysis and do not have any standing in the scientific community.
Here's a partial list of the scientific community that disagree's with you.: Dr. William Arion, Biochemistry, Chemistry Dr. Paul Ackerman, Psychologist Dr. E. Theo Agard, Medical Physics Dr. Steve Austin, Geologist Dr. S.E. Aw, Biochemist Dr. Thomas Barnes, Physicist Dr. Geoff Barnard, Immunologist Dr. John Baumgardner, Electrical Engineering, Space Physicist, Geophysicist, expert in supercomputer modeling of plate tectonics Dr. Jerry Bergman, Psychologist Dr. Kimberly Berrine, Microbiology & Immunology Prof. Vladimir Betina, Microbiology, Biochemistry & Biology Dr. Andrew Bosanquet, Biology, Microbiology Edward A. Boudreaux, Theoretical Chemistry Dr. David R. Boylan, Chemical Engineer Prof. Linn E. Carothers, Associate Professor of Statistics Prof. Sung-Do Cha, Physics Dr. Eugene F. Chaffin, Professor of Physics Dr. Choong-Kuk Chang, Genetic Engineering Prof. Jeun-Sik Chang, Aeronautical Engineering Dr. Donald Chittick, Physical Chemist Prof. Chung-Il Cho, Biology Education Dr. John M. Cimbala, Mechanical Engineering Dr. Harold Coffin, Palaeontologist Dr. Bob Compton, DVM Dr. Ken Cumming, Biologist Dr. Jack W. Cuozzo, Dentist Dr. William M. Curtis III, Th.D., Th.M., M.S., Aeronautics & Nuclear Physics Dr. Malcolm Cutchins, Aerospace Engineering Dr. Lionel Dahmer, Analytical Chemist Dr. Raymond V. Damadian, M.D., Pioneer of magnetic resonance imaging Dr. Chris Darnbrough, Biochemist Dr. Nancy M. Darrall, Botany Dr. Bryan Dawson, Mathematics Dr. Douglas Dean, Biological Chemistry Prof. Stephen W. Deckard, Assistant Professor of Education Dr. David A. DeWitt, Biology, Biochemistry, Neuroscience Dr. Don DeYoung, Astronomy, atmospheric physics, M.Div Dr. Geoff Downes, Creationist Plant Physiologist Dr. Ted Driggers, Operations research Robert H. Eckel, Medical Research Dr. André Eggen, Geneticist Dr. Dudley Eirich, Molecular Biologist Prof. Dennis L. Englin, Professor of Geophysics Prof. Danny Faulkner, Astronomy Prof. Carl B. Fliermans, Professor of Biology Prof. Dwain L. Ford, Organic Chemistry Prof. Robert H. Franks, Associate Professor of Biology Dr. Alan Galbraith, Watershed Science Dr. Paul Giem, Medical Research Dr. Maciej Giertych, Geneticist Dr. Duane Gish, Biochemist Dr. Werner Gitt, Information Scientist Dr. Warwick Glover, General Surgeon Dr. D.B. Gower, Biochemistry Dr. Robin Greer, Chemist, History Dr. Donald Hamann, Food Scientist Dr. Barry Harker, Philosopher Dr. Charles W. Harrison, Applied Physicist, Electromagnetics Dr. George Hawke, Environmental Scientist Dr. Margaret Helder, Science Editor, Botanist Dr. Harold R. Henry, Engineer Dr. Jonathan Henry, Astronomy Dr. Joseph Henson, Entomologist Dr. Robert A. Herrmann, Professor of Mathematics, US Naval Academy Dr. Andrew Hodge, Head of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Service Dr. Kelly Hollowell, Molecular and Cellular Pharmacologist Dr. Ed Holroyd, III, Atmospheric Science Dr. Bob Hosken, Biochemistry Dr. George F. Howe, Botany Dr. Neil Huber, Physical Anthropologist Dr. James A. Huggins, Professor and Chair, Department of Biology Evan Jamieson, Hydrometallurgy George T. Javor, Biochemistry Dr. Arthur Jones, Biology Dr. Jonathan W. Jones, Plastic Surgeon Dr. Raymond Jones, Agricultural Scientist Prof. Leonid Korochkin, Molecular Biology Dr. Valery Karpounin, Mathematical Sciences, Logics, Formal Logics Dr. Dean Kenyon, Biologist Prof. Gi-Tai Kim, Biology Prof. Harriet Kim, Biochemistry Prof. Jong-Bai Kim, Biochemistry Prof. Jung-Han Kim, Biochemistry Prof. Jung-Wook Kim, Environmental Science Prof. Kyoung-Rai Kim, Analytical Chemistry Prof. Kyoung-Tai Kim, Genetic Engineering Prof. Young-Gil Kim, Materials Science Prof. Young In Kim, Engineering Dr. John W. Klotz, Biologist Dr. Vladimir F. Kondalenko, Cytology/Cell Pathology Dr. Leonid Korochkin, M.D., Genetics, Molecular Biology, Neurobiology Dr. John K.G. Kramer, Biochemistry Prof. Jin-Hyouk Kwon, Physics Prof. Myung-Sang Kwon, Immunology Dr. John Leslie, Biochemist Dr. Jason Lisle, Astrophysicist Dr. Alan Love, Chemist Dr. Ian Macreadie, molecular biologist and microbiologist: Dr. John Marcus, Molecular Biologist Dr. Ronald C. Marks, Associate Professor of Chemistry Dr. George Marshall, Eye Disease Researcher Dr. Ralph Matthews, Radiation Chemist Dr. John McEwan, Chemist Prof. Andy McIntosh, Combustion theory, aerodynamics Dr. David Menton, Anatomist Dr. Angela Meyer, Creationist Plant Physiologist Dr. John Meyer, Physiologist Dr. Albert Mills, Animal Embryologist/Reproductive Physiologist Colin W. Mitchell, Geography Dr. Tommy Mitchell, Physician Dr. John N. Moore, Science Educator Dr. John W. Moreland, Mechanical engineer and Dentist Dr. Henry M. Morris (1918–2006), founder of the Institute for Creation Research. Dr. Arlton C. Murray, Paleontologist Dr. John D. Morris, Geologist Dr. Len Morris, Physiologist Dr. Graeme Mortimer, Geologist Dr. Terry Mortenson, History of Geology Stanley A. Mumma, Architectural Engineering Prof. Hee-Choon No, Nuclear Engineering Dr. Eric Norman, Biomedical researcher Dr. David Oderberg, Philosopher Prof. John Oller, Linguistics Prof. Chris D. Osborne, Assistant Professor of Biology Dr. John Osgood, Medical Practitioner Dr. Charles Pallaghy, Botanist Dr. Gary E. Parker, Biologist, Cognate in Geology (Paleontology) Dr. David Pennington, Plastic Surgeon Prof. Richard Porter Dr. Georgia Purdom, Molecular Genetics Dr. John Rankin, Cosmologist Dr. A.S. Reece, M.D. Prof. J. Rendle-Short, Pediatrics Dr. Jung-Goo Roe, Biology Dr. David Rosevear, Chemist Dr. Ariel A. Roth, Biology Dr. Joachim Scheven Palaeontologist: Dr. Ian Scott, Educator Dr. Saami Shaibani, Forensic physicist Dr. Young-Gi Shim, Chemistry Prof. Hyun-Kil Shin, Food Science Dr. Mikhail Shulgin, Physics Dr. Roger Simpson, Engineer Dr. Harold Slusher, Geophysicist Dr. E. Norbert Smith, Zoologist Arthur E. Wilder-Smith (1915–1995) Three science doctorates; a creation science pioneer Dr. Andrew Snelling, Geologist Prof. Man-Suk Song, Computer Science Dr. Timothy G. Standish, Biology Prof. James Stark, Assistant Professor of Science Education Prof. Brian Stone, Engineer Dr. Esther Su, Biochemistry Dr. Charles Taylor, Linguistics Dr. Stephen Taylor, Electrical Engineering Dr. Ker C. Thomson, Geophysics Dr. Michael Todhunter, Forest Genetics Dr. Lyudmila Tonkonog, Chemistry/Biochemistry Dr. Royal Truman, Organic Chemist: Dr. Larry Vardiman, Atmospheric Science Prof. Walter Veith, Zoologist Dr. Joachim Vetter, Biologist Sir Cecil P. G. Wakeley (1892–1979) Surgeon Dr. Jeremy Walter, Mechanical Engineer Dr. Keith Wanser, Physicist Dr. Noel Weeks, Ancient Historian (also has B.Sc. in Zoology) Dr. A.J. Monty White, Chemistry/Gas Kinetics Dr. John Whitmore, Geologist/Paleontologist Dr. Clifford Wilson, Psycholinguist and archaeologist Dr. Kurt Wise, Palaeontologist Prof. Verna Wright, Rheumatologist (deceased 1997) Prof. Seoung-Hoon Yang, Physics Dr. Thomas (Tong Y.) Yi, Ph.D., Creationist Aerospace & Mechanical Engineering Dr. Ick-Dong Yoo, Genetics Dr. Sung-Hee Yoon, Biology Dr. Patrick Young, Chemist and Materials Scientist Prof. Keun Bae Yu, Geography Dr. Henry Zuill, Biology Now - you were saying.......... |
|
|
|
Prove that statement. Krimsa said: The key tenets of flood geology are refuted by scientific analysis and do not have any standing in the scientific community.
I guess its another one of those "well known facts" like Hitler was not a Catholic. Prove what statement? That your claim that the "scientific community" has facts that the Biblical Flood did not occur? Of course they don't. There's no empitrical evidence to demonstrate this "fact" - as you claim. My proof is in the fact that there is no proof to substanciate what the "scientific community" to which you refer claims (by your assertion). In addition to this - there is a Scientific Community of Creationist which has laboratories and offices in countries all around the world. But - we all know that if someone is a believer - they can't be a Credible Scientist according to your world view. That is a cop out plain and simple. You stated that my assertion was a fallacy. I made a point of quoting myself to demonstrate the exact sentence that you were claiming was fallacious. So, what’s the hold up here? Yes. I make this claim that you cannot support your assertion without demonstrating that the scientific community to which you refer shares the same world view, and by comparison - you will find as many scientists who disagree with your statement than you do who agree. Therefore - this "Community" to which you give such high reguard - is split along "Party lines" as it relates to world view. Is this clear? I have already stated it as fact. You chose to quote me and claim that it is a fallacious statment. That burden is now on you to substantiate. Obviously - it's unclear to you. |
|
|
|
We know that God isn't material (or if your a Pantheist, he's all material) and we know that no one has seen God (with the exceptions of those using some really potent drugs). Eljay, Clearly you're idea of pantheism is truly warped. Abra; I wasn't actually attempting to define Pantheism with that post. Surely you know through our many posts in the past that I'm well aware that the God of Pantheism is more involved than "God is all - all is God", I was merely looking to have some boundries set. But I will say your post offers a concise response to the O.P. |
|
|
|
Prove that statement. Krimsa said: The key tenets of flood geology are refuted by scientific analysis and do not have any standing in the scientific community.
I guess its another one of those "well known facts" like Hitler was not a Catholic. Prove what statement? That your claim that the "scientific community" has facts that the Biblical Flood did not occur? Of course they don't. There's no empitrical evidence to demonstrate this "fact" - as you claim. My proof is in the fact that there is no proof to substanciate what the "scientific community" to which you refer claims (by your assertion). In addition to this - there is a Scientific Community of Creationist which has laboratories and offices in countries all around the world. But - we all know that if someone is a believer - they can't be a Credible Scientist according to your world view. That is a cop out plain and simple. You stated that my assertion was a fallacy. I made a point of quoting myself to demonstrate the exact sentence that you were claiming was fallacious. So, what’s the hold up here? Yes. I make this claim that you cannot support your assertion without demonstrating that the scientific community to which you refer shares the same world view, and by comparison - you will find as many scientists who disagree with your statement than you do who agree. Therefore - this "Community" to which you give such high reguard - is split along "Party lines" as it relates to world view. Is this clear? |
|
|
|
Why no, in fact one of the founders of creationism says so himself: Even prominent creationists like Henry Morris and Duane Gish (who pretty much created scientific creationism) admit that creationism is not scientific in creationist literature. In Biblical Cosmology and Modern Science, Morris, while discussing catastrophism and the Noachic flood, says: “We cannot verify this experimentally, of course, any more than any of the various other theories of catastrophism [e.g. Velikovsky], but we do not need experimental verification; God has recorded it in His Word, and that should be sufficient.” This is a statement of religious faith, not a statement of scientific discovery. Even more revealing, Duane Gish in Evolution? The Fossils Say No! writes: “We do not know how the Creator created, [or] what processes He used, for He used processes which are not now operating anywhere in the natural universe. This is why we refer to creation as special creation. We cannot discover by scientific investigation anything about the creative processes used by the Creator.” So, even leading creationists basically admit that creationism is not testable and clearly state that biblical revelation is the source (and “verification”) of their ideas. If Creationism is not considered scientific by the movement’s own leading figures, then how can anyone else be expected to take it seriously as a science? Anyhow, I like the irony of the Church (one man in a robe) throwing people in jail for scientific heresy and now the chicken has come back to roost. We are in total agreement. But you couls plug "Evolution" into this entire paragraph, and it would be unrefutable. And to clarify - "Evolution" in this term relates to the origin of species. |
|
|
|
ELJAY Hi doll ok carry on. |
|
|
|
how about DR. KENT HOVIND? i know you'll find a lot of people that disagree with him but that doesn't make them right. did you actually watch what DR. BROWN HAD TO SAY? or read icons of evolution.these people aren't trying to you saved but rather giving you more information to consider besides the one-sided evolutionary view What makes the people who disagree with Dr. Hovind's "Theories" right is scientific fact. And what would have really happened, had his "theories" actually happened. No it isn't - because "scientific fact" means that if can be either verified of disproved through experimentation. Now where is the documentation done to verify that Hovind has been "proven" wrong? And don't presume because I ask this question that I assume he's right, because I make no claim to that effect. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Eljay
on
Thu 02/05/09 12:12 PM
|
|
Prove that statement. Krimsa said: The key tenets of flood geology are refuted by scientific analysis and do not have any standing in the scientific community.
I guess its another one of those "well known facts" like Hitler was not a Catholic. Prove what statement? That your claim that the "scientific community" has facts that the Biblical Flood did not occur? Of course they don't. There's no empitrical evidence to demonstrate this "fact" - as you claim. My proof is in the fact that there is no proof to substanciate what the "scientific community" to which you refer claims (by your assertion). In addition to this - there is a Scientific Community of Creationist which has laboratories and offices in countries all around the world. But - we all know that if someone is a believer - they can't be a Credible Scientist according to your world view. |
|
|
|
The Supreme Court already ruled against Creationism for two reasons: 1. It is not accepted science 2. It is a veiled way to slip religion into the classroom. It would be ok to teach in philosophy, but it is not a science. Wait... wait, let me check my calendar... ok yeah it is 2009, not science. While I don't disagree with you that Creationism is in fact - not a science, I will say two thngs about this post. 1) Evolution is not a science for the same reason Creationism is not. 2) 9 men in robes with backgrounds and degrees in Law mean S.T.A.T. to e when it comes to validating the facts about anything to do with Science OR Philosophy. So what was your point? That Creationism is not a Scince because the Supreme Court said so? Please tell me that your not expecting to swallow that cr@p. |
|
|
|
the more actual science they use(NOT THEORIES AND GUESSES)testable science only helps to support the bible i.e... the flood,soddom and gomorrah,young earth CREATION!!! Well lets start with the flood shall we? Modern geology, and its sub-disciplines of earth science, geochemistry, geophysics, glaciology, paleoclimatology, paleontology and other scientific disciplines utilize the scientific method to analyze the geology of the earth. The key tenets of flood geology are refuted by scientific analysis and do not have any standing in the scientific community. What are you talking about exactly and where are these actual "scientists" that are on board with Noah's Flood? I would like to do a little background checking on their academic qualifications. Im sure you dont mind. Actually - you are incorrect in your assertion. It is well known that the scientific community is quite split on this issue of a world catastrophic flood, and the only agreement which can be found in the scientific community is amoungst the split in world view. Check your facts before you make erronious statements like this. |
|
|
|
The difficulty with your argument - is the assumed premise that all of the information available is exhaustive. There's no way to demonstrate that, as it may well be that there are buried, somewhere on the planet, documenting the Genesis account from an earlier period. Also, there is no way to adequately determine that either account existed orally, long before they were physically documented.
To say that anything preceeded Genesis, or Gilgamesh for that matter - is conjecture at best, since there is no record of supporting documentation outside of that which has been discovered, and no way of knowing if there in fact exists an even older account which predates both of these. The truth of these matters relies more on one's world view than it ever will of empirical evidence. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Atheism Weak or Strong
|
|
I determine people to be what their actions demonstrate - not what they say. People lie. Actions don't lie - they are what they are.
Are these people are "real Christians"? "There is a long history of the persecution of Jews by Christians, starting with the burning of synagogues in the 4th century, to numerous killings of Jews who would not convert to Christianity, to the extermination of Jewish communities in many European countries, all the way to a number of extermination camps during World War II in Yugoslavia, headed by a Franciscan Friar and run by Catholics, which were the equal of the German kilns of Auschwitz — killing about half a million people alone in this small country." Also, Since people lie, actions of those people lie too. So, you really have no way of truly determining what the truth is. As to your quote - these people are not christians if all I have is the information provided. They may claim to be, their actions prove otherwise. In terms of whether or not someone is a christian - it's purely subjective as to man's perception, for no one but God knows the heart, and "the heart is wicked"... However - it doesn't take much discernment to doubt a claim when the actions are totally contradictory to that claim. It's easier to determine who's NOT a christain, than who is one. That's all I'm saying. For instance - I know you are not one, because you claim not to be one. Also, the manner of your posts indicate a serious doubt should you decide to claim to be one. Not hard to discern that. Now - I couldn't say that Morningsong was definitely a christian - but I know she claims to be one, and through the evidence of her posts, I have no reason to doubt her claim, because her actions support her claim. That's the test. I find it hard to grasp the idea that murder is a christain attribute. It contradicts the scriptures in this respect. No where in the New Testament is this condoned. Jesus even goes as far as to say that if you look at someone with hate, you have essentially commited murder. A far cry from determining the actions of those in your quote are "following Jesus", and doing what he said to do. It's illogical to state this is christian behavior when it is in direct conflict with the words of Jesus. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Atheism Weak or Strong
|
|
It is all about what authority you decide to accept and believe. If you decide to accept and believe the Church authority who tells you that the Bible is the word and work of God then that is your choice. The problem seems to be that not everyone accepts that authority, and the ones who do are put in a position to have to defend their authority. Hence all the debates about the Bible. Science just wants to learn the truth about things and when what they learn does not support the Bible, people get upset. Science is not the enemy of the Bible. It does not seek to destroy religion. It seeks truth. I agree - though I think the bible itself speaks of it's authority. I don't need a leader of a church to tell me the scriptures are the word of God - the text tells me that. I long ago abandoned any church as a representative authority. I just see them as a group of people with a devotion towards God. Whatever God they may believe. I get my God from the bible - not a church. I will add that science is about the "How" of things, and not the "Why". Religion is more about the "Why" - and not the "How". The two are really not related. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Atheism Weak or Strong
|
|
You continue to claim that science has proven the bible wrong.
I know of no such claims that have empirical evidence to support it. What are you referring to? There have been plenty of examples given in multiple threads. It is not my job to bring them all nicely into one post for you to ignore anyway. I have not seen one example. If I had - I would have sited it. I don't ignore the posts - I agree with them if they're right, refute them if the logic is fallacious. But I knew you wouldn't give any examples. That's why I question your claim. It's fallacious. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Atheism Weak or Strong
|
|
Which is why I've asked you to demonstrate from the New Testament what makes Hitler a Christain.
I'm quite clear what the scriptures say that demonstrate why he isn't - I just don't see what supports him as being one, since we know by Hitory what Hitlers's actions were. It's not what you think the bible said that makes/ doesn't make Hitler a Christian. What makes Hitler a Christian is Hitler's OWN words on his OWN beliefs. We have presented enough of Hitler's own words on here, to proof to a reasonable person(i.e. Not You) that Hitler thought of himself as a Christian. Again, you use the passages that you want to use to define a Christian. Krimsa, myself, and others have brought up passages that disagree with you view. From what you keep posting, about your definition, it seems to me, that you definition of a Christian is someone who is without sin, but since human nature is not without sin, according to your definition, there is not a True believer on the planet. No - that's not my belief. No one is without sin. A Christian is just someone who is forgiven through their faith in Jesus. We are just in disagreement over semantics. I'm under the impression that to you - faith is simply belief. That if one claims themself to be something, they are. I determine people to be what their actions demonstrate - not what they say. People lie. Actions don't lie - they are what they are. A believer is essentially someone who knows they have sinned - that their sin has separated them from God, and that no amount of Good works can make up for it. They must understand, and believe that their sin sent Jesus to the cross - and this action was done to atone for the sins of those who believe that He did that for them. This is what the gospels boil down to. It was the reason Jesus came. To save the lost. His words - not mine. You and Krimsa may think that Hitler was a christian - but the bible, which by it's own claims are the word of God - demonstrate otherwise. I doubt that God thinks Hitler was a christian - since He made sure to inspire the writers of scripture to document those actions that cause self deception. |
|
|
|
I am curious if anyone can form a positive coherent Ontology for god. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmhVuOxuo_I&feature=rec-HM-rev-rn What is god? I doubt very much that anyone can. Also, there are many "gods" out there. I could attempt to respond to this question, as could Abra - but you will get two completely different responses. Throw Jeannie, Smiless and Funches into the mix, and it's off to the races. It is a thread of futility. We know that God isn't material (or if your a Pantheist, he's all material) and we know that no one has seen God (with the exceptions of those using some really potent drugs). So - should we set some boundries here? Do you want the God of Christainity, The Pantheistic God, Satan (the God of Satanists) Allah, Zeus, Isis, the list goes on. Where would you like this to head? |
|
|
|
Topic:
Atheism Weak or Strong
|
|
Charles Manson did the same thing when he sent Tex and the gang out to murder innocents.
What do you think - did Charles Manson follow a directive of God, or did he use pretext and find a passage to support his wild idea's? Let's put your understanding of Christianity to the test. So, if "God" tells you to do something that society tells us is bad, then you are crazy, and not a "True" believer. If "god" tells you to do something that society accepts as good, then you are a "True" Believer. But, "God" has a plan for everyone. Who are you, a mere mortal of a man, to question the Grand Plan that "God" has for us all? You tell us skeptics that we are picking and choosing what it is to be a Christian, yet you are doing the very same thing. God doesn't "tell" anyone anything. That's the point. It's already been said - that is why prophecy ended with John and Revelations. so the response to all of your questions is "No - not accrding to scripture". There isn't a picking and chosing of being a christian - it is there in scripture to be gleened. It doesn't change with perception, or supposition - it is what it is. It's unchanging. That is why the "No True Scotsman" analogy is fallacious, the two are non-analogous for this reason. What changes is the level of understanding and intelligence of those who are determining their subjective interpretations. Which is why I've asked you to demonstrate from the New Testament what makes Hitler a Christain. I'm quite clear what the scriptures say that demonstrate why he isn't - I just don't see what supports him as being one, since we know by Hitory what Hitlers's actions were. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Atheism Weak or Strong
Edited by
Eljay
on
Wed 02/04/09 11:51 AM
|
|
You've read the bible - and you're attempting to convince me that Hitlers actions were representative of a christain?
Forgive me if I say I don't believe you. Now, you are putting words in my mouth. I never once stated that Hitler was a representative of Christians. All I have stated is that Hitler WAS A Christian. What must you do to be saved? Say the right things. For by thy words thou shalt be justified. -- Matthew 12:37 Do the right things. And shall come forth; they that have done good, unto the resurrection of life. -- John 5:29 For you render to each one according to his works. -- Psalm 62:12 I the Lord ... give every man according to his ways, and according to the fruit of his doings. -- Jeremiah 17:10 When the wicked man turneth away from his wickedness ... and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul. -- Ezekiel 18:27 For the Son of Man will come in the glory of His Father with His angels, and then He will reward each according to his works. Matthew 16.27 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. -- Matthew 25:34-36 Who will render to each one according to his deeds. ... For not the hearers of the law are just in the sight of God, but the doers of the law will be justified. -- Romans 2:6, 13 For we must all appear before the jugment seat of Christ, that each one may receive the things done in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad. -- 2 Corinthians 5:10 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves into ministers of righteousness, whose end will be according to their works. -- 2 Corinthians 11:15 The Father, who without partiality judges according to each one's work. -- 1 Peter 1:17 I will give unto every one of you according to your works. -- Revelation 2:23 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works. -- Revelation 20:12-13 Believe the right things. A man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. -- Romans 3:28 Therefore, being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. -- Romans 5:1 A man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ. -- Galatians 2:16 For by grace are ye saved through faith. -- Ephesians 2:8 Do and believe the right things. Faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. -- James 2:17 Do the will of God. Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. -- Matthew 7:21 Believe in Jesus. Whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. -- John 3:16 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life -- John 3:36 Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved. -- Acts 16:31 Be born again. Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God. -- John 3:3 Hear the words of Jesus and believe in whoever sent him. He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life. -- John 5:24 Be born of water and the spirit. Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. -- John 3:5 Be washed by the Holy Ghost. Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration, and renewing of the Holy Ghost. -- Titus 3:5 Be converted and become like a little child. Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. -- Matthew 18:3 Believe and be baptized. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved. -- Mark 16:16 Call upon the name of the Lord. Whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved. -- Acts 2:21 Confess with your mouth "Jesus is Lord" and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead. If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved. -- Romans 10:9 Follow the commandments (at least some of them). If you want to enter into life, keep the commandments. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. -- Matthew 19:17-19 Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life. -- Revelation 22:14 Keep the commandments (at least some of them), give all your money to the poor, and follow Jesus. And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? ... Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother. And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. ...thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me.-- Luke 18:18-22 Keep the commandments and the faith of Jesus. Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. -- Revelation 14:12 Endure to the end. He that endureth to the end shall be saved. -- Matthew 10:22, 24:13, Mark 13:13 Wait until you die and then get baptized. Else what shall they do which are baptized for the dead, if the dead rise not at all? why are they then baptized for the dead? -- 1 Corinthians 15:29 Don't judge other people. Judge not, and ye shall not be judged. -- Matthew 7:1, Lk.6:37 Have lots of babies. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing. -- 1 Timothy 2:14-15 Don't defile yourself with women. (Be a virgin male.) ...the hundred and forty and four thousand, which were redeemed from the earth. These are they which were not defiled with women; for they are virgins. -- Revelation 14:3-4 Be given by the Father and come to the Son. All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. -- John 6:37 Be chosen (predestinated) by God. For many are called, but few are chosen. -- Matthew 22:14 For whom he did foreknow, he also did predestinate ... Moreover whom he did predestinate, them he also called: and whom he called, them he also justified: and whom he justified, them he also glorified.-- Romans 8:29-30 For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth. -- Romans 9:11 He hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love. Having predestinated us ... according to the good pleasure of his will. -- Ephesians 1:4-5 Be poor, not rich. Verily I say unto you, That a rich man shall hardly enter into the kingdom of heaven. And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God. -- Matthew 19:23-24 But woe unto you that are rich! for ye have received your consolation. -- Luke 6:24 Ye rich men, weep and howl for your miseries that shall come upon you. -- James 5:1 Be more righteous than the scribes and Pharisees. Except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. -- Matthew 5:20 Eat Jesus' body and blood. Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. -- John 6:53-54 Just ask. Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you: For every one that asketh receiveth; and he that seeketh findeth; and to him that knocketh it shall be opened.-- Matthew 7:7-8 All you need is love. Love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God. -- 1 John 4:7 He said unto him, What is written in the law? how readest thou? And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. -- Luke 10:26 Excellant. You've clearly demonstrated that Hitler was NOT a christain. Ordering the murder of over 3 million Jews is clear demonstration that he went against every single passage you've sited. So what criteria are you attempting to site from this post that he was, since you've clearly demonstrated that he wasn't? Why are you holding onto this lie? And why did you stop with these passages only? What about 2 Peter 1:5 "For this reason, make every effort to add to your faith goodness; and to goodness, knowledge; and to knowledge, self-control; and to self control, perseverance; and to perseverence, godliness; and to godliness, brotherly kindness; and to brotherly kindness, love. For if you possess these qualities in increasing measure, they will keep you from being ineffective and unproductive in your knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. But if anyone does not have them, he is nearsighted and blind, and has forgotten tht he has been cleansed from his past sins." 1 John 1:5 This is the message we have heard from him and declare to you: God is light; in him there is no darkness at all. If we claim to have fellowship with him yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not live by the truth. 1 John 4:1 Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether or not they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world. This is how you recognize the Spirit of God: Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does bot acknowledgecJesus is not from God. James 3: 13 Who is wise and understanding amoung you? Let him show it by his good life, by deeds done in humility that comes from wisdom. But if you harbor bitter envy and selfish ambition in your hearst, do not boast about ti or deny the truth. Such "wisdom" does not come down from heaven, but is earthly, unspiritual, of the devil. For where you have envy and selfish ambition, there you will find disorder and every evil practice. I'm having a hard time being convinced that Hitler was a Christian. |
|
|
|
Topic:
Atheism Weak or Strong
|
|
Can you disprove Gods Existence?
Can you prove god exists? If you understood the bible then you would
not title your self Atheist. You would call yourself more of an agnostic as you once were a Christian. Yes, I understood, and still understand, the bible. I also see it has nothing more than fictional stories made up to control man. The bible is a matter of Faith, which one cannot prove. However many Biblical Scholars and Historians have stated facts regarding the bible along with the prohets,Saints and many witnesses.
Science has already disproven many of the stories in the bible. Jesus Christ Crucifixtion and death along with his ressurrection are in numerous testimonies from the other New Testament writers, Early Church Leaders, and witnesses. He is the only known prophet out of all the religions in the world to call himself the Son Of God. There is too much evidence in History to refute his existence as a teacher, prophet and the Son of God.
You realize that the only real "evidence" of Jesus is the bible, right? Also many religions(that predate Christianity) have a god story similar to the Jesus story. Horus, an Egyptian God is one. When science can explain medical miracles or phenomenon's then you can question the existence of a God, however science cant and will never prove any mysteries or phenomenons that occur in this world our God created.
Science has already proven many things in the bible to be false, and one day, we will understand why medical "miracles" just happen. Just because we don't know why they happened, doesn't make them miracles. You continue to clim that science has proven the bible wrong. I know of no such claims that have empirical evidence to support it. What are you refering to? |
|
|