A short video explaining the differences between male and female thoughts of relationships..
I wonder if it is true. What do you think?

http://fb.watch/5BkFPpwiJE/

Who IS this guy and what kind of B.S. is he selling???

Lol...thanks Mo. Can always count on you to speak truth. It came up on my YouTube thread. I did wonder if it was right??

I think it is a generalisation .

I certainly have no doubt when a man is in to me .

if a woman misread a man’s interest/level of commitment e.g. if she believed he loved her but he was just using her as an option ... that might result in the “sitting on the fence “ behaviour described in the video . Otherwise , men who are interested in a woman will go out of their way to pursue , make her feel secure and commit ... whatever the stage of the relationship .

After watching the video,
I can understand, why his village
exiled him to live with squirrels.

So..have we not evolved at all to where we don't have to play games???

Secondly..if a woman "pushes" a guy out of the middle zone fence (to go *either* way)..she is accused of pressuring him/ being pushy/ demanding....ya can't win..

And, what about the women who are this way...can't agree to a relationship...but don't want to be alone either..it's not just men....

REW

MEN AND WOMAN ARE DIFFERENT THEY TAKE IN INFO DIFFERENTLY AND PROCESS IT

DIFFERENTLY....THE PROBLEM IS WHEN WHEN SEE THE WORLD THRU OUR LIMITED


EXPERIENCES AND GENDER YARD STICK....ITS CALLED TRYING TO SEE THE SENSE

(SHE)


IS MAKING TO HER5 SELF, WHILE SEEING HOW IT ONLY MAKES SENSE TO MYSELF

(HIM).....COMPLETE MISSED CONNECTION

The truth, except for the part of the scarcity for men back then. The rest is true and correct.

It's 1009% correct in his analogy of how it works, the only incorrect part is the scarcity of sex that he mentions but for the explanation that's not really overly important.

All this is based on is a difference in how our brains are wired -which is for a purpose- and the fact that this wiring has to do with different hormones.
The different behaviour, feelings, needs, etc. are a direct result of those different hormones and wiring.
Not rocket science.

What he mentions as a solution, healthy boundaries, is one thing. Another big thing -if not the biggest thing- is self-esteem and self-love. Without that you cannot have healthy boundaries either.
And when you have confidence, self-love & self-esteem you automatically 'repel' people who aren't right for you.
Basically what's at the core is fear of abandonment, something that is part of the collective feminine wound. (for men this is fear of commitment).

Also, having self-confidence, self-love etc. is difficult for women -more so than for men- because of the oppression of the feminine for thousands of years.
This is why so many women get trapped in this perpetual loop of men that leave them hanging.

It's not playing games either, unless you call the way your body functions a game.

I agree with Blondey, in that it is a generalisation.
I agree with Crystal in that his reasoning is unimportant - and also inaccurate. I also agree with Crystal's acknowledgement in the difference of sexes, some of her conclusions are somewhat debatable, but mostly correct

Rock is also unto something with the squirrels.

The only thing the dude got right, is that men are comfortable in the middle. His reasoning is all wrong. Having options is always advantageous.

I disagree with Blondey's conclusion slightly, in that - a dude will pursue a woman and let her know his interest.... but it's certainly NEVER at ALL stages of the relationship. And that's why his model is correct in that we will swing. Piss us off and you'll see that 8 go to a 2 or a 1 in a nanosecond. If it was a genuine 8, it might lose 2 or 3 points...not 7. This is because guys are less agreeable than women. That is a personality trait that buddy didn't address - which is how I know his conclusions are wrong. Women are more agreeable and this is why this system is allowed to perpetuate itself. Bluegrass is unto something about being pushy and demanding. That's the sure fire way to an empty bed and lonely life, so they ARE damned if they do and damned if they don't.

I have to confess..I have no clue. All I know is that some men always want to be around you and take you out places. And if their presence is agreeable, it can turn into something more...the brain chemicals change and we both become goofy in love.

What he is saying is not true, it is simply false information. Men just like women have personalities and characteristic defined by birth and life experiences. There is no magical wavelength or miraculous method to do just the right thing. These are all marketing methods, I know because I came across similar people with same promises to men. From my experience I can tell for women it is looks in prior than comes emotions, beliefs, mindset and lastly lifestyle. For man you may think the same thing goes because yes it is absolutely so for the most cases! Only scientific difference between a man and woman is genitals believe it or not! If I was born a female I think I'd say the same. It is just tactical selling, divide and conquer. It is not cool to classify people by gender, race or their social/financial status. They are just saying "oh look at there! There is sweet potatoes but as a potato you need to follow my sweet methods to charm them. (only for 99¢)"

I like chips

Good sales pitch. Although your here for the forum and you haven't written a love letter, since you were 11 yrs old.

Is it possible the forum are those letters you've been writing?

Me thinks you have a secret admirer/stalker

Yeah, it is why I left Mingle for the day