100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: can you describe God without sounding delusional | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
It is one of reciprocity,, Funches, not one of the will of God. All things considered, it does employ the age old adage, " do unto others as you would have them do to you". Apparently the lesson was not learned and the lesson was retaught. Ad infinitum, if you will. Nothing has changed. It is an age old lesson to learn on any level at any time by anyone. At All. Would you agree? but yet it remains in the bible and only slowed down because the governments had to override the laws of God and now frown upon stoning children to death ...the religious get to practice their religion as long as they abide by the laws of Man not God |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im not saying that at all.....Im saying show me where the Lord asked moses to kill the children....pretty simple......And don't even try to think your anything when it comes to bible scripture...I will eat you and spit you out mr. forgetaboutit feralcatlady ..you lost all certibility when you couldn't even find a simple passage in the bible ..don't worry "spider cmb the frog" will explain that passage to you and hook you up |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your last word......hmeself......... That is an impossible typo on my keyboard funches. There is more to your story. I feel you. sometimes a typo is just that...a typo ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last time the savior couldn't even save hmeself Your last word......hmeself......... That is an impossible typo on my keyboard funches. There is more to your story. I feel you. Wouldee, I can never tell what you or CreativeSoul are trying to say...Are you saying that "hmeself" couldn't possbily be a typeo? |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
esso
on
Wed 12/05/07 10:29 AM
|
|
the only purpose of this thread is to serve as a vehicle for funches to argue purely for the sake of arguing and pose as an intellectual.
stupid is as stupid does. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im sorry funches but how you tried to say this was so wrong on your part and of course no scripture on it......If you would of said the way spider did....well whole different ball of wax......I asked simply for the scripture and still you cannot funches why is that.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know something,Funches ? The first mention of stoning was an Egyptian form of penance that Moses apprehended as a threat to his own people as a consequence of destroying and defacing Egyptian images of worship. What I found was a consistent 'eye for an eye' analogy being dumped in the lap of the children of Abraham that subsequently had journeyed in expatriation from Pharoah and further insulted their deliverance from by God when they rebelled in the wilderness and murmured among themselves about being better off where they were under Pharoah. the children being thirsty, seemed to be a threat to Moses' being stoned by his own people , and further consequences for aligning themselves in marriage with followers of Molech and producing children and foreign relationships once again included the stoning of the children of the children of Abraham that had so mingled. Also depicting that God would prefer that they leave Egyptian customs where they found them as well, meaning don't think on them....but no!!!! They continued to embrace the concept of 'stoning'. hhhmmmmm...... It is one of reciprocity,, Funches, not one of the will of God. All things considered, it does employ the age old adage, " do unto others as you would have them do to you". Apparently the lesson was not learned and the lesson was retaught. Ad infinitum, if you will. Nothing has changed. It is an age old lesson to learn on any level at any time by anyone. At All. Would you agree? It goes as such : that employing Egyptian penance is equal to erecting graven images in the mind and by extension it is a form of idolatry. Think. Reason with the early lessons brought on by wrong assumptions and engendered upon God as beinng in the realm of His choosing. Tough love there, what? I am employing a quote of my own hand to assert a thought. Even the writers of the scriptures accepted as complete and called Torah fail to address one point that consistently evaded the better judgement of the people of Lsrael. That assumptions brought forward into their collective conscience from other cultures need to be dismissed to clearly hear and understand the knowledge of JHWH with wisdom. No where, in scripture, do I find JHWH defending his own words by directly acknowledging foreign assumptions observed in his chosen people's hearts and minds. But, JHWH does ask his chosen people to embrace his own words in their own minds and hearts and to think on the words of JHWH only for 'guiding light'. Isn't 'guiding light ' the English translation of the guardian angels depicted in the Book of Job? You seem aware of the use of three words for God, as the English translations impose on the writing, quite ignorantly, I might add. Were they not el, eloah, and elohiym? Reading the Book of Job is challenging but clear in Hebrew. Do you see my drift about 'guiding light' and it's need to be a singular and determinate and concentrated effort for understanding the words of JHWH's sake? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
wouldee
on
Wed 12/05/07 10:42 AM
|
|
It is one of reciprocity,, Funches, not one of the will of God. All things considered, it does employ the age old adage, " do unto others as you would have them do to you". Apparently the lesson was not learned and the lesson was retaught. Ad infinitum, if you will. Nothing has changed. It is an age old lesson to learn on any level at any time by anyone. At All. Would you agree? but yet it remains in the bible and only slowed down because the governments had to override the laws of God and now frown upon stoning children to death ...the religious get to practice their religion as long as they abide by the laws of Man not God funches, True. And God has been described as having put the children of Israel in that predicament for their own good as evidenced by the writings of the Book of Daniel and his contemporaries the 'prophets of JHWH'. hhmmm........ ( when blessed in subjection to Nebuchadnezzar, yes?) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
wouldee
on
Wed 12/05/07 10:42 AM
|
|
last time the savior couldn't even save hmeself spider, Your last word......hmeself......... That is an impossible typo on my keyboard funches. There is more to your story. I feel you. Wouldee, I can never tell what you or CreativeSoul are trying to say...Are you saying that "hmeself" couldn't possbily be a typeo? try typing 'hmeself'....then try typing 'himself.' It is not a slip of the fingers. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the only purpose of this thread is to serve as a vehicle for funches to argue purely for the sake of arguing and pose as an intellectual. stupid is as stupid does. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the only purpose of this thread is to serve as a vehicle for funches to argue purely for the sake of arguing and pose as an intellectual. stupid is as stupid does. esso, I disagree. Funches has a valid point, and investigation is his means of finding discipline to embrace some truth, as I see it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
try typing 'hmeself'....then try typing 'himself.' It is not a slip of the fingers. I disagree completely. Not all typeos are due to missed keystrokes. A sometimes type the wrong word or horribly misspell a word. If you think he was trying to say something else, come out with it. But I see no reason to believe that "hmeself" was anything but a typeo. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches, I know that verse and I know something about it that you don't. maybe you need to explain it to "feralcatlady" that has the habit of going around preaching gloom and doom about judgement day and is just as ignorant of what's in the bible than someone that never read it The purpose of the law is to show how much we need a savior. last time the savior couldn't even save hmeself spider, this is the statement funches made. imagine, 'last time the savior couldn't even save me(self) Just intriquing. No disrespect meant, Funches. Just an oddd observation I've made in my own mind. Delusional , huh? yup. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you show me a single verse where a man missing a limb came to Jesus, asked for healing and was refused? no need to go back that far spidercmb ..just ask any amputee that prayed to Jesus or God and you will see they didn't get their limb back |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last time the savior couldn't even save hmeself Choose not to. Jesus told the apostles when they tried to defend him, that he could call down angels to carry him away. Jesus could also have killed his tormentors. He could have healed himself. But he had to die to pay for our sins. The punishment for sin never changed, but God's mercy allows us to accept Jesus' sacrifice in place of our own spiritual death. sorry Spidercmb but you make Jesus sounds suicidal ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the only purpose of this thread is to serve as a vehicle for funches to argue purely for the sake of arguing and pose as an intellectual. stupid is as stupid does. the purpose of this thread "esso" is to describe God without sounding delusional ..and I guess you must be "stupid is" since you failed to do it |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
just ask any amputee that prayed to Jesus or God and you will see they didn't get their limb back I think I'm starting to get his motivation for all this. So funches... What did you lose and pray for? What unanswered prayer are you pining over? What indignation have you suffered and choose to blame God for? What sense of control are you striving for, yet know deep down inside is not attainable? Most importantly... What is the source of the self pity and anger, as you stand on your lonely mountain top, shaking your fist at a God you don't believe exists? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Im sorry funches but how you tried to say this was so wrong on your part and of course no scripture on it......If you would of said the way spider did....well whole different ball of wax......I asked simply for the scripture and still you cannot funches why is that..... it's amazing "feralcatlady" how you didn't understand the point but spidercmb the frog did ...kind of prove the point of you having tunnel vision |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is one of reciprocity,, Funches, not one of the will of God. All things considered, it does employ the age old adage, " do unto others as you would have them do to you". Apparently the lesson was not learned and the lesson was retaught. Ad infinitum, if you will. Nothing has changed. It is an age old lesson to learn on any level at any time by anyone. At All. Would you agree? but yet it remains in the bible and only slowed down because the governments had to override the laws of God and now frown upon stoning children to death ...the religious get to practice their religion as long as they abide by the laws of Man not God funches, True. And God has been described as having put the children of Israel in that predicament for their own good as evidenced by the writings of the Book of Daniel and his contemporaries the 'prophets of JHWH'. hhmmm........ ( when blessed in subjection to Nebuchadnezzar, yes?) but still it shows how man (government) had to step in and right the wrong of God |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
last time the savior couldn't even save hmeself spider, Your last word......hmeself......... That is an impossible typo on my keyboard funches. There is more to your story. I feel you. Wouldee, I can never tell what you or CreativeSoul are trying to say...Are you saying that "hmeself" couldn't possbily be a typeo? try typing 'hmeself'....then try typing 'himself.' It is not a slip of the fingers. dude ..maybe a cup or something felled on the keyboard ...let it go .. |
|
|
|
|
