Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next

Topic: 9/11 truth documentary among 'most watched' on PBS
Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Wed 09/12/12 09:19 AM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. Superweapon!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 09:20 AM
Real science is when a scientist is not afraid of saying the earth is round when everyone else is saying it is flat. We have too many scientists who are afraid to tell the truth where it comes to 9-11.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 09:23 AM
Its like a "real Jew" is a person to believes in and practices Judaism. and a "real Christian" believes in and practices Christianity. a "real scientist" does not let government grants and academia effect or influence their scientific conclusions.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Wed 09/12/12 09:59 AM
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" is getting public attention and casting doubt on the scientific validity of the U.S. government's investigation into the WTC tragedy. PBS is the first major network to air the program. Just days away from the 11th anniversary of the World Trade Center tragedy and months away from the U.S. presidential election, a game-changing 9/11 documentary is ranking number three among "most watched" documentaries on PBS and number one among "most shared." Available for free online August 18th - September 4th, the documentary could have a significant effect on public opinion. [Update: PBS has extended viewing indefinitely.] Both the Republicans and Democrats, as equally staunch defenders of the official story, stand to be affected if the public's suspicion of government corruption grows deeper. An earlier report on Digital Journal found that the claims made in the documentary can be verified by reading the government reports themselves. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the government agency charged with the investigation, did not provide any data -- no measurements or estimates -- of the mass or energy that would be required to bring down the buildings in about ten seconds. Normally a scientific report would present all the data that is used to construct a theory. The omission of data is a red flag to anyone familiar with scientific procedure. It appears that the investigators may have intentionally produced reports that the scientific community would reject. According to the experts appearing in Explosive Evidence, the scientific community did reject the reports immediately, but it has taken a very long time for this message to reach the public. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the producers of the documentary, have been trying to educate the public for a number of years. The PBS broadcast of their work represents a major step forward for them. While most people have probably heard that a scientific investigation has been conducted and that the building collapses were explained, few have probably looked at the NIST reports themselves. Links to the NIST reports can be found in the above mentioned Digital Journal article. NIST provides no data whatsoever on the actual collapse sequence itself. The new attention to the issue could be significant for the U.S. presidential election. Prior to the publication of the reports in 2005 and 2008, almost half the population was suspicious of the official story of 9/11, according to several opinion polls. Since then the 9/11 tragedy has been used to direct the policies that have led to the enormous increases in military spending and to a loss of civil liberties in the U.S. and worldwide. Like this article559 Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/332051#tab=comments&sc=1530297#ixzz25oWsSjMd guess people need some Entertainment in these hard times!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Wed 09/12/12 10:14 AM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. so,you mean to tell me that you know your way around any scientific Discipline,without any training in it?

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 10:19 AM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. so,you mean to tell me that you know your way around any scientific Discipline,without any training in it? Is that what you think I said?

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Wed 09/12/12 10:20 AM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. so,you mean to tell me that you know your way around any scientific Discipline,without any training in it? Is that what you think I said? Amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 10:47 AM
Answer the question please. Is that what you think I said?

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Wed 09/12/12 10:53 AM
So she thinks our 16 trillion deficit is actually used to bribe the world's scientists. Where is my money? Maybe next year. Sigh.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 11:08 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 09/12/12 11:09 AM
So she thinks our 16 trillion deficit is actually used to bribe the world's scientists. Where is my money? Maybe next year. Sigh. Threats and bribes, yes. They fear losing their careers and even their lives. The 16 trillion deficit is simply part of the plan to put the entire world in debt. Its just paper fiat money. Imaginary numbers in some computer.... there is not even enough forests in the world to make enough paper to create enough money to pay that ridiculous debt. Don't worry about the debt. It can't be paid. Do you have your stash of silver yet?

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 11:09 AM
Buy your silver now. It will go up to 100.00 per ounce later.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 11:11 AM Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 09/12/12 11:13 AM
When the Cabal prints counterfeit [fiat] money they can use as much of it as they want to bribe idiots who think it actually represents real wealth. So if you are inclined to take a bribe, make sure it is gold or silver. And I would not put it in a bank vault either, or a deposit box. If it is not in your possession, it ain't yours.

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 09/12/12 11:16 AM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. no, we only think certain people are idiots, like the ones that think steel turned to dust...

Chazster Joined Tue 08/28/07 Posts: 6206	Wed 09/12/12 11:41 AM
Yea scientists don't fear losing their jobs because of the government. We are not laborers. You can't just replace a good scientist with anybody and then of course thereally are all the people outside the US. You and your silly ideas.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Wed 09/12/12 11:53 AM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. no, we only think certain people are idiots, like the ones that think steel turned to dust... DUSTIFIED in the words of the learned D.Judy Woods!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 12:07 PM Edited by Jeanniebean on Wed 09/12/12 12:08 PM
Nobody will answer my questions. Everyone assumes to know what I think and believe and they don't listen to what I actually write. Steel and a lot of other things did turn to dust for some reason. There should have been a pile of debris several stories high after the towers did their famous "pancake collapse." But alas... there was just all that dust. People refuse to believe what is right before there eyes. So with that said, I know they will NEVER ever listen to common sense and reason. I was a fool to think they would.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 12:10 PM
Yea scientists don't fear losing their jobs because of the government. We are not laborers. You can't just replace a good scientist with anybody and then of course thereally are all the people outside the US. You and your silly ideas. We? So you consider yourself a "scientist?" Even if you do, you do not speak for all scientists. Some of them actually have highly respected highly paid positions.

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 12:11 PM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. no, we only think certain people are idiots, like the ones that think steel turned to dust... Thankfully I am not responsible for what you think. And I don't much care about what you think either.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Wed 09/12/12 12:12 PM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. Plenty space below Ground for the Debris! No need to DUSTIFY anything!

Jeanniebean Joined Wed 01/30/08 Posts: 40028	Wed 09/12/12 12:17 PM
I have read how they used computers to figure out how the buildings could possibly fall like that, by just being hit by a plane and I don't trust the data they used for the computers. They have no idea from real evidence how those towers could have fallen because there was nothing much left but dust. And those "scientists" were pressured to come up with answers to support the official lie in my opinion and there are other real scientists who disagree with them. In a normal pancake collapse there would have been tons and tons of left over material that would be piled stories high. For the twin towers, there was nothing much left at all. Nothing but dust. That is not normal people. They and you are trying to convince everyone that everything in those buildings, including steal, turned into dust because it fell from such a long distance. They must really think people are idiots. I don't have to be a scientist to tell you that you have been bamboozled if you believe that. Plenty space below Ground for the Debris! No need to DUSTIFY anything! I guess you haven't really done much investigation about that. They did not find enough stuff below ground to justify where it all went. dust.