Topic: You can't smoke, but you can drink.
sassyma's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:03 PM

criminal enterprise supports goverment


Whatever...


its true, look into it you would be surprised

johncarl's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:03 PM


all this talk about smokin....time to BLAZE!!!


Roll it up & fire it upsmokin
laugh laugh laugh

no photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:03 PM
I won't date anyone who uses any drugs or alcohol at all, period.

I smoked pot maybe 10 times in my life, between ages 19-22. All it ever did was give me a headache....

But if they were doing a survey and asked which one substance you would most like to see completely eliminated, I would pick alcohol with no hesitation whatsoever.


infectious_witch's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:04 PM
I don't know.
I don't watch much TV.

rara777's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:05 PM



all this talk about smokin....time to BLAZE!!!


Roll it up & fire it upsmokin
laugh laugh laugh


Oh HELLLLLLLLLLLL yes smokin

Don`t bogart that joint my friend, pass it over to me.smokin

laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

NightOwlvg's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:05 PM
If someone wants to smoke pot, and also get a good job, the person will know when he or she should not in case of the drug test.
The perfect example of the poor and/or lack of judgement that natrually accompanies drug use; I can stop doing it long enough to get hired.
The marijuana isn't going to imapre their performance in any way.
As it clearly did not impair your spelling.
If they were naturally not so bright and lazy, when they smoke weed they will probably be the same way.
However, if someone is already intelligent, if they are a hard worker, and they have the drive to do great things in their life, the weed is not going to change that.
Sorry, that's patently false. Their is significantly more evidence that disputes your position than arguments to support it.

infectious_witch's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:05 PM

maybe so, to a point but do realize how many government officials, presidents and others are succesful and use illegal substances. not making excuses just a question to ponder
Yes, but also look how much they are raked over the coals. Who remembers how much Clinton went through for "not inhaling". Shrub has a known alcohol and cocaine past. These things weigh on voters minds, although seemingly heavier when it's a Democrat than reTHUGlican.

The point is, yes people do it and succeed, yes some successful people used to do it, etc. But how many of them have you EVER heard defending their decision to ever have done or continue doing it?


I don't know.
I don't watch TV.

lulu24's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:07 PM
i choose not to allow anyone into my home and life that feels the need to alter their state of mind. i personally see it as weak and unhealthy. i only allow healthy people into my personal life.

i really don't care what people do...but i'm not going to be around the ups and downs that go along with marijuana usage. throw in my kids and the illegality factor...

i smoked and drank for many years. i chose to get clean...and i stay that way by only being around healthy people.

being around a user, in my experience, is like being on a freaking roller coaster. i got off of that ride years ago.

NightOwlvg's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:07 PM
its true, look into it you would be surprised
Are you familiar with the position that there is some truth to every lie? Yes, the government has had a hand in creating the illegal drug trade. Does that make it more acceptable? Does it excuse users who continue to support that trade?

No.

infectious_witch's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:07 PM

If someone wants to smoke pot, and also get a good job, the person will know when he or she should not in case of the drug test.
The perfect example of the poor and/or lack of judgement that natrually accompanies drug use; I can stop doing it long enough to get hired.
The marijuana isn't going to imapre their performance in any way.
As it clearly did not impair your spelling.
If they were naturally not so bright and lazy, when they smoke weed they will probably be the same way.
However, if someone is already intelligent, if they are a hard worker, and they have the drive to do great things in their life, the weed is not going to change that.
Sorry, that's patently false. Their is significantly more evidence that disputes your position than arguments to support it.


Oh, no!
I made a spelling error. I wonder... was it the weed or is it just because I am prone to spelling errors every now and again?
don't believe me? go back and read my old stuff. I really don't care if I make the mistake. I am not perfect.

NightOwlvg's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:08 PM
I don't know.
I don't watch TV.
And TV is the only source for information?

johncarl's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:08 PM

no reason to lay blame or shame to anyones usuage
Except that the alcohol and prescription drugs you mentioned (assuming it is YOUR prescription) are not illegal and do not support the criminal enterprise...
prescription drugs are giving big money to the government the doctors are getting kick backs for prescriptions they give us. same thing with shots they say we need.it will not stop soon

infectious_witch's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:10 PM
Edited by infectious_witch on Tue 01/01/08 03:10 PM

I don't know.
I don't watch TV.
And TV is the only source for information?


Nah. I don't like to listen to a lot of people.
I've learned that if I learn things on my own without having someone's judgement to cloud it, I can actually understand my world.

NightOwlvg's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:10 PM
I wonder... was it the weed or is it just because I am prone to spelling errors every now and again?
I don't know. But can you say without a shadow of a doubt that your usage did not create and/or contriute to the problem? That your continued usage is the reason for your continued misspelling?

NightOwlvg's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:11 PM
prescription drugs are giving big money to the government the doctors are getting kick backs for prescriptions they give us. same thing with shots they say we need.it will not stop soon
How's that apply? I'm discussing illegal drugs and/or illegally obtained prescription drugs.

infectious_witch's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:12 PM

I wonder... was it the weed or is it just because I am prone to spelling errors every now and again?
I don't know. But can you say without a shadow of a doubt that your usage did not create and/or contriute to the problem? That your continued usage is the reason for your continued misspelling?


Not at all. I've been chatting online for 10 years. Before I started smoking, I had typos. When I began to smoke, my errors would actually get better. If they did not get better, they were the same.
I don't care if I make a mistake. I type fast. I don't have the time to correct small mistakes.

johncarl's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:13 PM

prescription drugs are giving big money to the government the doctors are getting kick backs for prescriptions they give us. same thing with shots they say we need.it will not stop soon
How's that apply? I'm discussing illegal drugs and/or illegally obtained prescription drugs.
it does we voted in the pepole so we are to blame

NightOwlvg's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:14 PM
I've learned that if I learn things on my own without having someone's judgement to cloud it, I can actually understand my world.
How exactly do you go about learning things on your own without having someone else's judgement to cloud it? Read books? Author's judgement. Read the newspaper? Author's judgement. Listen to the radio? Announcer's judgement.

And don't get me started on the companies and corporations that employ said authors or announcers.

Please, explain how you learn without sources of information that aren't "tainted" with judgement?

NightOwlvg's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:16 PM
it does we voted in the pepole so we are to blame
You have completely ceased to make any sense...

infectious_witch's photo
Tue 01/01/08 03:16 PM

I've learned that if I learn things on my own without having someone's judgement to cloud it, I can actually understand my world.
How exactly do you go about learning things on your own without having someone else's judgement to cloud it? Read books? Author's judgement. Read the newspaper? Author's judgement. Listen to the radio? Announcer's judgement.

And don't get me started on the companies and corporations that employ said authors or announcers.

Please, explain how you learn without sources of information that aren't "tainted" with judgement?


Simple. I get an idea, I start working with that idea, and I come to my own conclusion (not based on the other person's view)