Community > Posts By > lu10nt

 
lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/24/16 06:45 PM

Instead you just don't think we are the same
type, what is this supposed to mean?
Just a guess...but maybe women just dont know what to say to a 27y/o Pokemon addict....


Read last post and although I proclaimed Addict, I struggle to find the time to play these days and also get bored fairly easily of it, I do enjoy other games of course, Skyrim, Halo, Medieval Total War to name a few. Doesn't make me a bad person. If the only difference between 2 people were that one plays pokemon and the other drinks a lot, smokes, does drugs then explain to me whats so bad about being a "geek"?

lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/24/16 06:40 PM

Don't fret friend. That person is not into gammers. Look elsewhere. Cheers. Also don't tell them your into Pokemon. Jkd. Look for gammers. Runner available, seeking Tanis.


To be fair though, the only reason I am into Pokemon is because if Pokemon wasn't apart of my life then I would be totally insane now because that time would likely have been used to overthink and depress myself about the reasons that no one else appears to be this Dark/Psychic type. Pokemon came AFTER the many failures and is as useful as Alcohol to an Alcoholic, it is my coping method with being lonely but isn't the reason I am lonely but could now be an added reason to why I can't find anyone as it has likely reduced my outgoings significantly and if someone that liked me found out that I play Pokemon could be the penultimate reason to turning me down. If only my Psychic typing actually meant that I was a mind reader, I doubt I'd have this problem

lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/24/16 05:42 PM
So I am sick and tired of hearing those words

your just not my type?

Now this is hurtful, because it is clearly that you don't dislike me because I am dull, boring, stupid, immature, skint, weak etc

Instead you just don't think we are the same type, what is this supposed to mean? I would rather "I just don't find you attactive" or "you are a total loser" because at least it gives me some indication as to why I can't find anyone who likes me.

So being a total Pokemon addict as my primary way of coping with being a total loner, I find it somehow Ironic that in Pokemon all pokemon have different types. Some are Water type, Fire type, Electric type and so on (total of 18 types) and some can be dual type so Fire/Ground type for example. So I thought that I needed to work out what type I am and try to find someone who is the same type as me.

I created an attempted question based "quiz" to determine what type I was. You only need to answer 3 questions and there are 324 possible outcomes. After creating and testing this quiz on myself I have discovered that I am Dark/Psychic type. The only Pokemon with this typing in its fully evolved form is Malamar. So if there happens to be any ladies out their who also happen to be Dark/Psychic type then look no further.

lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/24/16 05:30 PM
http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Trevenant_%28Pok%C3%A9mon%29

lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/24/16 05:26 PM
If religious people want to listen to the "knowledge" of one book from thousands of years ago against everything that we have learnt in the last year, 5 years, 10 years even 50 years then so be. Recorded history is quite a recent thing and that book isn't even recorded history. Just promise me one thing,

Pray for an end to all wars
Pray for an end to all poverty
Pray for an end to all diseases
Pray for the ability to inhabit other planets before our planet gets overcrowded
Pray for the ability to be immortal

Science could make all this happen eventually and potentially but if it all ends in the next few days then your Prayers will have been answered and you are right and I am wrong but until your Prayers have resolved any one of these issues, I will remain "ignorant" to the presence of God whom is obviously here its just that I haven't been granted the sight to see him. This is your cue to find some evidence he exists, perhaps something other than that age old book or just keep praying and hope you prove me wrong. I will tell you what, I will pray, TO GOD, for you religious people to prove me wrong, this is in your favour now massively. Can't wait for the wars to stop and poverty to cease and diseases to be wiped out and to be immortal. Can't wait to thank God in a few days when he does all this and can't wait to feel guilty for ever doubting him.

lu10nt's photo
Fri 03/18/16 06:16 AM
I have always found this an unusual topic, simply because, Why is it that ALL Ghosts are in Human Form, never seen a ghost cat, mouse, bird, giraffe, elephant, gazelle, flea..... I could go on.

The other thing to note is that ghost stories have only appeared with the last few hundred years and then the trail goes cold.

Lastly I can honestly say myself that I have seen "ghosts". I was sat on the sofa one day and my friend had gone home but then I noticed out of the corner of my eye my friend run from the back of the house to the kitchen, with our house you could walk around in a circle so I ran around the other way into the kitchen and my friend was not there. I questioned everyone else in the house and nobody saw him because he went home a few hours ago. For whatever reason I imagined it and have no idea why. Another occasion was when I caught a bus. I had waited for my bus and all of a sudden the number 38 bus came round. I got on the bus and it started to go on a different route. I asked the driver where we were going on it turned out I had got on the number 62 bus. Totally different number and said a totally different location but I got on the bus adamant that it was my number 38. Sometimes our eyes or mind can deceive us which is likely where ghost stories first came from but nothing more than stories. Watch Derrin Browns documentary of trying to prove ghosts existence and it will show you how "daft" "ghosts" are.

lu10nt's photo
Fri 03/18/16 05:56 AM




Quote from milesoftheusa "I do not need you to listen. we all have choices. Science is not bad. some of it is just purely man made."


Some perhaps, but most of it is thorough testing as to does 1 + 1 = 2 and if on any number of occasions it adds up to 3 then we need to analyses and see what went wrong with our predictions and calculations and test again and again until no matter how hard we try, 1 + 1 = 2. So when this comes down to the nitty gritty points about DNA and subtle differences, we start to learn something more intriguing about adaptations. Adaptations, in the long run are small gradual changes to select groups within a species that adapt and alter minor changes in their DNA to improve survival requirements. Inuits that live in sheer cold temperatures have adapted to survive in the cold conditions compared to others and notably, their DNA has altered to allow this change. Another is a tribe that spend about two thirds of their time in and underwater and through the course of time, unlike the majority of us they can see underwater crystal clear. With other tribes that consumed their dead ancestors became ravaged by Kuru Disease (A type of Brain Disease) but since they had been in the tradition of doing this ritual for so long many of the tribes survivors have since gained an immunity to Brain Disease. Everything can and will adapt to survive within such a small time frame to counter balance any changes in environment or lifestyle. The majority are likely to evolve subtle adaptations in response to our lifestyle changes of sitting around playing games or watching TV. None of these adaptations are Gods work it is simply more evidence in the evolution war chest. Scientists followed birth images of many mammals, including ourselves are noted how similar ALL mammals start out when being conceived. Us humans have gills present in our early stages but since we currently don't require these they are never developed and are in fact retracted during growth in the womb. If however like those who spend most of their time underwater adapted crystal clear vision, they could be more likely to adapt gills again to allow them to breathe more easily and mermen and mermaids could be a closer reality.

I don't need you or anyone to listen, but to open your eyes and perhaps your mind, sometimes the obvious is right in front of you.



Just prove Darwism? Duplicate it. Duplicate gills on a Human. More likely? Sounds like a lot of science ( We Believe it to be so) now is science not become a religion? Is that really science?


Did you need read the bit about adaptations, since a specie has adapted to its change in environment or lifestyle it passes down its new traits or changes in DNA to its offspring Thus, Evolution, Thus Darwinism! One thing at a time or perhaps in some cases several things at a time but note they are usually relatively small changes that over the course of time it looks like it happened all at once.

Science isn't a religion because we do not require a creator as our reason for being here and thus do not waste our time praying to empty rooms. Science is about being able to establish whether something works or whether it doesn't but whether it is possible to work and playing the "chef" by experimenting with ingredients or elements or DNA or other parts of science and mixing them to create a new recipe and provide guidelines for other people to understand why the recipe makes the cake and not something else. Science is simply understanding the fundamentals and since we have done most of that we are not trying to find more things to find. When you've learned to bake all the cakes known to man you move on to cookies, pastry's and so on until we can't possibly learn anymore science but this day will likely never arrive.

lu10nt's photo
Tue 03/15/16 09:33 AM
Edited by lu10nt on Tue 03/15/16 09:34 AM

lu10nt's photo
Tue 03/15/16 09:33 AM
Edited by lu10nt on Tue 03/15/16 09:34 AM

lu10nt's photo
Tue 03/15/16 09:29 AM

God is revealed in human beings now he was revealed in Jesus now his spirit is within us


So when I dissect a human body, where do I find this spirit and where is this bit of god that is within us. I failed anatomy and physiology terribly because I kept pointing to the heart and calling it my soul and my brain I thought was god and Spirit I thought was in the Stomach after drinking 50 glasses of Vodka the night before. So after getting over those hurdles, I never recall where soul, spirit and god are within the human anatomy. He was revealed in Jesus which was revealed in a book written in 400AD (yes that's right 400 years AFTER he was "born") that is pretty well revealed to be full of fascinating stories but that's all they are, children's stories.

Are we evolving yet? I bagsey the Adamantium Claws

lu10nt's photo
Tue 03/15/16 09:24 AM
Edited by lu10nt on Tue 03/15/16 09:37 AM


Quote from milesoftheusa "I do not need you to listen. we all have choices. Science is not bad. some of it is just purely man made."


Some perhaps, but most of it is thorough testing as to does 1 + 1 = 2 and if on any number of occasions it adds up to 3 then we need to analyses and see what went wrong with our predictions and calculations and test again and again until no matter how hard we try, 1 + 1 = 2. So when this comes down to the nitty gritty points about DNA and subtle differences, we start to learn something more intriguing about adaptations. Adaptations, in the long run are small gradual changes to select groups within a species that adapt and alter minor changes in their DNA to improve survival requirements. Inuits that live in sheer cold temperatures have adapted to survive in the cold conditions compared to others and notably, their DNA has altered to allow this change. Another is a tribe that spend about two thirds of their time in and underwater and through the course of time, unlike the majority of us they can see underwater crystal clear. With other tribes that consumed their dead ancestors became ravaged by Kuru Disease (A type of Brain Disease) but since they had been in the tradition of doing this ritual for so long many of the tribes survivors have since gained an immunity to Brain Disease. Everything can and will adapt to survive within such a small time frame to counter balance any changes in environment or lifestyle. The majority are likely to evolve subtle adaptations in response to our lifestyle changes of sitting around playing games or watching TV. None of these adaptations are Gods work it is simply more evidence in the evolution war chest. Scientists followed birth images of many mammals, including ourselves are noted how similar ALL mammals start out when being conceived. Us humans have gills present in our early stages but since we currently don't require these they are never developed and are in fact retracted during growth in the womb. If however like those who spend most of their time underwater adapted crystal clear vision, they could be more likely to adapt gills again to allow them to breathe more easily and mermen and mermaids could be a closer reality.

I don't need you or anyone to listen, but to open your eyes and perhaps your mind, sometimes the obvious is right in front of you.

lu10nt's photo
Tue 03/15/16 09:10 AM

The proof of the creator is in the creation. The way the stars and planets move and the symbiotic relationship of everything down to the cell level is beyond any possibility of happening by accident.


Just because someone throws a grenade in a hole, doesn't make the explosion (big bang) a precise molecule by molecule detailed occurrence that was designed exactly to happen the way it has happened. Now lets go back to the grenade and who threw it? After watching and learning much about the big bang, even I am still not convinced by their conclusion but yet have several of my own and if it were a chemical or chain reaction of events that were caused by mere elements not liking one another then we still have no creator and if it is in fact a "grenade" explosion on a stupendous scale then although everything was created, it doesn't really have something you can say is its creator either, some divine being who has an end plan for everyone and everything. Sadly Accidental is looking the most likely reason and the cause or creator is something and not someone. They "reckon" that if the big bang had been a hairline too weak that it would have all collapsed in on itself and a hairline too much would have destroyed the balls of rock we live on. However with a word like reckon, tells me they don't actually know but since praying won't get you the answer, don your scientist coat and specs and get to work.

lu10nt's photo
Mon 03/14/16 08:52 AM







For the religious, the term "God" is a deity or supreme being who created the world and all of humankind. Also the "heavens and the earth" what ever that involves. (I am not sure how they imagine the entire universe of stars and planets and galaxies came into being or if the Bible mentions those.)

For Athiests, (or "brights" as some call themselves) most conclude that "God" does not exist and any idea of spirit, soul, supernatural phenomena, does not warrant any consideration. If there is no evidence, it is not to be considered true.

But what about the spiritual idea that we are all part of that intelligence? What about people who declare, as Jesus did, that "I and the father are one?"

What about the I AM? The realization that: "I am God"

**~Nisargadatta Maharaj says:

One has to understand that the search for reality, or God, or Guru and the search for the self are the same; when one is found, all are found. When 'I am' and 'God is' become in your mind indistinguishable, then something will happen and you will know without a trace of doubt that God is because you are, you are because God is. The two are one.

~Nisargadatta Maharaj

************************

Therefore:

To deny "God is" �� would be to deny "��I am."��



Thoughts?









I've decided to re-read your original post that started this thread which immediately led down to the inevitable path of god does exist, no he doesn't and so on.

This quote is quite true depending on interpretation. So combine I AM with GOD and to accept yourself that you yourself are god will achieve the closest outcome to reality that one can get. Let me explain. I AM is reference to me and this idea of GOD is reference to someone in charge thus I AM IN CHARGE and by summarizing it like that you will realize that in your life you are in charge, of your thoughts, your actions, your beliefs. You are in charge of you, you are your own god and you should believe in yourself. With your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs you can decide on how to act. Man is capable of the most wonderful and beautiful things and is also capable of the most dreadful horrors, what you choose to do with you life is your choice but remember that other peoples lives and choices are bound to be caught up with your own. Everyone's lives can subtly or drastically affect the lives of those around you. To being that person walking by on the pavement (insignificant) or being the culprit of a 26 car pile up on a motorway (pretty significant), how you affect other people will determine how they choose their Thoughts, Actions and Beliefs about you and the world.

Your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs can be molded from birth due to factors such as schooling and parents. One should be allowed to graze the lands and decide for themselves what their Beliefs are. I personally was Christened at a young age and attended schools who engaged in assembly where you soon learned the morning prayers. It wasn't until I myself around the age of 20 started to question what I had been taught before realizing how absurd some of it sounds. No one converted me into the dedicated Atheist of today other than me. I delved down the road of Noahs Ark. How could one build a ship to carry the weight of 2 of every animal on earth using only wood. How plausible is it, getting hold of 2 of every animal on earth. All Animal Zoos in the world haven't got 2 of every animal (combined) on display because its impossible and today we have helicopters, planes and boats to collect them and a zoo (on land) to store them all and we keep discovering more species of animal each year. There is over 35,000 species of Spider and your telling me that Noah got 2 of every one of them. Over a million different species in the world and he got 2 million animals on a boat. This was the starting point for me that made me pull everything else into question and it got pulled about piece by piece and the thing I hated most was all that time I spent learning about this crap and praying, I could have spent LEARNING about things that matter. For me growing up I was fascinated by world maps and the solar system and now I believe that the Earth and The Human Race are the two most important things but unfortunately The Human Race is still shackled with numerous balls and chains that slow or stop our progress and whilst doing so the Human Race is constantly adding to the pressure on Earths Shoulders, for it is currently our only home and like a virus to its host, we are killing our planet just to try and survive.




could 2 million animals be on a boat? Interesting so long ago a measurement was given for us today through science to ponder.

from the Smithsonian.



However, the Bible is clear on one thing: Noah got specific instructions for the ark’s dimensions (300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide and 30 cubits high) and material (“gopher wood”). Gopher wood may refer to pine, cedar, or cypress wood.


Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/could-noahs-ark-float-theory-yes-180950385/#HtUTMBU06Qi4c1Ut.99

“You don’t think of the Bible necessarily as a scientifically accurate source of information, so I guess we were quite surprised when we discovered it would work,” said Thomas Morris, one of the students who worked on the project, in a statement.

To float, a boat has to exert the same amount of force on the ocean as the weight of the water it displaces. This buoyancy force is essentially the biggest weight the ark could hold and not sink. To put it another way, an object with a density greater than water will sink. So if the Bible gives an approximate volume of the ark, and after factoring in the mass of the wood used to build it, one could figure out how much mass the system could take before it becomes more dense than water and sinks.

Now that we've defined the constraints on the system...what in the world is a cubit? Ancients defined a cubit as the distance from a person's elbow to tip of their middle finger. In modern units, this can typically range from 45.5 centimeters to 52.3 centimeters.

In their study, students decided on an average length for their calculations: 48.2 centimeters. This means that, by their approximations, the ark would have been 144.6 meters long, 24.1 meters wide, and 14.46 meters tall—the size of a very small cargo ship. They went with cypress wood, though pine and cedar wood have similar densities. Using the density of cypress, they calculated the weight of this hypothetical ark: 1,200,000 kilograms (by comparison the Titanic weighed about 53,000,000 kilograms). Based on the density of sea water, they figured out that an empty box-shaped ark would float with it's hull only dipping 0.34 meters into the water.

But what about an ark filled with human and animal cargo? Working backwards they assumed that the maximum weight would put the waterline right just below the top of the ark—if the ark is immersed beyond it's full height, water would spill into the vessel and the ark would capsize.

Forcing the bulk of the ark down into the water while still keeping it afloat would displace about 20 Olympic-sized swimming pools worth of sea water. Knowing the volume of displaced sea water, and knowing that an object in water displaces its own weight, they crunched the numbers and found the total mass needed to displace that water. They subtracted the mass of an empty ark and found that the ark could hold 50,540,000 kg. For some perspective: the average sheep is about 23.47 kilograms, so the biblical boat could have held about 2.15 million sheep.

Fitting two of each of all the world's animals in the ark is an entirely different matter, and scientists question how many species Noah would have needed to save to produce the modern populations of species that inhabit our planet today. Scientists have characterized about 1.7 million species to date, so the students argue that, if the average mass of species represented on the ark was the average mass of sheep, the ark would theoretically have been able to accommodate them all without capsizing.


Science can get things wrong but it is amazing the bible must be right by its standards always or it is a fairy tale. Noah's Ark seems to be something science would figure out now through engineering more than a man from ancient times. I wonder or have you ever wondered How were the Pyramids built? Why do we find Pyramids all around the world? Science can not figure that one out either even with so much technology at hand







Pyramids are believed to have been built to allow people to become closer to god and although to my minuscule knowledge the Egyptians and Aztecs did this, the Christians did not because they could make strong assumptions based on many events that it did not help nor hinder their allies or enemies for being "closer", thus a waste of time building them.

Back to my point on Noah's Ark however, The fact that scientifically a boat is big enough and light enough to carry 2 of every species of animal in the known world it just isn't plausible to expect someone with far less technology back then to actually carry out the impossible task that even today we would fail at. If we were to do it today just think of the huge amount of people that would be involved in sourcing and moving animals and building dimension specific boats (yes boats in case they get the first few wrong) and yet Noah did this all on his own with a limited time constraint, fairy tale comes to mind. The Bible has some fascinating story's but that is all they are. They should be in the fiction section of the Library and as far as stories go some of them are actually pretty good but for factitious accounts of the past they are highly over exaggerated.

The most fantastic thing about science is that scientists will hold their hands up and say we got it wrong, whereas religious nuts will carry every last word wrote in that single book of evidence they cling on to as unchangeable and therefore fact or law. Science has spent for more time, effort and resources into proving and solving many mysteries and as soon as science comes and says we have discovered gravity and this is how it works, out of the blue god invented gravity. Somehow this God fella is capable of having his hand in everything science finds and proves. Space didn't exist then all of a sudden it was God.

My simple opinion is this:

If you believe we live in a solar system with planets known to most as Mars, Jupiter and Saturn then you should not believe in God

If you believe in Gravity, then you should believe in Science

If you believe in Medicine and Vaccines then you should not believe in God

If you believe in DNA then you should believe in Science

If you believe in technology (such as computers and stuff) then you shouldn't believe in God

If you believe in God then you should be living on a flat earth where gravity doesn't exist(so everyone moves around by floating), where no medicine or cures actually do anything and are simply a waste of time (a bit like God) where you have no DNA which would mean you don't exist whilst playing with sticks and stones because computers don't exist. If this is not an accurate description of how your life is then you should believe in science. Simples!





and just why would all those things not be made and come from Yahweh. BECAUSE THEY WERE MANMADE OR DISCOVERED USING SCIENCE NOT RELIGION IF GOD WAS PROVEN TO EXIST IT WOULD BE SCIENCE THAT PROVES IT NOT RELIGION AND WE WOULD STUDY THE SCIENCE OF GOD NOT THE RELIGION OF GOD.

one of the craziest theories I have ever heard of is we came up out of the ocean walked as a upright fish became a walking ape and now we are human. Now that's fanticy and science holds to this. IN A MORE STRAIGHT LINE APPROACH YES AND WE HAVE MORE DATA AND DNA ANALYSIS THAT CAN PROVE THAT WE PRETTY MUCH EVOLVED FROM CHIMPS BUT YA KNOW WHAT HAS SCIENCE EVER DONE? NOT TO MENTION THE MILLIONS UPON BILLIONS OF FOSSILS. LATEST RESULTS JUST IN:
EVIDENCE OF GOD: 1 V 1,000,000,000+ EVIDENCE OF SCIENCE (JUST FOSSILS)

The bible says so many things science took forever to see.

Isa 40:22
22 It is He who sits above the circle of the earth,
REFERENCE TO GOD THAT SCIENCE CAN PROVE DOESN'T SIT ABOVE THE EARTH, IN FACT DOESN'T EXIST.
And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers,
YES WE CAN BE VIEWED LIKE GRASSHOPPERS IN THE EYES OF A BEING GREATER THAN OURSELVES IF EVER THERE IS ONE
Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain,
HOW DO WE STRETCH OUT THE HEAVENS, A. THEY DON'T EXIST B. ITS NOT SOME FABRICATED MATERIAL THAT WE LATER MAKE A TENT OUT OF
And spreads them out like a tent to dwell in.
NKJV



sounds like someone 1000s of years ago knew about the earth and how its atmosphere works. SOUNDS LIKE MORE BALONI ON YOUR PIZZA

The Heavens or space is for signs. so why would I not believe in Planets? EARTH HAS HEAVENS ABOVE AND HELL WITHIN. THERE WAS NO SPACE UNTIL SCIENCE CAME ALONG AND THEN RELIGION HAD SPACE TOO!

Are vaccines good? well maybe. DEPENDS WHO THEY ARE USED ON! Personal choice if you want them. Is Medicine good? absolutely I believe all good comes from Yahweh/Creator. HUMANS WORKING ON CURES FOR HUMANS TO NOT DIE BY DISEASE BECAUSE GOD WOULDN'T SAVE SOMEONE DYING FROM DISEASE NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU PRAY! Not believing I do understand why so many do not believe. A lot of what you say I can see but just because mainstream religion tells us fanticy so much of the time does not make the bible untrue. IF A SINGLE ASPECT CAN BE CONSIDERED FLAWED THEN THE WHOLE THING NEEDS TO BE THROWN OUT UNLESS IT IS RE-WRITTEN WITH THE FLAWS OMITTED! I DON'T SEE A BIBLE VERS.2 ANYWAY! Do not eat the blood because their is life in it. We finally learned this. SCIENCE IS LEARNING USING TEST TO PROVE AND PREDICT OUTCOMES. Do not eat the fat I have seen people who suck on the fat because that's where the flavor is but Yahweh said not to do it. FAT IS THE BEST PART OF THE MEAL, MIGHT NOT BE HEALTHIEST BUT I DON'T CARE.


It goes on and on in our physical world that we are in a Mad Scientist world . New diseases, organic foods used to be the way all foods were. Now we are in a world of manipulating nature in all forms. The weeds are declaring themselves to be wheat.
I HEAR YOU WITH THE ORGANIC FOODS. COMPANIES ARE CONSTANTLY SCRIMPING OUT TO CREATE CHEAPER GOODS SO WE ARE LEFT WITH NOTHING NATURAL WHICH I DON'T LIKE AND SADLY I CAN'T BLAME GOD FOR THIS BUT SCIENCE IS NOT REALLY TO BLAME FOR IT EITHER. IT IS CORPORATE GREED. IN FACT I CAN'T BLAME GOD FOR ANYTHING AS HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING (NOT EXISTING AND ALL) BUT ITS THE PEOPLE THAT USE HIS IMAGINERY NAME AS A MEANS FOR AND AGAINST ACTIONS THEY HAVE OR ARE GOING TO COMMIT.




so yeah if you wanna read my responses that I put in caps. When your evidence towers over science then I might be inclined to listen but until then...

lu10nt's photo
Mon 03/14/16 04:31 AM





For the religious, the term "God" is a deity or supreme being who created the world and all of humankind. Also the "heavens and the earth" what ever that involves. (I am not sure how they imagine the entire universe of stars and planets and galaxies came into being or if the Bible mentions those.)

For Athiests, (or "brights" as some call themselves) most conclude that "God" does not exist and any idea of spirit, soul, supernatural phenomena, does not warrant any consideration. If there is no evidence, it is not to be considered true.

But what about the spiritual idea that we are all part of that intelligence? What about people who declare, as Jesus did, that "I and the father are one?"

What about the I AM? The realization that: "I am God"

**~Nisargadatta Maharaj says:

One has to understand that the search for reality, or God, or Guru and the search for the self are the same; when one is found, all are found. When 'I am' and 'God is' become in your mind indistinguishable, then something will happen and you will know without a trace of doubt that God is because you are, you are because God is. The two are one.

~Nisargadatta Maharaj

************************

Therefore:

To deny "God is" �� would be to deny "��I am."��



Thoughts?









I've decided to re-read your original post that started this thread which immediately led down to the inevitable path of god does exist, no he doesn't and so on.

This quote is quite true depending on interpretation. So combine I AM with GOD and to accept yourself that you yourself are god will achieve the closest outcome to reality that one can get. Let me explain. I AM is reference to me and this idea of GOD is reference to someone in charge thus I AM IN CHARGE and by summarizing it like that you will realize that in your life you are in charge, of your thoughts, your actions, your beliefs. You are in charge of you, you are your own god and you should believe in yourself. With your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs you can decide on how to act. Man is capable of the most wonderful and beautiful things and is also capable of the most dreadful horrors, what you choose to do with you life is your choice but remember that other peoples lives and choices are bound to be caught up with your own. Everyone's lives can subtly or drastically affect the lives of those around you. To being that person walking by on the pavement (insignificant) or being the culprit of a 26 car pile up on a motorway (pretty significant), how you affect other people will determine how they choose their Thoughts, Actions and Beliefs about you and the world.

Your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs can be molded from birth due to factors such as schooling and parents. One should be allowed to graze the lands and decide for themselves what their Beliefs are. I personally was Christened at a young age and attended schools who engaged in assembly where you soon learned the morning prayers. It wasn't until I myself around the age of 20 started to question what I had been taught before realizing how absurd some of it sounds. No one converted me into the dedicated Atheist of today other than me. I delved down the road of Noahs Ark. How could one build a ship to carry the weight of 2 of every animal on earth using only wood. How plausible is it, getting hold of 2 of every animal on earth. All Animal Zoos in the world haven't got 2 of every animal (combined) on display because its impossible and today we have helicopters, planes and boats to collect them and a zoo (on land) to store them all and we keep discovering more species of animal each year. There is over 35,000 species of Spider and your telling me that Noah got 2 of every one of them. Over a million different species in the world and he got 2 million animals on a boat. This was the starting point for me that made me pull everything else into question and it got pulled about piece by piece and the thing I hated most was all that time I spent learning about this crap and praying, I could have spent LEARNING about things that matter. For me growing up I was fascinated by world maps and the solar system and now I believe that the Earth and The Human Race are the two most important things but unfortunately The Human Race is still shackled with numerous balls and chains that slow or stop our progress and whilst doing so the Human Race is constantly adding to the pressure on Earths Shoulders, for it is currently our only home and like a virus to its host, we are killing our planet just to try and survive.




could 2 million animals be on a boat? Interesting so long ago a measurement was given for us today through science to ponder.

from the Smithsonian.



However, the Bible is clear on one thing: Noah got specific instructions for the ark’s dimensions (300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide and 30 cubits high) and material (“gopher wood”). Gopher wood may refer to pine, cedar, or cypress wood.


Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/could-noahs-ark-float-theory-yes-180950385/#HtUTMBU06Qi4c1Ut.99

“You don’t think of the Bible necessarily as a scientifically accurate source of information, so I guess we were quite surprised when we discovered it would work,” said Thomas Morris, one of the students who worked on the project, in a statement.

To float, a boat has to exert the same amount of force on the ocean as the weight of the water it displaces. This buoyancy force is essentially the biggest weight the ark could hold and not sink. To put it another way, an object with a density greater than water will sink. So if the Bible gives an approximate volume of the ark, and after factoring in the mass of the wood used to build it, one could figure out how much mass the system could take before it becomes more dense than water and sinks.

Now that we've defined the constraints on the system...what in the world is a cubit? Ancients defined a cubit as the distance from a person's elbow to tip of their middle finger. In modern units, this can typically range from 45.5 centimeters to 52.3 centimeters.

In their study, students decided on an average length for their calculations: 48.2 centimeters. This means that, by their approximations, the ark would have been 144.6 meters long, 24.1 meters wide, and 14.46 meters tall—the size of a very small cargo ship. They went with cypress wood, though pine and cedar wood have similar densities. Using the density of cypress, they calculated the weight of this hypothetical ark: 1,200,000 kilograms (by comparison the Titanic weighed about 53,000,000 kilograms). Based on the density of sea water, they figured out that an empty box-shaped ark would float with it's hull only dipping 0.34 meters into the water.

But what about an ark filled with human and animal cargo? Working backwards they assumed that the maximum weight would put the waterline right just below the top of the ark—if the ark is immersed beyond it's full height, water would spill into the vessel and the ark would capsize.

Forcing the bulk of the ark down into the water while still keeping it afloat would displace about 20 Olympic-sized swimming pools worth of sea water. Knowing the volume of displaced sea water, and knowing that an object in water displaces its own weight, they crunched the numbers and found the total mass needed to displace that water. They subtracted the mass of an empty ark and found that the ark could hold 50,540,000 kg. For some perspective: the average sheep is about 23.47 kilograms, so the biblical boat could have held about 2.15 million sheep.

Fitting two of each of all the world's animals in the ark is an entirely different matter, and scientists question how many species Noah would have needed to save to produce the modern populations of species that inhabit our planet today. Scientists have characterized about 1.7 million species to date, so the students argue that, if the average mass of species represented on the ark was the average mass of sheep, the ark would theoretically have been able to accommodate them all without capsizing.


Science can get things wrong but it is amazing the bible must be right by its standards always or it is a fairy tale. Noah's Ark seems to be something science would figure out now through engineering more than a man from ancient times. I wonder or have you ever wondered How were the Pyramids built? Why do we find Pyramids all around the world? Science can not figure that one out either even with so much technology at hand







Pyramids are believed to have been built to allow people to become closer to god and although to my minuscule knowledge the Egyptians and Aztecs did this, the Christians did not because they could make strong assumptions based on many events that it did not help nor hinder their allies or enemies for being "closer", thus a waste of time building them.

Back to my point on Noah's Ark however, The fact that scientifically a boat is big enough and light enough to carry 2 of every species of animal in the known world it just isn't plausible to expect someone with far less technology back then to actually carry out the impossible task that even today we would fail at. If we were to do it today just think of the huge amount of people that would be involved in sourcing and moving animals and building dimension specific boats (yes boats in case they get the first few wrong) and yet Noah did this all on his own with a limited time constraint, fairy tale comes to mind. The Bible has some fascinating story's but that is all they are. They should be in the fiction section of the Library and as far as stories go some of them are actually pretty good but for factitious accounts of the past they are highly over exaggerated.

The most fantastic thing about science is that scientists will hold their hands up and say we got it wrong, whereas religious nuts will carry every last word wrote in that single book of evidence they cling on to as unchangeable and therefore fact or law. Science has spent for more time, effort and resources into proving and solving many mysteries and as soon as science comes and says we have discovered gravity and this is how it works, out of the blue god invented gravity. Somehow this God fella is capable of having his hand in everything science finds and proves. Space didn't exist then all of a sudden it was God.

My simple opinion is this:

If you believe we live in a solar system with planets known to most as Mars, Jupiter and Saturn then you should not believe in God

If you believe in Gravity, then you should believe in Science

If you believe in Medicine and Vaccines then you should not believe in God

If you believe in DNA then you should believe in Science

If you believe in technology (such as computers and stuff) then you shouldn't believe in God

If you believe in God then you should be living on a flat earth where gravity doesn't exist(so everyone moves around by floating), where no medicine or cures actually do anything and are simply a waste of time (a bit like God) where you have no DNA which would mean you don't exist whilst playing with sticks and stones because computers don't exist. If this is not an accurate description of how your life is then you should believe in science. Simples!


lu10nt's photo
Mon 03/14/16 04:29 AM




For the religious, the term "God" is a deity or supreme being who created the world and all of humankind. Also the "heavens and the earth" what ever that involves. (I am not sure how they imagine the entire universe of stars and planets and galaxies came into being or if the Bible mentions those.)

For Athiests, (or "brights" as some call themselves) most conclude that "God" does not exist and any idea of spirit, soul, supernatural phenomena, does not warrant any consideration. If there is no evidence, it is not to be considered true.

But what about the spiritual idea that we are all part of that intelligence? What about people who declare, as Jesus did, that "I and the father are one?"

What about the I AM? The realization that: "I am God"

**~Nisargadatta Maharaj says:

One has to understand that the search for reality, or God, or Guru and the search for the self are the same; when one is found, all are found. When 'I am' and 'God is' become in your mind indistinguishable, then something will happen and you will know without a trace of doubt that God is because you are, you are because God is. The two are one.

~Nisargadatta Maharaj

************************

Therefore:

To deny "God is" �� would be to deny "��I am."��



Thoughts?









I've decided to re-read your original post that started this thread which immediately led down to the inevitable path of god does exist, no he doesn't and so on.

This quote is quite true depending on interpretation. So combine I AM with GOD and to accept yourself that you yourself are god will achieve the closest outcome to reality that one can get. Let me explain. I AM is reference to me and this idea of GOD is reference to someone in charge thus I AM IN CHARGE and by summarizing it like that you will realize that in your life you are in charge, of your thoughts, your actions, your beliefs. You are in charge of you, you are your own god and you should believe in yourself. With your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs you can decide on how to act. Man is capable of the most wonderful and beautiful things and is also capable of the most dreadful horrors, what you choose to do with you life is your choice but remember that other peoples lives and choices are bound to be caught up with your own. Everyone's lives can subtly or drastically affect the lives of those around you. To being that person walking by on the pavement (insignificant) or being the culprit of a 26 car pile up on a motorway (pretty significant), how you affect other people will determine how they choose their Thoughts, Actions and Beliefs about you and the world.

Your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs can be molded from birth due to factors such as schooling and parents. One should be allowed to graze the lands and decide for themselves what their Beliefs are. I personally was Christened at a young age and attended schools who engaged in assembly where you soon learned the morning prayers. It wasn't until I myself around the age of 20 started to question what I had been taught before realizing how absurd some of it sounds. No one converted me into the dedicated Atheist of today other than me. I delved down the road of Noahs Ark. How could one build a ship to carry the weight of 2 of every animal on earth using only wood. How plausible is it, getting hold of 2 of every animal on earth. All Animal Zoos in the world haven't got 2 of every animal (combined) on display because its impossible and today we have helicopters, planes and boats to collect them and a zoo (on land) to store them all and we keep discovering more species of animal each year. There is over 35,000 species of Spider and your telling me that Noah got 2 of every one of them. Over a million different species in the world and he got 2 million animals on a boat. This was the starting point for me that made me pull everything else into question and it got pulled about piece by piece and the thing I hated most was all that time I spent learning about this crap and praying, I could have spent LEARNING about things that matter. For me growing up I was fascinated by world maps and the solar system and now I believe that the Earth and The Human Race are the two most important things but unfortunately The Human Race is still shackled with numerous balls and chains that slow or stop our progress and whilst doing so the Human Race is constantly adding to the pressure on Earths Shoulders, for it is currently our only home and like a virus to its host, we are killing our planet just to try and survive.




could 2 million animals be on a boat? Interesting so long ago a measurement was given for us today through science to ponder.

from the Smithsonian.



However, the Bible is clear on one thing: Noah got specific instructions for the ark’s dimensions (300 cubits long, 50 cubits wide and 30 cubits high) and material (“gopher wood”). Gopher wood may refer to pine, cedar, or cypress wood.


Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/could-noahs-ark-float-theory-yes-180950385/#HtUTMBU06Qi4c1Ut.99

“You don’t think of the Bible necessarily as a scientifically accurate source of information, so I guess we were quite surprised when we discovered it would work,” said Thomas Morris, one of the students who worked on the project, in a statement.

To float, a boat has to exert the same amount of force on the ocean as the weight of the water it displaces. This buoyancy force is essentially the biggest weight the ark could hold and not sink. To put it another way, an object with a density greater than water will sink. So if the Bible gives an approximate volume of the ark, and after factoring in the mass of the wood used to build it, one could figure out how much mass the system could take before it becomes more dense than water and sinks.

Now that we've defined the constraints on the system...what in the world is a cubit? Ancients defined a cubit as the distance from a person's elbow to tip of their middle finger. In modern units, this can typically range from 45.5 centimeters to 52.3 centimeters.

In their study, students decided on an average length for their calculations: 48.2 centimeters. This means that, by their approximations, the ark would have been 144.6 meters long, 24.1 meters wide, and 14.46 meters tall—the size of a very small cargo ship. They went with cypress wood, though pine and cedar wood have similar densities. Using the density of cypress, they calculated the weight of this hypothetical ark: 1,200,000 kilograms (by comparison the Titanic weighed about 53,000,000 kilograms). Based on the density of sea water, they figured out that an empty box-shaped ark would float with it's hull only dipping 0.34 meters into the water.

But what about an ark filled with human and animal cargo? Working backwards they assumed that the maximum weight would put the waterline right just below the top of the ark—if the ark is immersed beyond it's full height, water would spill into the vessel and the ark would capsize.

Forcing the bulk of the ark down into the water while still keeping it afloat would displace about 20 Olympic-sized swimming pools worth of sea water. Knowing the volume of displaced sea water, and knowing that an object in water displaces its own weight, they crunched the numbers and found the total mass needed to displace that water. They subtracted the mass of an empty ark and found that the ark could hold 50,540,000 kg. For some perspective: the average sheep is about 23.47 kilograms, so the biblical boat could have held about 2.15 million sheep.

Fitting two of each of all the world's animals in the ark is an entirely different matter, and scientists question how many species Noah would have needed to save to produce the modern populations of species that inhabit our planet today. Scientists have characterized about 1.7 million species to date, so the students argue that, if the average mass of species represented on the ark was the average mass of sheep, the ark would theoretically have been able to accommodate them all without capsizing.


Science can get things wrong but it is amazing the bible must be right by its standards always or it is a fairy tale. Noah's Ark seems to be something science would figure out now through engineering more than a man from ancient times. I wonder or have you ever wondered How were the Pyramids built? Why do we find Pyramids all around the world? Science can not figure that one out either even with so much technology at hand







Pyramids are believed to have been built to allow people to become closer to god and although to my minuscule knowledge the Egyptians and Aztecs did this, the Christians did not because they could make strong assumptions based on many events that it did not help nor hinder their allies or enemies for being "closer".

Back to my point on Noah's Ark however, The fact that scientifically a boat is big enough and light enough to carry 2 of every species of animal in the known world it just isn't plausible to expect someone with far less technology back then to actually carry out the impossible task that even today we would fail at. If we were to do it today just think of the huge amount of people that would be involved in sourcing and moving animals and building dimension specific boats (yes boats in case they get the first few wrong) and yet Noah did this all on his own with a limited time constraint, fairy tale comes to mind. The Bible has some fascinating story's but that is all they are. They should be in the fiction section of the Library and as far as stories go some of them are actually pretty good but for factitious accounts of the past they are highly over exaggerated.

The most fantastic thing about science is that scientists will hold their hands up and say we got it wrong, whereas religious nuts will carry every last word wrote in that single book of evidence they cling on to as unchangeable and therefore fact or law. Science has spent for more time, effort and resources into proving and solving many mysteries and as soon as science comes and says we have discovered gravity and this is how it works, out of the blue god invented gravity. Somehow this God fella is capable of having his hand in everything science finds and proves. Space didn't exist then all of a sudden it was God.

My simple opinion is this:

If you believe we live in a solar system with planets known to most as Mars, Jupiter and Saturn then you should not believe in God

If you believe in Gravity, then you should believe in Science

If you believe in Medicine and Vaccines then you should not believe in God

If you believe in DNA then you should believe in Science

If you believe in technology (such as computers and stuff) then you shouldn't believe in God

If you believe in God then you should be living on a flat earth where gravity doesn't exist(so everyone moves around by floating), where no medicine or cures actually do anything and are simply a waste of time (a bit like God) where you have no DNA which would mean you don't exist whilst playing with sticks and stones because computers don't exist. If this is not an accurate description of how your life is then you should believe in science. Simples!

lu10nt's photo
Sun 03/13/16 04:02 AM


For the religious, the term "God" is a deity or supreme being who created the world and all of humankind. Also the "heavens and the earth" what ever that involves. (I am not sure how they imagine the entire universe of stars and planets and galaxies came into being or if the Bible mentions those.)

For Athiests, (or "brights" as some call themselves) most conclude that "God" does not exist and any idea of spirit, soul, supernatural phenomena, does not warrant any consideration. If there is no evidence, it is not to be considered true.

But what about the spiritual idea that we are all part of that intelligence? What about people who declare, as Jesus did, that "I and the father are one?"

What about the I AM? The realization that: "I am God"

**~Nisargadatta Maharaj says:

One has to understand that the search for reality, or God, or Guru and the search for the self are the same; when one is found, all are found. When 'I am' and 'God is' become in your mind indistinguishable, then something will happen and you will know without a trace of doubt that God is because you are, you are because God is. The two are one.

~Nisargadatta Maharaj

************************

Therefore:

To deny "God is" �� would be to deny "��I am."��



Thoughts?









I've decided to re-read your original post that started this thread which immediately led down to the inevitable path of god does exist, no he doesn't and so on.

This quote is quite true depending on interpretation. So combine I AM with GOD and to accept yourself that you yourself are god will achieve the closest outcome to reality that one can get. Let me explain. I AM is reference to me and this idea of GOD is reference to someone in charge thus I AM IN CHARGE and by summarizing it like that you will realize that in your life you are in charge, of your thoughts, your actions, your beliefs. You are in charge of you, you are your own god and you should believe in yourself. With your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs you can decide on how to act. Man is capable of the most wonderful and beautiful things and is also capable of the most dreadful horrors, what you choose to do with you life is your choice but remember that other peoples lives and choices are bound to be caught up with your own. Everyone's lives can subtly or drastically affect the lives of those around you. To being that person walking by on the pavement (insignificant) or being the culprit of a 26 car pile up on a motorway (pretty significant), how you affect other people will determine how they choose their Thoughts, Actions and Beliefs about you and the world.

Your thoughts, knowledge and beliefs can be molded from birth due to factors such as schooling and parents. One should be allowed to graze the lands and decide for themselves what their Beliefs are. I personally was Christened at a young age and attended schools who engaged in assembly where you soon learned the morning prayers. It wasn't until I myself around the age of 20 started to question what I had been taught before realizing how absurd some of it sounds. No one converted me into the dedicated Atheist of today other than me. I delved down the road of Noahs Ark. How could one build a ship to carry the weight of 2 of every animal on earth using only wood. How plausible is it, getting hold of 2 of every animal on earth. All Animal Zoos in the world haven't got 2 of every animal (combined) on display because its impossible and today we have helicopters, planes and boats to collect them and a zoo (on land) to store them all and we keep discovering more species of animal each year. There is over 35,000 species of Spider and your telling me that Noah got 2 of every one of them. Over a million different species in the world and he got 2 million animals on a boat. This was the starting point for me that made me pull everything else into question and it got pulled about piece by piece and the thing I hated most was all that time I spent learning about this crap and praying, I could have spent LEARNING about things that matter. For me growing up I was fascinated by world maps and the solar system and now I believe that the Earth and The Human Race are the two most important things but unfortunately The Human Race is still shackled with numerous balls and chains that slow or stop our progress and whilst doing so the Human Race is constantly adding to the pressure on Earths Shoulders, for it is currently our only home and like a virus to its host, we are killing our planet just to try and survive.

lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/10/16 10:09 AM









What if you find her really not enough attractive and still wishing to enjoy her company as a friend? And yet you could be concerned to tell her cause surely you will hurt her


tell her in a nice way, who knows friends do blossom in time/


lol...success rate of this tactical approach is rare in my experience...she normally disappears....so far i never met someone that while refused accept the "friend" status....


We have all been down that road at some time. So know what you mean.smile2


yeah...you bet...just i wonder why some women think always they are the best of the best and then they get furious when they realize a man can like them as a person and not as a partner. Sometimes matter of of well overrated selfrespect you think?



The common feeling is you have to like someone as a friend first before a lover, but everyone is different, some are satisfied being friends others are not and want the whole package.

lolol....brother after 3 years in Russia i learnt that what common feeling is in the Western world (don't mean geographically but culturally, western for me is Singapore for example)is not common in many other parts of the planet


I know exactly what you are referring to as i have been to Singapore a few times in the past


Singapore wonderful place. Have you ever been in Russia? Where women are the greatest pleasure and punishment for a man? BTW....BC is in my wishlist since i saw this Highway trough Hell show...must be great there....
Anyway..coming back to the topic....i really found hard to understand in different part of the world how the concept of sex for women is different. Fun in North America, bartering exchange in East Europe, authoriation by holy trinity in catholic countries...etc...not generalizing...just based on own made statistics with location experiences. If 9 in ten think one way there is probably a chance the % of the rest will be similar. I guess is matter of not yet multicultured environment. In this sense you north americans are lucky...too many slices of different cultures right at hand...in Europe is still quite rare especially in the south


See another revelation for me personally is that I believe relationships and people getting married is on the decline but like a dramatic decline. It seems to me that women are pretty stuck up to entertain someone of intelligence and would rather have the fun of the lively lout than pick me. I think that goverments and or trends are just creating a decline whereas I can imagine things like rape etc on the rise because some people who are in a similar boat to me could snap and do something unlawful because what should be a natural near daily event (sex) is rationed and deprived. I am nearly 28 and basically starved of "it" having never done it however I am tough on the inside. I can see how it would break others. All my close friends of similar age, although they have done it, haven't had girlfriends in many years. It always seems that the girls are taken and the guys are single. Has everyone turned Lesbo?

lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/10/16 08:07 AM

This is already clearly a two-thread question in one.

A) There are the Players/Romancers/Lady Killers/etc people, who see every pair up as a challenge or a sports meet, just for fun in the moment;


B) And there are the people who are intent on building a long term serious relationship with the other person, in which sex is an important component, but not the primary goal.

Whenever its a group A person meeting up with a group B person, we end up with threads later where the disappointed one of the pair complains.

My own answer, since I'm a group B person, is that I don't care whether someone spells things out or not. Frankly, I prefer that she does NOT start listing her rules and boundaries out like one of those little signs on the back of a cheap hotel room door. Because that sort of behavior, suggests that I'm a take-a-number guy from her point of view, and not a real person.


I'm n group B which is my problem. I never find someone who wants to get to know me. It doesn't help that I am very shy in this department and very much a wuss but I have never known anyone long enough or well enough to feel confident to get into the same bedroom. With the passing of time this problem is getting incrementally worse. But to answer the question, I don't think sex is important until you know each other well enough to trust one another.

lu10nt's photo
Thu 03/10/16 05:06 AM
Edited by lu10nt on Thu 03/10/16 05:11 AM
If you celebrate the traditional Christmas you shouldn't believe in God, you should believe in Santa Claus

If God was proven to exist then we would all be studying the SCIENCE of God and not the RELIGION of God

Here is a list of some gods that science has REPLACED

THOR - God of Thunder
KERANOS - God of Storms
RUAMOKO - God of Earthquakes
POSEIDON - God of The Sea
VULCAN - God of Volcanoes

In fact there is just about a god for EVERYTHING!

see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nature_deities

Gods were the only explanation until Science came along and made sense of Weather, Nature and more recently space and the big bang.

So with so many Gods being put to the Scientific Sword you still dare to challenge the more grown up world of today that there is still at least ONE god that science hasn't killed or ONE god that science doesn't prove beyond all reasonable doubt. All your faith has done is slowed down the speed at which these answers would have been discovered. Tried to denounce football for fear of it becoming more of an obsession than religion and look what happened, It is without a doubt one of the most popular sports in the world. People did not fear being put to death by the church for heresy for kicking a ball about and you will not be condemned to "hell" for waking up in the real world. Egyptians built pyramids to get closer to god and guess what, christians didn't waste their time because they knew it wouldn't count for $hit.

I am still waiting for a grain of evidence from you. The thing about you is you are pious to every last brain cell but will grant you the same empty seat in heaven that I will be levitating in. If you could only just open up your minds eye and see the compelling evidence before you, you complete and utter ignorant waste of space.

lu10nt's photo
Wed 03/09/16 02:12 PM
just watch all 4 parts to this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1fGkFuHIu0

Surely you can see the skeleton of any animal and look at a skeleton of a human and think that isn't it odd that we all have skeletons and bones and skin and see that there are many similarities with the many life forms around you. Is that common sense talking?

Do we all breathe oxygen or is it pixie dust for humans?

Of course God took a chimp and molded it to be slightly better. He got his carving knife out and altered the DNA. He added a touch a sugar to keep us sweet but added a touch of blood to keep us violent.

Just look for the answers yourself instead of your own babbling from what you were taught. Instead of carrying on believing the crap you were told when you were 4 years old you can SEE for yourself that we are very much alike in structure and ways to other animals.

Then watch this: I discovered it by accident and matches what I have thought all this time

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IM1-DQ2Wo_w

WE HAVE MILLIONS OF FOSSILS = WE WIN!
YOU HAVE ONE BOOK = YOU LOSE!